Dow+17.46up+0.17%
10,023.42
Nasdaq+7.12up+0.34%
2,112.44
S&P+2.67up+0.25%
1,069.30

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player. Click here to download.
More video on MSN Money . . .
A splurge? No, it's an investment © Image Source/Corbis

The Basics

A splurge? No, it's an investment

With carefree consumption out of style, luxury-goods sellers are now touting high-end clothes and accessories as investments. But do they really have lasting value?

[Related content: investments, retail, spending, luxury, prices]
By The Big Money

Behold the Enid, a handbag made from the softest goatskin, lined in vivid, peach-colored silk. Its silhouette "draws on the art of corsetry with its distinctive hand-stitched corded leather," according to luxury-goods house Smythson of Bond Street, which makes several tempting versions of the bag. The price tag: $1,660.

A year ago, the Enid would have been considered a splurge. The recession was mostly an unproven rumor, and consumption for consumption's sake was still in style.

But today, it's a different world. The Enid is most certainly not a splurge, according to Smythson. Instead, it's "this season's investment accessory of choice," a company advertisement says.

The international economy's implosion has blindsided the luxury-goods industry, and in the current vacuum of across-the-board spending, luxury companies have been scrambling to find ways to remain relevant in today's flat-lining marketplace.

One of the more visible and startling changes is in marketing semantics. As Valérie Hermann, the CEO of Yves Saint Laurent, recently told Women's Wear Daily, "There are still people with money, but we have to talk to them differently."

Rewriting the script

In advertisements and editorials, there has been some remarkable script rewriting going on: Conspicuous consumption, which was all the rage in glossies and on billboards not long ago, is deeply passé. The new chic, even in the elite realm, is being a smart-value shopper. When the Louis Vuittons of the world co-opt the lingo of Wal-Mart Stores (WMT, news, msgs), you know you're in the middle of a business-culture shake-up.

"They're just changing the slogans," says Dana Thomas, the author of the best-selling book "Deluxe: How Luxury Lost Its Luster." "It used to be, 'Everyone deserves a little luxury and a little splurge.' Now that no one can afford the splurge, the business executives are all scratching their heads and saying, 'How can we repackage this again?' So now you're buying 'quality things that last forever.'"

Thanks to such repackaging efforts, 2009 appears to be year of the "investment," as seen in Smythson's ad for the Enid. The new verbal engine to which the luxury industry is attaching the rest of the train, the word "investment" is cropping up everywhere. Suddenly, consumers are being urged to build "investment wardrobes" as opposed to making trend-driven seasonal ones.

Many magazines, which rely on luxury brands as advertising cash cows, instruct readers that there is no better time than the present to "invest" in the durable and expensive classics: a Burberry trench coat, a Cartier Tank Watch (an eventual heirloom for Junior) or a Chanel 2.55 handbag in caviar leather (which will never go out of style), etc.

This is a curious use of the term "investment." Editors and retailers appear to be saying that well-made "quality" (not "luxury") items are likely to carry you through several seasons or even decades, which is why they make good "investments," as opposed to dubiously made, flash-in-the-pan trend items that fall apart (or, worse, go out of style quickly).

Continued: Not so fast . . .

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High

MSN Money Video

Save Money

Save Money © CorbisStrategies for saving more and spending less.
The Big Money
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 4 of 4
Wednesday, May 13, 2009 3:23:54 PM
This article has absolutely no relevance to 99% of the people on planet earth.  If you need to buy consumer goods, sometimes it pays in the long run to go with a higher quality item.  But the rest of this article is tripe.
Wednesday, May 13, 2009 4:34:52 PM
I couldn't agree more with MiamiLitig8r.  I live in Anchorage, Alaska.  What the heck as I going to do with a $1600 purse in Alaska?!  The fact that there is people out there that are so out of touch with reality that they would spend that kind of money on something like a purse is mind boggling to me.  But Im sure my perspective is skewed, after all, it is 'Function over Form' for us Alaskans!
Thursday, May 14, 2009 4:05:26 AM
Total hogwash ! Of course you will be losing money on every luxury item you buy at this moment, if you purchase it with the intent to sell it again a few years down the road. Smart investors do not work as such, they look for 'vintage' quality goods which have proven their worth over and over again. As an example: I used to buy quality costume jewelry in the past from the 50's through the 70's, by such well known designers as Dior, YSL, Chanel etc... for just a few hundred dollars, but I knew that I could resell them to specialized dealers for 3 to 4 times the price I paid for them ! Imagine the fact that afterwards, they still sold these items at double the price of what they paid to me, to their customers. Some of these luxury goods go for thousands of dollars today, even at specialized auctions. Granted, you have to know what you're doing, but it gets to show you, that if you have the time to wait for a return on your investment on a luxury item, it will always pay off no matter which recession is going on at the time ! By the way, diamonds have never been an investment. They lose their value the moment you leave the jewelry shop and if you ever need to sell them, be prepared to receive less than half of what you've paid for them. Good luck !
Thursday, May 14, 2009 6:14:30 AM

This article has no relevance to far less than 99% of the people in the world.  Four figure purses are not even on the radar for nearly everyone, other than a handful of wannabees and an even smaller collection of people who have more money than sense.

 

Use of the word "investment" is abuse of the English language and amounts to marketing twisting language into Orwellian absurdity.  

 

The one thing about the article that spared it from being a total waste is that there are people out there that will fall for this silliness and I'll just chuckle quietly to myself should I ever encounter one.

1 - 4 of 4
To add a comment, pleasesign in