New Investor Center - This content requires the free Adobe Flash player.

MSN Money Video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires an updated version of the free Adobe Flash Player.
More video on MSN Money
Jon Markman

SuperModels10/19/2009 12:01 AM ET

Why saving is for suckers

Your bank, with help from Uncle Sam, is making obscene profits at your expense. Instead of funding the fat cats, here's how to join them in the economic recovery.

By Jon Markman
MSN Money

If there's one thing that seems like it has to be a good idea, it is saving money. I mean, it's like walking grandmas across the street, eating hot dogs on the Fourth of July and rooting against the Yankees, right? A concept that seems above reproach.

Yet the reality is that in times of low interest rates, a credit bull market and a steadily advancing stock market, socking income away in a savings account may be the dumbest idea in the world.

In fact, I'll go one step further and say it flat out: Saving is for suckers.

The reason this is true explains a lot about where we are in the business cycle right now and how the banking establishment and government conspire to rip off the public at every turn.

The truth about saving

Here's the deal: When you put a portion of your income into a savings account, a money market fund or a certificate of deposit at a bank or brokerage, it appears from your perspective that you are placing it in a vault for safekeeping. But the truth is that you are lending your money to the bank at a rate of about 1%. The bank then laughs behind your back as it turns around and lends it to the government for 4%, to big companies at 6% or to smaller companies for 8% or more.

The difference between what the bank gives you for your cash and what it earns from lending it out at higher rates is called its "spread," and it amounts to the bank's profit margin. That spread right now is so large -- as wide as 8 percentage points -- that even many stupid bank executives could not avoid earning huge profits this year.

Mind you, there are some bankers who are so lame that they won't make money. But for the most part, the profitability of banks right now is so obscene that any tricks they pull in their earnings reports this month will be intended not to hide losses (as bears would have you think) but to hide their gains. A steep yield curve -- which occurs when short-term interest rates are very low relative to long-term interest rates -- is a direct pipeline from your savings account to bankers' bonuses.

There is a way for you to halt this robbery and redirect the process in your favor. But before I get there, let me note that the cover story for this mass misappropriation of the public's money is quite simple and may actually have a positive purpose.

A spin on the credit cycle

The government wants banks to become as profitable as possible now, after their incredible screw-ups of the prior few years, because to the extent that they can regain their balance by siphoning income from their customers, they will not need to hit up Congress for more emergency relief funds. Thank goodness for small favors, right?

Video: Still too many skeptics, Markman says

It's a little hard to comprehend at first, but let me tell you how the credit cycle works, according to independent credit analyst Brian Reynolds, and then I'll tell you how to intervene:

  • First (in this case, from 2003 to 2006), you have a normally strong economy and equity bull market. Banks make loans to companies, which use the proceeds to expand, and all is well in the realm.
  • At some point (2007), banks get crazy and lend too much, and companies and individuals go crazy and expand too much, until eventually borrowers can't pay their debts and a credit crisis ensues.
  • As cash flow tightens (2008), companies turn to low-cost lines of credit they obtained from banks during better times but never used, and banks are forced to lend them at below-market levels, weakening their structures.
  • The central bank cuts interest rates, giving commercial banks some breathing room. Banks then spend the next year (2009) reducing loans to the public and less-creditworthy small companies as they bolster their own broken balance sheets via the carry trade, which is that pipeline from consumer savings accounts to their own treasuries.
  • As banks cut back on loans to everyone (2009), companies then turn to the bond market for cheap funding. Banks don't mind, because they are fattening up by borrowing cheaply from the public, which has been stampeded and scared into stowing income in savings accounts.
  • The Federal Reserve eventually raises interest rates, killing the value of the carry trade (late 2010). Only then do banks start to make commercial and industrial loans, then loans to the public.
  • Banks ultimately become more competitive with each other and the bond market and then start to go crazy again, issuing loans to any business or individual with a pulse, and that's when the credit cycle really goes nuts again (2011 to 2012).

Continued: A simple plan

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High

Glossary Search

Need answers fast? Find definitions for investing or financial terms.

