Financial planning: Make your money last in retirement © Tom Grill/Corbis

The Basics

Make your money last in retirement

People are living longer and saving less, leaving many in a financial bind in their later years. Here are some ways you can stretch your retirement dollars.

By Forbes.com

If you're like many people, you've put considerable time and effort into socking away money for retirement. But you've probably put less thought into how to spend the money in a way that will make it last, leaving you with a potential disaster.

A perfect storm has foisted this challenge on us. People are living longer. Fewer people have pensions and the 401k plans that more have come to rely on likely were decimated n the recent downturn. Further, assets in savings accounts may actually be losing value, thanks to short-term interest rates that are lower than the inflation rate. And the future of Social Security seems iffy.

There are steps you can take to make your money last. Spending less and working longer will help, of course. But even then you can't know how long you're going to live. All you have are the odds: For a married couple at age 65, there's a 58% chance one person will live to 90; a 50% chance one will live to 92; and a 25% chance one will live to 97.

William Wixon, the owner of Wixon Advisors, tells his Minnesota clients to plan for a retirement of 30 to 35 years. How can they make their money last that long, or longer? Let's say you're 65 years old, you want to retire now, and you expect to need $100,000 annual income in retirement. You'll need to adjust that $100,000 to rise with inflation because, as Wixon says, "What's a loaf of bread going to cost in 30 years? Maybe nine bucks." Here are some options for you, with pros and cons.

Savings accounts

If you have a Depression-era mentality, put your nest egg in savings accounts and certificates of deposit with no more than the FDIC-insured limit of $250,000 in any one bank. It's safe and will be there for you no matter what the markets do.

Unfortunately, inflation may erode the value of such low-risk investments over time after inflation, and they are unlikely to generate much income. If you have a pot of money for getting you through your golden years, the most you should withdraw annually over a 30-year period is 5% (some people say 4%).

With current savings interest rates of around 2%, you would need to start with $5 million to generate $100,000 a year in income. And that doesn't even account for inflation pressures on your annual withdrawal, as the buying power of your $100,000 decreases.

A balanced portfolio

If you don't happen to have $5 million lying around, you'll need to accept more risk to have any chance of generating that $100,000 a year you desire. One alternative is to put money in a diversified portfolio of stocks, bonds and real estate that pays dividends. If you start with $3 million and the market performs as it has over the past 70 years, you should be in good shape. But if the market lags or companies cut their dividends, your money might not last.

A recent white paper from Vanguard Group discusses making systematic, fixed, inflation-adjusted withdrawals from a balanced mutual fund of stocks and bonds. Adjusting your withdrawals based on the inflation rate might reduce the risk that you'll run out of money, but it won't eliminate it entirely.

Immediate annuities

With an immediate annuity, you put money in an insurance contract that usually pays a fixed rate of return (much like a certificate of deposit) and start receiving those payments within a year. How much income your lump sum will generate depends largely on how much you invest, your gender and age at the time you buy the annuity, and the prevailing interest rate environment (currently unfavorable to annuity buyers). A 65-year-old woman living in Illinois would need to plunk down about $1.5 million to generate $100,000 in inflation-adjusted annual payments for life.

It pays to comparison-shop for immediate annuities, especially among low-cost vendors like Vanguard and TIAA-CREF. Also consider tailoring the annuity to your needs --by arranging for payments to continue until both spouses pass away, for example.

One downside is that an immediate annuity ties up your money, so you won't have access to it in an emergency or to pass on as an inheritance if you get hit by a bus the day after you buy it. It also locks you into the interest-rate environment at the time of purchase. You can get around this by buying separate annuities in chunks over several years. To lock in real, after-inflation income, opt for an inflation-adjustment rider, but understand that it will cut into how much you'll receive each month.

