Dow+150.25up+1.52%
10,058.64
Nasdaq+24.82up+1.17%
2,150.87
S&P+13.78up+1.30%
1,070.52

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player
More video on MSN Money . . .
Michael Jackson's savvy estate plan © The Associated Press

The Basics

King of Pop's estate-planning guide

We could all learn something from the solid strategy Michael Jackson put in place before his death. Here are 4 lessons to carry to the grave.

By Kiplinger's Personal Finance Magazine

For a guy who squandered millions, consorted with chimpanzees and dressed like a Christmas nutcracker, Michael Jackson did something surprisingly sensible before his death.

He set up a smart estate plan.

Jackson's will provides for the care of his loved ones. A separate document gathers his assets -- said to be more than $500 million, exceeding his debt by about $200 million -- into a trust, ensuring that his affairs stay (mostly) out of the courts and (ideally) out of the public eye.

Far from being wacko, the arrangements set the stage for an orderly disposition of his chaotic empire, says Todd Reinstein, an estate-planning lawyer in Los Angeles. And although challenges could roll in like the California surf, this plan is so well crafted that it just might hold up, unless another will emerges.

Here's what you can learn about estate planning from the King of Pop.

Write a will

A no-brainer? Actually, about two-thirds of Americans neglect to take on this basic estate-planning chore, allowing a judge to divvy up their assets by default according to state law. Had Jackson been similarly remiss, his property would have been split among his three children, as dictated by California law. Instead, he divided it the way he wanted to, reportedly leaving 40% of his estate to the kids, 40% to his mother, Katherine Jackson, and 20% to charity.

Jackson avoided potential misunderstandings by citing each of his children by name and by specifically excluding his former wife and the mother of his two older children, Debbie Rowe, from any inheritance. That exclusion may not have been necessary, because the couple were no longer married, but it makes clear that Jackson purposely omitted her, rather than committing an oversight.

Anna Nicole Smith, another dead celebrity with a tangled personal life, neglected to name her infant, Dannielynn, in her will, creating confusion as to her intent. Jackson made his choices clear.

Consider a living trust

Along with a will, Jackson established a living trust, also called a revocable trust. This estate-planning tool lets you transfer all your property, including cars, bank accounts and real estate, into a separately owned entity -- in Jackson's case, the Michael Jackson Family Trust -- while maintaining control as trustee.

At your death, control transfers to your designated co-trustee or successor trustee. Most people, including Jackson, set up their will to "pour over," so that whatever property remains outside the trust at their death eventually is added to it.

Video on MSN Money

Who will get Michael Jackson's money? © CNBC
Who will get Michael Jackson's money?
A discussion with Diane Dimond, author of "Be Careful Who You Love," and CNBC's Jane Wells, Julia Boorstin and Dennis Kneale.

The beauty of a living trust for some is that the assets it holds at the time of death avoid probate, a public process. "People who are not interested in having the media know how much they died with or to whom the money is going to be left always do a living trust to prevent media attention," Reinstein says.

Avoiding probate can also make sense for regular folks with significant assets or property in more than one state because it spares their heirs the aggravation of a prolonged legal process. "It saves a lot of money, time and hassle," says David Shulman, an estate-planning attorney in Fort Lauderdale, Fla.

Continued: Name a guardian

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 33
Friday, July 10, 2009 6:39:08 AM

who cares

Friday, July 10, 2009 7:31:44 AM

Who thought he wouldn't have his ducks in a row? He was a savvy businessman with plenty of money for advisors.

Horrible and insulting first line to the article. I'm surprised it got past the editor. It's the same old Jackson story where people put him down to build themselves up. Does it actually make you feel good to slander the man. What a sad state of affairs.

Friday, July 10, 2009 9:41:18 AM

I thought the first line was insulting yet true. It was a very well written aritcle and kept my attention the whole way through. Nice.

Friday, July 10, 2009 10:07:52 AM
The man looked and dressed like a freak why get unreal now? Anyway, I'm glad he had enough smarts to take care of his children.
Friday, July 10, 2009 11:36:30 AM

This is an article talking about him doing something correct and proper - right?

But first line, lets give him a shot or two first.

Such slander has become expected and I think it's horrible.

 

 

Friday, July 10, 2009 11:56:58 AM

but let's break it down with facts.

"squandered millions" the man gave so much of his money to charity and never given the credit for it. In fact this article mentions that 20% of the family trust is going to charity as well.

"consorted with chimpanzees" this is bizarre terminology when referring to a pet that was rescued from a cancer research clinic.

Only someone with his kind of money could afford such a pet. I'm not sure why there is a "es" at the end. Only one I know of.

"Christmas nutcracker" do I really need to explain why this is wrong? The man was a performer and entertainer. His clothes were not terrible considering his field and level of accomplishment as a showman. Standing out is part of the game.

and why is it "surprisingly sensible". Businesswise he was genius as well.

Friday, July 10, 2009 5:45:54 PM

Viva Michael Jackson the King of Pop. Open-mouthed

 

Saturday, July 11, 2009 12:10:47 AM

I came across this article because I do volunteer work helping members of our congregation develop personal financial plans.

 

"Who cares?" People who are interested in KEEPING THEIR MONEY care, no matter who is the subject of the article (in this case Michael Jackson).   Although most of the article and what Jackson did is common knowledge, it is a fact that many Americans do not have a will, living trust, and assets that well exceed their liabilities.

Saturday, July 11, 2009 5:52:47 AM

I wouldn’t put MJ’s estate management practices in the stellar category. But, at least he didn’t die in debt. That’s more than most people his age will be able to say on their death bed, particularly if you account for their share of government debt.

 

My wife and I each have a will, and we’re in the process of arranging a living trust to manage our retirement.

 

Hey look at me, I’m living like a rock star.

Saturday, July 11, 2009 7:39:18 AM
I agree with others in saying that the comments in the article were unnecessary, unprofessional, racist and just down right LOW class.  It's obvious that the writer was and continues to be quite envious of Mr. Jackson's successes.  It makes you wonder living in their glass house or riding high on their peddle stool and using a public forum such as "MSN Money" is a area that no longer warrants our support!  Shame on YOU! Stick to the financial advice and not advertise your personal slander against another.  

Next time expose yourself or one of your family members to make a point...
 

1 - 10 of 33
To add a comment, pleasesign in