David Swensen is the Albert Pujols of the money-management world. Over his career, Pujols, the power-hitting first baseman of the St. Louis Cardinals, sports a freakishly low ratio of strikeouts to home runs. When baseball historians observe statistics such as these, along with Pujols' consistently high batting average and the lofty number of runners he has driven in, they compare the slugger's career figures with those of such legends as Lou Gehrig and Ted Williams.
Swensen is the chief investment officer of Yale University's endowment fund. From June 1985 through June 2008, Yale's endowment returned an annualized 16.6%, an average of 5 percentage points per year better than both the Standard & Poor's 500 Index ($INX) and a balanced index holding 60% in stocks and 40% in bonds. That's a 40-fold multiplication of wealth.
He achieved that feat with one-third less volatility than the S&P 500. He had only one down year (losing 0.2% in the year that ended in June 1988, a period that included the crash of 1987) and compiled a Sharpe ratio of 1.12 over that 24-year span. The Sharpe ratio is academic lingo for risk-adjusted return. A ratio in excess of 1 for a long period is a relatively rare event -- kind of the statistical equivalent of Pujols' high homer-to-strikeout ratio.
More from MSN Money and Kiplinger
No one's immune this time
Alas, even Swensen is mortal. Yale's endowment suffered terribly over the 12 months that ended in June. The school hasn't yet reported performance figures, but we'll guess that the endowment lost 25% to 30%, not a surprising conclusion given that virtually all financial markets collapsed in tandem during last year's unpleasantness.Swensen, who in the bond arena seems to prefer only government securities (both the traditional and inflation-protected sort), appears to have allocated only 4% to Treasurys, one of the few asset class that held up during the financial crisis. A lack of financing and liquidity crushed alternative investments, such as venture capital and leveraged buyouts, longtime staples of Swensen's strategy.
But even though the endowment sank 30% the past year, it has still returned about 14% annualized from June 1985 through June 2009.
Ideas we can all use
Can individual investors learn and borrow ideas from Swensen? Mebane Faber says yes. Faber, a money manager in El Segundo, Cal., analyzed the "super endowments" of Yale and Harvard (Harvard's endowment gained an annualized 15.2% from June 1985 through June 2008 with even lower volatility than Yale's). He published the results in "The Ivy Portfolio: How to Invest Like the Top Endowments and Avoid Bear Markets," a book that he co-authored with his colleague Eric Richardson.
Video: Endowment funds get defensive
Understand, though, that you can't precisely replicate the Ivy endowment portfolios. When Benjamin Franklin opined that the only certainties in life are death and taxes, he evidently wasn't thinking about university endowments. Unlike the rest of us, the funds pay no taxes and never perish. Moreover, the endowments have huge staffs and access to investments, such as private-equity partnerships and hedge funds, that are unavailable to the common folk.
