Dow+150.25up+1.52%
10,058.64
Nasdaq+24.82up+1.17%
2,150.87
S&P+13.78up+1.30%
1,070.52

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player. Click here to download.
More video on MSN Money . . .
Liz Pulliam Weston

The Basics

5 estate-tax myths that won't die

Yes, it's going away, but you can be certain it will be back -- and that the same old arguments will arise. Here are the facts about the controversial tax.

By Liz Pulliam Weston
MSN Money

Permanent estate-tax repeal is officially dead. With huge deficits to cover, the argument now is about the size of estates that will escape tax and how much that tax will be.

Currently, the estate tax is scheduled to disappear next year and then spring back to life, phoenix-like, in 2011. The top options under consideration are to:

  • Make permanent the 2011 exemption, in which estates under $1 million escape taxation and the top tax rate is 55%.

  • Make permanent this year's $3.5 million exemption and 45% tax rate.

  • Index the $3.5 million exemption to inflation and cap the tax rate at 45%, which is President Barack Obama's proposal.

  • Raise the exemption to $5 million and cap the tax rate at 35%, as proposed by Sens. Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark., and Jon Kyl, R-Ariz.

Now, reasonable people can disagree about which proposal is best, just as they disagreed about whether we should have an estate tax in the first place.

Good arguments, though, require good information. Bad information distorts the debate, and there's far too much of the latter floating around about the estate-tax system. Here are some of the most persistent and misleading myths:

Myth No. 1: Lots of people face the federal estate tax.

Even before Congress raised estate-tax exemption limits starting in 2002, relatively few estates paid taxes.

Only 2% of the 2.4 million people who died in 2001, or fewer than 52,000 estates, left behind enough wealth to owe estate taxes, according to the Internal Revenue Service.

That was back when any estate worth more than $675,000 had to file an estate-tax return. Since then, the estate-tax exemption limit has been raised substantially, starting at $1 million in 2002 and rising to $3.5 million for 2009. Right now, the limit is scheduled to disappear for 2010 and return at $1 million for 2011.

If the estate-tax exemption were fixed at $1 million, about 46,000 estates would owe tax annually, according to the Tax Policy Center, a nonpartisan joint venture of the Urban Institute and the Brookings Institution.

Raising the exemption to $3.5 million would reduce the number of taxable estates to 6,410 a year, the center found. Indexing it to inflation, as the White House proposes, would shrink the number to 6,160, while the $5 million exemption proposal would reduce the number even further, to 3,600.

And the vast majority of the taxes owed would be paid by huge estates. Under Obama's plan, for example, 84% of the total taxes owed would be paid by estates worth more than $10 million, said Leonard Burman, the center's director and a former senior analyst for the Congressional Budget Office. The average estate-tax bill would be about $3 million, or 19% of total estate value.

The bottom line: The estate tax is indeed an expensive problem for those who have to face it, but its direct impact is far from widespread.

Video on MSN Money

Abolish the 'death tax'? © Jack Hollingsworth / Getty Images
Abolish the 'death tax'?
Experts discuss whether the estate tax should be eliminated.
Myth No. 2: Average families are taxed twice.

The estate tax is indeed a kind of double tax on wealthy families, because income or other taxes may have already been paid on money or assets that are then taxed again at death.

But most families get a big tax windfall when someone dies and passes assets on to heirs. That's because of a tax break known as a step-up in basis.

Essentially, the property and most investments in an estate get a new value for tax purposes when someone dies. It's this value that the heirs use to determine their taxable profit when the property or investments are sold.

Here's how it works. Say your folks paid $20,000 for a house that was worth $200,000 on the day your last parent died. Without the step-up, you'd have to pay capital gains tax on that $180,000 increase in value if you sold the property. Thanks to the step-up, however, the house gets a new basis of $200,000. If you sold it for $200,000, you wouldn't owe any capital gains tax.

Estates get this special tax bonus whether or not they pay any estate tax. For the vast majority of people, that means the increase in value of their estates never gets taxed, either when they die or when the property they bequeath to others is ultimately sold.

The bottom line: The current estate tax system benefits far more families than it penalizes.

Continued: Can the tax be avoided?

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 183
Monday, August 03, 2009 4:27:55 AM
Liz has conveniently ignored the effects of individual state estate and probate taxes; these can be onerous and affect more than the super rich.  Taxes are not "more favorable" or rewarding to smaller taxpayers, they are simply less punishing.  It's like wishing for small hemorroids, which is what the whole mess is.  The industry built around the tax avoidance game is a "tax" on the productivity of society as a whole.  Let's have a serious discussion on the flat tax, and bring back sanity.
Monday, August 03, 2009 4:38:36 AM

Amen!

