Dow-14.28down-0.14%
10,318.16
Nasdaqunch0.00%
2,146.04
S&Punch0.00%
1,091.38

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video player requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player
More video on MSN Money . . .
4 signs you're in retirement denial © Clay Patrick McBride/Getty Images

The Basics

4 signs you're in retirement denial

Portfolio and home values have tanked, but you won't see that reflected in most people's retirement plans. Here's how to tell if you need a reality check.

By U.S. News & World Report

Optimism is good; denial isn't. When it comes to retirement plans, the evidence is overwhelming: The recession will delay retirements for millions and reduce the standard of living of many people who are, or thought they were, near retirement.

A recent Pew Research Center survey, for example, says most middle-aged Americans are thinking about altering their retirement plans. Yet despite the short-term adjustments that consumers are making -- looking for bargains, saving more -- many continue to hold expectations about retirement that experts say are simply no longer realistic.

Here are four signs that you may be in denial about how the Wall Street and housing meltdowns have changed your retirement prospects.

1. Your retirement plans haven't changed. This is the big one, and most people are kidding themselves if this is their view. McKinsey & Co. has developed what it calls a retirement readiness index (.pdf file). It measures changes in the values of retirement assets -- Social Security, pensions and financial holdings -- to determine the financial preparedness of households for retirement.

An index value of 100 means a household can maintain its current standard of living in retirement. A reading below 80, McKinsey says, "calls for large reductions in spending on basic needs, such as housing, food, and health care." The current index reading for a typical household is 63.

2. Your retirement age hasn't changed. Hello! McKinsey says its polling finds that only about 25% of consumers are thinking about postponing retirement. If you're in the other 75%, stop and think about what would happen to your standard of living in retirement. You don't need a retirement readiness index.

First, add up Social Security and any pensions. Next, total up any retirement accounts and other financial assets and assume conservatively that 4% of that amount is available to you each year for spending needs. How does the total compare with what you're spending now?

Some financial planners say you can live for less in retirement, but health-care expenses likely will be steeper, and if you want to travel and enjoy leisure-time activities, your spending could rise, not fall.

3. Your home is still your castle. Housing values fell sharply in most markets, and many experts say it easily could take a decade for them to return to the inflation-adjusted values of 2007. Yet McKinsey found that the percentage of consumers expecting to finance their retirements by tapping the equity in their homes actually has risen.

Take a serious look at the likely equity you'll have in your home when you reach your planned retirement age. Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, says those trillions in lost housing values will be a drag on the economy and retirements for years.

"I remain a pessimist on the prospect for a recovery anytime soon," he says.

Video on MSN Money

Paying for retirement © Kiplinger's
Paying for retirement
Your retirement could last decades. Here are tips for living well for as long as you need.

4. You expect to be debt-free in retirement. While consumers generally have held steady on debt levels in the past year, debt among baby boomers actually has been rising, according to a survey from Securian Financial.

More than 60% of nonretirees polled said they expect to have no debt other than a mortgage when they retire, and only about 20% expected to have some debt. But more than half the retirees in the survey said they carried debts, excluding mortgages, into retirement.

Likewise, less than a quarter of nonretirees believe they will still owe money on a mortgage when they retire, but twice as many people who already have retired said they were still making mortgage payments when they stopped working.

This article was reported by Philip Moeller for U.S. News & World Report.

Published July 29, 2009

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 173
Tuesday, July 28, 2009 8:57:31 PM

My retirement plans have indeed changed since the bear market commenced in 2007.   Prior to that, I had a 3-pronged approach to retirement, with one amounting to a successful life, one being a boring life, and one being a wretched life.

 

The change to my retirement plans consists of pruning away the possibility of having either success or boredom.

 

It is going to be wretched and brief.

Tuesday, July 28, 2009 10:47:21 PM
My plans have changed.  I have Army retirement, so I was just going to pay off my home next year, and be in a position to stop working (at the age of 44).  I have decided to work a little longer (until about 48), buy another home, pay it off, and have my first home as a rental, so I will have extra income to supplement my retirement income. 
Wednesday, July 29, 2009 4:44:43 AM
I'm currently in my third career.  I was in partnership with my father until my first wife died and I needed to spend time with my young family (not enough equity to sustain me beyond a retraining and job search period) - no retirement assets.  My second job identity was human services for the county government in my home area - four years and few contributions to retirement.  The jobs would come and go with the grants that funded them.  Not enough stability or security for my family.  Back to school again at 40 for another career that is now 13 years old and somewhat secure.  With little advancement potential I had planned to keep working till 65.  I expect to extend at least two more years now, praying that my health and that of my second wife allow (already there are some issues). 

I have been unable to help my sons in their adulthood as I wanted and time with grandchildren is rare.  Vacations at any distance have rarely  happened and continuing education programs for work have had to substitute.  We live in housing provided by my employer and required until my retirement, but with no compensating equity build-up.  We have invested instead in an old summer cottage now worth $100,000 where we still owe $70,000.  I pay a double shot on my income tax in a self-employed category that includs the fair rental value of the housing (this amounts to almost 30% of my gross income).  I have SS, $90,000 in my pension fund (down 30% from its peak in 2007) and continue to add 12% annually.  My health insurance premiums will be 90% covered in retirement on reaching 25 years service.  My wife has $65,00 remaining from her divorce but nothing of her own beyond the down payment on the cottage.  We will be OK if I can keep working that long, even with little growth in the stock market.

I will retire at 69 with little housing equity, 90% of my health insurance costs covered, about 85% of my present annual income and little if any debt.  At that point I will need to move and fund retirement housing.  My grandchildren will be grown, my wife's health poor and mine in a predictable decline.

I am your pastor.
Wednesday, July 29, 2009 4:46:02 AM
At this time my retirement plans have not changed.  My wife and I save 30% or more of our income and have for years.  We are both 45 and plan to retire comfortably in 5 years.  Open-mouthed
Wednesday, July 29, 2009 5:28:39 AM

The Problem with non-retirement is not addressed in this article.  Corporate America does not want a 65 year old person working for them, unless you consider a Wal-Mart receptionist making minimum wage working.  Most elder workers are shuffled out the door and replaced by new blood.  I cannot blame Corporate America, it is called profit.  The USA has a very serious problem on the horizon.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009 6:29:29 AM
After extensive and highly complicated calculations,  I have determined that I will be able to retire at the age of 168.   Can't wait!  
Wednesday, July 29, 2009 6:31:07 AM
I retired in 2005 at 48 after 25 years in the army, 4 reserve/NG the rest AC.  My heathcare is totally covered by the VA, I get 53% of my final base pay (O-5) each month and a COLA raise every year.  My wife and I are covered under Tricare and Delta Dental.  I have zero debt, invested in mutuals way back in 1991 and although lost a bit the past two years continue to life a very comfortable lifestyle.  Too many people ignore the military as an option in your early years yet all of my peers envy me because they are punching time clocks, and I'm taking cruises on my bike!
Wednesday, July 29, 2009 6:56:49 AM
I agree with Corporate_Greed.  All these retirement advice articles say you should plan to work longer - good luck with that!  So many of us have been forced out of our corporate positions in our 50's and early 60's and have been unable to find comparable jobs and salaries.  I'd advise young folks to assume you will not have a good job past 55 and save, save, save!
Wednesday, July 29, 2009 7:10:50 AM

no change of plans here.

Still surfing,still sunbathing,still eating.

Stop buying ,you do not need all that junk.

Pura vida

Wednesday, July 29, 2009 7:36:29 AM
its the new american dream..."WORK...DIE"....
1 - 10 of 173
To add a comment, pleasesign in