Dow+30.69up+0.29%
10,464.40
Nasdaq+6.87up+0.32%
2,176.05
S&P+4.98up+0.45%
1,110.63

MSN Money Video

Video on MSN Money
This video player requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player
More video on MSN Money
Buying a car © Image Source/Jupiterimages

Extra6/3/2009 3:54 PM ET

Fire-sale prices lift GM, Chrysler

Ford fares best among the Detroit rivals in May. Toyota and Honda see small cars stack up on dealer lots as low gas prices encourage consumers to buy bigger vehicles.

[Related content: GM, economy, manufacturing, automotive, savings]
By The Associated Press

Americans bought more cars in May than in any other month this year, drawn by fire-sale prices that pushed sales by General Motors (GMGMQ, news, msgs) and Chrysler above expectations despite their forays into bankruptcy protection. Overall sales were still 34% lower than a year ago.

But low gas prices encouraged the sale of bigger vehicles while small cars stacked up on dealer lots.

That could be a problem for the Obama administration, if the demand for more fuel-efficient vehicles drops just as it is forcing the U.S. auto industry to produce more of them.

"The great migration away from fuel efficiency is once again under way," said Mike Jackson, chairman and chief executive of AutoNation (AN, news, msgs), the nation's largest automotive retailer. "The price of gasoline determines the type of vehicles consumers buy. Period."

All major automakers including Toyota Motor (TM, news, msgs) and Honda Motor (HMC, news, msgs) posted drops from last year, with Ford Motor (F, news, msgs) benefiting from the financial woes of its Detroit competitors and recording the smallest decline, at 24%.

Cheaper gas a blow to imports

GM and Chrysler have pegged their recoveries to fuel efficiency -- Chrysler with small cars from Fiat (FIATY, news, msgs), GM with new American-built compacts and subcompacts, and both with plans for electric vehicles. It could take months of expensive gas for people to buy their new products.

Almost every small-car model saw significant drops in sales compared with May of last year, which was a record month for many models as gas headed for $4 per gallon.

Honda's Civic was off 61%, Ford saw Focus sales drop 54%, and GM's Chevrolet Cobalt was down 52%. Even Toyota's Corolla, the perennial small-car leader, saw sales drop 55%.

Yet sales of Ford's midsize Fusion jumped 9%, with four-cylinder engines making up 70% of the sales. Chevrolet's Malibu sales were down 11%, a far lower decline than the rest of the market.

Jackson said gasoline price instability makes it difficult for automakers to decide what models to produce and dealers to decide which ones to stock.

"I was an idiot last July when I didn't have enough fuel-efficient vehicles, and now I'm an idiot because I have fuel-efficient vehicles," he said in an interview. Jackson advocates a revenue-neutral gas tax increase to keep the price stable at $4 per gallon.

Early in the month, Honda had thousands of Civics stacked up in the lots of a closed Ford plant west of Cleveland, stored there from factories in Ohio and Canada. Many have since been shipped to dealers, the company said.

Jackson said all automakers' small cars suffered, but Honda was hit harder as a company because it is the most fuel efficient.

"Honda is perfectly positioned for $4 per gallon gasoline and is out of favor at $2 per gallon. It becomes a headwind for them."

Buyers unfazed by GM, Chrysler chaos

Jackson said he is changing his dealers' mix to larger vehicles, from midsize cars up to sport utilities, because that's what people want to buy.

But George Pipas, Ford's top sales analyst, said the trend to more efficient vehicles is continuing. Premium gasoline is back to $3 per gallon in California, said Jesse Toprak, executive director of industry analysis for the auto Web site Edmunds.com.

"We know the downsizing of the American vehicle has been taking place for several years and is still going on," he said. "I think the midsize segment does have some appeal, but don't forget fuel efficiency is still key."

Video on MSN Money

Car on highway © Brand X/SuperStock
On the other side of Chapter 11
GM and Chrysler are expected to emerge from bankruptcy court more lean and competitive. But will they be any more appealing to consumers? Mike Jackson of AutoNation weighs in. (June 1)
Ford said its May U.S. sales fell 24% from last year but rose 20% from April, and its share of the U.S. market rose to the highest level since 2006.

"The winner is still Ford out of all automakers in terms of their May performance and the trending so far this year," Toprak said.

Although Chrysler's sales were off 47%, the decline was about the same as it was in the months before the Auburn Hills, Mich., automaker filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

The company said its sales were pulled lower because it didn't sell to fleet buyers such as rental car companies, but retail sales to individual buyers were the best they've been all year.

With 789 dealers set to be severed from the company next week, many of those purchases were encouraged by deep discounts. Chrysler had the highest average incentive among automakers last month -- $4,159 per vehicle, according to Edmunds.

GM, which saw its sales drop 29% in the month leading up to its bankruptcy protection filing on Monday, ranked second in incentives at $3,783 per vehicle. Even Honda, where sales dropped 42%, raised incentives to a record $1,626.

"GM and Chrysler are still outperforming our expectations by a little," Toprak said. "It seems like the fire-sale message came across pretty strong."

But Mark LaNeve, GM's vice president of North American sales and marketing, said GM's incentives were the same as last May.

"We have great competitive deals out there, but with the mere fact that our incentive spending did not go up is evident that we did not, and will not, resort to fire-sale tactics due to any kind of bankruptcy proceedings or discontinued brands," he said on a conference call with reporters and industry analysts.