Quite a narrow view considering employment by MSN Money.

Not a word about living trusts or other tax planning venues.

Not a word about off-shore investments being involved or uninvolved in estate taxes.

Monday, August 03, 2009 5:50:38 AM

Huh? How convenient that Liz leaves out important facts about estate taxes and the like.  More due diligence would be appropriate.  Everybody has an estate tax at their death.  However, their is an offsetting credit for smaller estates, essentially mitigating any payment to Uncle Sam.

 

What about probate?  Liz, get your head out of your backside. 

 

Taxes at death of a second spouse are something we all will have to deal with, regardless of the size of the estate.  The estate tax is only one of the taxes that gets levied death.

 

The article has a very narrow view of what the implications are and a bigger discussion/re-write is in order.

 

 

 

Monday, August 03, 2009 5:55:19 AM
the Iowa St economist has his head someplace else.  most of us with smaller family farms nurture a lifestyle that allows us to hold onto the 'farm'.  it is a treasured asset within a somewhat unique culture of thinking.  that we should put our 'extras' aside to accumulate resources to pay the death tax, in order to preserve the farm, while our societal counterparts put their extras into perditious pursuits, is ludicrous.  if we allow this to continue in the USA, the day will come when Chile, Argentina, et.al. say to the US populace, "oh, by the way, we are going to charge more for the food you have to buy from us, actually, we are going to charge you a lot more! since you can no longer produce your own"
Monday, August 03, 2009 6:02:49 AM

I thought Ms. Weston's piece was fine alternative to the "Death Tax" drivel

I consistently hear on Fox Business and CNBC.

Monday, August 03, 2009 6:06:48 AM

Myth No. 3: The tax can be avoided.

Estate planning can reduce the tax bite. If you're rich enough, however, your estate will eventually face taxes unless:

  • You die in 2010, the one year in which the estate tax is scheduled to be totally repealed.
  • You give everything to charity.
  • You give everything to your spouse.

Liz, how can it be a myth when you list exceptions? Each exception is a means of avoiding the estate tax. And it is a short list. I can add two or three more ways of avoiding and/or assigning the cost but I don't give free advise to the upper crust.

 

It is my experience that the upper crust complain constantly, but pay very little. If they are paying as much as Fox Noise claims they are then they need to fire their accountants, tax attorneys, and give me a call. Of course the accountants, tax attorneys, and lobbyist are doing a great job. I don't expect to hear the phone ring anytime soon.

Monday, August 03, 2009 6:14:21 AM

Thanks Liz for another well thought out article.  There seems to be a lot of political comments/myths which always surprise me as normally it comes from those who will never have to pay the tax but enjoy the stepped up basis when they inherit.  With regards to state estate taxes, the federal tax gives a credit for state taxes paid.  Generally, states "piggy back" off the federal estate taxes with the same exemption so the net effect is that total tax paid is the same - only some of the money is diverted from paying the federal government and is paid to the state.  This has always been a politically charged issue that brings about such emotional statements. 

Monday, August 03, 2009 6:17:49 AM

Anyone who refers to a reduction in taxes as a "Tax Bonus" begins with the presumption that the Government owns what we produce. There is a word for that. It is slavery. We need to rebel against the political aristocracy that confiscates the hard earned wealth of the productive populace in order to distribute it to the less productive in exchange for political power. The death tax, in any form is the most eggregeous example of this arrogance. 

 

The fact that relatively few people are affected by estate taxes is irrelevent. That is like saying that only a few people are affected by tainted drugs.

Monday, August 03, 2009 6:46:53 AM
You don't know what you're talking about.
Monday, August 03, 2009 6:49:49 AM
The author fails to mention the the very rich - think family dynasties like Rockefeller, Heinz, Kennedy - move assets from the estates while they are alive and set up trust funds for their offspring.  When the surviving spouse finaalyy dies the offspring have alreay been provided for and the net taxable estate is musch lower than it otherwise would have been without the trusts.  The surviving families continue to be wealthy.  The statistics the author provides note the big dropoff in taxable estates between $1 million and $ 3+ million.  This is because those at the lower end of the the taxable estate level don't have the financial ability to "move" money in their lifetimes through the trust method.  Of course, anyone not subject to an estate tax think anyone with more than they have is "rich" and should be taxed.  But it is hypocritical of the uber-rich liberals who say they favor an estate tax to set up their children as trust fund babies and penalize the families who are at the lower end of the estate tax scale.
1 - 10 of 183
To add a comment, pleasesign in