Dow-17.24down-0.17%
10,433.71
Nasdaq-6.83down-0.31%
2,169.18
S&P-0.59down-0.05%
1,105.65

MSN Money Video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires an updated version of the free Adobe Flash Player.
More video on MSN Money
Wal-Mart logo © Walmart

Extra10/9/2009 12:01 AM ET

What's to love about Wal-Mart

The company's success has come one store at a time, an empire built small town by small town on a foundation of thrift. What's more American than that?

[Related content: Wal-Mart, retail, savings, shopping, discount]
By Jeff Macke, Minyanville

If it were possible to find the nation's largest merchant pitiable, Wal-Mart Stores (WMT, news, msgs) just might deserve our sympathy.

The goods Wal-Mart sells aren't hip enough for self-styled trendsetters on the U.S. coasts. To those who would never deign to set foot in a Wal-Mart, the chain's labor practices are widely regarded as only slightly more civil than a slave galley. The retail giant is belittled for driving mom-and-pop shops out of business and bullying vendors into cutting profits to the bone.

What's wrong with this picture? In a word: everything. Wal-Mart isn't what's wrong with capitalism. Wal-Mart is capitalism.

Joining Sam's big club

Fifty years ago, a man named Sam Walton took a look at the corner stores serving agrarian America and decided he could do better. He didn't do it by inventing the spreadsheet and selling Ma and Pa indecipherable derivatives that left them homeless. He didn't see a country full of suckers who would work long hours for slave wages and pay top dollar for whatever Walton opted to throw on his shelves. Walton didn't even go the Standard Oil route and drive the competitors out of business before jacking up prices.

What Walton did was build a better mousetrap. He built a chain one store at a time and revolutionized the distribution of goods to far-flung stores serving communities previously thought to be too small to support big-box retailers.

In so doing, Walton made it more affordable to live and do business in those communities. Were there losers in the Wal-Mart rollout? Absolutely. If you ran an inefficient dry-goods store with one style of shoe in four sizes and Wal-Mart bought the lot across the street, your business wasn't long for this world.

Wal-Mart steamrolled lousy merchants like a jumbo thresher plowing through the heartland. Walton asked no quarter and gave none; the company is legendary for grinding down the vendors whose goods stock the shelves of his stores.

Video: Secrets behind Wal-Mart's success

Walton had a capitalist's genius for creating a mousetrap that could expand at warp speed, but Wal-Mart is slow to change. It has an insular management structure that doesn't jibe with the enlightened members of the Fourth Estate. While other retailers burned through rain forests designing and redesigning customer service policies, Walton hired locals out of retirement and posted them at the front of his stores with the instruction to "Look customers in the eye and smile."

The greeter was born.

Obsessed with low costs, low prices

Wal-Mart's weaknesses spring from its strengths. The company is obsessed with controlling costs -- all the better to hold down prices. When a chain consists of only a handful of stores, it's relatively easy to ensure such a policy is deployed with common sense. When the chain has thousands of stores in 15 countries, the results are less predictable -- such as when a Wal-Mart manager was accused of locking his cleaning crew in the store overnight with neither a break nor exit.
Become a fan of MSN Money on Facebook

Such violations are inevitable, not evidence of evil. Peer closely enough and you'll find cracks, warts and failings in all of us.

In a chain the size of Wal-Mart, I defy a trained merchant to walk through any single store and not find something objectionable. Wal-Mart has made mistakes of merchandising, judgment and execution. To the glee of Wal-Mart's critics, it's all but inevitable that the company will err again. (On this topic, check out "The Bad Boys of Business: Wal-Mart.")

Wal-Mart shows it can change

What separates Wal-Mart from Gimbels, Sears (SHLD, news, msgs), Kmart and their ilk isn't its perfection, but its ability to adapt.

Like the country it grew up serving, Wal-Mart is a behemoth that's slow to change. But it can. Wal-Mart dealt head-on with its highly publicized labor woes nearly a decade ago. It withstood an embarrassing "Made in America" debacle before that. Wal-Mart has withstood competition, one of the worst "fashion" rollouts in history and the contempt of highbrows nationwide.

Wal-Mart has lowered the price Americans pay for basic goods, brought respectable retail to our heartland and managed to deliver for shareholders, all without using any scam derivatives or feasting on the customers they serve. Wal-Mart won by competing every step of the way and by refusing the apathy that success so often breeds.

In short, Wal-Mart is one of the few corporate giants still standing using the same strategy upon which it was founded: It sells discount goods at a fair price.

It's hard to see what's so loathsome about that.

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 703
#1
Thursday, October 08, 2009 8:19:11 PM
"It's hard to see what's so loathsome about that."

How about this for starters, buckwheat.

The employees of walmart are just getting the information on their health benefits for next year.  These benefits are far from adequate now, but they have just learned that their coverage will be severely cut while at the same time their premiums have skyrocketed.  For example, if an employee or family member has a medical emergency, the insurance will now pay a total of 150.00 for emergency care.  That is even if the individual or family has met their huge deductible already for that year.

This will force more of them to drop their health care for their families.  And in the end that means we will all end up paying for those folks health care, such as they get.

Now that is truly despicable.



Thursday, October 08, 2009 9:19:17 PM

Good insightful article Jeff.  (By the way, I miss you on Fast Money.  It was good to have a reliable bear to remind us of the dangers of the market, and act as a balancing rational point of view.)

