Dow+30.69up+0.29%
10,464.40
Nasdaq+6.87up+0.32%
2,176.05
S&P+4.98up+0.45%
1,110.63

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player. Click here to download.
More video on MSN Money . . .
4 ways to stretch your nest egg © Corbis

The Basics

4 ways retirees can battle inflation

Inflation erodes buying power faster for older Americans, but there are ways for those entering their retirement years to push back against the squeeze.

By MarketWatch

Make no mistake: A dollar doesn't go as far as it used to. That's true for all Americans, but the loss of purchasing power is especially insidious for Americans 62 and older. This group lives between the proverbial rock and a hard place: fixed incomes plus inflation that tends to run a bit faster than for the general population.

Fortunately, there are some solutions to the problems faced by older Americans who feel squeezed by the ever-rising cost of living.

But first some background: Annual inflation for older Americans rose, on average, 3.3% from December 1982 to December 2007, according to the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics' Experimental Consumer Price Index (CPI-E), an index designed to track the cost of living for those 62 and older.

By contrast, inflation overall for workers rose just 3.1%, according to the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U). To be sure, the 0.2-percentage-point difference might not seem like a lot, but it can add up over time, especially if you're living on a fixed income. Consider: $1 in 1983 was worth just 45 cents in 2007 for those 62 and older, compared with 47 cents for Americans in general.

According to a BLS report (.pdf file), the Experimental Consumer Price Index rose somewhat faster mainly because prices for medical care and shelter, which are weighted more heavily in the CPI-E, increased more rapidly than overall inflation during the period.

Housing and health care, not surprisingly, are two of the top three expenses seniors have. Housing represents 34%, or $12,396, of average expenditures for Americans 65 and older, and medical care represents 12.7% of expenses, or $4,631, according to another BLS report, "Consumer Expenditures in 2007" (.pdf file). Transportation is the second-largest expense, representing 16% of expenses, or $5,785.

Earlier this month, the Senior Citizens League released a report showing that seniors have lost 20% of their purchasing power since 2000. In other words, $1 from nine years ago is now worth just 80 cents. And when you look at housing and health care costs, that loss of purchasing power is even more dramatic:

 
 20002009% increase

Homeowners insurance

$492

$789

60%

Real-estate taxes

$690

$1,224

77%

Heating oil, 1 gallon

$1.25

$2.45

96%

Medicare Part B monthly premiums

$45.50

$96.40

112%

Given that rate of inflation, what can retirees and would-be retirees do to protect themselves?

1. Don't count on Social Security adjustments

The Senior Citizens League notes that "seniors receive a small increase in their Social Security checks, intended to help them keep up with the costs of inflation." But since 2000, the Social Security cost-of-living adjustment, or COLA, has increased average benefits just 31%, while typical senior expenses have risen more than 58%, the group says.

According to the Senior Citizens League: "A senior with the average Social Security benefit in 2000 received $816 per month, a figure that rose to $1,072.30 by 2009. However, that senior would require a Social Security benefit of $1,288.60 per month in 2009 just to maintain his or her 2000 lifestyle."

Multimedia on MSN Money

Reinventing retirement © Corbis
Reinventing retirement
An MSN Money special report examines 7 common retirement mistakes, fantasy retirements, the new hot spots for retirees and more.

To help increase buying power, the league says it is lobbying for a change in the index used to determine the Social Security COLA. By tying the COLA to the CPI-E, seniors would see much-needed relief in their monthly checks, the league said.

"For example, a senior who retired with a benefit of $460 in 1984 would have received $12,014 more over the past 26 years with the CPI-E," the league reports.

Though tying the COLA to the CPI-E could help many seniors who rely largely on Social Security, there may not be any political will to change how the COLA is calculated, given the latest trustees report on Social Security and Medicare. Social Security is projected to exhaust its reserves by 2037, and Medicare will do so by 2017, according to the report.

One looming problem: The Congressional Budget Office is projecting no COLA increases from 2010 through 2012. And that, according to the Senior Citizens League, means seniors will likely fall even further behind if medical costs continue to climb as forecast.

Continued: Live within your means

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 94
Thursday, May 21, 2009 6:11:08 AM

I'm 80 yrs. old,& I've been living w/ in my means my whole life.That's

why I'm not that bad off.But the politicians & big money people are the ones to blame F/ our country's problems.Greed & power have al-

ways been the problem of getting our people into the predicaments

we common people are put into at  all times.

 

 

Thursday, May 21, 2009 6:15:45 AM
Get back to old school CURTERSY & CONSIDERATION.
Thursday, May 21, 2009 6:16:51 AM
rich are getting richer ,poor are getting poorer
Thursday, May 21, 2009 6:54:36 AM

Get real.  SS is not going to use an index that results in a higher cost of living calculaitn.  SS can bare afford to pay out current levels, and with recent unemployment the 88 billion plus surplus expected for 2009 before unemployment hit is now hopefully going to be 3 billion.  That is the money that this ponzi scheme is using to pay current benefits.  Does anyone with a half a brain think the ponzi scheme payout is going to be increased?

