New Investor Center - This content requires the free Adobe Flash player.

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video player requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player
More video on MSN Money
calculate your retirement © moodboard/Corbis // calculate your retirement © moodboard/Corbis

The Basics

Retirement? Good luck with that

The stock market's crash has revealed the US retirement system's holes with painful clarity -- and middle-class Americans may be forced to make some big adjustments.

By MarketWatch

The destructive effects of the financial crisis may be waning, but your retirement account won't soon forget. Savers lost 40% or more in the downturn -- a collective $2.1 trillion disappeared from 401k and IRA assets in 2008 alone -- and while the recent stock market recovery may feel good, it's done little to stem a mounting crisis in the retirement system in the United States.

It's not just investments that are the problem: Social Security needs financial resuscitation, and the bursting of the housing bubble that helped spark the financial crisis vaporized the home equity many people were counting on to fund their golden years. Corporations are curtailing traditional pensions, and older Americans are being forced to work longer to make up the difference.

Where does this leave our retirement plans? Ask a middle-class American when he plans to retire, and more often than not you'll get a wry chuckle and "I'll be working until I die." The attempt at humor masks what may be close to reality for some people.

The retirement-savings system in the U.S. is "a failed experiment," said Teresa Ghilarducci, the Bernard Schwartz professor of economic policy at the New School for Social Research in New York.

The U.S. system is "headed for a serious train wreck," said John Bogle, the founder and former chief executive of the Vanguard Group, in testimony to a House committee hearing on retirement security in February.

Separately, Ghilarducci and Bogle have called for substantial changes to the current system, but even those who like what we've got now say it needs improving -- and certainly demands better financial education be offered to savers.

"Many people are very overwhelmed with the notion of retirement," said Gregg S. Fisher, the president and chief investment officer of Gerstein Fisher, a financial advisory firm. "How much do we need to put away? Where should it go? How should I invest?"

Living-standard shock

Of course, people's retirement outlooks vary widely. Some 20 million workers still participate in traditional pension plans and employers pay pension benefits to millions more retirees (that doesn't even count government-sponsored public plans), according to Boston College's Center for Retirement Research.

Those workers are sitting a lot prettier than the more than half of U.S. families that aren't covered by any kind of pension at their current jobs, according to the Employee Benefit Research Institute, a nonprofit, nonpartisan group. Still, even a well-prepared person may get thrown off by a job loss or unexpected health care costs. (Average medical costs in retirement can run into the six figures even for those covered by Medicare, according to EBRI.)

And those lucky people with traditional pensions likely are wondering how long the money will last as the financial crisis shreds employers' ability to fund such plans for the long haul. (Read "Companies' pension problems could hit taxpayers.")

Video: Managing your faltering 401k

Defined-contribution plans such as 401k's have largely taken the place of traditional pensions: 67% of workers say they have a DC plan, up from 26% in 1988, while 31% of workers participate in traditional pensions, down from 57% in 1988, according to EBRI.

But while lower-income workers face a worrisome retirement reality all their own, middle- and upper-middle class workers likely face the biggest living-standard shock. That's because lower-income people can replace a good chunk of their pre-retirement income with Social Security, and high-income people generally have enough personal savings. But middle-class workers may see their relatively comfortable life change drastically come retirement.

"People in the middle and upper-middle have highly variable rates of savings," said Eric Toder, a fellow at the Urban Institute, a nonprofit, nonpartisan research center in Washington.

Become a fan of MSN Money on Facebook

Social Security will take up some of the slack, but the program was never intended to provide full wages. It replaces about 57% of lower-income workers' pre-retirement wages, about 43% of medium-income earnings and 35% of higher-income earnings. A replacement rate of 70% to 75% usually allows retirees to maintain their standard of living, according to a report by the Center for Retirement Research.

And Social Security's and Medicare's financial outlook means that future retirees likely will find the programs pay even less. Without changes, the Social Security trust fund is expected to run out in 2037, and Medicare will be broke by 2017. The financial outlook for both programs has worsened as the recession and 6 million job losses have shrunk tax revenues.

Continued: Welcome to risk

 1 | 2 | 3 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High

Glossary Search

Need answers fast? Find definitions for investing or financial terms.

Feature requires Adobe Flash Player
MarketWatch on MSN Money
Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 355
Wednesday, September 30, 2009 8:00:33 AM
Two words: Personal Responsibility. Why should I rely on anyone to fund or manage my retirement? Afterall, it is my money and my future so why should I leave it up to someone else? I have been forced to pay into Social Security since I started receiving a paycheck only to be told I will get approximately 70% of my benefits in retirement (even less if inflation kicks in) by 2040. I take the time to educate myself about the various investment options that exist today. I spend many an hour tending to my investments much like a gardener with his vegtables. Why then should I be punished by a public (i.e. Socialist) system where my hard work supports those who choose not to educate themselves on their investment options? Personal responsibility - it is what made America!!!
Wednesday, September 30, 2009 10:53:18 AM
I'm on the older end of Generation X.  All through high school our teachers told us not to rely on Social Security or a pension when we retire.  I've always kept this in mind when I think about and plan for retirement.  Yeah, I may have lost a good chunk of my retirement savings; however, I'm realistic enough to understand that I'll be working for a long, long time before, or even if, I can retire.  Now I'm trying to show this to my children.
Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:03:33 AM
I love people like jweese who have an extremely simplistic answer for everything.  His line of reasoning runs like this "It's my health, why should I leave it to someone else (like a doctor)?"  Or my car, why should I let someone else maintain it?  Personally, I can fly jet fighters and heavy jets like airliners.  Can jweese?  After all, why should he leave flying a passenger jet to someone else?  He/she should learn that too.  The point is everyone has particular skills that are useful to others.  I know many, many individual investors who worked their butts off researching and making investment decision that for reasons far beyond their ability to control went sour.  One I know lost a million.  Frankly, it's more than a bit self centered to expect everyone else to do what I can.  And to run screaming through the night at the word "socialism" displays a very large lack of knowledge.
Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:04:29 AM

I'm with jweese. I screwed up on my 401K when I was in my 20's, but learned from my mistakes. I've made other financial mistakes, and learned from them. I've also gotten lucky, and been willing to take risks.

