Dow+150.25up+1.52%
10,058.64
Nasdaq+24.82up+1.17%
2,150.87
S&P+13.78up+1.30%
1,070.52

MSN Money Video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires an updated version of the free Adobe Flash Player.
More video on MSN Money
Jim Jubak

Jubak's Journal11/5/2009 8:08 PM ET

A better gauge of a company's health

Two companies with very different tales to tell -- Ford and Australian mining startup Lynas -- show why investors shouldn't rely solely on easy-to-manipulate earnings reports.

By Jim Jubak

Follow the money.

That's great advice whether you're trying to unravel political skulduggery or to separate stock market winners from wannabes.

Too many investors, though, think the money they should be following is earnings, the most familiar but also most easily manipulated of financial measures. The great financial crisis, which still has the world economy in its grip, should have taught us that companies can continue to generate fabulous earnings growth even as they rot from the inside.

If you want to follow the real money, concentrate on a company's balance sheet, the best single source of information about its health.

Right now, with so many companies still recovering from near-death experiences in the land of debt and leverage, watching balance sheets for the moment when a company goes from intensive care to the recovery room is one of the best ways to look for bargain-priced stocks that are on the mend.

Ford under the microscope

Let's take Ford Motor (F, news, msgs) as an example of what following the balance sheet can tell you about a company and about whether or when you want to buy its shares.

Ford made the front page of business sections across the country Nov. 3 by announcing a startling $1 billion profit for this year's third quarter. The company generated earnings of 29 cents a share, a huge improvement over its loss of 7 cents a share, or $161 million, in the third quarter of 2008.

Other earnings numbers were just as impressive. For example, Ford's North American unit generated its first profit from operations -- as opposed to rearranging financial deck chairs on the Titanic -- in four and a half years. Overall, the company will be solidly profitable in 2011, Ford has told Wall Street analysts.

It's time to buy, right?

Not until you look at Ford's balance sheet.

From that financial report you'll get a better idea of how much progress Ford has made and how much further it has to go.

Because Ford is the only one of the three major U.S. automakers to avoid bankruptcy, the company still carries the full burden of its debt. And a very full burden it is.

The company's liabilities will come to $38 billion in 2011, according to Barclay's Capital. That compares with just $22.3 billion for General Motors, which has been able to shed substantial debt in its passage through bankruptcy.

Indicative of Ford's newfound relative financial health, rather than drowning in that sea of red ink, the company will be able to refinance much of its debt. Ford has announced that it will raise $3 billion to pay down debt. The cash will come from a $1 billion offering of common stock and the sale of $2 billion in senior notes. The notes can be converted to common stock or cash in 2016.

A thumbs-up from creditors

What will Ford do with this $3 billion? It will use the money to pay down 25% of its revolving line of credit. That planned reduction, in turn, has enabled the company to persuade other lenders representing $6 billion on its credit line to extend the maturity of that debt from December 2011 to November 2013. In other words, rather than having to find the cash to pay off that $6 billion in a little over two years, Ford has put off the bill on that debt for an additional two years. (The company is negotiating to extend the maturity on the rest of its revolving line of credit, too.)

Video: Ford chief Alan Mulally on the company's future

What do the lenders get in return? A 1-percentage-point increase in their interest-rate margin, an increase in fees, an upfront payment and a 25% reduction in the amount that Ford can draw down on this line of credit.

All this means that lenders, who have an opportunity to do far more extensive due diligence than do individual investors, have given Ford a balance-sheet seal of approval. They believe the company is on the comeback trail, and they've backed up that belief by giving Ford a chance to strengthen its balance sheet. That, in turn, will make the company significantly less vulnerable if sales volume in the auto industry doesn't pick up again as quickly as everyone now expects.

Shares face dilution

I'd take that kind of balance-sheet improvement over an announcement of a one-quarter gain in earnings as evidence of a turnaround any day.
Become a fan of MSN Money on Facebook

But this kind of balance-sheet analysis also convinces me that I don't want to buy Ford's shares quite yet. The company is going to issue 132 million new shares to raise that $1 billion in its stock offering. After the offering, current investors will own 4.1% less of the company. That degree of ownership will have passed to investors who buy the next shares. Until the stock sale, current shareholders will own all of the 20 cents a share that Standard & Poor's projects Ford will earn in 2010. After the sale, they'll own just 19 cents in earnings per share.

