Dow-17.24down-0.17%
10,433.71
Nasdaqunch0.00%
2,169.18
S&Punch0.00%
1,105.65

MSN Money Video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires an updated version of the free Adobe Flash Player.
More video on MSN Money
Jim Jubak

Jubak's Journal9/29/2009 12:01 AM ET

Another revolution coming in China

The Beijing government plans a massive investment in social services, particularly health care. For investors, this will have a major impact on how to make money in China.

By Jim Jubak

Health care spending doubled from 2002 to 2007.

Tens of millions of people aren't covered by any health insurance, and millions who had insurance have lost it as a result of the global economic crisis.

Despite the rise in health care spending, the population isn't getting any healthier. Infant mortality rates have stopped declining. Diseases once under control have re-emerged.

Too many people live in fear that they're only one illness away from poverty.

Yep, things sure are bad . . . in China. So bad that, in January, the Beijing government announced a plan to spend $124 billion by 2011 to provide some form of health insurance to 90% of the population.

That's a huge amount of money. Yes, the dollars being thrown around in our own health care debate are larger: The draft bill being debated in the Senate Finance Committee carried a price tag of $856 billion when introduced. But that would be the cost for 10 years.

The Chinese price tag of $124 billion for two years is impressively large when you consider that China is still a relatively poor country. U.S. gross domestic product hit $14.3 trillion in 2008, estimates the CIA World Factbook. The factbook puts the size of China's economy at $4.4 trillion, using the official exchange rate, or $7 trillion at what's called purchasing power parity. (Purchasing power parity attempts to adjust official figures to take into account what people in different countries actually pay for the same goods and services.)

A radical and profitable change

Either way you look at it, spending more than $60 billion a year to improve health care in China has the potential to be revolutionary.And I think it will be exactly that. Especially if it is, as I think likely, just the first wave of government spending in areas such as health care, education and retirement pensions. We are looking at the beginning of revolutionary change in the Chinese economy.

For investors, that revolution will totally change how to make money in China.

Let me explain what's so revolutionary about spending $124 billion over two years.

The goals of the plan seem modest enough. The government wants to extend some form of health insurance to 90% of the Chinese population. "Some form" is the key. Each person covered would get an annual subsidy worth about $17 beginning in 2010. Medicines would be covered by the insurance. Some of the money would go to improving health centers in rural areas, and efforts would be made to reform the operation of public hospitals.

Now, $17 a year per person doesn't seem like much, and indeed it's not in the developed economies of the world. It's a much bigger deal in rural China, which is much poorer than the urban areas.

Video: Counting on China's economic recovery

In the first quarter of 2009, according to a nationwide government survey, the average household in rural China showed an annual income of $237 at official exchange rates. Rural households average 4.5 people (or at least they did in 1995, which is the most recent data I could find). In a household of four people, the new plan would provide an annual budget of $68 a year. That's a big percentage on a household income of $237.

Cash and apothecary

The effect, though, is even greater if you look at the way China's health care system works now. Everything requires a cash payment from the minute you walk through the door.

I'm going to take a few details from a description of a hospital visit by Bill Siggins, who had surgery in a Chinese hospital to remove his appendix. (You can read the complete account here.)

The first charge was 10 yuan, about $1.40, to register. After a preliminary diagnosis, there were tests to confirm the diagnosis. Test costs totaled $100. Fortunately for Siggins, an operating room was available, but it required a $730 deposit. In recovery, a thermometer cost $1.40. Patients and their families are supposed to provide things like a bowl, a spoon, towel and soap. Food tickets for meals cost about $2.20. (The system reminds me a bit of the last flight I took on a low-cost airline in Europe.)

This account doesn't take us down into the pharmacy, which in many ways is a much more wrenching economic experience than the hospital itself. With the end of much government support for the hospitals, the pharmacies attached to hospitals have become major profit centers. Pharmacies are allowed to charge a 15% markup over the wholesale prices of drugs.

That doesn't seem like much. But pharmaceutical sales provided 43% of revenue at China's general hospitals in 2005, according to a 2009 paper by Meredith Wen, "Averting Crisis: A Path Forward for China's Healthcare System." In that same year, government funding provided almost 7.4% of general hospital revenue. That figure had been 10.2% in 2002.

Continued: Save or die

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High

Stock Picks

Search for a Jubak's Journal article by topic or stock symbol.