 

There are two kinds of risks. One is that you'll invest too riskily, and the money will be gone when you need it. The other is too conservatively, and there won't be enough money when you need it.

 

TIPs by themselves fall into the second risk category. At best they preserve the buying power of the dollars you put into them, but they only grow at the what the government says is the rate of inflation; but that's understated from the true rate of inflation. I have 10% of my portfolio in TIPs, as an inflation hedge. I also have 10% domestic non-TIP bonds, and 5% foreign bonds.

 

You need to have equity exposure to grow your earning power faster than the inflation rate. That's why I have 75% equity exposure. Ideally, when bond prices go down, equity prices are going up, and you sell some equities to buy more bonds. And, when bond prices are up, equity prices are down, so you sell bonds to buy equities.

 

Its hard to time the market, so you keep your portfolio "eggs" in a lot of baskets. When some basket values go up, you sell parts of those baskets so you can buy more baskets whose values have gone down. This is Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) in a nutshell.

 

I'd messed with investing until I discovered MPT, but hadn't had much success. Now, I'm doing pretty well. It takes a couple hours a weekend to keep up with it. The time I spend on it is well rewarded.

Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:18:44 AM

I agree with jweese. Its all about the choices you make over a lifetime.  Today you better be able to finance both retirement and your medical care.  I retired in Dec 2008 at 57.  I have not touched my 401K although I could since after 55 if retired withdraws are not subject to penalties unlike an IRA which requires you to be 59 1/2.  A 401K only makes sense up to the employer match anything over that amount is better invested elsewhere. 

 

Think like Warren Buffet.  I own my home because I paid off the 30 yr mortgage in 25.  I don't have a gararge so I don't accumulate things I don't need.  I do not have cable TV or a cell phone, so no monthly payments to drain my savings.  I was able to purchase a new car since retiring even though I didn't use the clunker hand out.  I won't see any SSA money for 5 years. 

 

But I do  enjoy retirement, I travel and basically do whatever pleases me.  I pay over $400 a month for medical insurance.... So yes you can retire if you have the right mindset and learn to save and not spend.  I raised 5 kids including paying for college without loans.  It is possible but it requires forward thinking.  You have to always ask yourself where do I want to be in 5, 10 and 20 years, then do what it takes to get there.  More government programs are not the answer.

 

What I fail to understand is how corporate America has cut pensions and health care for the workers but is still not competitive in the world markets.  Seems they like the Wall Street bankers are all driven by greed. Thats not what made this country great and will be our downfall if we don't get it under control.

Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:19:14 AM

I agree. We have worked for years setting up various investment instruments  including long term care insurance(look into it in your 30s and 40s since premiums will be lower and most people are still insurable). With the price of homecare, it will protect other assets. If you buy, make sure it is indexed for inflation and has compound interest. If you don't use it, it becomes a pool of money which grows over time. It can be used for anything. A difficult pregnancy where you need help at home, an accident etc. It isn't just for old people.

Problem is, people are not informed. Talk to someone. Pick their brain You don't have to buy from them but you just might once you understand just what vehicles are out there... The keys are: curiosity, linked with caution, connected to education. 

Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:21:50 AM
Lmao suddenly everything is Obama fault ..Seriously why can't people believe that we were headed down this road a long time before bush or obama came into office, we just chose to look the other way when warning signs were going off ..... i been investing in social security for at least 4 yrs now .. im 25 and regardless of the dire predictions these people are making i guarantee you when it is time for me to retire social security going to be there 
Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:24:46 AM
What a joke.  How kind would it be for the government to give me $600 a year with what will be a hyperinflated currency.  I'm a 22 year old graduate that luckily found a job and contributes $8,000 a year to my 401k.  Let me manage my money and let the government continue to claim what a great job they did in "fixing" a economy on the brink of collapse.  Also, let's punish our generation for being responsible and doing what the previous generation never did.  I sure wish I had the change to leverage everything.
Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:27:29 AM

Obama has drilled us right in the ass.  Bailed out his buddies and the stimulus was a payoff for the fraudulent election.  But our 401's took it right straight up the ole pooper!

 

IMPEACH OBAMA!!!!!

Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:31:13 AM
Stefan, the far left ideologues screwed the economy up??  The Republicans took control of congress in the mid 90's then had the presidency from 2001 to 2008 and during that time the mantra was that business could regulate itself better than government, hardly a far left ideology.  Finance grew into a major part of our economy during this period and debt was their method of making money.  Finance pushed government into a period of de-regulation and a wide variety of new financial instruments grew including a huge growth of derivatives which were a main part of the resulting collapse. As in past history when capitalism is left with little regulation it tends to implode. Even chairman (Bubbles) Greenspan finally admitted that he was wrong to believe that business could regulate itself.  So the idea that far left ideology caused this crises is complete BS. 
1 - 10 of 355
To add a comment, pleasesign in