Dow-17.24down-0.17%
10,433.71
Nasdaqunch0.00%
2,169.18
S&Punch0.00%
1,105.65

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player. Click here to download.
More video on MSN Money . . .
Liz Pulliam Weston

The Basics

Frugal or tight: Where's the line?

Continued from page 1

Hoisted by their inner miser

The regrets among those of a BF bent tended to be different. Several bemoaned the fact that they bought quality and can't quite justify replacing the old microwaves, cars and televisions that still work just fine.

Poster "mwz_2410" yearns for a flat-screen TV, for example, and briefly rejoiced when the sound went out on a 27-inch monolith purchased a decade ago.

"I was thinking to myself, 'Woo hoo! I can get a new TV and not feel guilty,'" mwz_2410 wrote, "but then my BF (boyfriend) came up to visit me, smacked the TV on its side and it worked again . . . still have that stinking TV."

When it comes to extremes, though, none can match the folks who live modest or even less-than-modest lifestyles, only to die with millions in the bank.

I profiled a bunch of these folks when I was a reporter for the Los Angeles Times, including:

  • Gordon Elwood of Medford, Ore., who used a bungee cord in place of a belt, picked up soda cans from the roadside to redeem the deposits and died with a $10 million fortune.

  • Emma Howe of Minneapolis, who left $1 tips at restaurants and then bequeathed more than $20 million to charity.

  • Gladys Holm, a Chicago secretary who never made more than $15,000 a year but left $18 million to a children's hospital.

  • Anne Scheiber of New York, a former Internal Revenue Service auditor who wore the same frayed black dress daily and then left $22 million to a university that had never heard of her.

Frugality is a means, not an end

Few of those who knew these secret millionaires had any idea they were worth fortunes, thanks to their stock market investments. But only the last one truly would be my definition of a tightwad.

That's because Elwood, Howe and Holm seemed to enjoy their lives. They were friendly, sociable and charitable. Elwood started a foundation while he was alive, while Howe made small contributions to her church and Holm regularly brought teddy bears to children in a hospital's cancer ward.

Video on MSN Money

Expenses NOT to trim © MoneyTalks
Expenses NOT to trim
Though times are tough, there are some expenses that you're better off paying. Learn where you might be able to safely cut back and where you shouldn't even try.

They were quirky, to be sure, and perhaps felt a deep psychological need to hoard. But their failure to spend didn't seem to harm them significantly and ultimately benefited others.

Scheiber, on the other hand, lived in seclusion and was estranged from her family. It's hard to believe she had a happy life.

And there's where I'd draw the line between frugal and too tight. When your frugality isn't accompanied by joy -- if saving money has replaced living life -- then you know you've gone too far.

Get the latest from Liz Pulliam Weston. Sign up to receive her free weekly newsletter.

Preferred format:

Learn more about newsletters
Liz Pulliam Weston is the Web's most-read personal-finance writer. She is the author of several books, most recently "Your Credit Score: Your Money & What's at Stake." Weston's award-winning columns appear every Monday and Thursday, exclusively on MSN Money. She also answers reader questions on the Your Money message board.

Published July 9, 2009

< previous |  1 | 2 |

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High

MSN Money Video

Save Money

Save Money © CorbisStrategies for saving more and spending less.

Search for a Liz Pulliam Weston article by topic.

Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 74
Thursday, July 09, 2009 4:44:40 AM

I thought everybody washed plastic storage bags.

Liz, the last paragraph says it all.  "If you ain't having fun, don't even bother getting out of bed in the morning."

Of course each of us must be allowed to define our own fun.

Ed Cabaniss

Holden Beach,NC

Thursday, July 09, 2009 6:18:21 AM
Frugal is when you use creativity, inspiration and passion to create wealth for self and others.  For example, the gardener lovingly tending his herbs and fresh tomatoes, the home cook who saves her family from salt, fat and atrocious quality, the gifted seamstress who can remake anything from drab to wow and extend the life of the ancient but well-made article, the person who always knows ten odd ways to make a quick honest buck in the hard times and tells others too.

Tight is, the person who steals the condiments in the restaurant and stiffs the waiter while paying 200% of what the meal would cost to make, the person who neglects their teeth and loses them, the person who cheaps out on car maintainance and drives a deathmobile.

We've all been both and it pays to watch out for reoccuring sins.

