Dow+150.25up+1.52%
10,058.64
Nasdaq+24.82up+1.17%
2,150.87
S&P+13.78up+1.30%
1,070.52

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video player requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player
More video on MSN Money
Nest egg  © Stockbyte Gold/Getty Images  // Nest egg  © Stockbyte Gold/Getty Images

Mutual Funds10/13/2009 12:01 AM ET

The quickest ways to restore your nest egg

Rebuilding your retirement portfolio requires careful planning -- and, unfortunately, one of the fastest strategies may be to lower your expectations.

By MarketWatch

Jo and Al Lineberry were expecting a smooth and stress-free retirement when life intervened.

Two years ago, the Lineberrys were corporate executives in Minneapolis with successful and lucrative careers. Then Al was laid off, and Jo lost her job nine months later. Today, Al's new job pays one-third of what he used to make, while Jo is employed part time.

Like millions of Americans who have painfully watched their home values collapse and their 401k's crumble, the Lineberrys are being forced to make major lifestyle changes they never imagined.

"We didn't have to worry too much about money," Jo said. "Now, if we can't pay cash, we don't buy it. We have taken no trips at all. We'd always go out to the nicer restaurants; now it's Red Lobster, Olive Garden -- with coupons."

Critics might be quick to say the Lineberrys brought this on themselves, with their fancy dinners and frequent vacations. Except that in planning for their financial future, the couple had been doing everything right. They'd diligently paid off their mortgage and hadn't tapped the home equity to buy more things. And they'd been textbook savers, maxing out 401k contributions so that Jo, 51, and Al, 60, could retire early.

Best-laid plans

That goal is now most likely out of reach for the Lineberrys. But they do have options: Spend less; work longer; save more; take greater investment risk, reassess financial goals.

Indeed, those are the basic choices for anyone close to retirement or already retired who hopes to rebuild his or her investment portfolio. Maybe they're not ideal, but they are the new reality for people who've been hit with a series of body blows in a short time.

"The game has changed," said Nathan Dungan, the founder of counseling firm Share Save Spend, which teaches families about money matters. "People say: 'I was on track. I was doing everything correctly, and the bottom dropped out. Through no fault of my own, I am now in this difficult spot.'"

Difficult -- and shocking. At money and investing seminars, Dungan directly confronts people's feelings of helplessness and loss, bringing up the five established stages of grief: denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance. "These are tough things to face," he said, "but facing them and getting a plan of action is empowering. It's when we don't face it that anxiety continues to build and our situation doesn't get any better."

What can you do? Look backward -- not to regret but to remember how it felt to experience terrifying volatility and uncertainty as the financial markets melted down. Then live forward -- think hard about what you hope to have in coming years and map out how to get there. If that dream involves more risk than you're willing to take, you'll have to scale back or extend your horizon.

Replacing lost wealth

It's natural when you lose money to want to make it back. Research shows that the pain of financial loss is much more acute than the satisfaction of a gain. Losses, of course, are particularly hard on retirees, who no longer have the time to recoup them and need regular income from their portfolios.

Pressing needs often lead to unrealistic expectations. "People come to us and say, 'You fix it; I want you to take more risk to get me a higher return,'" said Scott Kays, a financial adviser in Atlanta.

"Taking too much risk is what got them in trouble," he said. "Sometimes advisers are tempted to take too much risk to help the client get that money back faster. It's a trap for clients and advisers. The steps I'm going to take are no different than I would take for someone just building their portfolio."

Video: Protecting your retirement wealth

Do you really want to know the quickest ways to replace lost wealth? It's not by pouring money into stocks or other speculative investments. The answer is to follow a financial plan that brings down the cost of your lifestyle.

"Retirement is a cash-flow issue -- how much do you need every month after taxes?" said Jonathan Guyton, a principal at Cornerstone Wealth Advisors in Edina, Minn.

"Anything we can do to increase your after-tax wealth or lower the cost of your after-tax lifestyle," he said, "puts less pressure on what you have to do to be ready."

Become a fan of MSN Money on Facebook

Consider this: Every $100 a month in expenses requires $25,000 in assets, assuming that you are spending 5% of your portfolio. If you can reduce expenses by $100 a month, that's $25,000 less you need in your nest egg.

