Liz Pulliam Weston: Hidden retirement mistakes

The Basics

5 ways to wreck your retirement

So, you think you're prepared for retirement? You might be overlooking big traps. But smart moves now and after you quit work can keep you on solid ground.

By Liz Pulliam Weston
MSN Money

You probably know the more obvious ways to sabotage your retirement. Things like:

  • Cashing out your retirement funds when you leave a job.

  • Making poor investment choices (taking too little or too much risk).

But there are a lot of lesser-known ways to mess up your post-work years, either in the years leading up to your quit date or afterward.

You could:

1. Think only about the financial side

The lion's share of retirement advice is devoted to how to save and invest your retirement funds, with another whole substratum of counsel that focuses on withdrawal rates.

I've talked to hundreds of retirees over the years, though, and their message about what really matters is a bit different. Yes, money is important, particularly if you don't have enough. But equally vital are:

  • Good health.

  • Good relationships with family and friends.

  • Absorbing interests.

Ralph Warner, the author of "Get a Life: You Don't Need a Million to Retire Well," calls the focus on amassing money "hugely exaggerated and sadly incomplete." All the money in the world won't compensate you, he says, if in your rush to acquire it you damage your health, wreck your relationships and fail to develop passions, hobbies or volunteer work that connect you to life.

So, while you're saving, think about where you want to live in retirement, what you will do with your time and whom you want spend it with. If relationships with your loved ones are suffering, work on fixing them. If your health habits aren't the best, improve them. If most of your day is spent working, carve out time after hours or on weekends to explore new interests. Warner quotes Hermann Hesse: "Happiness is a how, a talent, not an object."

2. Fail to get a second opinion

Until recently, it was tough to get truly objective financial advice. Most of those who held themselves out as advisers -- often insurance salespeople and stockbrokers -- gave such conflicting advice that many people felt safer just handling their investments themselves.

The world has changed. There are now fee-only financial planners who specialize in providing nonconflicting advice by the hour. (Many are represented by the Garrett Planning Network; for other options, read "Don't panic; get a financial adviser.")

Fee-only planners are not exactly cheap -- figure $100 to $150 an hour, with several hours required for a retirement plan review -- but an investment in their time can help you learn if your retirement plans are viable and prevent you from making financially devastating mistakes: retiring too soon, spending too much, messing up your investments, tapping the wrong accounts or running afoul of Internal Revenue Service rules on withdrawals.

The problem is that it can be hard to convince a longtime do-it-yourselfer that he or she needs help or that it's possible to find someone to trust. It's worth making the effort, though. The decisions you make near retirement can have lifelong consequences and are often irreversible, so you'll want to make sure you get it right.

Continued: Spousal Social Security benefits

More from MSN Money

 1 | 2 | 3 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowHigh

Recent articles by Liz Pulliam Weston

Discuss personal finance with Liz on the Your Money message board.

22Comments
2/08/2011 5:38 PM
avatar
its a good idea to save for retirement, but its best to consult a financial planner who can guide you on the right path that suits your needs
1/08/2011 7:33 PM
avatar
Overall, good article; until it perpetuated the "financial advisor is just a salesman" myth.  It really irritates me when people state or imply that fee-based advisors are more o****ective or less expensive than commission-based ones. In the long run, advisors don’t profit by selling things; they profit by consistently operating in their clients’ best interest. A good advisor understands that if he doesn’t make a dime from a particular client at a given time, he has properly done his job if he has offered competent counsel. The rewards will come later as the result of loyalty, reputation, and the advisor’s own sense of self-respect. 

O****ectivity in the financial industry is the result of available options, not fees and consultation agreements. Independent advisors with little or no beholding to particular companies are free to recommend only the best solutions and get properly compensated for them. If a client is insistent that he cannot trust someone compensated solely by commissions, perhaps a fee-offset model is appropriate. This is a fee-based agreement where the consultation fees are reduced or eliminated based on commissions received. As the advisor already has the client’s money, there is no financial incentive to make an improper recommendation.

Concern yourself about what's in it for you; not what's in it for your advisor. If you can't place the same level of trust and respect in your financial advisor that you do your physician, then you have either the wrong attitude or the wrong advisor. One of them needs to change.

Rob Drury
Executive Director, 
Association of Christian Financial Advisors
www.christianfinancial.vpweb.com

11/27/2010 1:48 PM
avatar

First of all, SS will be around for a long time. Evenfor you angry folks in your 40"s. Just don't let the tea party take over. The payouts may drop slightly but it is solvent for many years.

