Dow+150.25up+1.52%
10,058.64
Nasdaq+24.82up+1.17%
2,150.87
S&P+13.78up+1.30%
1,070.52

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This player requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player. Click here to download.
More video on MSN Money . . .
Jon Markman

SuperModels4/16/2009 12:01 AM ET

2 tech stocks with epic potential

A pair of once-mighty techs with prices now under a buck may be poised for a rare '10-bagger' comeback. Signals suggest the economy may also be on the cusp of recovery.

By Jon Markman
MSN Money

Twenty months ago, corporate earnings growth was smokin' hot, job growth was hitting new highs, bankers were kings, and real-estate flipping was a popular sport. Yet stocks and the economy were on the verge of a historic crash.

Today corporate earnings and chain-store sales are actually contracting for the first time in 50 years, unemployment is soaring toward 60-year highs, bankers are public enemies and the only home flipping going on is of the one-finger-salute variety. And yet, despite all this gloom, stocks and the economy may be on the verge of a historic recovery.

It's weird, it's unexpected, and it may not last. But boy, if it's the real thing, you sure won't want to miss it as a policymaker, entrepreneur or homeowner. And for investors, these are the sorts of moments that can produce those fabled 10-baggers you may have heard about in days of yore.

I've got two famous but down-on-their-luck techs now selling for less than a buck that just might work out as epic 10x plays, but first let me explain why a rebound can appear out of the blue in much the same way that the recent plunge appeared out of the gray.

Separated at worth

The key thing to keep in mind is that stocks and the economy really have very little to do with each other. I know that sounds crazy, and counterintuitive, but it's true. Bear markets for stocks and recessions for the economy tend to overlap, which make them linked in the minds of the public and media, but they are asynchronous, which means they start and end on different timetables. Economists have competed with each other for decades to devise a formula that shows the secret yoke between the two, but to no avail.

The only economics group that has ever come close to consistent predictive power in my opinion is the Economic Cycle Research Institute. This group, founded by pioneering economist Geoffrey Moore (he taught Statistics 101 to Alan Greenspan at NYU) publishes a Weekly Leading Index that synthesizes a short list of barometers into a single measure that has an eerie capacity to peer around corners at what's coming next -- a welcome contrast to most economic models, which linearly project the recent past into the near future. Back in 2007, when the consensus was calling for a soft landing for the economy, ECRI economists were screaming from the rooftops that a deep, dangerous recession lay ahead due, in part, to interest-rate and oil-price shocks.

After bottoming in December last year, the Weekly Leading Index has moved ever higher as the impact of unprecedented fiscal stimuli around the world, ultralow interest rates, cheap energy and cheap raw materials has begun to course through the veins of industry like repeated shots of adrenaline. The pace of the rise in the WLI is also quickening: The average week-over-week increase was just 0.4% through the end of March. For the first week of April, the index jumped 1.2%.

While the WLI remains in negative territory, it appears the economy has started the long, arduous climb out of recession. This is happening faster than I expected, which is great. But even if it's an accurate signal, it may not look that way for some time. And just because the economy may be stealthily emerging from recession, the stock market does not actually have to follow.

An example: The last recession started amid the tech bear market in March 2001 and ended in November of that year. Stocks rose steadily from October 2001 to March 2002 as the recession ended, and many thought that the bear market was over. But prices then proceeded to plunge another 30% into October 2002. Whoops.

In short, while it's valuable to study the economy for signs of market recovery, it takes a lot more than reduced inventories and higher housing starts to conclude a bear market. You need a combination of strengthening demand for stocks and contracting supply, as increasingly intense buyers find they must tear equities out of reluctant sellers' hands by offering higher prices. That's starting to happen now, even if it's not quite at a tipping point like March 2003.

If stocks can falter even as an economy improves, the opposite can also happen: Stocks can rise even as the economy stumbles. Why? It's a function of the funky way that demand for goods and services works backward from the consumer to the manufacturer.

Video on MSN Money

A recovery ahead? © Cory Docken/Jupiterimages
A recovery ahead?
Rob Morgan of Clermont Wealth Strategies and Robert Brusca of Fact and Opinion Economics discuss whether consumers pose a risk to economic recovery.

A tsunami of cash

Retailers, auto dealers, homebuilders and restaurants -- all organizations that directly face folks with money to spend -- are called "front-end" companies. Right now, their sales and optimism are rising off very low levels after deteriorating since 2006. After a long period of drought, their inventories are low. So they get on the phone and call "back-end" companies, such as chemical makers, shippers and wholesalers, and tell them to start making more product, pronto. Right now these companies say business is lousy, but ECRI's work suggests that a turn is coming.

It makes sense that improvement would occur because over the last 20 months almost 575 policy initiatives have been announced around the world, by ISI Group's count, including tax cuts, spending increases, mortgage modifications, interest rate cuts, quantitative easing, capital injections, mark-to-market modifications, bank rescues, auto aid, currency swaps, deposit guarantees, aid for life insurers, the G-20 package of $1.1 trillion for emerging markets, and the alphabet soup of Treasury and Federal Reserve programs like TARP, TALF and PPIP. It's a staggering list ranging from sledgehammers to the kitchen sink, and the inventive folks in government undoubtedly have even more tricks up their sleeves.

Continued: Stocks that could catch fire

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 23
Thursday, April 16, 2009 1:10:11 PM
This article sparked my interest as I am continually looking to pick up bargains as we grind our way through this mess. QTM interested me until I took a look at a simple weekly chart.
This stock has been in a decline since 2002! And then it moved sideways until 2007 when of course it dropped like all other stocks.

