401k's, retirement plans, stock market risk © Spencer Platt/Getty Images

Extra11/12/2010 5:00 PM ET

401k's pay off only for lucky few

Millions of Americans have no access to a 401k plan, and many of those who do misjudge market risk -- individual retirement plans lost $2 trillion in the recent plunge.

[Related content: retirement, stocks, 401k, Fidelity, savings]
By MarketWatch

People who stuck with their 401k plan through thick and thin for the past 10 years more than doubled their account balances, according to the latest data from Fidelity Investments on the behavior of 11 million plan participants.

But a separate study found that many workers are not faring well with retirement saving.

The average account balance for savers who are now 55 or older and have been participating in their plan continuously for 10 years was $211,300 at the end of the third quarter, up from $96,000 a decade ago, according to Fidelity.

Keep in mind: About two-thirds of the account-balance gain is due to savers' own contributions, plus their employer match, and one-third of the gain is due to market returns, according to Fidelity.

Looking at the total population of Fidelity accounts, the average balance rose 9.4% to $67,600 in September, from $61,800 in June.

Workers pumped an average 8.2% of their earnings into their 401k's, a figure that hasn't changed for almost two years. But a sign of optimism, perhaps: 4.2% of savers increased their contribution rate, a bigger portion than the 3.1% who decreased it.

But the relatively rosy picture painted by the Fidelity data doesn't describe the many Americans who have no access to a 401k plan, or, if they do, misjudge stock market risk along the way.

Among full-time workers, just 38% of Latinos, 54% of workers ages 25 to 43 and 38% of those in the lowest income bracket have access to a workplace savings plan, according to "The Failure of the 401(k)," a report published Nov. 9 by Demos, a nonpartisan public-policy and research organization that focuses on lower-income Americans.

Only 45% of workers in the service industry have access to a workplace plan, compared with 80% of management and professional workers, the report said.

Become a fan of MSN Money on Facebook

And while just 35% of the lowest-paid workers can contribute to a workplace plan, 84% of those in the highest income quartile have access to retirement benefits at work.

Meanwhile, those who planned to retire in 2008 or early 2009 faced the following staggering reality: Individual retirement plans lost $2 trillion in value in the stock market plunge.

Twenty-one percent of plan participants have more than 80% of their assets in stocks, while 38% don't have any money in stocks, according to the Demos report.

The good news, perhaps, is that Fidelity found that fewer savers put 100% of their assets into equities in the third quarter: 13% did so, down from 14.5% in the same period a year ago

This article was reported by Andrea Coombes for MarketWatch.

More from MSN Money and MarketWatch

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowHigh
MarketWatch on MSN Money
47Comments
11/28/2010 11:24 AM
avatar

My Vanguard 401K has a brokerage window which allows me to buy and sell anything under the sun.

 

My biggest beef is the trading fees.  $20 per trade.  A discount broker it is not.  Oh well.  Better than being locked into only pre selected mutual funds.

11/28/2010 6:35 AM
avatar
Couldn't agree more. Government got one more way to  invade our private lives and Employers get away with tying their profit sharing with the 401k's as well (one more way to control us). Has anyone ever wondered why it take several weeks to cash out a 401k in this age of computers and instant trading. Why not give and employee more of his own salary and let him invest it wherever he chooses?
11/28/2010 6:19 AM
avatar

One of my many issues with 401k's is the limited ability to trade in and out of the market daily like real investors or stockbrokers (thief's in suits) do. Being limited to only 3 trades / month just stinks. Would you go to a casino and agree to place 30 bet with only 3 chances to change your bet? Heck no, the casino would have your money in no time.

11/27/2010 12:19 PM
avatar
and just where else would you make any money on your investments?0.25 on your passbook? 1.5 percent on  cds? why not just stick iot under your bed?if you diversify and dont get greedy you will be just fine....stupid article
11/26/2010 12:28 PM
avatar
The 401K laws should be changed so you can invest in any financial instruments (CDs, ETF, funds, stocks) like any IRA instead of only the ones that the idiots at your company select. People of all incomes can invest through IRAs and private equity accounts; you don't need a 401k.  People then need to be educated in the pros (rewards) and cons (risks) of each.  Buying AT&T with a 6% dividend  can be a lot better than some index fund that follows the market swings.  Never invest in a fund that can't get out of the market if conditions warrant.  Also, never follow the herd or believe in "golden" rules (real estate will always go up - ha, ha) as there are always exceptions.  Being in CDs is a perfectly valid approach in rising interest rate environments or if your totally adverse to risk.  Always follow logic and avoid your emotions.
11/25/2010 9:17 AM
avatar

 

Bull Hockey!  I left my 401K in 2001 in the “Plan” in the highest gain portfolio I could without adding a dime.  9 years later I still had 50K to catch up on from the 2000 correction when I finally moved the money to something that would gain.  Where do these guys get their numbers?

