Dow-17.24down-0.17%
10,433.71
Nasdaq-6.83down-0.31%
2,169.18
S&P-0.59down-0.05%
1,105.65

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video player requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player
More video on MSN Money
Bubble © Kyu Oh/Getty Images // Bubble © Kyu Oh/Getty Images

Extra8/11/2009 12:01 AM ET

5 downsides to 'cash for clunkers'

Automakers, car dealers and the White House are praising the rebate program. But the benefits may be less than advertised. And there may be hidden consequences. 

By U.S. News & World Report

The first $1 billion allocated to "cash for clunkers" rebates apparently helped boost car sales by more than 250,000 vehicles, bringing some much-needed cheer to depressed auto showrooms. So Congress added $2 billion to the program, which by extrapolation could increase sales by more than 750,000 units overall.

Carmakers are gleeful. And the Obama administration finally has some concrete evidence that extravagant government spending occasionally moves the needle.

But the buying spree, fueled by government rebates of up to $4,500, may not be quite the economic boost it appears to be on the surface. And there will probably be some of those pesky unintended consequences.

Here are a handful of reasons that cash for clunkers is likely to look a lot less successful when seen in the rearview mirror:

1. Some of those car purchases would have happened anyway. Analysis from car-research site Edmunds.com found that at least 100,000 car buyers put off a purchase earlier this year to take advantage of cash for clunkers, once they learned about it. So those sales would have happened even without the government giveaway.

And analysis of the steep discounts offered in 2001, after the 9/11 attacks, has shown that most buyers who took advantage of the sales simply moved up their planned purchase by a few months, creating a "payback" effect when sales dipped several months later. That's probably happening now.

"We have crammed three to four months of normal activity into just a few days," wrote Edmunds CEO Jeremy Anwyl in a Wall Street Journal op-ed.

If so, car sales could dip again this fall, slowing any momentum gained over the summer.

2. The used-car market might go haywire. Since clunkers that get traded in have to be destroyed, the program could take 750,000 vehicles out of the used-car market. That's about 5% of the market, according to kbb.com, or enough of a contraction to cause significant price hikes for used vehicles.

Kbb.com predicts there will even be a used-car bubble, with a shortage now leading used-car dealers to stock up on inventory. But when the clunker rebates end, dealers could end up with too many cars, causing prices to seesaw the other way.

Video on MSN Money

Blank TV © Digital Vision Ltd./SuperStock
Why media love 'clunkers'
Commercials for the 'cash for clunkers' program provided broadcasters with a needed shot in the arm. That's just one reason analysts think things are looking up for the media sector.
A serpentine sales curve makes it much harder to manage a business and earn profits than a nice steady one.

3. The program could depress sales of other goods. Most consumers have only so much money to spend, especially in a recession. And while the rebates lower the cost of a new car, buyers are still adding a sizable new payment to their monthly budget.

Purdue University retail expert Richard Feinberg estimates that the average clunker-upgrader takes on an extra $400 in monthly car payments, which could divert $1.5 billion from elsewhere in the retail economy.

"After suffering from the worst holiday sales season since 1970," Feinberg says, "retailers will be facing an even more dismal 2009, in part because of the cash for clunkers program."

So the overall effect on the economy could be nothing more than a shift from one kind of retail spending to another.

4. Drivers could end up burning more gas. That's counterintuitive, since drivers must trade in their old car for one that gets significantly better mileage in order to get the rebate. But with a fresh ride in the driveway, buyers are likely to change their driving habits.

Surveys by research firm CNW Marketing Research have found that clunker-upgraders drove their old vehicle about 6,200 miles in 2008, barely half the typical annual mileage of 12,000. But most said they'd drive their new car more and take longer trips. CNW's math shows that if clunker-upgraders drive just 90% of the annual average mileage in the first year of ownership, they'll end up burning an extra 61 gallons of gas, even though they get better mileage. Multiply that by 750,000 vehicles, and cash for clunkers would result in an additional 46 million gallons of gas being burned.

As a consolation, the program will unambiguously cut down on greenhouse gas emissions, since today's cleaner engines more than make up for extra miles driven. CNW pegs the greenhouse-gas reduction due to clunker retirement at 92% or more.

