The Social Security earnings test: What you need to know © Scott Speakes/Corbis

The Basics

The Social Security Catch-22

If you claimed retirement benefits early but were forced back to work by an uncertain economy, you might be in for an unpleasant surprise.

By Kiplinger's Personal Finance Magazine

It sounds like a cruel joke.

After a lifetime in the work force, you call it quits at 62 to claim Social Security benefits and begin a long and satisfying retirement.

Then, the worst economic calamity since the Great Depression hits with the vengeance of Hurricane Katrina, decimating your nest egg and depleting the value of your home. Faced with the painful reality that you must go back to work, you count yourself lucky to find a job at a time of high unemployment.

And your reward? The federal government suspends your Social Security benefits.

Say hello to the confusing and controversial Social Security earnings test. This provision of the law says sure, you can claim your benefits as early as age 62, but you can't necessarily keep the cash if you work before reaching your normal retirement age (66 for workers born in 1943 through 1954).

The earnings test cost a quarter of a million working Social Security beneficiaries about $100 million each month in 2009, according to a ballpark estimate Social Security officials made for Kiplinger. That was up 14% from the $666 million lost in the corresponding period of 2008.

No one knows how much of the increase is a result of retirees being forced by deteriorating finances to go back to work. But it's clear that anyone who claims Social Security benefits early -- or who's thinking about it -- needs to understand what's going on here.

And that includes the increasing number of 62-plus men and women who have lost their jobs and, as they've struggled to find new ones, have filed for Social Security early to pay the bills until they can restart their paychecks. There's been a big jump in the number of Americans claiming benefits early since the recession began driving unemployment higher.

How the earnings test works

If you apply for Social Security benefits early, you'll be asked whether you plan to keep working and, if so, how much you expect to earn -- to determine whether you'll be stung by the earnings test.

For 2010, the test applies if you make more than $14,160. And for every $2 you earn over that limit, you'll lose $1 of benefits. Suppose you claim benefits at age 62 and your monthly benefit is $1,500 (and you estimate that you'll earn $30,000 during the year). Because $30,000 is $15,840 over the limit, you would lose half of the excess, or $7,920, in benefits.

The Social Security Administration doesn't trim each check by a proportional amount. Your benefits are withheld completely until the squeeze is satisfied. In this example, you'd get no benefits for five months (covering $7,500 of the lost benefits), and your benefit in the sixth month would be $1,500 minus the final $420 claimed by the earnings test, or $1,080.

In the year you first claim benefits, the test basically lets you ignore money you made before you applied and squeezes benefits based on monthly earnings for the rest of the year. In the calendar year you reach normal retirement age, a more lenient earnings test applies: You lose $1 for every $3 in earnings over $37,680 before your birthday. Starting in the month you reach normal retirement age, there's no earnings test. You can earn as much as you want without losing a dime in benefits.

Note this: For purposes of the earnings test, only wages from a job or self-employment income count. Investment earnings, pension benefits, money drawn from an individual retirement account or 401k, or even lottery winnings do not.

Continued: Not the honor system

More from MSN Money and Kiplinger

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowHigh
85Comments
11/15/2010 8:27 PM
avatar
Does anyone know how much the government has stolen from social security, this money must be repaid and new laws need to be written that congress can never borrow money from the fund again. Interest on the money must also be paid.
11/09/2010 4:32 PM
avatar
I worked in private industry for over forty years ten years full time the rest part time but later I  worked at   for a county agency full time for thirty years the government under Regan passed legislation that was called double dipping so when I retired I only got 1/4 of my SS Where did the other 3/4 of  that money go! im still working at 70 the way I look at it the government is screwing me. Why is it that Federal judges have a life time job and upon there death the spouse gets % 100 of their salary ?
11/09/2010 4:13 PM
avatar
djoey347:  I have worked since I was 18; I am now 55 and as of 2007 had a large retirement fund.  Thanks to Wall Street, Bush and God knows who else, I have no retirement left.  I better get something out of this; I will be working until I die, like the draft horse in the reins in the field.
11/09/2010 3:06 PM
avatar

So funny how most of the comments confirm the article - American's are in denial about our shrinking standard of living. It's easy to see that cost of living has gone up more than wages in the last decade alone. The stock market's flat. Health care costs have sky rocketed! But, most posters here are almost hostile about these facts. We deserve this hole we're in, it'll only get worse with this kind of arrogant ignorance, and the rest of the world will leave us in the dust.

