Dow+150.25up+1.52%
10,058.64
Nasdaqunch0.00%
2,150.87
S&Punch0.00%
1,070.52

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player. Click here to download.
More video on MSN Money . . .
MP Dunleavey

Women in Red

Why own when you can rent?

It's fun to get something new, but the thrill wears off pretty quickly, and the costs of ownership can be endless. For proponents of the anti-stuff movement, renting is in.

By MP Dunleavey
MSN Money

Having shelled out close to $700 in car repairs last month and facing a chimney repair that is creeping up to $5,000 or more, I'm fed up with the endless cost of owning stuff.

Ownership is supposed to be the key that unlocks the American dream. But there are hidden costs that no one talks about, like the constant repairs and upgrades and attention that possessions demand.

Is it any wonder that people are flocking to the small but feisty anti-stuff movement, bartering instead of buying, swapping instead of shopping and, in the latest trend, opting to rent things rather than own them at all?

All hail the new "transumerism"! It's hard to tell whether temporary materialism is any cheaper than keeping up with the Joneses, but an unfettered way of life looks awfully appealing right now.

A lease on life

What, exactly, is transumerism?

The transumer philosophy is largely based on a "leasing lifestyle," according to an analysis by Trendwatching.com, a global trend-spotting company based in the Netherlands. Rather than spending your money on individual things, which you then have to keep (suddenly an old-fashioned idea), you purchase access to an array of objects and experiences. It can save time as well as cash: The more you own, the more you have to worry about, maintain and upgrade.

"We're seeing the rejection of the accumulation society," says Kristina Dryza, a trend consultant based in London, in her report "Temporariness" (.pdf file).

Trendwatching has been tracking the lifestyle rental trend for a few years now, and CEO Reinier Evers says the worldwide recession is making nonownership more appealing.

"The 'save money' aspect of the transumer trend is definitely making it more popular," he says.

Some say it's better for you, too.

"You can get rid of the stuff that is clogging your life," said Eric Ginsberg, the vice president of marketing for BookSwim, a Netflix-like service for books. "Free it up for what you actually want now, and when you're done with those things you can go ahead and get rid of them without the constant cost and expenses."

Oh, the things you can rent!

Transumers are able to enjoy a vast and ever-changing number of experiences. For example:

  • Why pay for the upkeep of a car when you can car-share for a fraction of the cost, renting a Prius for your grocery trip, a Mini for your date and a truck for bringing home your latest Craigslist bargain? (Check out CarSharing.net to find dozens of services, like Zipcar, in cities all over the world.)

  • Why buy a piece of artwork when you can adorn your home with a series of low-priced rentals from a local museum or online gallery such as Art Rent & Lease, or even free pieces on loan from a library?

MSN Money video

Buying happiness © Photodisc Blue / Getty Images
7 smart ways to buy happiness
Money may be tight, but that doesn't mean you have to stop spending altogether. Rather, use these tips to get the most joy for your cash.

Less is more in the short term

There's nothing new about renting, of course.

Renting has long been an alternative to buying things that were unaffordable or pointless to purchase because you needed them only temporarily (whether a tuxedo, pressure washer or diamond tiara for the Oscars).

But the seesawing economy has highlighted a big advantage of renting: Smaller, incremental payments are more manageable when you're worried about cash flow and job security.

Is renting really a cheaper way to go? It can be. Using a car-sharing service only when you need it can save hundreds, possibly thousands, over the full-on cost of car ownership.

When you count gas, maintenance, insurance, repairs, loan payments and depreciation, the average cost of car ownership is $8,095 a year, according to AAA. Yet the majority of cars in North America are driven only 66 minutes a day, according to a 2008 study by Susan Shaheen of the University of California, Berkeley. That works out to about $20 an hour, two to three times the hourly cost of car sharing.

Continued: What about wearing it out?

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High

Discuss personal finance with MP on the Women in Red message boards.

Search for a Liz Pulliam Weston article by topic.

Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 206
Wednesday, May 06, 2009 3:49:40 AM
Showing off a purse? Seeing the world?  What happens when that grows old, and it does. When one looks deeper in the article, the ideas are very much "other driven" and may be based on not knowing what one really wants.  Do some rethinking before going too far into transumerism.  Real happiness does not depend on traveling, renting, owning, possessions nor how others see us....we find it inside.
Wednesday, May 06, 2009 6:36:13 AM

Why own a home?  A big reason is that some day it will be paid off, and if you are living on a fixed income, or God Forbid, just Social Security in your retirement, it is a lot better to only have to pay taxes and utilities to keep a roof over your head than it is to have to pay rent (which inevitably goes up along with inflation).  Yes, homes require upkeep but some of it is discretionary -- and much of it can postponed for times when money is relatively less tight.  Then, you can get a "reverse mortgage" and let your home pay your bills in the Golden Years.  To me those are the most compelling financial reasons to own a home and not to be a lifetime renter.