How important is that swing of a penny? Not very. Hardly enough to deter an investor looking to buy at $7.58 a share now.

But the difference does start to become significant if you believe Ford's $1 billion stock offering in 2009 won't be the last time the company has to go to the well. Even if Ford uses all the $3 billion it raises in cash to reduce debt, it will still have $35 billion in liabilities at the end of the process.

So investors who are encouraged by Ford's balance-sheet improvement have to ask themselves how many more times will they see their ownership of earnings diluted by 4% or more before Ford's balance sheet is reasonably solid.

Continued: A different look Down Under

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High

Stock Picks

MoneyShow.com
Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 13
Friday, November 06, 2009 9:20:12 AM
As Jim stated in his article, it is too easy for companies to manipulate their earnings. That makes me ever more fearful of a "value trap". How does the little guy cut through the nonsense to see what a company is really doing? If the experts can't tell with their armies of analysts, how can I? I am starting to think riding the gravy train is not so bad, if you know when to jump off... 
Friday, November 06, 2009 9:29:19 AM
mmmmm...gravy train.....one my old favories!
Friday, November 06, 2009 10:43:24 AM

why is it that Libs have no trouble using this kind of logic when it comes to evaluating the health of a company, but turn your focus to the US Government, and some how they ignore this kind of thinking.  How much you spend, or even make, is not the only info needed to explain one's financial health.  If JJ here was allowed to run an article like this about Obama and his financial "philosophy," he would be telling us all to run, not walk, from having any financial ties to America.  Unfortunately, however, that's much easier said than done....

 

How's that whole "hopey / changey" thing workin for ya now???

 

2012 can't get here fast enough!

Friday, November 06, 2009 11:55:55 AM
2 sick - Yeah, and I'm sure the whole Bush/repub reduction of income while maintaining expenses and increasing our deficit would go over well too.  Right?  There needs to be balance and the repubs have lost it by beleiving in big business and the 1 %ers.  Also, government is NOT just business and the short-sighted, trying to make our numbers for the current quarter.  It's being responsible to ourselves and our environment so it's around for generations to come.
Friday, November 06, 2009 12:26:47 PM
Now there's an idea for an article, Jim Jubak!  Do a financial analysis on the US government as if it were a company in which you are considering investing.  Is it a sound investment?  Ask and answer all the questions that you would expect to be answered in any thorough analysis of a large company like Ford.
Friday, November 06, 2009 3:10:05 PM

2 sick, you should be grateful to president Obama for fixing the colossal mess your republican compadres created.  in 2012 republicans will be beaten to a pulp. maybe then your people will realize the cost of putting troglodytes in charge of the party.

Friday, November 06, 2009 3:41:57 PM
Hey Old Dog...I'm all over Obama as long as he takes money from you and gives it to me.  Start spreading that wealth to me, suckers.
Friday, November 06, 2009 4:29:56 PM

Don't you guys understand that a two party system is used to divide? Reading this and many other message boards shows you how well it works. Throw the parties aside and start some real dialog about these issues.

Friday, November 06, 2009 6:17:10 PM
Really? And you would do what? Reelect W, the great one? Hang all the problems on one guy. He's certainly screwed up already, but geez, what should we do? Let's see, the GOP and the Faux news crowd would do what? I'm still listening. Cut taxes? Oh sure, that will work - for the rich and we still won't have an economy. Ther eis nothing to do except wait this out. You're certainly too young to remember the early 80's when Reagan came in. Well it was over 3 years until things changed and it was just as bad as this. It takes time.
Friday, November 06, 2009 7:01:17 PM

nightrite,  call me when your IQ reaches room temperature.

 

kite, the more divided congress, the healthier the nation. 

 

i want to crush my competitors as much as they want to crush me. that's why i devote every hour to make better products than theirs. president Obama said as much when he said that the nations that out-educate us today will put us out of business tomorrow.  republicans picked the most strident losers to lead the party; that's why democrats crushed them in 2008 and will do it again in 2012.

1 - 10 of 13
To add a comment, pleasesign in