Dow+150.25up+1.52%
10,058.64
Nasdaq+24.82up+1.17%
2,150.87
S&P+13.78up+1.30%
1,070.52

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video player requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player
More video on MSN Money . . .
Liz Pulliam Weston

The Basics

3 legal papers you shouldn't live without

If you were too injured or ill to make your own decisions, who would do it? A stranger or a greedy relative picked by the state? Don't wait; make your choices known.

By Liz Pulliam Weston
MSN Money

Writing about incapacity is one thing. Experiencing it, even secondhand, is quite another.

My father suffered a devastating stroke last year while visiting his sister in Florida. During the final four months of his life, this once bright, capable man couldn't decide anything more complicated than what color shirt to wear on a given day. Every other decision regarding his life -- what he ate, how his bills were paid and how hard his caregivers should fight to keep him alive -- had to be made by others.

Most Americans don't have wills, but that's not the crisis that many in the estate-planning industry would have you believe. With a few exceptions, which we'll talk about below, most people's quality of life won't be much improved by a will.

That's because your state already has a basic plan for distributing your stuff when you die. You're dead, so what do you care? If who got your compact disc player or your comic book collection wasn't important enough for you to bother with a will while you were alive, it certainly won't matter to you after you're gone.

What your state doesn't have, though, is an efficient way to take care of you if you're still breathing but unable to make your own decisions because of incapacitating illness or injury.

So if you get in a car accident and die, your estate will be distributed more or less efficiently. Get in a car accident and end up in a coma, and you could be in a world of hurt.

Your critical decisions made by a stranger?

Who would pay your bills or wrangle with insurance companies about your care? Who would decide whether to sue that driver who hit you -- or to shut off the respirator that's keeping you going?

The state will eventually find someone to fill these roles, after a potentially costly and time-consuming court hearing. But it might not be the person you would want. So at a time when you're most vulnerable, life-and-death decisions could be made for you by a stranger -- or an estranged, distant or greedy relative.

That's why you need the following documents:

  • A durable power of attorney for health care, which lets you identify who will make medical decisions for you. (This is also known as an advance directive or health care proxy.)

  • A durable power of attorney for finances, which designates who'll handle money decisions.

  • A living will, which tells doctors exactly what kind of care you do and don't want to receive if you're terminally ill and incapacitated. (Some states, including Kentucky, Minnesota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Carolina, Virginia and Wyoming, combine the living will and the durable power of attorney for health care in the same form.)

Fortunately, you can get these documents, plus a basic will, drawn up by an attorney for $300 to $500 in most areas. You can also buy software, such as Quicken WillMaker, for about $40 if you want to do the work yourself.

Video: Estate planning for new parents

Fight over removing the feeding tubes

The point is, just do it. Strokes and accidents don't happen just to other people.

If you need more convincing, consider the case of Robert Wendland, who was severely injured in a 1993 car crash at age 42, sparking a gut-wrenching court battle between his wife and his mother that ended up before the California Supreme Court.

Wendland was in a coma for 16 months before recovering what doctors called "minimal consciousness." He could catch a ball and play with infant toys but couldn't speak, eat, walk, recognize his family or comprehend a Saturday morning cartoon. Doctors said his condition was not terminal but would never improve.

Become a fan of MSN Money on Facebook

Wendland's wife, Rose, whom a court had appointed as his conservator, decided he wouldn't have wanted to live as he was and asked doctors to remove his feeding and hydration tubes. Wendland's mother, Florence, went to court to keep him alive. Eventually, California's top court sided with the mother -- a few weeks after Wendland died of pneumonia, after surviving on life support for eight years.

Although courts have allowed family members to disconnect life support from unconscious, terminally ill patients who didn't express their wishes clearly, the California justices were reluctant to set such a precedent for "minimally conscious" patients.

