Dow+150.25up+1.52%
10,058.64
Nasdaq+24.82up+1.17%
2,150.87
S&P+13.78up+1.30%
1,070.52

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video player requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player
More video on MSN Money
15 funds on a 30% run © Tom Brakefield / Photodisc Green / Getty Images

Mutual Funds11/4/2009 12:01 AM ET

15 funds on a 30% run in 2009

These mutual funds, screened for year-to-date performance and low fees, are walloping the S&P 500. But be careful about joining them in midstream.

[Related content: stocks, funds, Fidelity, S&P 500, mutual funds]
By SmartMoney

Investors who had gotten used to seeing negative signs in front of the returns for their portfolios can certainly take some satisfaction with the performance of the stock market this year. The average S&P 500 Index ($INX) fund dropped about 37% last year. This year, the average S&P index fund is up 20%.

Of course, there is still some way to go before investors get back to even territory, but the market is moving in the right direction -- at least for now.

The market's ride up has lifted some funds more than others. While some offerings are struggling, investors can easily find funds that are up 25%, 30% or 35%. There are more than 2,000 funds and share classes listed in our database that have returned double the S&P's performance this year.

So we recently turned the spotlight on them. To construct this screen, we suspended some of the usual guidelines we follow, such as focusing on long-term track records. This screen concentrates on just one detail: year-to-date performance.

Outperformance is easy right now

There are more than 10,200 funds and share classes beating the S&P 500 this year. We knocked out the funds that charge loads and have high fees and minimums. That left us with a universe of more than 500 offerings. From that group, we highlighted 15 funds that are up at least 30% in 2009 -- double the return of the S&P 500 -- and are run by well-known managers or are popular with investors. They are listed in the table below.

We mention this list with some reluctance. After all, by favoring year-to-date performance, we are, in effect, putting our stamp of approval on performance chasing. That certainly isn't our intention. If you jump into one of these funds hoping for an additional 30% or 40% pop, you're bound to be disappointed. Many market watchers think the stock market is due for a pullback at some point.

"I think we may have some room to run," says Tom Karsten, the senior managing partner at Karsten Tax and Financial Management in Fort Worth, Texas. But Karsten is still being cautious and taking some profits. "Based on the (price-earnings ratios) we are seeing, the market is starting to get on higher price levels that can't be fundamentally supported."

Study the trend

That said, by studying these funds, investors can pick out trends and then decide whether they have staying power.

More than a dozen of the funds on our larger list are classified as emerging-market offerings. T. Rowe Price Emerging Europe and Mediterranean (TREMX), for instance, is up a whopping 113% this year. This concentrated fund invests more than half its assets in Russia, 17% in Turkey and almost 7% in Egypt. Several Matthews funds concentrating on India, China and South Korea are also up big.

These funds have benefited from investors willing to take on more risk as the market shows signs of improvement and from the general rise in commodity prices. If either of those pillars is shaken, though, the returns could easily cool off.

Video: Don't blindly follow hot fund managers

Sectors such as technology, natural resources and real estate are turning in good numbers. In terms of mainstream fund categories, midcaps and multicaps have been the sweet spots. For example, Ariel (ARGFX) is up 46.4% this year. Aston Optimum Mid Cap (CHTTX) has gained 49.9% during the same period.

Lock in some gains

That said, there's likely much merit in following Karsten's advice. Since March, he has been adding weekly to his clients' equity holdings and is now taking some profits. In other words, his clients still have exposure to the market and will participate in any further rally, but they'll also benefit from locking in some gains.

"People want to regain the capital they lost. The tendency from a psychological standpoint is to be more aggressive," Karsten said. "I am still focusing on low fees, which will become more important if there is another low-return environment."

The criteria

The equity funds on our list are open to new money, require a minimum investment of less than $5,000 and charge an annual expense ratio of 1.5% or less.

