Dow+150.25up+1.52%
10,058.64
Nasdaq+24.82up+1.17%
2,150.87
S&P+13.78up+1.30%
1,070.52

MSN Money Video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires an updated version of the free Adobe Flash Player.
More video on MSN Money
Finding the best Mutual funds © ThinkStock / SuperStock

Mutual Funds11/24/2009 2:53 PM ET

Brokers' favorites? Funds that pay them well

Many advisers are essentially salespeople, preferring to sell funds that give them the biggest cut of the sales fees. With a little research, you can beat their game.

By SmartMoney

Want to buy a mutual fund or exchange-traded fund?

There are more than 9,600 choices. If the selection is overwhelming, you can start by picking a fund company. But there are at least 700 of those, including independent companies and ones that are tucked into banks, insurance companies and brokerage houses.

No wonder more than half of households still buy mutual funds through professional advisers instead of directly from fund companies. Some advisers are paid for their time, but many get a cut of sales fees on the money invested, whether those fees are obvious or not.

This group -- salespeople, really, although they have titles such as "financial consultant" or "registered representative" -- cost investors plenty.

According to one analysis of 2002 sales fees, front-end loads (the most obvious kind of fee) totaled $3.6 billion, back-end loads (a less obvious kind) totaled $2.8 billion, and 12b-1 fees (the least obvious kind) came to $8.8 billion. It cost $23.8 billion to pay the people who buy and sell investments within the funds and to cover the operational expenses of fund companies.

Are salespeople worth their price?

Of course, the salespeople are worth their fees if they recommend funds that customers otherwise wouldn't know about, funds that provide returns large enough to make up for the cost of hunting them down. Do they? Two new studies suggest not.

Professors from Harvard and the University of Oregon looked at more than 10,000 share classes for more than 4,500 funds (some have more than one share class to denote whether the fees are paid right away or gradually) for the six years ending with 2002. The professors found some evidence that brokers focus on smaller, younger funds, but they saw no evidence of better returns.

In fact, the funds sold through brokers did worse than the ones that were bought directly, whether their results were adjusted for risk or not -- even before the sales fees were deducted. You'd think salespeople would at least have found funds that have lower operational costs beyond their sales fees. They didn't.

Any benefits that exist among brokered funds "must be found along less tangible dimensions," the authors tactfully concluded.

The do-it-yourself advantage

The benefits to the brokers are all too tangible, of course.

Richard Evans, a physicist turned finance professor at the University of Virginia, whose previous research showed how some mutual fund companies artificially sweeten their returns, has moved on to studying broker compensation.

He and two colleagues looked at U.S. stock mutual funds over the decade ending with 2004 and found that, after controlling for things like return histories, brokers prefer to sell funds that give them the biggest cut.

Video: Follow the Roadmap to Riches

Perhaps it's worth it for more investors to read up on mutual funds and pick their own. The first of the two studies mentioned above found that fund buyers who avoid brokers tend to be a little richer and a little better-educated than those who don't -- but not much.

Become a fan of MSN Money on Facebook

In other words, many fund buyers who pay brokers can probably do it themselves.

To take that a step further, perhaps the 6,000 or so stocks traded on major U.S. exchanges aren't much more difficult to choose from than the 9,600 funds. And maybe company reports are long and dry, though no more so than mutual fund prospectuses.

Somehow, American investors have been infantilized -- if that's not too strong a word -- into believing they can't tell good businesses from rotten ones and buy stocks and bonds for themselves. But maybe more of them can, and at lower cost.

If I've listed too many choices here, forget the whole thing and curl up with "The Paradox of Choice," a book by Barry Schwartz about how a flood of options has exhausted and restricted consumers instead of freeing them.

This article was reported by Jack Hough for SmartMoney.

