Dow+150.25up+1.52%
10,058.64
Nasdaq+24.82up+1.17%
2,150.87
S&P+13.78up+1.30%
1,070.52

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video player requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player
More video on MSN Money
Tata Nano © Saurabh Das/The Associated Press

Extra6/8/2009 11:58 AM ET

World's cheapest car coming to US

Indian automaker Tata Motors says it will develop a new version of the Nano that meets US emissions and crash standards and could be available by 2012.  

By MSN Money staff and wire reports

India's Tata Motors says it hopes to sell its tiny, ultracheap Nano car in the United States by 2012.

Chairman Ratan Tata hinted as much in March as the car, dubbed the word's cheapest, launched domestically to wide acclaim and 200,000 orders. Though the $2,500 car was not developed with the United States in mind, Tata told the Financial Times that the company would reconsider in the wake of the economic collapse. "In this economic situation, we see perhaps there is a place (for the Nano in the U.S.)," Tata said.

On Wednesday, Tata confirmed plans to develop a version for the U.S. market.

"It will need to meet all emission and crash standards, and so we hope in the next two years we will be offering such a vehicle in the U.S," Ratan Tata told an environmental panel at Cornell University in New York. Company spokesman David Good later confirmed the plans to Automotive News but said "it might be two years and six months."

At 10 feet long, the Nano is about 2 feet longer than Smart fortwo but 10 feet shorter than a Chevy Silverado pickup. Its 623-cubic-centimeter, two-cylinder engine is estimated to produce about 35 horsepower, good for a top speed of 75 mph. There's no radio, no air bags, no passenger-side mirror and only one windshield wiper.

A European version of the Nano is expected in 2011. If that car, previewed at the Geneva Auto Show, is any indication, Americans will see a slightly larger, more powerful vehicle beefed up to meet crash standards and cushioned to accommodate local tastes. The Tata in Europe is expected to use a three-cylinder engine, employ air bags and sell for perhaps twice what the simpler Indian model fetches. The U.S. model will cost more, too.

But Tata won't be the first Indian-made vehicles on U.S. streets. Global Vehicles U.S.A. of Atlanta plans to introduce pickups made by Mahindra & Mahindra later this year.

And both would be just part of a wave of foreign car brands newly aimed at American buyers.

Sale of Saturn opens floodgates

On Friday, auto racing magnate Roger Penske's dealership group reached a deal to snag the Saturn brand from the ruins of General Motors, with plans to use its well-regarded sales experience to offer a variety of foreign nameplates.

Key to its success, though, will be the ability to sign on other global manufacturers to make cars for Saturn, giving it a diverse portfolio of vehicles that will sell whether gasoline prices are high or low.

But by opening the door to automakers not now in the U.S., such as France's Renault, Penske could alter the market, allowing smaller automakers to compete against Detroit, Toyota, Nissan and Honda.

Penske said foreign automakers would be key to his business model, but they will have to match GM quality standards before Saturn's 350-dealer network will distribute their products.

"As people around the world look at that, they have the opportunity to tap us on the shoulder and say, 'We have product that we'd like to bring into the U.S.,'" he said.

Penske Automotive already distributes the Smart car.

Lot of deals, but will any succeed?

The deal announced Friday is another example of how the cataclysm that hit Detroit's three carmakers is reshaping the global automotive landscape in profound ways, reducing their worldwide influence and -- if Saturn turns out as Penske envisions -- opening new markets to smaller companies.

"There's no doubt that the automotive deck chairs are changing," said Michael Robinet, vice president of CSM Worldwide, a Detroit-area auto industry consulting firm. For example:

  • Italy's Fiat is waiting for U.S. courts to approve its acquisition of Chrysler assets.

  • GM's German subsidiary Adam Opel may be turned over to Canadian auto parts company Magna International, with Russian financing.

  • Hummer may be going Chinese, although state media there reported Saturday that the deal has hit regulatory hurdles.

  • Tata purchased Jaguar and Land Rover from Ford last year.