Continued: Deferred annuities

More from MSN Money and Forbes.com

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowHigh
Forbes.com on MSN Money
26Comments
8/24/2011 4:37 PM
avatar
It's easy.  Round up Alan Greenspan, Larry Summers, top execs at Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Citi, AIG, and BAC, throw them in jail, take all their money away, ban trading in any type of derivatives, and you will have plenty to retire on.
1/09/2011 2:49 PM
avatar

To all the commenters complaining that it's stupid to use $100k, it's not for us 30 year olds reading it thanks to inflation.  That's about right or low for those of us that are still saving for retirement 20 or 30 years from now since we won't have social security or a pentions, and a have huge national debt because of the baby boomers borrowing/stealing my generations wages. 

12/03/2010 11:36 AM
avatar
what a crock, what elistism and what lack of sensitivity.  Few are the privileged that will retire with half a million, fewer still are those that will retire with a million and above.  Who is the audience for this article?  Ten people?  $100,000...a year  Based on needing 70% of pre-retirement income in order to retire, this means making about $140,000 a year.  How many Americans make that much and even at that...able to save $1000000 fir retirement--other than a few who inherited money, no one in my group (all college graduates, civic minded and hardworking all their lives).
12/03/2010 11:05 AM
avatar
I agree with most commentators - The figures used in this article are not realistic for most readers and if the figures stated reflect your situation then you most likely are not reading this article or at least really don't need to read the article.  The author is way out of touch with normal everyday average Americans.  I am surprised Forbes published this article.  Bottom line - the article is useless for the vast majority of readers and somewhat insulting to the very same readers.
12/03/2010 10:59 AM
avatar
What an assinine article!  In what world does the author live?  Where does the average person find enough money to have a nest egg of $100,000 a year?  I am already retired.  Having lost more than 40% of my retirement funds in 2007/2008 we now live happily on about $28,000.00 a year.  And, we are still paying a mortgage!!!  And, we still eat out at least once a week.  Next time you run an article such as this make sure you mention you are targeting millionaires so the rest of us don't waste our time reading it for advice!
12/03/2010 5:12 AM
avatar
This is a ridiculous article. If one has the mortgage paid off and no debts, one needs no more than about 20,000 a year now in living expenses which may increase to about 35,000 a year in 20 or so years. Requiring 100,000 a year in retirement is absurd unless one has lots of debt and mortgages. This author is totally unrealistic and out of touch with reality.  
11/28/2010 12:11 PM
avatar

Is this article telling us that we need 100K to live in retirement?  That is way too high a number and thus the rest of this article becomes useless too.  I don't see too many people being able to generate that kind of income.  What it basically says is that to have any sort of chance to retire in peace you would have to be a multimillionaire.  Please!!!!!!

11/23/2010 10:06 PM
avatar

Whomever wrote this article has no idea of what the average wage earner makes....retire on a $100,000 a year, get real

11/23/2010 11:28 AM
avatar

This article is deceptive and is designed to benefit those who sell financial products.

It compares an immediate annuity to savings accounts where you don't touch the principal. Since you don't recover your initial investment with an annuity, the more appropriate comparison would be savings accounts where you reduce your principal to zero and an immediate annuity. Assuming that you need that 100k per year (which you don't) that 1.5 million would last more than 20 years in a savings account even if rates stay as low as they are now for the next 20 years (which pretty much noone thinks they will).

An article that was really trying to be helpful would give apples to apples comparisons.

11/22/2010 5:25 PM
avatar
Striving to generate $100K income while keeping principal intact is beyond wishful thinking.  My husband and I  had multiple jobs in Chicago, and prices continually went up to the point that we were spending every dime that we made!  So we sold our place, moved to South Texas, bought a beautiful place for a song and can easily live without financial pressure on investment income plus Soc. Sec. totalling around $30k.  To give an idea, our monthly assessment here is $100; in Chicago it had gone from $200/month to just a few dollars under $1,000 in ten years!      The weather is gorgeous, neighbors are lovely and time flies by every month.  we are in constant contact with loved ones by phone and emails and have stopped chasing the almighty dollar.  It can be done.  Guess it just takes a sense of adventure, which we have.
11/21/2010 6:36 PM
avatar
i recently showed my parents a way to reserve their post-retirement funds...prepaid cell phones. They are using the senior value cellphone from TracFone and it is perfect for them.. inexpensive, displays usage right when you flip the phone open and easy to keep in touch with the family!
11/17/2010 2:46 PM
avatar
AMEN, to all those that thought this article to be out of touch with most people planning to retire.  It was unrealistic and not useful!  Try some tips for real people, not just the wealthy!
11/16/2010 2:44 PM
avatar

What planet does this man live on?