The ONLY reason that it is seeing a gain is because ALL STOCKS ARE. When this rally ends, and it will (in tears for many) this poor stock will plummet right back down to cents.

So, recommending this stock to anyone except a trader like myself is bad advice. It would be a nice chunk of change to ride it back to the whooping $4.23 that it topped out at in 07, but I doubt it will go any further.

Question is, if this company is so intriguing why has it not been scooped up by one of its competitors? It's cheap to say the least and yes it does have some cash, however that said the company has $51 million in reserves but has over $400 million of debt. Moreover, cutting head count, seriously? This is a small company, at this point I would imagine that a workforce reduction would eliminate much needed talent.

All in all, this is a very risky play that ordinary folks who simply want to invest for the long term should avoid. Stocks at this price level are controlled (manipulated) by a handful of traders who can take the stock to the moon and right back down before you have time to check your email and log back into your trading account.  Stay away or go with a more formidable solid company like EMC.

Thursday, April 16, 2009 2:57:26 PM
How about Delphi, who just announced their full scale entry into the manufacturing of Fuel Cells for vehicle propulsion. It appears the electric system, like GM's Volt, will be an expensive vehicle to purchase and additionally, expensive to replace the lithium batteries every four to five years at the tune of $6,000.00 to $8,000.00! With Fuel Cells, the maintenance is negligible compared to the electric lithium system.
Thursday, April 16, 2009 4:04:28 PM

The only way to play this garbage is through options.  I can't possibly imagine having much optimism for Unisys for heavens sake.  They're the stepchild for horrid management in the technology sector.

Thursday, April 16, 2009 6:07:04 PM
Electric cars...fuel cells...lmao. Until there is some huge breakthrough in technology, these things are a joke. No one ever talks about how much energy it takes to recharge those horribly expensive and heavy batteries. And fuel cells...hmmm...what are they fueled with? Hydrogen perhaps? Now there's a safe and cheap fuel to power us into the 22nd century! I'd love to be rear-ended with a tank of liquid hydrogen behind my seat. Barbeque anyone? Get real people. Until Star-Trek-like dilithium crystals are made, oil is king. Unless of course you want to pay $5.00 or more per mile. Why do you think submarines use nuclear powerplants? Because batteries suck. And Delphi would get into growing mushrooms considering the shape they're in. What a load of BS.   
Thursday, April 16, 2009 6:20:31 PM

Very interesting!

 

I am involved in transportation and IT retail businesses.

Being in involved in 2 front line businesses simultaneously i do not see any improvement as of today 04/16/09.

 

Transportation industry is suffering from luck of freight. There is just simply no freight to be transported. Every year there is a seasonal increase in shipments that usually shows in March. This year there is simply no increase that i see. Furthermore, number of shipments is still steadily declining. Drivers loose jobs and i hate to be the one to fire them.

 

As far as IT industry goes, there is just no improvement as of yet. Most of the purchases made are upgrades, discontinued or end of life components, discounted items and low end cheap pc's. Overall there is barely enough profit to cover all operational expenses.

 

Seeing these facts it is disturbing to see stock market...  

People are dumping money into paperweight. Are these stocks backed? Are they worth the risk? Look at the negative numbers all across the boards, unemployment rates, bankruptcies, housing market, loss reports...

 

All of the government funding is not going to save anyone either. Has anyone thought about inflation and other surprises awaiting us. Most currencies are backed by precious "gold"... However US dollar is long overprinted... It was said that it is backed by our economy... Judging by how our economy is doing and the fact that we just print more money i am speechless. It is not long until we may as well get paid with toilet paper...

 

 

Anyway, todays stockmarket is way overrated and stocks are way overpriced.

Whatever "improovement" anyone can see it may be a simple seasonal increase that does not mean much at all.

Thursday, April 16, 2009 6:43:32 PM
Great, Mr. Markman...you've lowered yourself to become a stock-picker.  Geez!
Thursday, April 16, 2009 6:52:52 PM

You are right about cars.

 

As a matter of fact there was a huge progress made in automotive industry. Not electric cars or diesels. Those are great.

Hydrogen powered vehicles. Great potential!

Already talked about, made and used... they produce no pollution since the only thing coming out of the tail pipe is - water.

We may never see those around due to simple fact that we are so busy and so happy making money on oil, that we do not want, neglect, and probably will never build fueling stations across the country.

 

I doubt that in our time we will be able to travel across country on one of hydrogen powered cars simply because somehow we are unable to do so due to the fact that we can not fuel it up at the gas station.

 

 

Thursday, April 16, 2009 6:56:04 PM
What the heck kind of pump and dump article is this?!?!?!  I am truly shocked that a web site like msn.com would allow this kind of pump and dump scam to appear!  Today, after this article was posted, QTM was up 36% and UIS was up 69%!!!!!  If it is found out that Markman owned shares in either of these companies before this article appeared, he should be going to jail!!!  I would expect this kind of rubbish maybe out of some Russian mobsters, but not out of anyone at msn.com. 
Thursday, April 16, 2009 7:52:20 PM

Does anyone know that the Lithium Ion Batteries are dangerous?

Whatch the video, see what smal piece of lithium can do and then imagine what can happen with the car in event of an accident etc.!!!

 

Will react with air and water... potential fire and explosion hazard.

Here is a good look:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ypUVpwgcAA&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5f0VCoFuFM

similar

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_rQGS5UD2w&feature=related

 

Thursday, April 16, 2009 7:54:43 PM
"Epic potential" sounds like an irresponsible infomercial. It's 2006, and I'd like to tell you how you can buy Florida real estate with NO MONEY DOWN.
1 - 10 of 23
To add a comment, pleasesign in