Dow-17.24down-0.17%
10,433.71
Nasdaq-6.83down-0.31%
2,169.18
S&P-0.59down-0.05%
1,105.65
Jon Markman

SuperModels4/3/2008 12:01 AM ET

Stocks' wild ride isn't over

Even if the markets have touched bottom, there's still plenty that could go wrong. So don't unfasten your seat belt just yet.

By Jon Markman

Big investors and government officials have pulled out all the stops in recent weeks to make it look like equity markets, and possibly the U.S. economy, hit rock bottom in early March in sync with the crash and sale of Bear Stearns (BSC, news, msgs).

Yet new evidence suggests that credit markets, where most of the world's businesses are financed, have hardly improved a bit in the past month and threaten to drag corporate earnings and stocks back into the hole from which they appear to be emerging.

If that's confusing, considering Tuesday's 391-point pop in the market, imagine the climactic scene in a horror movie in which the hero fights to wriggle out of quicksand, yet every time he makes a few inches of progress he's yanked back in by hidden forces.

What makes a happy getaway for stocks so plausible is that it has come at an ideal time in the market cycle. Investor sentiment readings by mid-March had fallen to extreme lows, prices and valuations of favorite stocks were at multiyear nadirs, short sellers had become fearless, and, by every account, a mountain of cash had accumulated on the sidelines.

Moreover, the Bush administration had shockingly stepped away from its long-standing effort to keep its mitts off Wall Street by announcing a plan to rein in bank and brokerage meanies with sweeping new rules.

In other words, everything looked perfect for a massive rebound, as savvy hedge fund traders -- flush with money from their successful efforts to push the market down over the past few months -- could take advantage of an obviously sour mood. You could smell a short squeeze coming a mile away, and that's why I recommended a bullish stance amid the pall last week.

Give traders credit: Their effort to prey on late-coming, mom-and-pop short sellers and force them to cover their bearish bets at higher prices in the past few days has proved effective so far.

R.I.P. Pollyanna

But don't let all the drama fool you into thinking the bear market is over and real-money value buyers are grabbing cheap stocks.

There are still plenty of things that can and will go wrong. And unlike earlier this week, when bad news from financial goliaths UBS AG (UBS, news, msgs), Deutsche Bank (DB, news, msgs) and Lehman Bros. (LEH, news, msgs) was treated as good news, next time the reaction to bad news won't be naively positive.

Why? Well, even if the market truly is at a bottom, it's more likely to be a long, muddy and confusing one with many false starts -- not a touch-and-go affair like March 2003. As veteran fund manager Craig Drill pointed out to clients this week, it's important to remember that we are ending a housing and debt bubble, not an equity bubble as in the early years of this decade.

The conclusion of a stock bubble is kindergarten compared with a credit bubble. The former merely vaporizes stockholders over time in a straightforward way. The latter involves the unwinding of highly leveraged, complex instruments that interact with each other in ways their creators never imagined, leading to a broad re-pricing of risk and loss of trust.

Said Drill: "I do believe the stimulus by the Fed and other parts of government will win the day -- but what kind of day will it be?"

Video on MSN Money

Jim Jubak
Jubak's Journal: Why is unemployment so low?
The unemployment rate is below 5%, low for such a seemingly weak economy. Two possible reasons: a lag in the official numbers and changes to the traditional ways we work full-time and part-time jobs.

This truly is the point, as it is easy to guess that $160 billion worth of fiscal stimulus and the slashing of interest rates by more than 2 percentage points in record time are likely to improve companies' access to credit. But it's another thing to wait and see whether it actually occurs. It worked back in 1991, after the unwinding of the nation's previous real-estate-lending orgy, but leverage is far higher and more broadly used now, and losses are much deeper -- approaching $1 trillion by some accounts. Keep in mind we've been hearing only about bank losses that occurred in 2007 and not about losses dead-ahead this year as debt downgrades force banks to painfully, methodically knock down the value of the loans on their books.

Continued: Betting on a bust

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High

Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.