New Investor Center - This content requires the free Adobe Flash player.

MSN Money Video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires an updated version of the free Adobe Flash Player.
More video on MSN Money
Jon Markman

SuperModels10/19/2009 12:01 AM ET

Why saving is for suckers

Continued from page 1

Central bankers and government officials have been trying to make the public think they are going to end the first part of this crazy game soon by raising interest rates as soon as the economy shows a hint of stabilizing. That is why Federal Reserve chief Ben Bernanke and his band of regional Fed governors have hit the lecture circuit in recent weeks to give speeches at a stunning pace. But their comments are really just a smoke screen, as I have mentioned before, because these guys really have no intention of raising rates until substantial employment growth has been under way for several months, and that might not happen until the end of next year at the earliest.

A simple plan

Putting it all together, Reynolds thinks the evidence suggests we are still in the very early stages of the credit cycle, similar to the first seven months of the 1991-2000 period or the 2003-07 period. In those time spans, people who were simply saving excess cash in passbook or money market accounts at banks were throwing money at bankers with virtually no tangible benefit to themselves.Different times call for different strategies. Last year you were a sucker if you were long on stocks. This year you're a sucker if you're not. My suggestion is that you participate in the recovery of the global economy right along with the fat cats, instead of serving as their financing vehicle. Despite the recent advance off the March lows, stocks and corporate bonds are still inexpensive relative to the sharp recovery that likely lies ahead.
Become a fan of MSN Money on Facebook

I've written a lot of columns over the past seven months with specific recommendations. But if you haven't started yet and want to get involved again with stocks -- after all of your family, business and tax requirements are met, of course -- then consider starting with a very simple strategy first and adding more complexity later.

A good, inexpensive exchange-traded fund to start with is Vanguard Total World Stock (VT, news, msgs), with an expense ratio of only 0.3%. It gives you exposure to all large and medium-sized companies in the world's developed markets. To add a little more risk -- and thus, hopefully, return -- add small companies with SPDR International Small Cap (GWX, news, msgs). To creep out a little further on the risk spectrum, add iShares Emerging Markets (EEM, news, msgs). And finally, to add bonds as ballast, add iShares Investment Grade Corporate Bond (LQD, news, msgs).

Keep it simple. Adding sectors and specific regions will increase the complexity of your portfolio but probably won't add much more in returns, which could well exceed 15% per year after the recent crash in value.

These are not buy-and-hold-forever ideas, because cycles will change. And they won't go straight up. There will be long periods of sideways motion or bumpiness. But the fiscal and monetary stimuli poured into the global financial system over the past year, as explained two weeks ago, will more than likely lead to a prolonged recovery of at least a year and more likely two or three or more.

For that period, investing will get you a lot farther than saving.

Fine print

To learn more about WJB Capital Group analyst Brian Reynolds, visit his company's Web site. To learn more about Vanguard ETFs, click here. To learn about iShares ETFs, click here. To check out my daily investment newsletter, featuring active ETF and stock portfolios, click here.

< previous |  1 | 2 |

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High

Glossary Search

Need answers fast? Find definitions for investing or financial terms.

Feature requires Adobe Flash Player
Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 267
Monday, October 19, 2009 1:30:34 AM
The jest of the article is instead of letting a bank make obscene profits, let some money manager make even more obscene profits.  This allows you to acquire a downside risk in hopes of increasing your small nest egg.  Let's face it, If you had sufficient funds you would be looking a tax exempt bonds or a diversified market approach.  So just invest overseas where banks are paying ten times the rates paid in the US.  They are even offering better interest rates in US dollar funds although it is more than likely that you are still going to lose money compared to the euro.  They (European) banks have also put the liquidity issue to rest where US banks seem to have a problem funding their executive washroom.
Monday, October 19, 2009 5:02:37 AM
Sure you might make more money in the short term but you could be left holding the "empty" bag like last year if we fall back into a recession. I for one reduced my exposure to equities and put lots into munis, TIPS, and commodities. Agree with tactic of increasing exposure to international stocks and small caps. I'm just doing it slowly. When I see real earnings improvement, ie. increasing revenue, that is not dependent on cost cutting, I'll put more toes into the domestic large cap water. Improved housing and job creation will further my investment in equities. Lowering my risk is just as important as seeking a good return on my money. Everyone must find their own risk-reward balance.  
Monday, October 19, 2009 5:20:29 AM
Personally I think anyone who implies "saving" is not a good idea is the idiot!  I prefer both saving for the unexpected backup to handle those "oops" things that happen in life and "investing" the rest for long term financial reward.  Investing is for those willing to do their homework to find good companies with low debt and growth potential, and savings is a small return but at least its FDIC insured. 
Monday, October 19, 2009 5:48:52 AM
I agree with Kabeno59.  There is no greater peace than knowing you can pay your bills, your debt is minimal and that you have a back-up if you loose a job.  Our goal is to have three months amount of  income in "savings" incase of a job loss, or illness.  Other money can be invested at a higher rate--with penalties if removed early.  I think savings is vital to financial security, regarless of what other people are making. 
Monday, October 19, 2009 6:44:33 AM

Here is the basic problem; I am pretty sure Mr. Markman works and lives pretty close to Wall Street. Second the advice offered by the "experts" is jaded to what they experience and observe. On Wall Street the “experts” look at investing in a three to four hour windows of time. For us plain folk it sucks, the 401Ks that we are trying to protect our retirement with, has penalties and restrictions on trades with in THREE months. We cannot and even protect ourselves if we want to. All this has been a grand plan to lure us in with the hope of a good retirement, then once we get all the money within the grasp of Wall Street it is like the phone booth money game and the fan turned on last fall, they are still grabbing all they can get.

The next one is the health care mess, we all get to put more into that pot and as soon as we can't give any more, we will get less.

You know what, the odor from a pot that you stir, is completely dependant on the contents.

Jon made some good points about the bedpan we stuck our spoons in though.

 

Monday, October 19, 2009 7:02:27 AM

I am very sad sad whenever I com to the Internet about the what they doing with me. since my bank have yet named my bank, I never see what msn provided right to his customers .

The federal finance deposit Insurance was what IHotOliver Igbo seen in this and unable to give me fund and bank while security calling that errors.
Monday, October 19, 2009 7:09:15 AM
One fact was missing from this article: an explanation of fractional reserve.
 
When someone puts 10K in the bank, the bank can not only loan out that amount, but 12 times that amount. While the depositor will earn $100/yr on that 10K, the bank--let's say they're lending mortgages as 5%--is making 6K/yr off of that 10K.
 
But pay no attention to that man behind the curtain.
#8
Monday, October 19, 2009 7:39:01 AM
"Here is the basic problem; I am pretty sure Mr. Markman works and lives pretty close to Wall Street."

Markman lives and has his business in Seattle, Washington.

I'm glad to see most posters are rejecting the idea to move savings to stocks.  That means the rally will continue for now.
Monday, October 19, 2009 8:02:52 AM

Dear Mr. Markman,

 

If you are willing to back up your advice, lend me the money to invest and I will pay you back your initial invesment. Your all the same your opinions blows with the wind.

Monday, October 19, 2009 8:17:20 AM
Get in the market.  Put in stop orders to protect your gains. When it gets bad, get out of the market.  When the market turns up again, get back in. Repeat this over your lifetime.  Get rich.  Live well.

Hey, this investing stuff isn't so complicated after all!

Oh yeah, when the government prints money like they are now, get into some other market where the shares are denominated in something besides US$.

1 - 10 of 267
To add a comment, pleasesign in