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 19
Tuesday, November 24, 2009 6:28:46 PM
What a useless article! Let's see, the study says people who "do it themselves" are a "little bit richer and a little bit more educated - but not much" So your message to the masses is that we should carve out what little free time we might have boning up on the 9600 funds to be not much better off than with a broker - WOW sounds like Jack Hough's advice is even worse than an investment sales person!!
Tuesday, November 24, 2009 6:42:42 PM
I was really looking for some names in this article, but found none, I was hoping for some research that would be of benefit to stock or fund picks, to aid the private investor, to keep from overpaying for productsSad, but little research here.  I left my broker, a bit broker, and he me too as well, now I look to articles that are well written and somewhat educational for direction  ....I found neither here. 
Tuesday, November 24, 2009 8:37:16 PM
          Checkitout; Got it right. Well written Jack. The truth but nothing but the truth Amen. Where is the other half?
Tuesday, November 24, 2009 11:56:22 PM
Just put it into a mix of index funds at Vanguard.  Don't mess with managed mutual funds because even managed no load funds are not cheap.  Index funds beat 80% of the  managed funds out there, so your not settling for average, your beating 80% of the dumb managers who can't beat the index. 
Wednesday, November 25, 2009 8:45:12 AM

The writer of this article should be charge with false advertising.

LAME

Wednesday, November 25, 2009 12:54:18 PM
Why not choose one of the top 20% of the mutual funds; average is meaningless!
Wednesday, November 25, 2009 1:20:35 PM

Hidden costs indeed!  Just like all those closing costs on your mortgage refinance; just like the fine print when you buy a car; just like the commission you pay a realtor; just like the membership fee at the warehouse stores; just like the distribution and shipping fees figured into your groceries; just like the profit the gas station takes by boosting the price of your gasoline....

 

I find this article interesting.  Mr. Hough has clearly invested previously with an investment professional who took him for a ride.  As a lifelong advisor of nearly 1,000 clients, I have never received a complaint from my clients stating that they felt I should not be paid to assist them.  I have years of education behind me.  I am a CFP and a CFA, and actively manage the accounts of each and every one of my clients, as if they were family.  I know my clients' names, lives, joys, trials and tribulations; I know their kids and oftentimes am working with the third and fourth generation of the family. 

 

I will say this -- there are numerous folks in this business who are shady and only out to make a quick buck.  In addition, the larger percentage of investment professionals aren't financial gurus, but rather are excellent salespeople -- a salesperson will sell you something to earn a better commission -- a true seasoned, trustworthy financial advisor with integrity, while potentially difficult to find, will make the most suitable and appropriate recommendation. 

 

Without fail, my clients all feel I should earn a living at what I do.  They are informed, at length, of all costs associated with investing with me and my company, and inevitably they ask how I make my money -- when I tell them, they are generally okay with it.  Of course, during the market downturn, my clients received a great deal of attention from me, personally, and we made strategic moves at that time to prevent and ultimately recoup any market loss -- which we have managed to do. 

 

In other words, to the fellow who suggested simply buying the index and leaving it at that...  my portfolios are positive through the downturn and are back up to October 2007 levels in nearly all cases, whereas the market (and therefore the index funds) still has yet to recover anywhere near all the loss. 

 

So as I said, it sounds as though Mr. Hough simply hasn't yet found an advisor worth his salt. 

 

 

Wednesday, November 25, 2009 1:34:42 PM
Mr. Foster;

So glad to hear that you are not a bad person, of course I am certain that those who were vested with Bernie believed just as highly in him as you do in yourself, to your credit you are still on the outside, but the concern here is not that you personally are good at what you do and are honest and reliable and trustworthy and well worth your salt, it is that the folks who are now in view are not.  While you extort, and I certainly thank you for the extortion of your ability and wealth and the ability and value of some good folks who dabble, my broker did too.  I myself, don't trust any of you any longer with what is mine, I have seen those who trusted who trusted wrong, and all we have is your wonderful words which fill me with wonder.  Tell me how I can find out if you are who you say you are, and if you are not.  Then you have told me something I can use.

#9
Wednesday, November 25, 2009 1:39:07 PM
my portfolios are positive through the downturn and are back up to October 2007 levels in nearly all cases

If your portfolios were all positive during the downturn then how come they are 'back up to' October 2007 levels?  That implies to me they lost value.

#10
Wednesday, November 25, 2009 2:16:02 PM
Overall this is a good article--one I wish I'd known of when I became an mutual fund investor after inheriting some money 10 years ago. From experience (meaning that I learned the hard way), I know to beware of any situation in which a financial advisor has a conflict of interest. All investors who are considering mutual funds, index funds, or ETFs should ask themselves whether it's in their financial advisor's best interest to look out for them or for a big investment bank. If you find out from Morningstar or another reliable source that your advisor has put you into a batch of two-star funds, get a second opinion.
1 - 10 of 19
To add a comment, pleasesign in