 

Point number two - budget better - also known as eating cat food.  Even the number provided in the story tell their own story.  In seven years real estate taxes increased 70 plus percent.  The "average" senior spends $10,000 plus on housing.  Hell, we own our home free and clear and the real estate taxes alone are $11,500 a year, and they keep climbing.  Senior out here are really losing their homes because they can't afford the taxes.  Even the assessment "freeze" programs are near total bs because the taxing bodies just use a higher multiplier to get their money.  We are in Illinois, were the taxing bodies are guaranteed the same money they got the year before, plus what amounts to a cost of living increase, if they want that much.  No one is providing similar protection on the side that is doing the paying.  And let's not even get going with utilities, medical cost, and other hyperinflation expenses.  Yeah right - watch your budget.  Pleeze!

 

Then there is the gem of gems - invest in things that benefit from inflation - i.e. stocks.  And then do what when the stock market gets totally creamed the next go around?  Move in with your kids?  You sure aren't heading for that nursing home you can't afford.

 

This article is total nonsense.  By and large it is an insult to the intellegence of seniors.      

Thursday, May 21, 2009 8:13:50 AM
What a bunch of pap! If you are a senior and haven't learned to live within your means, gotten out of debt, put aside some rainy day funds and made plans  long before retirement then you are basically screwed.  How much longer can those that have just enough to get by because they planned ahead afford to continually be asked to give more? I made sure I was out of debt before  I retired and I have cut back considerably on eating out, traveling and vacations.   I'm sorry for those that are suffering but it seems many who never provided for themselves feel  "we" owe them a living. Foolish indebtednes should not rewarded  with a bailout, it's the old grasshopper and the ant story in modern times.
Thursday, May 21, 2009 8:55:05 AM
Grow your own garden! Great advice for some people who can not even bend down to pick up something off the floor.  Our seniors have spent their life working, raising their children, paying taxes etc now you say grow your own food fool because you will not get the benefits you were promised and WORKED FOR!! I wonder where the seniors will grow this garden if they live in apartments and places where land is not available.  I guess they will come to your house and have your front yard plowed to grow those gardens.
Thursday, May 21, 2009 9:23:59 AM

Recommendations

1 Own what you live in and make it something that you don't pay taxes on- RV.

2 Keep moving and establish residence in a state that has no income tax.

3 Get a trailer which can hold Earth Boxes and grow your own food.

4 Work out everyday to maintain your health.

5 Keep as much cash as you can in Gold.

6 Become proficient with a hand gun.  Acquire a large enventory of ammunition as it will become the best currency.

7 Establich relationships with like minded people.

8 Never vote for a Democrat.

Thursday, May 21, 2009 9:33:40 AM
Beans and taters is the secret.  Shop around. Some of the grocery store have store brand cans of pinto beans, etc.  You can do wonders with a potato. Bags of lettuce can last a week.  So it can really be cheaper to buy food in some instances than to grow it  with all the monetary and physical expense involved.  With health prescriptions, get second opinions, or start reading up with dedication on alternative meds.  Stay away from the mind-robbing cholesterol drugs---no matter what the doctor says.  Our house has been paid off for years, small, two bedroom, less than 900 square feet, property taxes  380 dollars per year.  We never had kids, so there are no grandchildren; we saved, skimped, (but not to the degree to where we never missed a weekend dining out), had regular savings accounts.  I am so glad that I got the hell out of California 32 years ago when my enlistment was up because it is now an utter basket case.
Thursday, May 21, 2009 9:52:13 AM

Social Security is just that, SOCIAL, as in SOCIALISM!!!!!!!!!! In other words owned and controlled by the government. The gov. has used Social Security for everything but what it was intended for. If the Government would just pay back, instead of bailing out the banks for instance, all of the IOU's that have accumulated over the years, that for sure would help make the SS fund self supporting as it was intended to be. Also stop feeding the ILLEGAL'S BY SENDING THEM BACK TO WHERE EVER THEY CAME FROM, as they are one of the most costly un-necessary drags on the federal system, as a whole, that we face today. Truman sent them back, Eisenhower, sent them back but Johnson propagated them for his rich friends in Texas, for cheap labor, along with expanding the Vietnam War, another drag on the Social Security system at that time. Now Pelosi and her thugs want to legalize 12 million or so illegal's. They have never contributed to the SS system, and yet they receive benefits from the system now and more if this should happen.

 

I was self employed, so paid both half's of the SS,  most of my working career so learned early to hate Social Security.  I for sure was never a great success but paid plenty into the SS System. I looked at all of that money and wished the whole time that I could put it into something that would pay out dividends and compound interest, as it should have been. That is what the next generations to follow should mandate. A system that is mandatory, as it is now, but  as a private NON GOVERNMENTAL program. Just think what a person would have come retirement time after 40 years or so of work. What money that is contributed during those years would be there free and clear, to be taken as a whole or taken out as needed etc etc.

Name one program, that the Government operates, that isn't in the Red.!!!!

WAKE UP AMERICA

Thursday, May 21, 2009 10:14:19 AM

Right on Kally - your garden answer is the best so far !!!!Great answer to the idiot who wrote this article !

1 - 10 of 94
To add a comment, pleasesign in