My husband and I have worked our whole lives and will be lucky to retire with $100,00 period, not per year.

 

Guess I'll be sharing my cat's food by the time I hit 70.  Geeze, MSN Money - who do you think you are talking to??  Anyone who can put away $5 mil has no reason to read your advice.

11/14/2010 1:05 PM
avatar

mardq

 

According to payroll tax records, only 6% of Americans hit the payroll tax cap (that's $106K per year this year).

 

Here are some stats for AVERAGE income in certain protected professions (those with their lobbyists - aka unions that are not called a union):

 

Lawyers (state Bar Associations): $140K (that's staff BEFORE bonuses, partners make more than $400K)

Doctor (AMA): $170K (that's your family doctor, specialists make more than $230K)

Dentist (ADA): $180K

CEO (Chambers of Commerce): $200K (this survey includes a lot of small businesses)

 

And, these numbers are NOT from the coastal cities. And, these numbers do NOT include business, rental or investment income.

 

These groups collectively spent hundreds of miliions during the mid-term elections through clandestine organizations approved by the GOP SCOTUS.

 

Be careful of what you vote for because you will get it. The U.S. is now one of the most top-heavy nations on the planet.

 

11/13/2010 10:36 PM
avatar
Simply put, whoever wrote this article is an ****.
11/12/2010 1:11 PM
avatar
yeah right, 5 mil, 3 mil, 1 mill.  breaking news: there are way more of us out here who don't have than those that do have. Push come to shove, the dont's might possibly just take it from the do's when they get hungry enough. much better if we work towards trying to get more in the middle than day dreaming about winning the lottery or retiring with x mil in investement. hello do's, make jobs now. hello dont's, make yourself more hireable. and everybody save more spend less. nothing changes
11/12/2010 10:53 AM
avatar

Ridiculous!  What percentage of the U.S. population even makes six figures?  3-4%?  How about writing something useful for real people for a change?  Like, how are we going to survive when the Republicans have managed to turn Social Security over to Wall Street so they can charge big fees and effectively gamble it away from the working class?

11/11/2010 5:30 PM
avatar

You can receive 30 annual payouts of $100K if you put on account (present value) $2,255,940 at 2%.

 

That burns the principal, too, for those of us who believe it's best to "Live Rich, Die Poor."

11/11/2010 4:21 PM
avatar

With current savings interest rates of around 2%, you would need to start with $5 million to generate $100,000 a year in income. And that doesn't even account for inflation pressures on your annual withdrawal, as the buying power of your $100,000 decreases.

Yo MSN...........time to get someone that can use a calculator!

 

5 million divided by 30 years WITH NO INTEREST AT ALL is

166,666.00 per year..........numb nuts!

 

WHAT YOU MEANT TO SAY IS: YOU WILL NEED 5 MILLION TO GENERATE 100,000.00 PER YEAR IN INTEREST ...........SO THAT YOU CAN LIVE A FAR MORE AUSTERE LIFE THAN IS POSSIBLE JUST SO YOU CAN LEAVE THE ORIGINAL 5 MILLION TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND A SMALL CHUNK TO YOUR HEIRS!

11/11/2010 3:02 PM
avatar

What if having a cool million and/or an income stream of 100K isn't really, when you sober up and get real, going to happen for you?

 

Take another look at what it would require to have a 25K income stream.  You might find it would actually be doable in your real world . . . and very, very surprised at what a great life it can make possible.

 

Pie in the forbes.com sky may not be fattening. But then again, it's not actually available to a great many ordinary folks.

Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of ConductPlease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
Additional comments(optional)
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
viewCounter