Wednesday, May 06, 2009 7:06:15 AM
This is a clever way to live for the first few years of adulthood...  But I couldn't imagine not sitting in my little (but really nice and private) backyard and cracking a cold beverage and looking at the house we as a family built into a home.  Never mind the tax deduction for % paid.
Wednesday, May 06, 2009 7:11:24 AM

Ditto to the first two responses - especially the part about living in retirement or on a fixed income.  Look at the financial security of those who rent versus those who own and see who is going to fair better in a financial bind.  If you are renting and you lose your job - good luck finding another place to rent with no income!  With a home, you have assets you can use to get you through if you need to use it.  Owning a home doesn't mean you have to live beyond your means.  You said you are paying $1350/month now - what would you be paying for the same size apartment?  Did you opt for a more expensive house than what you would have spent for an apartment?  If you did, then maybe you bought too much house.  The cost of repairs should be part of what you budget into your total "housing" expense.  If you could afford $1500/month, then you don't buy a 95 year old house that costs $1350 per month - you would be naive to assume repairs and such would not run you over the 1500 benchmark.  You would have been more realistic to assume with a house that age you would have $500/month in repairs and limited your purchase options to a house that would only cost $1000/month in PITI.  Plus, let's not forget the benefit of being able to write off the interest you are paying on your taxes.  Good luck writing off the rent.

 

I have been stunned by some of your grossly misleading and uninformed financial advice and the fact that you have such a high profile column.  I admit I do read it for the entertainment value and I like the items on the "Women in Red".  But this is really the worst thing I have seen you propose to date.

Wednesday, May 06, 2009 7:20:19 AM
Wow you have no patience! You've sunk 50K plus 16,200 a year on mortgage payments and taxes and insurance for a 95 year old house! And you still have 25+ years to go?  (16,200 * 30 years = $486,000) I bought a used mobile home for less than $15,000. We live in it and bank the mortage payments into our savings account. Now after about 3 years we've saved up 40k. We have a few more years to go. But one day we'll reach our goal and start building the house we want the way we want. This is no different than the cash car buying strategy - Buy a used beater, drive it and continue to make car payments to yourself every month until you've saved up enough to buy the car you want for cash. The only difference between buying a car cash and a house cash is the length of time and the size of the payment. Wouldn't it of been smarter to save that 16,200 a month for say - 7 years and buy a house you want for cash? (16200 * 7 = $113,400) Then be mortgage free for the rest of your life? I got a friend you went online and bought a used school classroom for $500! He had it moved to his property and built walls and added cabinets and did everything to make it a house. It already had plumbing, electricity, etc. He just finished the interior to make it livable. He did this over 6 months and paid cash. Now he lives rent and mortgage free. He's saving $3,800 a month for the goal of building the kind of house he and his wife want. You don't need to rent or get a mortgage if you do these kind of strategies.
Wednesday, May 06, 2009 7:23:21 AM

Wouldn't it of been smarter to save that 16,200 a month for say - 7 years and buy a house you want for cash? 

Should be: Wouldn't it of been smarter to save that 16,200 a year for say - 7 years and buy a house you want for cash?

Wednesday, May 06, 2009 7:25:36 AM
Wow, by this logic, why invest exercise, good food and a healthy lifestyle in your body.  Indulge, live in excess, do drugs, and die in a flash by 40.

Oh thats right, realistic lifestyle and thinking longterm as opposed to short term thrills seems to make sense.
Wednesday, May 06, 2009 7:27:27 AM
The biggest reason I see for owning something, especially a vehicle or house, is that when you need/want (i.e., can afford) another vehicle or move somewhere else, you can sell the vehicle/house and recoup at least a part of your investment.  With renting you really have just thrown money at someone else and will never see it again.
Wednesday, May 06, 2009 7:32:50 AM
I agree that people are tiring of piling up endless mountains of posessions.  The feeling is the less you own the more free you are.  Free to travel, free to move  relatively quickly to take advantage of a new opportunity and free from much worry and expense. I think this is a major trend we will see many adopt in our society in the years to come.  Good Article!
Wednesday, May 06, 2009 7:44:34 AM

Yes, instead of going to see Venice, Barcelona or Paris, why not rent a DVD and watch it at home? Instead of bying car of your dreams and enjoy owning it, why not rent and make money for rental agency? It is better to pay rent and build someone else's equity than leave a home for your kids... America, this recession is a way for many people to make money publishing stupid ideas like this.

1 - 10 of 206
To add a comment, pleasesign in