Dow+17.46up+0.17%
10,023.42
Nasdaq+7.12up+0.34%
2,112.44
S&P+2.67up+0.25%
1,069.30

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player. Click here to download.
More video on MSN Money . . .
Jim Jubak

Jubak's Journal4/28/2009 12:01 AM ET

5 tech stocks full of promise

Some of the best investing clues turn up in daily life. My personal radar has led me to these picks, but, in today's shaky market, I'm not ready to jump in just yet.

[Related content: stocks, technology, Cisco, Internet, Jim Jubak]
By Jim Jubak
MSN Money

There it was. Sitting on the desk of my trendy hotel room in Seattle. Black. With a discrete Cisco Systems (CSCO, news, msgs) logo.

A telephone, of course.

But also a hot stock tip for anybody paying attention. And this phone isn't an isolated stock tip either. You can easily find stock tips in the technology sector just by keeping your eyes open as you run through life.

And it's certainly worth paying attention right now, since technology stocks are leading the market and the best of them look to be especially well-suited to profit from the new, post-recovery world that I described in my previous column, "5 rules for post-recovery investing."

In this column, I'm going to tell how you can find great technology buys by just paying attention as you live your life. And I'm going to identify the five to put on a watch list if, like me, you remain skeptical about the current rally -- or to buy if you're more optimistic than I am.

A way to focus your research

How does this work? What can you learn about investing by paying attention in your daily life?

Let's take the example of what you could have learned if you had simply paid attention to the phone you'd used over the past 25 years or so.

I'm old enough to remember the black, absolutely reliable -- and so heavy and solid that you could use them to crush walnuts -- phones produced by the Western Electric subsidiary of AT&T (T, news, msgs) before the 1984 breakup of that company. In the intervening years, you would have learned:

  • To stay away from AT&T as you saw more and more of the phones you and your neighbors used come from other companies.

  • To pay attention to newer names such as Lucent Technologies and Nortel Networks (NRTLQ, news, msgs). (I've got a Nortel phone on my desk as I write this.)

  • To invest in the rise of the cell phone companies when you noticed more and more of your friends using wireless phones at home.

  • To invest in the rise of Internet protocol telephony (the Cisco phone on my hotel desk) as phone service over the Internet grabbed a bigger and bigger share of the traffic and equipment markets.

What you notice by paying attention gives you a way to focus your stock research. So, continuing my hotel phone example, with a little research you'd learn several things about Cisco, the 800-pound gorilla of the market for networking equipment and software:

  • It recently pushed into new markets for Internet telephony plus home networking, Internet security and storage, and Web-based conferencing.

  • Revenue is projected to fall 5% to 10% in the fiscal year that ends in July -- because of lower spending by telephone companies and other network operators -- before picking up to show 5% growth in 2010. (And you'd discover that 5% growth is still way below the company's target of double-digit revenue growth.)

  • The company has remained profitable during this recession, produced $5.9 billion in cash flow from operations during the quarter that ended in January and was sitting on $29.5 billion in cash at the end of the quarter.

  • Using that cash and its relatively valuable stock, Cisco continues to pursue its long-term strategy of using smaller acquisitions to acquire technology and products it can push through its superb distribution system. A good example was the 2007 purchase of Internet meeting and collaboration software leader WebEx for $3.2 billion.

Video on MSN Money

Crystal ball © Randy Allbritton/Photodisc/Getty Images
Where should you invest?
An International Monetary Fund report looking at recoveries from credit crunches back to 1970 says that companies with low debt and hefty overseas sales have grown faster. Those are the companies to look at, Jim Jubak says. (April 27)

After that research, you could spend some time thinking about how Cisco fits into the post-recession, slow-growth paradigm that I laid out in my previous column. You'd likely conclude that Cisco would actually gain an edge from that kind of economy, because many of its products -- from Internet protocol telephony to Web conferencing to its recent entry into the market for blade servers for data centers -- offer customers a way to cut costs while retaining or improving functionality. That's a solid value proposition in an economy where lots of customers will be looking for value.

Then you'd probably spend some time looking at the price trends in the market. If you did, you'd notice that technology stocks were showing relative strength by hanging above their January highs (in contrast to sectors that are fighting to get back to January highs). You'd also see from your study of the charts that Cisco shares were near resistance levels set by their 200-day moving average and their April high of about $18.50.

You need Flash player 8 or above to view this content
And finally, you'd likely take a look at the valuation on Cisco shares. Cisco's shares were trading, as of the April 24 close, at a price-to-earnings ratio of 14.1. That was lower than the 15.4 P/E ratio for the Standard & Poor's 500 Index ($INX) as a whole. The stock was also trading at a price-to-sales ratio of 2.7 versus the 1.7 ratio for the overall market.

The relative overvaluation of the stock on its price-to-sales ratio and its relative undervaluation on its P/E ratio could be explained by Cisco's higher-than-average profitability. With an operating margin near 26%, Cisco is better than the average company at turning sales into earnings.

None of that tells you whether the stock is reasonably priced. To figure that out, you might look at the average P/E ratio of the past five years. Because the average was 21.6, you could conclude that Cisco, at 14.1, was undervalued, since the price in the future will climb until Cisco trades again at something like 21.6 times earnings. Or you could conclude that the lower P/E ratio was a logical reaction by investors to the company's falling earnings. Wall Street analysts now think Cisco's earnings will fall 23.2% in fiscal 2009 and 6.3% in fiscal 2010.