Ford, GM sales fare best

May '09

May '08

Change

Share May '09

Share May '08

General Motors

190,098

266,744

-28.7

20.5%

19.1%

Ford Motor

155,620

205,270

-24.2

16.8%

14.7%

Chrysler

79,010

148,747

-46.9

8.5%

10.6%

Toyota

152,583

257,406

-40.7

16.5%

18.4%

Honda

98,344

167,997

-41.5

10.6%

12.0%

Nissan

67,489

100,874

-33.1

7.3%

7.2%

Hyundai

36,937

46,415

-20.4

4.0%

3.3%

Mazda

16,718

27,921

-40.1

1.8%

2.0%

Mitsubishi

4,352

10,430

-58.3

0.5%

0.7%

Kia

26,060

31,047

-16.1

2.8%

2.2%

Subaru

17,505

18,436

-5

1.9%

1.3%

Suzuki

2,585

10,364

-75.1

0.3%

0.7%

Mercedes-Benz

15,138

21,798

-30.6

1.6%

1.6%

Saab

783

2,148

-63.5

0.1%

0.2%

Volvo

5,577

7,238

-22.9

0.6%

0.5%

Volkswagen

36,313

43,504

-16.5

3.9%

3.1%

Audi

7,503

8,534

-12.1

0.8%

0.6%

BMW

18,383

25,469

-27.8

2.0%

1.8%

Porsche

1,979

2,796

-29.2

0.2%

0.2%

Isuzu

...

510

-100

NA

NA

Jaguar

1,168

1,757

-33.5

0.1%

0.1%

Land Rover

2,223

3,003

-26

0.2%

0.2%

Mini

4,610

6,312

-27

0.5%

0.5%

Ferrari

85

143

-40.6

NA

NA

Maserati

128

286

-55.2

NA

NA

Bentley

159

251

-36.7

NA

NA

Rolls Royce

26

21

23.8

NA

NA

Maybach

3

9

-66.7

NA

NA

Total

925,824

1,397,033

-33.7

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 194
Wednesday, June 03, 2009 4:42:47 PM
If gas is going back up, I don't understand the article saying that the public is once again shopping for mid and large vehicles.  Staying small is the only choice until all this oil crisis is taken care of. I do have one question about the oil drilling that all the politicians were promising during the presidential campaigns; Drilling off shore and on our own  land.  There's oil in Montana and still great amount in TX still to be had,so why not help ourselves to our own supply and leave the others behind in the dust?  Just a thought.... dah.   wake up America and start making demands NOW.
Wednesday, June 03, 2009 4:54:11 PM
Can someone tell me why all of the intelligent morons in Washington DC have completely overlooked simply lowering the speed limit back to 55 mph. Would save billions every year.
#3
Wednesday, June 03, 2009 5:01:08 PM
The faster you go, the more gas you use. The more gas you use, the more gas tax the Feds collect.
Wednesday, June 03, 2009 5:02:45 PM
Because Joker.....who wants to drive 55.
Wednesday, June 03, 2009 5:04:56 PM
I personally wouldn't own a small car. I feel safer and more comfortable in a larger vehicle. Price of gas would never change my mind. Even if they want to give me $4,500 to trade my vehicle in.
Wednesday, June 03, 2009 5:12:01 PM

Why would you cut dealers? It doesn't cost anything to have them, and if they are needing to sell cars/trucks so bad, sell them at a discounted price to the dealers who in turn can sell them at discounted prices to consumers.  There are no job losses at the dealers, the consumers are getting a better deal, the manufacturers are unloading inventory thus creating cash... it is a win win situation.  "Cutting dealers' is bad for everyone, the massive job losses have a serious trickle down effect,

and no one will sell cars!

 

I also agree w/ HenrynTuscon-- there is PLENTY of oil to be drilled here, and saving that for a 'rainy day' is the stupidest thing.  It is POURING now...once these other countries don't have us there to support them by buying their oil, should we need it in the future, the price should be lower since they have such the surplus. 

 

All food for thought from the Midwest..

Wednesday, June 03, 2009 5:25:11 PM

You have to be retarded to buy a vehicle based on "current" gas prices. Seriously...do they ever stay the same? Don't the prices go up EVERY summer and then back down afterwards? I don't think every time that the prices hit $3.00 per gallon, then everyones says, 'I need to sell this SUV and get me a Honda Civic'...then 6 months later when prices drop say the opposite.

/rant

Wednesday, June 03, 2009 5:25:53 PM
The problem with a flat statement of lets all drive 55 is not all vehicles are geared properly.  I own a vehicle with a 5 speed standard (non automatic). I've tried driving 55 in fifth gear and the engine looses power and mph drops.  Drive in forth gear at 55 and the engine rpm's are higher, burning more fuel.  This vehicle cruises easily at 63 mph and I regularly get 22 mpg.  Not bad for a vehicle with over 250,000 miles
Wednesday, June 03, 2009 5:39:05 PM
... was in a car accident two months ago and if I was driving a small sub-compact I would have been killed for sure! Size does matter, tell that to the tree!
Wednesday, June 03, 2009 6:11:01 PM

 If no one paid attention to the studies of all those years at 55 it didn't show we saved a hill of beans. older cars with higher rear gears and heavier bodies gained but the newer cars gain nothing from less speed.

 The problem with gas prices right now has nothing to do with oil prices go back a  couple years and check what the price per barrel was and the price per gallon of gas you will see that we have never gained back in gas prices what we lost when oil started going up. It happens every time people oil goes up or we have an oil shortage creating higher prices and when its over and oil drops gas never drops back to match it. its called greed and corporate planning to make more profits.

1 - 10 of 194
To add a comment, pleasesign in