Feature requires Adobe Flash Player
Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 267
Monday, October 19, 2009 1:30:34 AM
The jest of the article is instead of letting a bank make obscene profits, let some money manager make even more obscene profits.  This allows you to acquire a downside risk in hopes of increasing your small nest egg.  Let's face it, If you had sufficient funds you would be looking a tax exempt bonds or a diversified market approach.  So just invest overseas where banks are paying ten times the rates paid in the US.  They are even offering better interest rates in US dollar funds although it is more than likely that you are still going to lose money compared to the euro.  They (European) banks have also put the liquidity issue to rest where US banks seem to have a problem funding their executive washroom.
Monday, October 19, 2009 5:02:37 AM
Sure you might make more money in the short term but you could be left holding the "empty" bag like last year if we fall back into a recession. I for one reduced my exposure to equities and put lots into munis, TIPS, and commodities. Agree with tactic of increasing exposure to international stocks and small caps. I'm just doing it slowly. When I see real earnings improvement, ie. increasing revenue, that is not dependent on cost cutting, I'll put more toes into the domestic large cap water. Improved housing and job creation will further my investment in equities. Lowering my risk is just as important as seeking a good return on my money. Everyone must find their own risk-reward balance.  
Monday, October 19, 2009 5:20:29 AM
Personally I think anyone who implies "saving" is not a good idea is the idiot!  I prefer both saving for the unexpected backup to handle those "oops" things that happen in life and "investing" the rest for long term financial reward.  Investing is for those willing to do their homework to find good companies with low debt and growth potential, and savings is a small return but at least its FDIC insured. 
Monday, October 19, 2009 5:48:52 AM
I agree with Kabeno59.  There is no greater peace than knowing you can pay your bills, your debt is minimal and that you have a back-up if you loose a job.  Our goal is to have three months amount of  income in "savings" incase of a job loss, or illness.  Other money can be invested at a higher rate--with penalties if removed early.  I think savings is vital to financial security, regarless of what other people are making. 
Monday, October 19, 2009 6:44:33 AM

Here is the basic problem; I am pretty sure Mr. Markman works and lives pretty close to Wall Street. Second the advice offered by the "experts" is jaded to what they experience and observe. On Wall Street the “experts” look at investing in a three to four hour windows of time. For us plain folk it sucks, the 401Ks that we are trying to protect our retirement with, has penalties and restrictions on trades with in THREE months. We cannot and even protect ourselves if we want to. All this has been a grand plan to lure us in with the hope of a good retirement, then once we get all the money within the grasp of Wall Street it is like the phone booth money game and the fan turned on last fall, they are still grabbing all they can get.

The next one is the health care mess, we all get to put more into that pot and as soon as we can't give any more, we will get less.

You know what, the odor from a pot that you stir, is completely dependant on the contents.

Jon made some good points about the bedpan we stuck our spoons in though.

 

Monday, October 19, 2009 7:02:27 AM

I am very sad sad whenever I com to the Internet about the what they doing with me. since my bank have yet named my bank, I never see what msn provided right to his customers .

The federal finance deposit Insurance was what IHotOliver Igbo seen in this and unable to give me fund and bank while security calling that errors.
Monday, October 19, 2009 7:09:15 AM
One fact was missing from this article: an explanation of fractional reserve.
 
When someone puts 10K in the bank, the bank can not only loan out that amount, but 12 times that amount. While the depositor will earn $100/yr on that 10K, the bank--let's say they're lending mortgages as 5%--is making 6K/yr off of that 10K.
 
But pay no attention to that man behind the curtain.
#8
Monday, October 19, 2009 7:39:01 AM
"Here is the basic problem; I am pretty sure Mr. Markman works and lives pretty close to Wall Street."

Markman lives and has his business in Seattle, Washington.

I'm glad to see most posters are rejecting the idea to move savings to stocks.  That means the rally will continue for now.
Monday, October 19, 2009 8:02:52 AM

Dear Mr. Markman,

 

If you are willing to back up your advice, lend me the money to invest and I will pay you back your initial invesment. Your all the same your opinions blows with the wind.

Monday, October 19, 2009 8:17:20 AM
Get in the market.  Put in stop orders to protect your gains. When it gets bad, get out of the market.  When the market turns up again, get back in. Repeat this over your lifetime.  Get rich.  Live well.

Hey, this investing stuff isn't so complicated after all!

Oh yeah, when the government prints money like they are now, get into some other market where the shares are denominated in something besides US$.

1 - 10 of 267
To add a comment, pleasesign in