Setting a target price isn't a science. Where your target winds up is a result of the assumptions you make going in. I like to check the range of price targets for a stock and compare that with its current price. For Cisco, the range for a 12-month target price now seems to fall between $16 and $31 a share. At a recent $18.50 or so, Cisco has been trading above the most pessimistic target, but not by a great deal. Depending on your read for the market as a whole, that means Cisco is toward the cheap end of reasonable but not a compelling buy if you think, as I do, that this rally will yield to a correction in the next month or six weeks.

Continued: 4 more to track

 1 | 2 | 3 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High

Stock Picks

Search for a Jubak's Journal article by topic or stock symbol.

MSN Money Video

Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 11
Tuesday, April 28, 2009 8:58:18 AM

I still like INTC for the long run. The company is well run for the long haul. One possibility I see is someone buying up AMD, who would be a likely buyer?

 

One thinks Intel...but I'm sure the anti-trust issues would come to play. So who wants to compete in chips that might buy AMD?

 

I'll be coming out to the Money Show in vegas, so I'll see ya there Jim. I'm actually booked at the Mandalay Bay, you would not believe the rip off MSN tried to pass on these rooms for the event when I signed up. I had already booked mine weeks before thru expedia.

Tuesday, April 28, 2009 9:36:00 AM

Jim

 

Your insight and thought process is invaluable. Thank you.

 

Agree with you on QCOM, fits right into the value theme, which i believe is the prime of your 5 rules going forward

 

Thanks again

 

 

 

 

Tuesday, April 28, 2009 11:51:31 AM

Just a note about another topic that is really starting to tick me off. During the past 6 or 8 weeks, I seem to receive a letter every week from another of the banks (never a credit union) that hold a credit card of mine. The game runs like this: the letter states that they have reviewed my credit and are lowering my available credit to my outstanding balance (chasing the balance down). That of course ruins my FICO score, because now instead of owing $2K on a $10K line of credit and being below the magic 30% available, I am now at 100% of available credit so when the next bank runs a routine check, I look overextended. On top of that, some of the banks are implementing annual fees on the cards that I declined the change in terms (those 4.9% rates that they were tripping over each other to hand out several years ago). So now I might owe $800 on a card that they now want a $100 annual fee. I have no sympathy for these SOB's whatsoever, and I am mad as Hell that these guys continue to soak up taxpayer dollars. It isn't right. I will do all of my future business with credit unions. They are not in trouble and they are there for the individual.

Tuesday, April 28, 2009 12:47:14 PM
Amazon also has the Kindle 2, which is a wonderful way to replace those bookstores and newspaper stands we keep driving by.  I own one, and it reminds me of the beginning of the Ipod era a few years back.  Think about what the ipod did to the record store, and that is what I think the Kindle will do to the bookstore and newspaper stands.  Out here in the sticks, electronic delivery of WSJ is only possible with the Kindle technology.  Once we get used to not driving to the bookstore or dealing with old newspapers, then we are hooked.
Tuesday, April 28, 2009 1:20:13 PM
and you keep a $2,000.00 balance because why?
Tuesday, April 28, 2009 3:49:40 PM
Looking forward to meeting you in Las Vegas to personally thank you for getting me out of equities two years ago and saving me lots of money.
Tuesday, April 28, 2009 5:02:03 PM

even though I believe Cisco is an attractive company making lots of money and they have a monopoly of the networking hardware world, apparently it does not mean that shareholder will get a portion of the profits because it seems that they do not distribute dividends, or at least it is my assumption looking at the MSN "Quote" for CSCO ("Dividend & Yield"= NA).

If this is so, I would think it twice before buying Cisco shares, if I am wrong, then please let me know

Tuesday, April 28, 2009 7:28:18 PM

Cisco does not pay any dividends and is notorious about its stock option awards. It is well known that this company is run for the executives who enrich themselves at the cost of gullible investors. I have some CSCO and would unload them when (and if) I recover my "huge" losses owning it. I did hold my nose and cost averaged down over the last year and am ready to throw them out - mainly because this company does not care about its investors.

Tuesday, April 28, 2009 10:34:05 PM
I pulled up your 5 stocks on Sabrient's rating system. CSCO and QCOM are Holds, AMZN and AAPL are Strong Buys (both have very high growth scores), and JCI is a Strong Sell. The ratings are based on a 3-6 month time horizon. By the way, holding onto a stock that you hate and averaging down because you want to try to recover losses (as one commenter noted) is an inadvisable strategy -- it's better to take the loss and invest in a stock that you actually believe in.
#10
Wednesday, April 29, 2009 6:16:53 PM
thank you Jeez123, I was right then, this is a good company for their managers and not for the investors. I think that was also the case of INTEL many years ago, but nowadays they pay dividends. It is really hard to understand for a well capitalized company why they do not pay dividends. I think that if Cisco decides to begin paying dividends, then share value would be substantially better than otherwise. It seems that Cisco's policy is convenient for the early stages of a startup, but after they are a successful company, they do not need to reinvest so heavily.
1 - 10 of 11
To add a comment, pleasesign in