Top Stocks blog home page

Wall Street bonuses to rise 40%

Analysts thought 2009 would be a good year for bankers, but it turns out it will be great

Posted by 247 wallst on Thursday, November 5, 2009 7:05 AM

CEO © Roy McMahon/CorbisThere has been plenty of evidence that firms like Goldman Sachs (GS) have had such huge profits that their bonus payouts may be at all-time highs.

 

The federal government has systematically begun to control bank pay packages. The Treasury “pay czar” is effectively controlling compensation at companies which still owe TARP money. The Fed is pressuring other large financial firms to tie pay to risk.

 

None of those efforts seems to be working well, because bankers are ignoring the signals from Washington.


A new compensation survey described in The Wall Street Journal predicts that Wall Street incentive pay will rise 40% this year. For those in the fixed-income part of the industry, the increase could be closer to 60%.

 

Data about pay packages will be available, in some cases, as banks release their proxies. It is safe to say that the study and other data from Wall Street show that being a financier was very rewarding this year.

 

What is not so clear is whether there will be a “clash of the titans” of sorts between the CEOs of Wall Street's biggest firms and Congress?


Many in Congress have taken the stance that the financial community is entirely at fault for the collapse of the credit markets. These politicians argue that greed was the key ingredient that caused bankers to take unnecessary risks.

 

Wall Street executives will rely on three arguments to counter Congress. The first is that only a small number of bankers were responsible for the trouble in the mortgage-backed and leveraged deal markets. Why should all of of the other bright bankers on Wall St. be punished?


The second argument is heard over and over again. Underpaid banking stars will leave for private equity firms and hedge funds leaving the largest banks on Wall Street stripped of their best talent.

 

The last argument the big banks will make for controlling their own pay is the most compelling. The SEC has set up governance rules that force boards to be responsible for how senior management is paid and to set the tone for the compensation of other executives. Why is Congress able to usurp the rights of sovereign boards elected by independent shareholders?

 

Top Stocks writer Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 24/7 Wall St.

 

Related stories:

 

Top 500 companies

 

Financial TV

 

Biotech stocks


Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 12 of 12
Saturday, November 07, 2009 3:23:03 PM
Bonuses reflect how well management thinks of their decision choices. Bonuses reward or punish how well institutional morality is obeyed. Despite what people think about the bonuses, what we should do is take them as internal communication about what banking institutions think of themselves in terms of recent performance including the procurement of massive government bailouts.
Saturday, November 07, 2009 5:27:48 AM
Independent shareholders?  Has this writer never seen a publicly traded company?  Most are proxies, and even if the voting goes heavily AGAINST a board member, they may be unseated but they'll move into another position that doesn't require election. 

Without the board turning on others, nobody can be removed, and they only have to deal with any flack once a year over it.  Just like customers, it can be assumed that shareholders are stupid and won't remember anything for more than six weeks or so.
Thursday, November 05, 2009 2:48:08 PM
In some ways maybe we should feel a little remorse for these poor banking employees, after all the entire bunch of them had to squeak by last year on a mere three quarters of a million dollars. That's enough to sadden anybody. Of course they had to cough up 10% into the "Get Rid Of Obama", fund effort!
Thursday, November 05, 2009 2:42:11 PM
Money changers never change, do you not remember Christ condemned then to hell for a this very reason! All of them.
Thursday, November 05, 2009 2:18:43 PM
Stevep1984, Wallstreet firms used to pay commissions....over the past 15 years commissions were eliminated in favor of "Bonuses" because it allowed the firms to reduce the percentage paid to employees.  So the term "Bonus" is totally misused.  Furthermore most people working for wallstreet firms do not get a Salary or the salary they get is small....meaning they depend on the year end compensation to be their actual salary.

Lease4....Unemployment is running at 10% max....maybe you didn't pay attention to your math teacher when you were in grade school.  "Most" would imply 50% or more.  The media has made this into their very own disaster scenario...puts more butts in the seats and sells more papers or gets more AD revenue.  While this recession has been difficult for many we are still thriving as a country.  Don't forget that the newspapers and news stations are just as greedy as anyone else in society (maybe more!)  A big news story gets them a lot of eyeballs.

There's no doubt that certain people did illegal things but does that mean your whole company should go down?  Ask the people at Arther Andersen or Enron if they were lazy people that never worked.  There was a handful of people that were cheating the system.  And for that tens of thousands of people lost their livelihood having to find new employment.  Not to mention it washed out everyone's retirement account.