 

A guy at work, smart and modest person, got really offended when I told him that Scandinavian countries have higher standards of living than us. Betcha your pension that people here post the same kind of hostile reactions ;-)

11/09/2010 12:20 PM
avatar
My wife has an ongoing problem with the idiots at soc sec,,,had been retired for 4 months then got a bill,,You owe us $347,,pay in 3 months,,,Next week got letter "you owe us $347, please remit immediately" called them and were told "Well the check wouldnt clear in time" Whatever the hell that means,,,we are now up to owing them $1357 for what who knows,,request for some numbers in Aug resulted in no ans so far,,Arent they great and concerned...
11/07/2010 6:17 PM
avatar

It has been true that everyone who lived to his life expectany or beyond would draw more than he/she put into the system.  However, a lot of people died early and didn't collect anything. (My father and my brother among them.) The raising of the collection rates and of the amount that is taxed helped create the social security trust fund that does earn interest from the bonds in which it is invested. Last year it earned well over 100 billion in interest.

 

You get benefits based upon age 60 dollars from the average of your best 35 years (420 months of earnings). You get 90% of the first 8XX dollars, 32% of the next 4YYY-8XX dollars and 15 of the next 8ZZZ-4YYY dollars. This means that higher wage earners get back less of what they paid in than lower wager earners. If you have multiple employers you can pay in more than the maximum. You can get back half of it but not the "employer match" part. They got an extra $2100 from me last year on self employed earnings.

 

A privatized system would likely attract the higher wage earners but not the lower wage earners. Thus, privatizing would not be good for the masses. We need to make adjustments to our current system and keep it solvent.

 

I would not trust Wall Street and the big banks with retirement dollars. They have demonstrated that they are not experts in predicting what will happen. However, they are good at maximizing their profits even if their investors lose out.  

10/14/2010 10:03 AM
avatar
Why are they allowed to tax social security when we have already paid taxes on it every week we are paid?????
10/13/2010 9:09 PM
avatar

 If the S.S. Don't  give some of us a raise this comeing

year then that will make us having the same amount for 3'

years in a row. 

The price of living has gone up.  Like the gas for cars is going up again , food , Lights , Water, an Gas to heat the homes

with.

    It is a shame that we all  have to suffer like this.

10/12/2010 2:48 PM
avatar

th3parasit3 wrote:

If you are pulling SS or will be able to, then enjoy the ride. I am just expecting that I will not have that retirement option and that means that I, and perhaps a large portion of people my age, will start saving earlier than previous generations. This does not bode well for the economy and is a concern for those 45 and younger who have not already started saving. It is fear, and it is spreading."------------

 

Stop drinking the Kool-ade!  the GOP has spread lies to make people think SS is in trouble, and to create generational rifts.  The GOP has long had a Plan to End Social Security. Google  "Starve the Beast."  They actually have planned to run up debt so they could justify ending Social Security. Reagan/Bush/Bush ran up 75% of the debt for our entire 233-yr history. Look that up, too. Google "National debt by presidential term."

 

 

10/12/2010 2:39 PM
avatar

zzzaa wrote --"Don't forget if you work and collect SS you still pay SS taxes and your employer also pays matching SS taxes. You receive no credit for those taxes paid on your income tax return. It's free money for SS with no payback to you. "

 

Not accurate. You get credit for those payments in your SS account, just as you did for other payments earlier in your working career. 