Yet industry experts are doubtful that the flurry of mergers and alliances will be any more durable than failed marriages of the past, proving to be just one big distraction from the underlying issue that made them so vulnerable in the first place: making more cars than people can buy.

For years, the U.S. auto manufacturing base has been too large for the market, forcing automakers to overproduce to keep plants running and flooding the market with vehicles. As a result, the Detroit Three especially have been forced to discount vehicles to sell burgeoning inventories.

Video on MSN Money

global manufacturing © Comstock / SuperStock
A car for the people
The Nano was designed to bring motoring to India's masses. A more elaborate, and expensive, model will be produced for the US market.
Worldwide, analysts say automakers have the capacity to produce 18 million to 20 million more cars than the market demands, leaving many plants grossly underutilized. To make money, automakers have to run their plants above 90% capacity, but few are doing that in a depressed global market.

Nearly 70 million cars and light trucks were produced worldwide in 2007, according to the latest figures available from the International Organization of Motor Vehicle Manufacturers.

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 58
Friday, June 19, 2009 8:35:47 AM
In this economy?  I'd buy the Nano at the foreign prices, have my own side mirror added, and just sing to replace the radio - or maybe throw a disc player in the car.  No one steals those anymore.   While probably not the safest car on the road, it still beats motorcycles (lacking even helmets, which aren't required here in NH).  I'm 62, on limited funds, don't have young children in the car and drive a 9 year old Ford.  If it dies, we have no public transportation - this car would be a dream to someone with minimum highway driving.
Friday, June 19, 2009 10:35:21 AM

Even at twice the $2500 cost, it would still be close to 1/3 the price of a similar sized vehicle (e.g.: Honda Fit?). 

Cost of vehicle aside... What kind of mpg does this 2 or 3 cylinder car get?  What kind of fuel (regular or premium gas, or diesel)?  Does max speed of 75 mean with one occupant, on level ground, after a long run-up, or closer to other vehicles' get-up-and-go?

This looks like it would be a good car for urban areas, where speed limits are usually lower on the streets, and parking spaces are tight, but not on freeways with a lot of large vehicles, high speeds, and crazy drivers!

Friday, June 19, 2009 2:34:19 PM

  Who will be selling these? The dealerships closing down will be converted to less expensive, import vehicles already by the time it hits the market. And kia/hyundai will do what they can to maintain their competitiveness. Warranty structuring on a car in the sub 8k range will be very tricky. and why do we need more vehicles sold in the US that are manufactured overseas?  That's the problem with not having protective tariffs to keep jobs here. If I could export cars without 3-4 thousand dollar taxation overseas, I could make a lot of money as tariffs raise prices on vehicles there way above prices here. 

P.S. sorry for the rant, but build,buy,sell in america and the economy prospers  

Monday, June 22, 2009 9:00:44 AM
WHAT THE HELL IS A "TATA" just kidding because I would so like to have one.  The American market is just too greedy and now they want everyone to buy ,build and sell American, well we did that and look how greedy they got, allowing wages to skyrocket and product prices become unobtainable SOooooo my suggestion is to FIRE anyone that does not want to work for 15-20 dollars per hour and hire people that will take it in a hart beat, like "me", that would be thankful for the bread then maybe we can SAVE up and purchase American products, but for now I am sorry I going for the cheapest well made item I can find.  SORRY but got to do what you have to do!   
Friday, June 26, 2009 12:38:52 PM

I think somebody needs to take some spelling and grammar lessons :)

