Dow+17.46up+0.17%
10,023.42
Nasdaq+7.12up+0.34%
2,112.44
S&P+2.67up+0.25%
1,069.30

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player. Click here to download.
More video on MSN Money . . .
Jon Markman

SuperModels6/11/2009 12:01 AM ET

Fall of Chrysler, GM saved the day

The outcome of the 2 automakers' bankruptcies has astonished investors, thawed corporate credit markets and sparked 'euphoric buying.'

By Jon Markman
MSN Money

The credit gods last year were angry and lusting for blood. They wanted a live sacrifice but were not satisfied with the painful, public deaths of Bear Stearns, Lehman Bros. (LEHMQ, news, msgs) and Washington Mutual.

They demanded more, and for a while in February it looked like they wanted no less than the entire financial system to burn as punishment for all the hubris and crimes of leverage that lenders and borrowers had committed for a decade.

Instead, the U.S. government threw itself in front of the banks and tossed two industrial companies into the line of fire: Chrysler and General Motors (GMGMQ, news, msgs). And that appears to have done the trick, because by all appearances the great credit crisis of 2007-08 ended with the two carmakers' bankruptcies and is now on the path toward a real recovery. We're not talking just "green shoots" here but flowers and trees.

The automakers' bankruptcies are major milestones in the recovery of the markets for a very strange reason, according to credit analysts. Investors had come to expect that Chrysler debt holders would lose their legal rights at the front of the line and be annihilated in a prepackaged bankruptcy -- humiliated, ground into meatballs and fed to sharks -- and instead, in a shocking development, they were treated with a respect almost amounting to decency.

That led to a thaw in the corporate credit markets, to the surprise of virtually everyone involved, and snowballed into what one veteran called "euphoric buying" two months ago. That was only accentuated when details of General Motors' bankruptcy began taking shape in late May.

Did Chrysler bondholders kill the bear?

Most investors had come to believe that the government was trying to steal what belonged to the debt holders and give it to the United Auto Workers. Credit markets believed the union and bondholders should be treated roughly equally, but the government wanted to give the union 39% of GM and the bondholders 10%.

As it turned out, institutional bondholders agreed to a deal in which the union got 17% of the company plus debt while the bondholders got 10% of the company with warrants for 15% more -- and the secured lenders were paid 100%. That was the way that credit market believed it should be, and then the bond guys really began to buy distressed debt, helping companies recover in a truly fundamental way that has provided the foundation for the equity rally.

Veteran analyst Brian Reynolds has observed that by facing down the government and defending the rule of law, in short, Chrysler and GM debt holders deserve a medal from fans of capitalism and possibly even credit for ending the bear market.

Don't believe it? Well, it's hard for people focused on equity markets to get good visibility on the debt markets due to their opacity, but veterans say they have never seen a credit rally of such magnitude and speed. It's almost as if the stock market had already gone back to the 1,200 level of the S&P 500 Index ($INX), instead of the 940 level, where it is now.

A good way to see the recent change is through the price of insuring bonds through credit default swaps. Without going into the gory details of how they work, consider that to insure a distressed company in difficult times in the credit-default-swap market, you must pay 1,000 basis points, or 10 percentage points, over what you would pay to insure U.S. Treasurys. When credit investors think a company won't make it past the end of the week, you need to pay 2,000 basis points. If they think a company won't make it past sundown, the cost goes to 3,000.

Video on MSN Money

What's ahead for corporate credit © MedioImages/Corbis
What's ahead for corporate credit
Greg Peters, Morgan Stanley's global head of fixed-income research, expects a multiyear cycle with several years of outperformance on the horizon.

In early April, according to Reynolds, the credit default swaps of insurer Lincoln National (LNC, news, msgs) traded at more than 3,000 basis points. The markets were saying they thought Lincoln had virtually no chance of survival. But since the Chrysler and GM bankruptcy resolutions goosed the credit markets, the Lincoln credit default swaps shot all the way back down to 400, reversing all the pain that had been embedded since early 2008.

Reynolds says it's important to realize that there was no pause or retracement in the credit derivatives, no investors staring at their feet and grumbling that it was a bear market rally. The pros just took the value all the way back to where they believed it should be if the rights of bondholders were enforced and the bear market were a thing of the past.

Continued: Waiting for stocks to catch up

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 1 of 1
Thursday, July 30, 2009 8:26:20 AM
The latest from JM is his attempt to carry on the work of Jim Jubak...
and puts last Summers RE debacle into an economic perspective. As Jubak was explaining to U.S. that we are, now, firmly in bed with China.
 
{Y}our elephant cannot rollover and kill their elephant..., nor theirs ours - without badly hurting each other. What we COULD do, however, is to both roll over and kill everyone.
 
What we saw last Summer was China stopping their purchases of FMae&FMac RE securities, and that was when F&F were the only ones still making RE purchase loans. When the "securitization" bubble burst, F&F went from below 50% of the RE lending market to over 85%..., bcuz they were, now, the ONLY major RE lender still IN the RE mortgage game.
 
And, since the economy WAS based on the RE market, IF China stopped buying RE securities, which they did by switching their cash over into TBills, FMae&FMac had NO money to lend.  And, with NO money available, from anybody, for RE transactions, there WERE going to be NO buyers - without cash, and therefore NO sellers.  And, with all the foreclosures, if those lenders were not willing to "hold their own (substitute) paper", even THOSE homes could not be re-sold.
 
Which was why the W admin announced that they would take over FMae&FMac. AND in Sept that they would use the US$ 50 Billion a month that China shifted from RE securities to TBills, to buy US$ 50 Billion each month and shift the money back.
 
Prior to the Presidential election they simply COULD not permit the total collapse of ALL real estate lending.
 
Sadly, they did not even start shifting the RE money until Feb of this year. And, we all got to see the Unemployment claims explode in October, days before the November election. But, not made public until AFTER the election.
1 - 1 of 1
To add a comment, pleasesign in