Continued: You can keep working

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 21
Tuesday, October 13, 2009 6:28:53 AM

I don't understand this article.  The couple in the article are 51 and 60, have no mortgage, been maxing out retirement for what sounds like the majority of their working life and are employed....what is so stressful????  They should be quite comfortable handling day to day expenses with no mortgage; their investments probably took a hit but should be back close to what they were before the slide (at least our 401k's / IRA's are - I assume others are too).

Sounds like they'll be just fine or is this article whinning about settling for Red Lobster with a coupon? 

I'm not concerned for people in these situations; I'm concerned about people losing their homes and struggling to keep food on the table.

Sounds like this couple did a good job with their finances and will be just fine.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 7:08:41 AM

Are you serious? With more than 1 American in 10 out of work and homes being repossesed right-and-left MSNBC has the guts to publish an article like this! That is not all either folks:

(1) At least one more round of foreclosures because the President and Congress have done nothing to promote legislation to help create jobs in America, Keep jobs in America, or bring jobs back to America and the President could have promoted and requested such legislation from Congress.

(2) Failed mortgages on commercial properties will be the number two item to hit us and it will hit us hard.

(3) More bank failures are on the way and again . . . a very hard hit.

(4) Insolvency of the FDIC, which has already started. The FDIC is currently active in trying to borrow the taxpayer dollars the government used to bail the banks out, back from the banks. Nice isn't it when they borrow our money and then charge us a much higher rate of interest to loan it back to us?

(5) Continued rising numbers of unemployed American Taxpayers - more jobs are being lost every day than are being created and with the restrictive laws we have in place, it isn't likely to change soon.

(6) Inflation - it is not possible to hold off forever the inflation that we are bound to experience from the insane level of spending that this administration has been doing. Eventually, the piper must be paid. Some economists are predicting hyperinflation. Even if we do not experience hyperinflation, we will almost certainly experience inflation that will surpass even the worst seen during the Carter years. The question is when? . . . not if?

 

This is actually frightening! Our President simply has no clue what so ever . . . . or does he?

 

So, the issue really is “Is the President really that out-of-touch or is this just another smokescreen from the Whitehouse propaganda machine”? There is an old saying . . . “If ifs and buts were candy and nuts, what a wonderful Christmas this would be!” That saying could be applied to the economy right now. My suggestion is to pull in whatever you can convert to ready cash and sit on it in a guaranteed interest rate account of some type, where it has some protection. I believe that the market will drop below 7,000 long before it ever hits 14,000. There are just too many negative happenings waiting in the wings.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 7:10:27 AM

Once again, we see strong evidence that our elected officials are turning a blind-eye toward the poorest demographic segment of Americans . . . those living on Social Security. This administration is too busy putting plans in place that will cost all Americans more tax dollars every year, to help the average taxpaying American. Cap and Trade, Healthcare reform, Card-Check, Bank and Auto Company buyouts, and Stimulus will all result in every taxpaying American taking a harder hit come tax time. The well-known problems with Social Security and Medicare are being ignored. When LBJ moved Social Security monies (1968) from the lock-box type trust that FDR placed them in (1934), he knowingly made those monies accessible to every Congressional Representative, Senator, and President who could garner a vote to do so. Those individuals then began working overtime to do just that. They were only too happy to divert those monies contributed by taxpaying Americans for their retirement into projects near and dear to the hearts of every special interest group who contributed large sums of money to their respective election and re-election campaigns. This behind the scenes thievery has been going on for 41 years now and has drained what was a healthy trust fund down to near bankruptcy. Your elected representatives have knowingly placed their respective constituents in harm’s way to assure their own ride on the gravy train that American politics has become. Liaisons are built between our elected officials and special interest groups over time. As we keep re-electing these same officials (incumbents) the liaisons become stronger and stronger and favors owed to these same special interest groups continue to mount up. As those favors are repaid, our retirement funds are drained for purposes other than what they were meant for leaving us and our heirs high-and-dry. We can only put a stop to this corrupt practice by eliminating all incumbents at every election opportunity. Now here is the kicker . . . if you believe that your favorite political party was not involved in this fiscal slight-of-hand, you are sadly mistaken. Both major political parties have been guilty of this type of activity from day one! Our social security monies have paid for politically motivated wars (Viet Nam, Gulf-war I, Bosnia, Gulf War II). They have also paid for the foggy now-you-see-it now-you-don't magical surplus Clinton imagined he had found. Folks, we need to band together and clean our political house in Washington, D.C. before this band of thieves sell our country right out from under us. One more thing folks: These corrupt politicians neither contribute to nor collect from Social Security or Medicare. You see, they have a plan which, they voted in for themselves, that is fully paid for by the American Taxpayer and which any one of us would love to have because is it so superior to anything we have ever been offered. Isn’t it time we showed these crooks the door in a traditional bums-rush fashion?