Thursday, July 09, 2009 6:23:38 AM
I would argue that Emma Howe was stingy, not just frugal.  My husband's aunt and uncle once took us out to eat.  They do very well and lay down money for whatever suits them.  After the bill came, my husband's uncle (by marriage) left a $5 tip for a party of six.  We had been wondering why the service was so awful, and found out that the aunt and uncle frequent this place.  They obviously are notorious!  We don't go out with them anymore, and I encourage anyone leaving a tip to be generous.
Thursday, July 09, 2009 6:41:38 AM

Both my wife and I grew up well below the poverty level, so we know how to be BF's or down right cheapSad, but through a little luck, a lot of hard work (we started at 16) and education (I have 3 MS degrees) we are now middle class millionaires.   We no longer need to live cheap, or even particularly frugal, and we don't.  We drive very nice cars, live in a nice home, eat out a couple of times a week. 

 

Yes, we still spend less than we earn, (the first rule for becoming rich), but we enjoy the fruits of our labors.  I did not work hard to get where I am to live like I was still poor.

Thursday, July 09, 2009 7:46:07 AM
My brother's (accountant) gas grill just died; $50 to replace the rusted grates; buys a $79 gas grill instead (I just spent $279 on my Weber Q220 w/ cart). A $79 gas grill. I'm sorry, that's not frugal, that's cheap and foolish. First time they used it was fourth of July w/ family over- the grate is so cheap and flimsy the burgers fell through, everything got burned, the shrimp was like rubber.  My $229 Weber has a 25lb grate that will last years and years; their $79 grill will be trashed in 2 years and it really wasn't all that fun to have the Fourth of July lunch / dinner burned and ruined. Yea, when your "frugality" takes the fun out of life and becomes a twisted source of self-esteem and pride (my sister-in-law, with a satisfied look "we only paid $79 for it!!"), you're over the line.
Thursday, July 09, 2009 9:09:17 AM
"Take only what you need and leave the rest." Of course, that depends on what you view as needs vs. wants. I've lived in lean and plenty times - plenty is more fun!!! Just don't be a PIG.
Thursday, July 09, 2009 9:30:55 AM
There's a difference between buying quality on sale, like a refurb, and just plain buying cheap. It doesn't take much effort or shopping to buy cheap.
Thursday, July 09, 2009 10:41:40 AM

Haha! I love the thing about the TV... I'm the same way! I want a flat screen and my fiance is DYING (or at least thinks he is!) for one but I refuse to get one while ours is working. We thought the sound was going on it and we were so excited, but it was just a glitch LOL. We don't have the money for one anyway...

 

I notice that people who have to be frugal now that weren't before seem to have cheap and frugal mixed up. I went grocery shopping with a friend (which shows a change in the economy - we used to go clothes shopping for fun LOL). She mentioned that she never understood how I could be so "cheap" all the time but now she was doing the same thing. So I asked her what I did that was cheap and she said comparing prices before buying instead of just getting name brands and clipping coupons... I couldn't believe that was her definition of cheap!

 

I will admit that I did something pretty cheap this last month. I was in a wedding and because I just had a baby I didn't get my bridesmaid dress until a week before the wedding. It was a pretty casual wedding so it was a cocktail dress from JC Penney. I carefully removed the tags while leaving the plastic string on it and then put the tags back on after the wedding and returned it... I only wore it for like 3 hours! It was only $25 because it was half off but we are BROKE so I couldn't help it! I consider that cheap because I feel like I cheated the system or ripped off the store.   

Thursday, July 09, 2009 11:09:00 AM
Just remember, you can't take it with you.
Thursday, July 09, 2009 1:03:17 PM

When I talk about this it is the difference between frugal and cheep.  Frugal is getting what you need at the best price.  Cheep is paying the lowest price no matter what.  I purchased a 60" DLP TV new (store return) for $600.  It was a quality set and cost half of the original price.  I paid an extra $100 for an extended warranty.  I got a quality name brand TV for less than most bottom of the line new 40" LCD's.  Even in this case it could have been costly because of the light but I checked and the light has a 2000 hour life, is designed to be replaced by the owner and costs less than $100.  I also found out that with a DLP when you replace the bulb it is like new where 50% of the LCD's quality is gone within 7 years.  That was frugal.  I got quality at an excellent price.  Cheep is keeping an outdated set and having to pay for a converter, antenna, etc. to keep it going.  In the short run it doesn't cost as much but in the long run it isn't worth the effort.

 

Just like skimping on maintenance for a car.  In the short run it is less costly but you will need to replace the car more often.  The last two cars I have purchased lasted 12 years each with regular maintenance.  Now, I could have purchased new cars every 3 or 4 years with less maintenance but  I didn't have a car payment for most of those 12 years and I didn't need to carry full coverage insurance.  I wonder which would save me more.   That's frugal.

1 - 10 of 74
To add a comment, pleasesign in