Friday, June 26, 2009 1:10:41 PM
I would like to be first in  line to buy one of these, even at twice the quoted price.
Friday, June 26, 2009 3:28:23 PM
MM Doom,, thank you, thank you.  It is all to often that some smart *** feels the need to point out spelling and grammar errors like they're some sort of ****** Einstein or something.  I completely agree to buy American made products and do so whenever I can.  However, a previous poster has a point, it's the greed of CEO's and over paid air gun trigger pullers in America that has caused prices on American goods to be jacked up so high.  Hell, pay me $50 an hour with lifetime bennies and I'll go pull the trigger on an air ratchet all day long and then some.  Air gun trigger pullers (AGTP's) should not be making doctors wages,, period.
Friday, June 26, 2009 3:37:20 PM
I don't see in the article how much extra they expect to charge for making the Nano meet US Crash and Emissions Standards.  I have heard that a lot of cheap Geo Metros were scrapped if the airbags went off (even at low speeds) because the dealers were liable to charge $500-$1500 per  bag to replace them, and that was more than most of the cars were worth.  I continue to fail to see how we are the home of the "free" when it is perfectly acceptable to straddle an enormous motor with 2 wheels and handlebars and go 80 miles an hour (in places) with no helmet, no firesuit, no seatbelt, and no airbags, but grandma driving 15 miles an hour to the grocery store in her "tank-like" Volvo with multiple front and side airbags, will get a whopping ticket and an increase in her insurance premiums if she's wearing no seat belt!  Give me a break.  This "Nanny State" is getting ridiculous.  If I can straddle myself to a huge motor with no safety gear, then I should be able to drive a Nano without airbags and save on that expense.  And while we are at it, how is it that India can sell a car like that so cheaply in America and our own companies can't?  It wouldn't be because our Government handicaps our own companies with piles of regulations that they don't require of foreign manufacturers, could it?  Surely not!  That would be practically treasonous.  I'm "sure" that our own government requires the same things of India as they would in our own factories, such as minimum wage requirements, following all OSHA rules at their factories, paying for gobs of government inspections and permits and fines where required (even rebuilding whole factories if necessary if they turn out to be standing in the way of any endangered migrating birds!)  Etc. etc. etc.  It's no wonder all of the manufacturing is being sent overseas (and all of our money, too!)  This economy will never recover until we stop requiring our own manufacturers to follow rules we don't also require of importers.  As Ronald Reagan said, "The government isn't the answer to our problems; The government IS the problem!"
Friday, June 26, 2009 3:38:46 PM
I don't see in the article how much extra they expect to charge for making the Nano meet US Crash and Emissions Standards.  I have heard that a lot of cheap Geo Metros were scrapped if the airbags went off (even at low speeds) because the dealers were liable to charge $500-$1500 per  bag to replace them, and that was more than most of the cars were worth.  I continue to fail to see how we are the home of the "free" when it is perfectly acceptable to straddle an enormous motor with 2 wheels and handlebars and go 80 miles an hour (in places) with no helmet, no firesuit, no seatbelt, and no airbags, but grandma driving 15 miles an hour to the grocery store in her "tank-like" Volvo with multiple front and side airbags will get a whopping ticket and an increase in her insurance premiums if she's wearing no seat belt!  Give me a break.  This "Nanny State" is getting ridiculous.  If I can straddle myself to a huge motor with no safety gear, then I should be able to drive a Nano without airbags and save on that expense.  And while we are at it, how is it that India can sell a car like that so cheaply in America and our own companies can't?  It wouldn't be because our Government handicaps our own companies with piles of regulations that they don't require of foreign manufacturers, could it?  Surely not!  That would be practically treasonous.  I'm "sure" that our own government requires the same things of India as they would in our own factories, such as minimum wage requirements, following all OSHA rules at their factories, paying for gobs of government inspections and permits and fines where required (even rebuilding whole factories if necessary if they turn out to be standing in the way of any endangered migrating birds!)  Etc. etc. etc.  It's no wonder all of the manufacturing is being sent overseas (and all of our money, too!)  This economy will never recover until we stop requiring our own manufacturers to follow rules we don't also require of importers.  As Ronald Reagan said, "The government isn't the answer to our problems; The government IS the problem!"
Friday, June 26, 2009 3:41:46 PM
amen! brothers, were the only country that does not tax imports....nafta.....but all of our exports are taxed highly in other countrys.....if we dont repeal nafta we aint gonna make it!
1 - 10 of 58
To add a comment, pleasesign in