If you don't have a defined benefit pension, lots of options r avail. Join Reserves or National Guard and stay in for 20yrs. I did; am now enjoying a $500/mo. pension and VA health benefits. Get a  government or teamster job. Be an overpaid teacher and travel the world on your fantastic pension. 

Lastly , don't live on all your income while working. Save your A-- off. Hell , I have a 30' boat with all its annual costs, a new Chev. Malibu, a decent modest home and live on 40K quite nicely. and you might surprise yourself how good life can be.Watch how you spend

11/04/2010 11:25 AM
avatar

Having read ALL 20 comments, I noticed that almost every one is about MONEY -- I think the best part of this article was the quote from Ralph Warner who wrote -- Get A Life: You Don't Need a Million to Retire . . .

He writes that the focus on amassing money is hugely exaggerated and sadly incomplete.  He adds that all the money in the world won't matter if in your rush to acquire it you damage your health or your relationships . . .

My husband and I are in our 8th year of retirement -- family and friendships are what we find important in day-to-day living.  As Susie Orman once said . . .All you NEED is food in your belly, clothes on your back and a roof over your head -- everything else is "wants"

So think hard about what you truly need when you retire --  yes you need money to pay the bills, but as we age, time spent with family and friends becomes so important.  For the first few years of our retirement we did travel, then health problems curbed our desire to be away from home.  We enjoy our family gatherings and daily events in our community keep us busy.  Volunteering also makes our days "special" . . . After all, retirement only lasts a set number of years . . . If you're a believer you know eternity lasts a lot longer than your retirement years!

10/27/2010 6:22 PM
avatar

Its interesting to me how a lot of the comments sections of these MSN money articles end up being debates about social security and the Govt's mismanagement of it. I think that if you're below say, 46 years old ( the youngest boomers by most measures ) There will be almost NOTHING left when you're 62. (if I'm wrong, great, you have more money) This brings the obvious questions from Gen X'ers like me, "Should I be paying into it at all?" Its important to realize that although its "my money" if I'm consistently paying into the system, its also mandatory...I don't get a choice. So if there's nothing left for me when I get to 62 years old in 2034, would I be a selfish jerk If I took my bank account, all my assets, and my military pension to some foreign country where I can live well? After all, Its not like the government would try to make it up to me by letting me live the rest of my life federal tax free...any thoughts?  

10/27/2010 5:06 PM
avatar

uvuvuv said,

 

[If I had a savings program of CDs] with an average cd rate of 4.5% over the last 40 years, with my starting to draw on my savings at 62 (1200 per month) my money would last 18 years. 

 

What you'd need to have (present value) that payout for 18 years: integral of 14400*e^-.045*t, from 0 to 18=$177,645.

 

How much would this require saving per year at 4.5% for 40 years? solve this integral for x:

 

integral of x*e^-.045*t, from 0 to 40=177645 . . . and  x (annual amount to save each of 40 years) = $9,577.11

 

Actual interest and investment will be periodic and not continuous as these integration calcs show, so the actual amounts to save are a few dollars less each year.

 

 

 

 

10/27/2010 11:34 AM
avatar
The best way to insure you never have enough to retire is to be forced into the farce called 401K, the 401K was originated to extract money from the poor to make the already rich richer while allowing Corporate America to abandon it's financial obligations to it's workforce so they can also get richer, a typical American scheme to keep all the nations wealth headed up to the wealthiest 2%, also a typical American financial scheme that requires the working man to take up the a$$ as usual, God Bless America.
10/23/2010 6:24 AM
avatar
The first is to pass away unexpectedly.
10/21/2010 11:43 AM
avatar
What is your opinion or the consensus on reverse mortgages?
10/20/2010 4:02 PM
avatar
Take the money at 62-invest it.  Later, for example at age 70, you can repay the total amount of income you have received (no interest) and start drawing the higher income available at age 70. If you die or your health is bad taking  income at 62 was smart.  If you expect to live a long life and are healthy you can get the higher income. Compare the amount of your income at age 70  from social security with an annuity purchased with the money you have to repay SS.  In any event you have the interest earned on SS income from 62 to 70.
10/20/2010 11:53 AM
avatar

Steaming Pile, Just show me where to sign. Give me a refund of everything I have "invested" into the government corruption filled entitlement programs, with interest, and I'll never come looking to be included in the "benefits" they claim to provide. I am 100% sure that I can invest my money wiser than the government does and I am 100% sure that I act far more efficiently than the government.