5. Sticker prices could rise. For the past 18 months, there's been an oversupply of cars, since virtually all automakers failed to anticipate the sharp plunge in sales. The excess inventory has made it a buyer's market, with historic deals available on many models. But the automakers have curtailed production and whittled down their inventory, gradually bringing it in line with demand. Now, the sudden spike in demand generated by the clunker program has created unexpected shortages of some models.

That's the kind of problem the automakers don't mind, because it allows them to raise prices. As long as the clunker program is still in place, the government rebate will mask the increase for those who qualify.

But buyers who don't qualify for a clunker rebate will be more inclined to notice that prices are up and choice cars are harder to find. And the clunker rebates will end at some point, since the government can't subsidize car purchases forever. Or can it?

This article was reported by Rick Newman for U.S. News & World Report.

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 361
Monday, August 10, 2009 8:50:09 PM

Frankly, some of these points are exaggerations. They sound reasonable until you actually think about it.

 

2. The used-car market might go haywire.

Most used cars I see advertised are no older than 5-7 years. People who keep their cars longer generally keep them until they die so they were never in the market at all.

 

3. The program could depress sales of other goods.

There is some truth to this. But, how much is the question. If you were not spending before, the multiplier effect was stalled in the economy. At least now, money is flowing again. I suspect the effect will exceed the decline in other spending.

 

4. Drivers could end up burning more gas.

A lot of older cars are third cars in the household (maybe for the teenager). If they drive the new car more, they just drive the other cars less. You don't run more errands or eat out more just because you have a new car.

 

5. Sticker prices could rise.

uh, if prices rise, won't people just, you know, wait until the prices come back down to buy?

 

Tuesday, August 11, 2009 1:10:37 AM
The money you receive for your clunker is taxable income.  It may also change your tax bracket to a higher level.
Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:29:21 AM
Better than giving the money to Wall Street so they can pay themselves bonuses. 

The glass is half full, not half empty.

Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:44:38 AM
I'm confused. If a person is driving more, and yes, using more gas, aren't the chances of that person pretty good that he or she will spend money while away from their home? If they are spending more, won't this help the economy? Try leaving your home on a Saturday morning, stay out for four hours and NOT SPEND A DIME. Gloom and doomers need to shut-up and sit down !
Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:46:50 AM
He didn't even mention the most important one:  DOT reports that the top ten cars being traded in are all American.  6 of the top 10 being bought (and 4 of the top 5) are Japanese.  More proof that Obama is the best president the rest of the world has ever had.  When are we going to wake up?
Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:48:10 AM

I'm a CPA and the money is not taxable income to the buyer.  It is taxable income to the dealer (they are getting another $4500 for the car in addition to what you are paying).  Get your facts straight before you post.

 

Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:48:42 AM
I have a used car lot my sales have hit rock bottom prices at the auctions are higher then the banks will finance but some car dealers have more capital to work with but no matter who's in office it's always about the big companies not the little man where's my government bail out .
Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:54:54 AM
The real fear of the backlash of this 'cash for clunkers' program is that people who would otherwise never qualify or attempt to buy a particular car are now baited to go where they shouldn't (financially).  Just as we had in the realestate debockle where people bought homes they couldn't afford.  Same goes for many who are buying cars that they can't afford.  The real winners here will be the repo companies, new car dealerships and slick, polyester clad, fast-talking car salesmen.  Nothing is free - when will they understand this?
Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:58:46 AM
Don't forget #6 - the clunker only has to have the engine crushed. The rest of the parts can be sold through salvage yards thereby keeping existing clunkers on the road even longer.
Tuesday, August 11, 2009 7:59:25 AM
You forgot one consequence, lots of really ticked off people who didn't get $4500 from the government for a new car but will pay higher taxes so you can get new rides.  This program is just a payoff for Demoncrat voters anyway.  And the next big bailout will be for the losers who can't afford a new car payment any more than they could afford the mortgage on the McMansion they bought while working at McD's. 
1 - 10 of 361
To add a comment, pleasesign in