Dow+150.25up+1.52%
10,058.64
Nasdaq+24.82up+1.17%
2,150.87
S&P+13.78up+1.30%
1,070.52

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video player requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player
More video on MSN Money
budgeting © Tom Grill/Corbis  // budgeting © Tom Grill/Corbis

Extra9/18/2009 2:00 PM ET

Social Security's new math: Who loses?

Barring action by Congress, 2010 will be the first year in 35 years that seniors don't get a cost-of-living adjustment. Benefits won't shrink, but it may feel like a cut because of rising medical costs.

By SmartMoney

Come January, seniors may do a double take after seeing their Social Security checks. The 2- to 3-percentage-point increase in benefits they've been getting each year won't be there.

That's because, for the first time in three decades, the checks likely won't include a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA).

"People notice when their checks don't change," says Bruce Meyer, a professor at the University of Chicago's Harris School of Public Policy.

In the context of degraded home prices and investment losses, the change will feel like a loss to many seniors, even though benefit amounts for 2010 won't shrink.

Social Security benefits are adjusted every year to keep up with inflation, so that seniors can retain their purchasing power. Adjustments are based on the Consumer Price Index for urban wage earners between the third quarter (July-September) of the previous year and the third quarter of the current year. The 2010 COLA will be based on a period marked by sharp drops in prices and deflation.

Democratic lawmakers are trying to lessen the perceived pain. New York Rep. Carolyn McCarthy has introduced legislation that would provide a one-time $150 payment for Social Security beneficiaries to compensate for the lack of an adjustment.

Still, anxious seniors should keep in mind that they will actually come out ahead of inflation.

"In a sense, older people are going to do fine because the cost of living is down and they're not going to have their benefits cut," says John Laitner, the director of the Retirement Research Center at the University of Michigan.

There's both good and bad in a flat COLA:

On the downside

The next COLA increase is in 2012: Not only won't seniors receive an adjustment for 2010, but the Social Security and Medicare trustees project no cost-of-living adjustment for 2011 and only a modest 1.4% increase in 2012. Of course, the trustees report is a forecast, and next year's report, which will take into account new data, could be revised.

Rising health care costs: Older people are hit hardest by rising health care costs, says Pamela Herd, an associate professor of public affairs and sociology at the University of Wisconsin. That's because seniors are disproportionate users of the health care system and pay out-of-pocket health care costs that are about 20% higher than the population at large. So while inflation hasn't been much of a concern, health care costs are increasingly eating into seniors' Social Security checks.

Medicare premiums are rising for some: Medicare Part B premiums have increased almost every year to keep pace with the growth in Part B expenditures. (Part B insurance helps pay for some services not covered by Part A, generally on an outpatient basis.)

Video: Will Social Security be there for you?

For most of the 42 million Part B beneficiaries, the amount of the monthly Social Security COLA each year has been more than enough to offset the increase in the Part B premium -- resulting in net increases in benefits, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

But next year and in 2011, about 8% of Part B beneficiaries will be subject to higher premiums, sums that will be deducted from Social Security payments. According to Kaiser, beneficiaries will pay $104.20 a month in 2010 and $120.20 in 2011, up from $96.40 this year.

On the upside

The benefit bump: Social Security beneficiaries got an atypically large 5.8% increase in benefits in 2009 -- the biggest in more than 25 years. That outsize increase was primarily because of 2008's spike in oil prices, says Laitner.
Become a fan of MSN Money on Facebook

But since then the CPI increase was lost as energy prices fell. It was an excessively high COLA that raised the purchasing power of seniors' benefits, actually putting them "ahead where they should be," says Andrew Biggs, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, a nonprofit public policy group.

Seniors are better off than most: While the poverty rate increased from 2007 to 2008 and median household income fell, both indicators remained statistically unchanged for people 65 and older, according the Census report issued earlier this month. "So the official data say that group is doing quite well -- and all those numbers predated the 5.8% increase in Social Security benefits" this year, says Meyer of the University of Chicago.