10/03/2010 9:32 PM
avatar
The wiser we become / The less children we have an not a smart thing. Less of a tax base. We loose our way of life /not rocket wisdom  just one man an one woman an 4 kids 1 dog 1 suv / small house  lots of love .
10/02/2010 8:49 AM
avatar

Well, this is no surprise to me.  Before I filed for SS, I checked out all the details (as everyone should do, to see if they can live on a SS check plus the $14,000 you can make, on top of that.) 

 

It's not possible that anyone collecting SS money these days, doesn't know this information.  They give you the full rundown when you apply.

 

For me, it worked out well.  I've never made $30,000/year in my whole life, so collecting SS checks and working a part time job, was the answer for me.

10/01/2010 12:21 PM
avatar
holyone  i am 86yrs i took sos.-sec at 65 i found out that i am a notch baby this means i get less $$$ than the regulars do this was done by act of congress.  how do we wife & i get the regular $$$ as soon as possible. i find out that they are waiting for us to pass on  ha ha i am going to live to 100.
10/01/2010 12:06 PM
avatar
This social security system is a very bad system. Designed to support people who can not save over a lifetime. Designed to "hook" people on Government.

When I received my first pay check in 1969 I saw through the whole scam.

The Government can make any rules they want to make. Think about 50 years from now when the payments can not be made.

A typical working person in 1970 would achieve the limit around now (October). Then there would be more money in his or her check for the rest of the year.

Today most people do not reach the limit.

9/30/2010 7:50 AM
avatar
Don't forget if you work and collect SS you still pay SS taxes and your employer also pays matching SS taxes. You receive no credit for those taxes paid on your income tax return. It's free money for SS with no payback to you. This law needs to be changed so it would reduce taxes owed. I am talking about earning under the limit around 14k. I doubt this would be considered a high income year. Also you pay tax on the already taxed SS you receive if your income is over around $26k started by president RR. So the rich cannot afford to pay more tax but a retired couple living on 20 to 40k can. Lookup what caused the Great Depression on Google or Ask  and see why the rich don't need anymore tax breaks. Before RR the top tax bracket was close to 90% so the rich have gotten a hugh break already. So don't tax the rich more than pay the working poor more a lot more. Than they will pay more taxes problem solved. Freeze government speeding and do away with waste.
9/28/2010 5:08 PM
avatar
When you get that age, you should just start lying about how much your making.  It's likely you wont have to spend too much time in jail by the time they catch you anyway. LOL
9/27/2010 3:15 PM
avatar
This is ridiculous. No one in their right mind would exceed the $14K limit. Remember that you will have to pay social security and medicare taxes (7.65% if employed or 15.3% if self employed) and then pay federal and state income tax on the full amount you earned. Then take the $1 for every $2 (pre tax) hit. Once you exceed the limit, you are working for nothing, maybe less than nothing depending on your tax bracket.
9/24/2010 5:12 PM
avatar
When I received my first pay check in 1969, I said to my Boss; "What the hell is this?"

Since I have always been a large saver, this social security has been a problem to me.

The money I was forced to contribute is now forcing me to work at age 59. If I have been allowed to save this money since I started working, I would now have achieved the amount I would need to retire.

Thank you FDR and the dead Liberals who started this Ponzi racket.

What a wasteful program.

End it.

9/22/2010 6:51 PM
avatar
All problems could be cured if the Government paid the money back it 'BORROWED' since the Ford Administration. I believe the total is 3.5 TRILLION DOLLARS. This would work without changing rates, or contributions.
9/22/2010 6:25 PM
avatar
Cash only.  Is the way for anyone who has to go back to work because of the crash caused by the greed of wall street.  Fine someone who will pay you cash for your services, and the government won't know how much money you earn.  Don't feel bad about it, no one on wall street feels bad about destroying most  401k's.  Remember seeing the Goldman Sachs boys testifying before congress?  They had no remorse at all!  That is the attitude of the wall streeters and the banks that got bailed out.
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of ConductPlease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
Additional comments(optional)
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
viewCounter