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 7:15:44 AM
mommajones,

what it meant in the article is that the couple would have retired at the ages of 50's or early 60's had it not because of the financial turmoil,  Now instead, they have to work longer and live a less affluent life style. 

If all the financial advisors advise baby boomers (the most affluent demographic group) to spend less and save more, how can the economy recover?  How can corporate America make money to pay the interests and dividends to the bond and equity investors, to whom they have advised they should invest in?  I am NOT advocating to be a spendthrift, but the pendulum seems to swing too far to the other side.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 7:42:32 AM

"The quickest way to restore your nest egg."  That is the title of this piece of "reporting".  That is what led me to click on to the story.

 

Other than some passing advice that taking bigger risks in an attempt to make up the losses isn't a smart strategy, this story has nothing to do with "restoring your nest egg".  It has to do with making do with less, lowering your expectations, and reducing your needs/wants in retirement. 

 

Totally lame stuff.  I guess truth in advertisement doesn't apply to MSN story headlines, does it? 

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 7:47:35 AM
Ok lets speak the truth...These idiots in the government would love to give us incentives and all this crap to spend money when the country is in the poop hole and no one has any money. God forbid they do anything good for us or offer us tax breaks when things are good. They are just as bad as wall street and we should have an uprising.....$uckin Crooks!!!!!!!!!!They couldn't fix it if the where Bob Villa......
Tuesday, October 13, 2009 8:44:13 AM
Wow, my wife and I would love to be in their situation.  After Katrina, we both lost our jobs and were unemployed for over 6 months.  We both finally were able to land jobs that were not in our field and paid only $10 per hour.  Before Katrina we were making together over $70K.  We were paying our mtg., car, insurance, putting money in the 401K and IRA.  After Katrina, we had to use all that money just to survive.  We ended up having to file a Chapter 13 to keep our house.  We tried to get help from banks, our mortgage company, fema, the government as our loan was VA.  But, no help for us at all from any of them.  Now my wife is finally back in her chosen field making good money and I took early SS.  We are still struggling to make the Chapter 13 and trustee payments.  It makes us sick that the Liberal Left Wing Government can bail out all the people that are low income and losing their homes because they bought houses that they shouldn't have! 

We have lost all respect for this President and Congress!

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 8:47:25 AM
MSNBC and their Parent Company NBC, need to get their heads out of Obama behind and start asking serious questions about this economy and the "health bill" that the Liberal Congress is trying pass. 

The fed's say that unemployment is down.  That is because there were many that were on unemployment that were taken off because their money had run out. 

This article is a joke!!

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 8:51:05 AM

J12120- I too clicked on this article to try and glean some helpful advice. It reads like I've already missed my opportunity. The last paragraph reads like the current rise is coming to an end. The only advice in here is cut your spending??? What kind of advice is that?

Ask the retailers if that isn't already being done. This article wasted my time.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009 8:53:24 AM

THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE. HOW CAN A RETIREE FIND A PART TIME JOB, WHEN THERE ARE THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE OUT OF WORK.

ALSO, DON'T FIGURE ON A 4 OR 5 % RETURN -YOU MAY GET 1% -IF YOU'RE LUCKY. MOST EMPLOYERS STOPPED MATCHING 401K'S. SO, 1/2 OF THE DEPENDED UPON MONEY FOR RETIREMENT IS LOST THERE, TOO.

IF YOU ARE FORTUNATE ENOUGH TO BE EMPLOYED, THE ONLY WAY TO TRY TO PLAY CATCH UP IS TO DOUBLE YOUR 401K CONTRIBUTION AS SOON AS  YOU CAN. ALSO THESE WRITERS SHOULD THINK ABOUT THE FACT THAT PEOPLE THAT  HAVE 401KS DO NOT HAVE THE OPPURTUNITY TO SWITCH THINGS AROUND- THEY ARE AT THE MERCY OF THEIR PLAN.

1 - 10 of 21
To add a comment, pleasesign in