Funds on the run

FundAssets (in millions)Year-to-date returnExpense ratio

Appleseed (APPLX)

$56

53.0%

0.9%

Ariel (ARGFX)

$1,714

46.4%

1.1%

Aston/Optimum Mid Cap (CHTTX)

$843

49.9%

1.2%

Buffalo Science & Technology (BUFTX)

$166

41.4%

1.0%

Chesapeake Core Growth (CHCGX)

$372

31.6%

1.4%

Columbia Value & Restructuring (UMBIX)

$6,085

40.2%

0.9%

Croft Value (CLVFX)

$122

31.7%

1.5%

Dodge & Cox International Stock (DODFX)

$35,320

44.8%

0.6%

Fidelity Magellan (FMAGX)

$22,724

32.6%

0.7%

Matthews China (MCHFX)

$2,030

65.6%

1.2%

Matthews India (MINDX)

$630

77.8%

1.3%

Oakmark International (OAKIX)

$4,044

49.8%

1.1%

Royce Opportunity (RYPNX)

$844

49.9%

1.2%

T. Rowe Price Growth Stock (PRGFX)

$16,746

33.7%

0.7%

Yacktman Focused (YAFFX)

$431

55.0%

1.3%

This article was reported by Rob Wherry for SmartMoney.

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 15
Wednesday, November 04, 2009 12:11:25 AM
This BS post with the water buffalo photo to the left will not work to draw in the suckers to buy it at its peak. What a joke, why do folks still believe unknown persons handling your money give a damn about your or your money. The whole system is flawed. 
Wednesday, November 04, 2009 7:08:03 AM

I bet these funds did terribly last year. Don't forget, a 50% loss followed by a 50% gain still equals a 25% loss overall. How is this article anything but performance chasing? weren't most mutual funds outperformed by the S&P 500 over the last 10 years? Mutual funds have to have a certain amount of money invested in equities, bonds, a limit to how much cash they can have etc. that means that when the market crashes, they have to crash along with it. You are better off in an index fund with the  lowest management fees you can find and be able to recognize when the market changes direction so you can get into cash.

Wednesday, November 04, 2009 8:13:19 AM
It is really easy to have large gains after the beating all stocks took last year. One huge issue I see with mutual funds is the tax consequences for the investor and the time it takes to get out of them if the tide turns and you need to go to cash.  My asset manager is trying to talk me into mutual funds right now and I am not buying his sales pitch. Early this year was the time to move into them.....now I feel they are too high for the headwind in the economy.
Wednesday, November 04, 2009 9:17:19 AM
I don't like all of the negativity! MSN, just tries to post an article showing something positive, and these guys are like, that's dumb, I could have written a way better article that people would want to read, and there wouldn't be a water buffalo on there either!! I would have an eagle or something cool like that!! Well go ahead and write it MR. Smarty pants!! I've got a nice chunk of the oakmark fund, and it did well last year too!!!
Wednesday, November 04, 2009 9:29:41 AM

I bet these funds did terribly last year. Don't forget, a 50% loss followed by a 50% gain still equals a 25% loss overall. ---- good point. My son said they are still losing jobs and contracts to China

and the rest of Asia....so I think we have already seen the up

side of the huge loss....Don't expect much more..

Wednesday, November 04, 2009 9:53:41 AM
A little late to be called to the party. We are not idiots!!!
Wednesday, November 04, 2009 10:08:17 AM

Really now, if fund managers are so smart why didnt they sell off when their funds were spiralling down. Isnt that what "managing" is all about. Guaranty the ride to 14,000 and I am all in.

Wednesday, November 04, 2009 10:14:21 AM
Note the ThaFatrat's comment - 50% down followed by 50% up means we're still way behind.  The markets have all kinds of room to run just to return to the 2007 peaks.
Wednesday, November 04, 2009 10:57:57 AM
ThaFatrat makes a very good point in analyzing fund performance. The funds in their zeal to look good will often times make distorted claims which may be technically accurate but irrelevant or out of context. These % gains have to examined in the framework of the base or original cost or else it is interesting info but meaningless. I am not totally sold on Index Funds bacause I do not think they take advantage of deviations in certain classes since they are "married" to the group and reflect their overall performance. In other words they have limited latitude to exercise judgment.
#10
Wednesday, November 04, 2009 11:40:55 AM
Not a big fan of funds. They manipulate the performance numbers, even closing and reopening under new name to swipe clean the history. Often stray from stated investing philosophy. Fees reduce performance, making it hard to beat benchmark indexes. Have little control over tax consequences. Better off managing your own stocks (20 to 30 minimum) or buy ETFs. Sure you can find funds that outperform but rarely can you find funds that do it year in and year out. Next year's list will be completely different. Buying and holding funds may be worse than buying and holding individual stocks. I don't suggest market timing but one needs to stay "fluid", shifting sectors when need be and rebalancing back to personal allocation.
1 - 10 of 15
To add a comment, pleasesign in