11/23/2010 12:14 PM
avatar
401k's are always being raided by the Wall street raiders, The system is fixed to allow the Wall street'ers to take when they want from everyone's 401k usually a little here and a little there. I had 132k in a 401k the market collapsed I had 54k the market went back to near the level it was and investing the whole time it was only back to 73k. People take out your money while you have any to take out. This is the biggest scam I have ever seen, Wall street raiders will take it if you do not.
11/15/2010 10:14 PM
avatar

EricTheRon

 

That wasn't the point of the article's comment. It was meant to indicate (like a number of tax deductions), the availability and benefit of these tax deductions are heavily skewed to those in the top 20%. If the goal is to get more people to save for their retirement, this was a terribly ineffective way of doing it. One would think the incentives would be more directly aimed at the people who need it the most and the most likely to fall short come retirement.

 

I am sure everyone would have been happy to vote for the law that would have allowed for a non-employer controlled savings vehicle. But, the problem was that, as is common practice, the bill was packed with other content that made it a non-starter.

 

11/15/2010 9:59 PM
avatar

Red_Man

 

There was nothing special about investing skill or temperament in your story. You were just lucky. You started investing at the bottom of a multi-decade low in the market (1980) and then rode it up during a spectacular run for the next 20 years (before the calamities of the 2000s). Whooopeee!

 

11/15/2010 7:07 PM
avatar

Fidelity Money Market Trust Retirement Money Market Portfolio contains 16.4 Billion dollars, and is the only choice many companies provide in their 401K for stable value/money market, what a total rip off! At the very least the  return and fees should flip.

 

Fee

Management Fee 0.42%

 

return on

Investment 0.04
11/15/2010 5:35 PM
avatar
DEMO is non-partisan now?

The organization that Obama was a founding board member of, and whose director, Heather McGhee was the Deputy Policy Director, Domestic and Economic Policy, for the John Edwards for President 2008 campaign, is a non-partisan organization.

**** happened to responsible journalism?

This article is junk.  Of the $2 trillion lost, all but $400m has been recovered as long as the people weren't stupid and sold out due to fear
11/15/2010 5:01 PM
avatar
ChicoJax....We lost 2Trillion in our 401k's..where did you get 2 Cents???..you must have a different plan...hahahaha
11/15/2010 4:39 PM
avatar

I do not see the value in this article but I thought I would add my 2 cents...

 

I think the US should move to a system similar to RRSP's in Canada. There would still be limits on the amount you can contribute but every employed person would be able to participate by opening a "401(k)" type account with a brokerage company. The individual would then be able to invest in all the potential vehicles (stocks, bonds, mutual funds, Cd's, etc) that the brokerage company provides.

 

This still servers the interests of the 2 parties mentioned by GaryInNola and also addresses concerns about limited investment opportunites within current 401(k) plans.

11/15/2010 4:32 PM
avatar
Now, we're even blaming the 1st Bush (GHWB)?  Come on, if folks would quit borrowing against 401k's and taking the $ when they change jobs, we would all be better off.
11/15/2010 4:23 PM
avatar
The 401K law was passed for 2 reasons, neither of which were to help people fund their retirement. The first reason was to shift the risk from employers who no longer wanted to manage and fund traditional pension plans. The second was due to heavy lobbying by Wall Street investment firms who knew that a 401K type law would funnel enormous sums of money their way into stocks and mutual funds. So, you could say the 401Ks have been very successful for the 2 interests who wanted the law passed. But retirees would have been better off with traditional pension plans that provided a guaranteed monthly check for a specified amount of money regardless of the performance of the stock market. The people, that is the workers, have been hoodwinked, again. Wall Street is at it yet again, this time they are pushing for privatization of Social Security. If they succeed, the next generation of retirees will likely live in abject poverty.
11/15/2010 4:21 PM
avatar

Wow lol in michigan - you sound really on the defensive; how ironic your screen name is!

As for this report, MSN really should change this page to read, "Let's Scare People About Their Money".

11/15/2010 4:19 PM
avatar
Been investing in my 401 (k) since 1980.  I now have 3X the cumulative contribution including the portion matched by the company, and 5X my personal contribution.  I have been entirely in stocks (essentially the S&P 500 index) except for 2 years in late 1990 when I was all in cash.  The program has made me very comfortable financially as I approach retirement.  I will likely make more money in retirement than I did working.  People that stick with their plans will end up with a very nice pile of money.
11/15/2010 2:44 PM
avatar
Note to By Our Example:  Everything is Bush's fault, huh?  I'm sure he called you personally and told you to invest in that 401k.  That's why I love these message boards.  Seriously, think for yourself.  Obama is not going to save you.   
11/15/2010 2:40 PM
avatar
A number of points: There is no discussion of the tax advantages; Social Security gives you such a ridiculous low return on investment; The author of this article picks a point in time (the lowest point of the market) to do his lousy analysis - says nothing of the return to that point;  Markets go up and down - always will.  I will ALWAYS take my chances on the market vs. the government.
11/15/2010 2:26 PM
avatar
I've paid much more into my 401K than I have SS but thanks to George H W Bush, my SS benefit is about twice as much as my 401K benefit.
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of ConductPlease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
Additional comments(optional)
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
viewCounter