 

Just look at Obama's stimulus. He claims 2-3 million jobs on his $1 TRILLION dollar stimulus. Even if you believe those numbers which are obviously at the high end of the estimates depending on what "expert" you listen to, that means the government spent AT LEAST $333,333.33 to save 1 job. Unfortunately the jobs they saved were policemen, firemen, teachers, construction, etc. Those jobs have an average salary of less than $50,000. Where did the other $283,333.33 go? I could have provided $50,000 checks to 12-18 million people and have at least $100 BILLION leftover. The government is a waste pit.

10/20/2010 10:12 AM
avatar
Ok, uvuvuv.  You think you can do better than Social Security by saving the money yourself?  Fine.  But you have to shoot yourself in the head on your 80th birthday (or sooner if you run out of money), and you have to pay for your own health insurance.  You want out.  You get ALL the way out.
10/18/2010 4:14 PM
avatar

Here's a few other pieces of advice for happiness in your old age from 'ol Dude:

1.  Along the way, if it flys, floats or fuxx, rent don't buy.

2.  Wait until you're plenty old enough to stick with one toot before getting married. 

3.  Pick one you're sure you can live with for a lifetime.  Slender,  healthy and sane.  From a lineage that doesn't pork up.  It's the body; forget the face.

3.  Make sure she's from a lineage that stays married.

4.  Marry above yourself.  Well educated.  Wealthy, nice family.  

5.  If you are at all religious (I'm an agnostic),  don't tithe.

In fact, don't ever lend or give money... period!

6.  Hide as much as you can.  From everybody; particularly Uncle Sam.  Keep some cash in a secret bank strongbox.

7.  Buy one none-to-ostentatious​ house and pay it off quickly.  Paying unnecessary property tax is stupid.   

8.  Don't put up with anybody's substance abuses.  Spouse, children... nobody! If they over embibe; they hit the road.  There's no "cure".

9.  Early on, inform the family that there will be no money for bails, lawyers and lawsuits... and mean it!  I did. 

10.  Stay out of debt.  Pay off that plastic completely each month, automatically from a checking account.  If your best tax option is to annually file using the standard deduction; you've arrived.  Stay there. 

 

10/18/2010 3:08 PM
avatar
Presently 67 years old.  I took SS at age 62 and will not withdraw from my tax deferred retirement plan until the beginning of 2011.  Any comments?  Was this wise or should I have begun to withdraw $18,000/yr from my plan and defer SS benefits until 70.
10/18/2010 11:22 AM
avatar
I am a Financial Planner and we get the "Do I take it early" question all the time. The simple answer is "It Depends!!" Yes, you will get a larger benefit if you wait, however each individual needs to crunch the numbers and find the break even point. It may take you 8-12 years to break even by taking SS later. The biggest question of all if "When are you going to Die" If you have health problems or a family history of passing away at a young age, you may want to take SS asap. If you think you can outlive the mortality and morbidity tables then wait. Different for each individual
10/18/2010 10:23 AM
avatar
what id really like to know is what planet  this writer is living on
10/18/2010 10:21 AM
avatar

uvuvuv

where the hell are you getting a cd rate of 4.5%

10/18/2010 9:15 AM
avatar

fragile flame

i wouldnt be to fast to point out the boomers as old hippies looking for social security

if you know a bit more about ssi youd realize that the bottom line is 'ITS OUR FREAKIN MONEY' and from a personal point of view, I WANT MY MONEY BACK plus i want it back with the interest it would have gained in the year it was stolen from me i/e the money they took in 1975 i want it back with the interest it would have gained if it had been deposited in a savings account paying avg 1975 interest and every year going on paying the national avg interest rate

never forget 'its our money' the govt stole and now try to mollify us with these paltry payments and if the govt screwed up handling our money they should not be allowed to handle that money

10/18/2010 7:01 AM
avatar
lilbear68, I agree.  It take seven years to make up the funds  lost from not taking Social Security early.  And I don't know where T. Rowe Price get their amortization rates but it seems like the same place that calculates reverse mortgages.  The figures could be 50% higher depending on your investment returns which should definitely be low risk.  The most important test for retirement is not paying for someone's opinion but actually trying retirement for a month before you retire.  Save a month of vacation (minimum) and then live on the funds you would have in retirement.  For me it was a 43 day strike that showed I was way too concerned.  For others, social problems caused by staying at home all day have proven to be a show stopper.  Try before you buy.
10/18/2010 4:23 AM
avatar

Reality Facing Boomers Retiring -   Turning  things around would be nice. 

 Massive Sit In .. The Washington Mall, would  bring media attention.

   ~  Old Hippies Looking for Social Security Reform ~

 

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of ConductPlease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
Additional comments(optional)
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
viewCounter