 

Like the clown GD60 above, all most folks can do is whine that Wal-Mart doesn't pay princely salaries, offer huge benefits, AND have a highly efficient operation.   (And like Wal-Mart is the only company slashing health care benefits or raising premiums -- yeah sure).

 

It's great to see someone with a brain acknowledge Wal-Mart for what it does well while admitting it doesn't do everything.  I buy about 90% of my stuff at Wal-Mart - it has saved me a bundle over the years, and I like one stop shopping for everything I don't buy at specialty places online.  

Friday, October 09, 2009 6:40:43 AM

TRASH-MART ! Devil

 

WAKE UP AMERICA! DON'T BE A CONSUMER! Confused Stormy cloud CryingLightning

LEARN TO BE AN INVESTOR! Nerd

 

                     CASH IS KING!!!!  Tongue outWinkTongue outWinkTongue outWink

 

 

#4
Friday, October 09, 2009 6:58:14 AM
It seems outcast guy should quit his high paying job and apply at "The Walmart" if it is that wonderful, or are you one of the 70 percent of the people who shop at "The Walmart who don't have a bank account! I never stepped foot in  "The Walmart" and I may have missed out on a penny or two.
#5
Friday, October 09, 2009 7:46:57 AM
This is from walmarts own internal documents.

"Wal-Mart’s critics can also easily exploit some
aspects of our benefits offering to make their case; in other words, our critics are
correct in some of their observations. Specifically, our coverage is expensive for
low-income families, and Wal-Mart has a significant percentage of Associates
and their children on public assistance."

Here is more from that document, which you can read in its entirety if you click the document in the article, "Why You Should Hate Walmart". 

"Public reputation risk. Healthcare enrollment will fall several
percentage points due primarily to a shift to more part-time Associates,
which could draw additional attacks from Wal-Mart’s critics. Also,
despite the proposed efforts, the Medicaid problem will not be “solved.”
A significant number of Associates and their children will still qualify for
Medicaid. Because many of these programs will offer more generous
health insurance than Wal-Mart provides, many Associates will still
choose to enroll in Medicaid, leaving the door open for continued
attacks."



Friday, October 09, 2009 7:54:29 AM
I appreciate the down to earth view of this article.  Walmart is an embodiment of capitalism.  Why?  If there are workers and suppliers willing to sell at a discount price and/or work at a discount rate, then Walmart is there.  This sense of entitlement we have sickens me.

I remember just 10 years ago working at K-Mart making $5.15 an hour.  That can be termed as low wages to many people.  Those at Walmart make $9 or more an hour in my area.  That's pretty decent wages even with the CPI factored in. 

The benefits aren't stellar.  However, would you shop at Walmart if the prices were 15% higher to take into account the added overhead?  They'd lose customers and as a result, they'd need to cut jobs or raise prices somewhere.  They are just trying to get the best bang for the buck on all sides of the dice.

If you don't like them, don't shop there.  I've got many friends whose wives work there and they enjoy it.  It's extra money, a job, and while it's not perfect, it's convenient.

That's capitalism.  If you don't like it, get educated and/or make the effort to work at a place that pays better wages and salaries.  It's up to you to decide who you want to be.  That's freedom.

Friday, October 09, 2009 8:02:20 AM
My sister worked for Sam Walton and she says he must be turning over in his grave everyday. He helped American companies, not try to put them out of business. That part of it started after his death. She loved working for him, a fair man that wanted to help the people that worked for him and the people he worked for. The same thing happened with Publix with Mr. Jenkins died, his strong principles died with him. He took such good care of his employees that when he opened his doors to the Union, they were turned down. The union could not offer better than the employees were already getting. That is what is wrong today with employers, they want everything and give back nothing. A very wise man once said "If you want to know how your company is doing, ask the janitor."
Friday, October 09, 2009 8:03:33 AM
JonnyBoy has it right.  Too many Americans apparently believe that the government should determine employee compensation and benefits, not the free market.  What would happen to Wal-Mart if they had to pay what the liberals think should be paid?  Wal-Mart would have to charge higher prices for their goods.  Then the liberals would complain about THAT, and the government would mandate Wal-Mart lower its prices.  Eventually, Wal-Mart would either shut its doors, or the government would take it over (which is what the liberals actually want).  Stupid libs.
#9
Friday, October 09, 2009 9:58:55 AM
Queenie,

Your ignorance is showing.

Friday, October 09, 2009 10:08:55 AM

Just to counter the barrage of negativity you will undoubtedly receive, here's my take (and no, I don't work for Wal-Mart). I grew up in a small rural town well before Wal-Mart. To buy anything more than basic stuff, we had to drive 10 miles to the nearest "big" town, which was still less than 5000 people. There we could shop at all the "mom-and-pop" stores that Wal-Mart haters love so much, and we would of course pay the 100% markups these stores so kindly provided. We didn't have a lot of money anyway, so they made sure most of it went to get the least in return.

 

I grew up and left for the big cities (at least, bigger cities) long before there was a Wal-Mart. But I recognize Wal-Mart as representing a substantial rise in the standard of living of people in so many places, because their meager funds go farther. Now I know many of you have no great love for the common man, except as fodder for Unions where his dues can be squandered by fat-cat Union bosses promoting demogogues and twisted truths (i.e. lies). But for the common man, Wal-Mart has been a great blessing.

1 - 10 of 703
To add a comment, pleasesign in