Tinman....funny every place I have ever worked at the people talking always thought they were the most important.  It's a basic human emotion...we all think were the most important and the most indispensable.  The truth is it takes thousands of people to build great companies some are more valuable than others.

Ford & Squeaky...go to the government website and check out the status of the Bank bailout.  The are only a few firms than have not paid back the TARP money they were granted.  Goldman, Morgan Stanley, JP Morgan have paid it all back and furthermore the firms that have paid the money have paid back including interest plus warrants (like stock options) that will net the US government billions of free cash (since they borrowed the money at 0% interest from the fed to lend it to the banks).

And for those of you that can't see the other rather "large" benefit from Wallstreet bonuses....consider this.  Bonuses are considered income and therefore almost impossible to hide which means they are taxed to the fullest.  This means that as most of these people are high income earners they are in the highest tax bracket which means nearly 50% of those bonuses will end up as US and State government revenue. 

You will never hear this version of the story because it wouldn't sell very well on TV.  What sells is to say everyone's misfortune is caused by a couple of fat cats on Wallstreet.  The truth is millions of people overspent on homes, cars and other things overextending their credit to the max.  Admittedly the banks should have been checking the people they gave credit to but shouldn't all the people that bought too much "home" be at fault too?  I know we've become a society that no longer takes responsibility for anything but come on!!!!

Thursday, November 05, 2009 2:00:28 PM

Unfortunately, they really don't care what you or I think or anyone else for that matter. They have no qualms about usurping funds, awarding themselves huge bonuses and they are laughing all the way; (if you'll excuse the pun) to the bank!

It's high time we held them accountable and put them in jail with Bernie Madof.

Thursday, November 05, 2009 1:54:20 PM
Bonuses? How dare they. Give the bail out money back you crooks!
Thursday, November 05, 2009 11:12:23 AM

Wow, are these the same people who pushed the "too big to fail" banks right to the brink?  Or the ones who gouged us taxpayers for BILLIONS of dollars of federal bailout money and still haven't paid it back?  Or the ones who are approving predatory credit card lending strategies, "maintenance fees" on zero-interest accounts, and punitive fees against people who pay their bills on time and pay off their balance in full... because the bank is "just too broke" to keep providing necessary banking services?

 

What's next: are they going to have a contest to see who can come up with the biggest Ponzi scheme, the most extensive insider trade network, or the biggest con-job (excuse me, I should have said "hedge strategy") to create gigantic profits for a few insiders at the expense of the majority of their customers?

 

Oh, wait, the evidence suggests they're doing just that!

 

Fire your bank... all praises to my credit union.

 

Thursday, November 05, 2009 10:57:07 AM
There are so many categories of business that need a complete overhaul. Mostly banks, the workers as a whole do a good job but the management are their just for the benefits performance or not. Another entity is the U.S Post office, worked there for a few years & to say the least management & union are a complete failure if you work there don't try to improve the system as they say (rock the boat). It is not any wonder they are always in the deficit. They gave UPS & Fedex a gold mine through just mismanagement of parcel post. As you may observe our beautiful congress does a poor job also, as it stands now the two parties are failing to see the light & are failing to get the job done. All the present programs that they have & are anticipating are a complete failure. I hope that in the next election the people can see this & vote accordingly another words get the (AH's) out & hope for some form of sanity, there is just too much corruption in our government (Greed).  
Thursday, November 05, 2009 10:20:25 AM

Every place I have ever worked, including the Military, the people near the bottom of the chain have the knowledge and expertise to get the job done, not the so call "Managers".

#11
Thursday, November 05, 2009 9:54:10 AM
I find it disappointing that when the majority of our people are either unemployed or, agreeing to furloughs, wage and benefit cuts just to stay employed that there are companies that would reward marginal performance with a bonus. Do these people live in such an isolated place that they cannot recognize the absolute arrogance of their actions?
Thursday, November 05, 2009 9:31:41 AM
Salaries could and should be tied to performance, but are these guys really worth that much?  Tie their wages to long term stock values rather than screwing the shareholders.
1 - 12 of 12
To add a comment, pleasesign in
Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.

MSN Money Video

Search for videos about a specific company.

Top Gainers
Symbol%Change
SHZ+33.32%
ACLI+24.81%
NBG+24.56%
Top Losers
SymbolChange
TRID-17.13%
CONN-17.04%
TMRK-16.30%
View all lists and trends