MSN Money Video

MoneyShow.com
Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 92
Tuesday, September 29, 2009 5:58:44 AM
Seems like another MSNBC/NBC article in support of the Obama administration's push to enact a government health care plan.  I read into it that if China is doing it, so should we be doing it.  I draw this conclusion from Jubak's comment that the medical care in China inthe case he cited was as good as some places in the U.S.  Unless the suggested investment is in a China health care company does research and development in better health care technology, I don't see any future value. 
Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:39:03 AM

Your last sentence Jim says it all. If this revolution is just beginning we will never see the investment benefit in our lifetime. I find that saving money is a part of the character of a person. Some people spend everything they get their hands on while others hold it tight. I have a pension, health-care and I expect to receive S.S. benefits yet I still save 6% into my 401K on about a 50K income. That leaves little to splurge with after all the cost of living expenses. I was taught to save from a young age and that has stuck with me. I guess your point is that China' govt will invest/inflate value in the health-care business sector. That has not served us too well judging by the enormous amount of spending in Medicare in it's short period of existence. But if the goal is to make money, I see your point.

Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:46:51 AM
TNicos has a very valid point.  Since Jubak has come back from his 'vacation' he is pushing socialist points.  Last week it was what to do with a second stimulus.  I did not agree with the Bush one year ago, especially Obama's stimulus/porkulus that was rammed down our throats as soon as he took office.  Has Jim been promised a cabinet post or something?
Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:51:24 AM
TNicos has a very good point.  Since Jubak has come back from his vacation he seems to be pushing socialist points.  Last week it was what to do with another stimulus package.  I did not like the one on presidents Bush's watch about a year ago, the stimulus/porkulas Obama rammed down our throats immediately after taking office is infuriating.  Has Jim been promised a cabinet post lately?
Tuesday, September 29, 2009 6:59:27 AM

As I am also a recent consumer of the Chinese Health systems, I should point out that Mr. Jubak's friend was probably in a large city when he received care.  I can tell this because of the 10 yuan charge for the initial "negotiation".  And yes, the care in the cities, in only 1 or 2 hospitals per city, is the same as the US.  In the vast majority of China, health care as we know it is nonexistant. 

The key component in the Jubak article does NOT mirror Obama's socilaized medicine.  It is pay as you go, with direct contact between the patient and the provider.  The Chinese directive for rural healthcare is for catastrophic insurance much the same as plans in the States.  The user will pay for routine care and the state will subsidize the expensive treatments and routine drugs.  Medicines in China, from transplanted western companies and Chinese companies, provide routine and proven drugs.  They do not produce "new" drugs.  So Chinese pharma companies are not good investments.  However, Mr. Jubak does not recomend pharma companies but service providers.

I am a conservative, and while NBC/GE is in bed with the current administration, Mr. Jubak is certainly not.  It is very easy to lump in financial wisdom with opinion news especially from the NBc/GE source.  However, this article is neither.  A closer read will see mirroring of what is needed in the US system and it is not Obamacare.

 

 

Tuesday, September 29, 2009 7:17:38 AM

What a Marooon that TNicos is.   Another developing nation finds a

way to get a larger portion of its' population covered with insurance than America can and TNicos goes off about Obamacare.  No one, even Obama evidently, wants Obamacare.   Profit oriented

health care is not providing the care Americans need and deserve as

one of the richest nations in the World, so why not have a NON-PROFIT government or private co-op to give the insurance companies

a little capitalist competition.  The do nothings wail of without profitt

R&D would dry up and innovation would suffer falls flat when drug

companies spend more on advertising than R&D.  Insurance companies seem to be able to find a loophole to drop you like a hot

potato when the cancer comes calling.  Damned right people neet to

be busing into Washington and taking to  the srteets for health

care reform.  Oh wait, those tubbys were protesting against health

care reform.   Down the rabbit hole this country is spiraling - it gets

curiouser and curiouser.

Tuesday, September 29, 2009 7:19:18 AM
Centerfire:
Agreed!  It seems that nearly ever day we see more polarity in this country. The media has been tilted left for years, but now there seems to be an all out effort to convince Joe the Plumber that he knows very little, but that he should rejoice in the fact that his government wants to take care of all his needs.
Joe seems to have forgotten that anything worth having is worth earning for one's self.  Without earning a thing there is no true ownership.
I wish people would stop acting like lost sheep who just found their sheppard.  Their sheppard's intention is to lead them all to the slaughter house.  
Tuesday, September 29, 2009 8:22:11 AM
I thought Jim was just mentioning possible investment ideas...who knew it was political propoganda in disguise?
Tuesday, September 29, 2009 8:55:35 AM

Many Chinese ADRs are inexpensive still...they were so low - they seem high now to a casua observer.  But take FUQI - incredible run up = but P/E in teens - and growth that would justify one in the 30s. 

#10
Tuesday, September 29, 2009 8:56:01 AM
tnicos - sorry but china is not the only country that gives health care to its residents - it is sad that we are basically the only civilized country in the world who does not give health care to its residents.  all we do is beat our chests and brag about how great we are when in reality we are so far behind the rest of the world in everything it is sickening
1 - 10 of 92
To add a comment, pleasesign in