Continued: A right to direct your own medical care

 1 | 2 | 3 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 97
Thursday, July 16, 2009 6:58:14 AM
SadAfter dealing with the death of my sister,then my father and having to make these aforementioned decisions, I can agree just how devastating it can be.  Now years later I am second guessing my actions {although several family members agreed upon my asking their opinion}.  Nobody wanted to really narrow down the final decision and do what the dr. asked.  It is life altering. The worst thing you can do, but necessary.
Thursday, July 16, 2009 8:28:47 AM
My mom has been on me and my siblings to do this for years.  It really isn't fair to expect her to fight the state and do all of this messy stuff.  Nobody else would do it.  I sent the article on to my brothers and sister.   This morning.  Thanks Liz.  Great article.
Thursday, July 16, 2009 9:00:52 AM
Mechelle McNair listed herself and her two sons, Tyler and Trenton McNair, as the heirs to the estate. Steve McNair also has two other sons from a previous relationship.
Anyone know how old his other sons are?  I'm going to grab a seat, get some popcorn and watch this hot mess unfold in the courts.  All caused by McNair not having a will.  How many new spouses would protect their own kids and leave kids from previous relationships out in the cold?
Thursday, July 16, 2009 9:16:25 AM
I went to an attorney to do a will. After talking with me and looking at the list of assets thag I brought he said I would be better off to do a living trust and I did a living will to address the medical issue both for $ 500.00.  A couple of years later I got remarried and did an amendment to the living trust for $ 150.00 .  this elminates arguements and strangers deciding who gets what.
Thursday, July 16, 2009 10:18:04 AM
Excellent article. We have the durable power of attorney for health care and for finances, but didn't know we needed a living will as well. I will look into getting the living will set up ASAP. My husband and I are in agreement on how we want things handled, but there are close family members with very differing views on life support and how to spend money, so it's reassuring to know that if we are ever incapacitated, our wishes will be followed.
Thursday, July 16, 2009 10:22:52 AM
My husband and I went and had a living trust put together.  It includes ALL the documents mentioned as well as others.  It even tells our family how (buried or cremated) and where (ashes scattered or burial) we want to be taken care of once we pass away.  There's a big 3" binder full of paperwork, as well as instructions to our executor(s) and co-executor(s) on what is needed once we pass away.  They even get a free 3-hour meeting with our attorney to get assistance with anything in the binder.  We also have a page that gives us the option of naming certain items of ours and who we want them to be given to in the case of our passing; otherwise, our executor(s) have the option of what do to with our possessions.   It was well worth the money it cost for this to be done, believe me.   All our bank accounts, insurance policies, etc., are in the Trust's name, so nothing will be left to chance for those of our loved ones left behind.   It's great peace of mind!
Thursday, July 16, 2009 10:28:08 AM
It is time for me and my  husband have that talk and I'll include my mother too. We all need to participate and make sure things are clear between us before we put things on paper. This is a great article.
Thank you for sharing,
Thursday, July 16, 2009 10:58:11 AM

I think Mrs. McNair is WRONG.  I have a stepdaughter and i'm very lucky I guess that all of us are family.  It does not matter if they were not her children they were Steve's and they desire what is rightfully theirs.  I think the judge was wrong not to have add all children involved or fathered by Mr. McNair.  If I was the children's mother or the children are old enough I would be filing a suit with the State of Tennessee that part of the estate ours.  The estate should be divided into 5 parts.  His current spouse and 4 children.  I hope they all get their part of estate.

Thursday, July 16, 2009 11:27:42 AM
I usually like Lisa Pullmans' advice,  and agree that  theses are three documents that you should have, but this time she is missing the mark, Let me explain why.
Saying that "you don't need a will because the state has a plan for you" is irresponsible at best. Dying without a will is knows as Dying intestate, basically means without a will. Now, as a result of this, your estate goes into probate and the a Judge will determine who gets what of your estate and when. This process can take months or even years to decide, especially if the heirs are in dispute. Meanwhile, all the assets in the estate can be frozen and the heirs have no access to them.
She also says  that the state will distribute your estate "more or less efficiently" When does a bureaucracy like a state government ever do anything MORE efficiently? The answer, NEVER.
Her argument that "you'll be dead, why should you care " is lame and grossly irresponsible. This attitude is for some one who "doesn't care now", much less when they are dead. Anyone who has ever had to deal with the hassles, the pain and the inconvenience of someone else affairs, know what a burden it is.
She then criticizes herself and states that "you don't want a stranger making critical decisions for you" .  But what? it's OK for a stranger (the state) to make decisions about who gets your assets?
That said, a will does not necessarily solve all of these problems. For instance, a will can and does frequently go to probate. But every document that you have, a  will. POA, Advanced Directive, ect. is ONE more weapon in your arsonal to protect your estate.
Sorry Lisa, you missed the mark on this one. If you were in the estate planning business you would be a lawsuit waiting to happen.

Thursday, July 16, 2009 11:50:05 AM
A living trust and will are the way to go. I want to know that I won't be a vegetable lying in the hospital when I could just pass on my own. Having this be your "own" decision is the best way to deal with these situations and spouses need to know what each other would want. To have to put the burden on the other, only to second guess the decision, puts even more pressure and stress on the devastation that will come with the situation.
1 - 10 of 97
To add a comment, pleasesign in