This article was reported by Lisa Scherzer for SmartMoney.

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 2460
Friday, September 18, 2009 2:46:40 PM
All very interesting....screw the elderly yet again!  My Part D supplemental premiums DOUBLED last year!!!!!!!!  Will they do that again this year?  If so I shall have to decline such a 'benefit' and wing it.  I suppose I can cut back on unnecessary medications like the cream I use for a chronic skin rash...after all....what is a little itching that keeps one up at night?
Friday, September 18, 2009 2:54:39 PM
At least you are getting a check. Those of us in our thirties will be lucky to see anything when we need it. And we're the ones paying the most into it.
Friday, September 18, 2009 3:00:00 PM

I think they made a decent case for not giving an increase! Make sure the same goes for all public employees! Please begin to fund SS with the savings- there's 8,000 plus turning 60 EVERY DAY! You'll need to downsize government if you ever plan to pay for SS! Don't plan on some sort of Madoff scheme -you're flirtin with dynamite if ya do-leave the gambling to dumb casinos- hey, increase their taxes to help pay for SS while you're at it! Thanks 

Friday, September 18, 2009 3:27:52 PM
Amen, d_in_kc.  I am so tired of hearing seniors complain, especially baby boomers who overspent for years.  Many of us in our thirties are paying into a social security system that will not be around when we retire, which means that we are subsidizing senior citizens.  For those seniors who complain about not being able to live on their social security checks, it was never intended that a person would live on social security alone.  WHY DID YOU NOT SAVE MORE WHEN YOU WERE WORKING?
Friday, September 18, 2009 3:36:17 PM
The politicians refuse to acknowledge the truth: Social Security and Medicare are both gigantic Ponzi schemes.
Friday, September 18, 2009 4:08:05 PM
Look my wife and I are 67, so we are too old to be baby boomers.... So we had nothing to with all this stuff... We really don't care if there is a Cola this year or next.... We live with what we have and have done so for the past 47.5 years....I suppose if you live that way all your life it really doesn't feel like a difficulty... I'll have to pay off the Ducati early so we can put a sidecar on the BMW, but youngsters ya learn to live with these problems over the years... Have a fun weekend, I rented a lift so I can paint the side of the house, that should be an adventure riding that baby up 30 feet in the air, I hope I don't get air sick.... Relax and enjoy, living sure beats being in the one room bungalow with the silk sheets and the dutch door.........
Friday, September 18, 2009 4:20:42 PM
Please keep in mind that not everyone has enough income to save for retirement.  My father had serious health problems that kept him from being able to work for the majority of his 40's - 60's, but was turned down for disability payments through soc sec.  My mother was left working just far enough above minimum wage that she was able to pay rent (on an apt that was completely unsafe, and unhealthy) and put just enough food on the table to survive.  My point is, not every senior living on Soc Sec overspent and lived unwisely!  Many did the best they could to just make it to retirement!!!
Friday, September 18, 2009 4:33:47 PM
Why didn't we save more while we were working? Because we were putting young A-$es like you through college, so you could grow up and be Wall street bankers and turn our 401k's into 201k's.
Friday, September 18, 2009 4:42:42 PM
It is not impossible to get fired from a government job.... Get that out of your mind... Want to test that theory, Lie on your application....When the personnel office discovers that and they will .... GOODBYE
Friday, September 18, 2009 4:47:24 PM
I am on SS Disability and I don't mind giving up a cola if the CEO's of banks don't mind giving up their government bailouts. After all, social security was set up initially as a government bailout. We've just turned it into a crutch since then. I have children from the mid 20's to the late 30's and I am sick inside to imagine what will become of them in their later years. This country is sliding downhill every decade just like a chronic terminal illness. It is sooo sad.
1 - 10 of 2460
To add a comment, pleasesign in