Dow+34.77up+0.33%
10,468.48
Nasdaq+6.97up+0.32%
2,176.15
S&P+4.16up+0.38%
1,109.81

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player. Click here to download.
More video on MSN Money . . .
A splurge? No, it's an investment © Image Source/Corbis

The Basics

A splurge? No, it's an investment

Continued from page 1

[Related content: investments, retail, spending, luxury, prices]

Problem: It's not true

Even with this clarification, there is something vaguely dishonest about the use of the term "investment. "Moreover, this seems like an odd time to encourage the once-greedy-and-now-subdued masses to shell out thousands of dollars for anything but necessities. No matter how narrowly the term is used within the new marketing context, the underlying implication is that these items are literal investments -- i.e., objects that will hold or increase their value.

In most cases, this notion is simply untrue.

"Investment is the concept that you invest $1,000 to get back $5,000 in the future," says Pam Danziger, a consumer-insights expert at Unity Marketing who specializes in the luxury market. "The idea that any of these consumer goods are going to grow in value is just ridiculous. They're like cars: The minute you take them out of the store, they lose half their value."

Luxury-goods experts point out that in troubled times, consumers have tended to purchase jewelry, which has a perceived inherent value -- meaning that you believe that if you needed to sell that diamond in a pinch, you'd get around the same amount of money that you'd spent on it. (More on this delusion below.) Those peddling today's luxury products as investments seem to be trying to import this perception -- that aura of undiminished perpetual value -- to the realm of leather handbags and other luxury goodies.

The Hermès Birkin bag is often touted as such an investment. Though classic in sensibility, the Birkin became a badge of excessive disposable income during the "because I'm worth it" era.

Posh Spice, investment adviser

Case in point: Pop icon Victoria "Posh Spice" Beckham reportedly owns about 100 Birkins, a collection perhaps worth $2 million. The more basic Birkin bags retail for between $6,000 and $7,000. Forbes listed a crocodile Birkin (with nearly 10 carats of diamonds on the hardware) as being one of the world's most extravagant handbags when it sold for $120,000 at auction house Doyle New York.

Like so many luxury items, the Birkin has recently been reborn everywhere from magazine editorials to the fashion blogosphere as the emblem of good value for the money. But how good of an investment, in the literal sense, is the Birkin?

Let's say that you are in possession of one of these creatures, a relatively modest one: a blue, 30-centimeter bag made from togo leather with silver hardware that you purchased for about $7,000 in 2007.

You decide to sell it through an elite designer resale boutique -- such as New York City's Fisch for the Hip, which recently had 15 secondhand Birkins for sale -- which then decides to retail it for $8,300. (The uptick in price is because would-be buyers are circumventing the notorious Hermès Birkin bag waiting list, the fashionista's version of cutting in the lunch line.) It sells after five months on the high shelf, and the store takes a 25% cut, leaving you with around $6,000 -- a 15% loss.

That's not so bad, you might say, but remember that the Birkin is the gold standard of luxury goods. Other more easily obtained luxury "investment" items being touted today would take a much greater hit. For example, Celine's Boogie bag, which retails for around $700, hovers on the secondhand market for about $300. Try selling that $995 Burberry trench coat at Fisch for the Hip. It might go for $500, and with a 50% commission for apparel, your "investment" has dwindled by a staggering 75% in value.

Even jewels don't hold up

Not even jewelry can be considered a reliable investment. As Unity Marketing's Danziger points out, "Even if you melt down the gold and sell the emerald, you're still not getting back what you paid for it, because there was the initial design element that you paid for."

And yet, at a time when the word "investment" conjures up images of a flattened cake, maybe the luxury marketers have a point. After all, for people who've been beaten within an inch of their lives by stocks, a five-figure bag that loses a mere 20% of its value might look like the golden ticket.

This article was reported by Lesley M.M. Blume for The Big Money.

Published May 13, 2009

< previous |  1 | 2 |

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High

MSN Money Video

Save Money

Save Money © CorbisStrategies for saving more and spending less.
The Big Money
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 4 of 4
Wednesday, May 13, 2009 3:23:54 PM
This article has absolutely no relevance to 99% of the people on planet earth.  If you need to buy consumer goods, sometimes it pays in the long run to go with a higher quality item.  But the rest of this article is tripe.
Wednesday, May 13, 2009 4:34:52 PM
I couldn't agree more with MiamiLitig8r.  I live in Anchorage, Alaska.  What the heck as I going to do with a $1600 purse in Alaska?!  The fact that there is people out there that are so out of touch with reality that they would spend that kind of money on something like a purse is mind boggling to me.  But Im sure my perspective is skewed, after all, it is 'Function over Form' for us Alaskans!
Thursday, May 14, 2009 4:05:26 AM
Total hogwash ! Of course you will be losing money on every luxury item you buy at this moment, if you purchase it with the intent to sell it again a few years down the road. Smart investors do not work as such, they look for 'vintage' quality goods which have proven their worth over and over again. As an example: I used to buy quality costume jewelry in the past from the 50's through the 70's, by such well known designers as Dior, YSL, Chanel etc... for just a few hundred dollars, but I knew that I could resell them to specialized dealers for 3 to 4 times the price I paid for them ! Imagine the fact that afterwards, they still sold these items at double the price of what they paid to me, to their customers. Some of these luxury goods go for thousands of dollars today, even at specialized auctions. Granted, you have to know what you're doing, but it gets to show you, that if you have the time to wait for a return on your investment on a luxury item, it will always pay off no matter which recession is going on at the time ! By the way, diamonds have never been an investment. They lose their value the moment you leave the jewelry shop and if you ever need to sell them, be prepared to receive less than half of what you've paid for them. Good luck !
Thursday, May 14, 2009 6:14:30 AM

This article has no relevance to far less than 99% of the people in the world.  Four figure purses are not even on the radar for nearly everyone, other than a handful of wannabees and an even smaller collection of people who have more money than sense.

 

Use of the word "investment" is abuse of the English language and amounts to marketing twisting language into Orwellian absurdity.  

 

The one thing about the article that spared it from being a total waste is that there are people out there that will fall for this silliness and I'll just chuckle quietly to myself should I ever encounter one.

1 - 4 of 4
To add a comment, pleasesign in