Dow+141.85up+1.37%
10,460.01
Nasdaq+32.51up+1.51%
2,178.55
S&P+17.04up+1.56%
1,108.42

Video on MSN Money
This video requires an updated version of the free Adobe Flash Player.
Jim Jubak

Jubak's Journal11/3/2009 12:01 AM ET

5 stocks to buy as prices drop

The best time to pick up long-term winners is during a short-term correction near the beginning of an economic recovery.

[Related content: stocks, energy, Ultra Petroleum, Jim Jubak, oil]
By Jim Jubak

The stock market is fixated on the short term. We all know that. It's an unusual occasion when stock analysts and investors look more than a few quarters ahead. That means stock prices often tend to respond to short-term news as if it were the only news.

And that means investors with long-term views of companies and economic trends can often buy likely long-term winners while they are temporarily depressed by short-term news. This kind of long-term thinking in a short-term market is one of the best ways for the average investor to beat the stock market indexes.

In pursuing that kind of strategy, however, too much caution is actually a bad thing. Let me explain -- and give you some examples of stocks and sectors where taking the long view will pay off.

Don't fear the long term

The past week or so has been a vivid reminder of how hard it is for investors to take the long view.

Many of us are convinced that over the next decade or more the U.S. dollar will decline in value, commodity prices will climb, inflation will re-emerge, gold will continue to march higher and developing economies will outperform.

But all it took was a (so far) very modest correction -- a 5% drop in the Standard & Poor's 500 Index ($INX) from Oct. 19 through Oct. 28 -- to rout all those convictions.

Investors who believe, firmly, in those long-term trends sold gold, oil and other commodities, bought dollars and dumped developing economies. The iShares MSCI Brazil Index (EWZ, news, msgs) exchange-traded fund fell even more steeply than the S&P 500, dropping 6.2% in the same period.

That's completely understandable.

After all, investors have suffered through two vicious bear markets in the past 10 years. And the lesson of those bear markets is to sell first and ask questions later.

It also doesn't help that everyone is waiting for a correction that will take some of the exuberance out of the rally that began March 9. You just don't get 60% rallies without 10% corrections -- but that is exactly what this rally has delivered. Call it too good to be true.

Now, caution is a good thing. I don't believe the economic recovery is clearly sustainable yet (see my Oct. 29 post on JubakPicks.com on the third-quarter gross-domestic-product numbers for why not). It's certainly not the time to get reckless.

Don't be overly cautious either

But just as you can overdo fear at market bottoms and greed at market tops -- to the very real detriment of your portfolio -- you can also overdo caution.

And right now, caution shouldn't be stopping you from making the kind of long-term bets that you'll need if you want to earn decent returns in the decade ahead. If, as I suspect, average annual returns are going to be lower than the long-term average for stocks of about 10%, then you need some kind of strategy for beating the market if you hope to meet your financial goals.

Most of us aren't going to get where we want to go averaging 5% a year before inflation. And while saving more is great advice, it's awfully hard for many people who are struggling to rebuild household balance sheets and seeing paychecks stagnate (at best) as costs of things like insurance and energy rise.

If you have a long-term investment trend that's as clear-cut as the ones I've mentioned above, you ought to regularly fight through the temptation to be overly cautious and set up a strategy for buying low whenever you get a chance.

That's exactly what the best oil company CEOs are doing right now, for example.

Think natural gas

Oil companies have to take the long view. Any investment decision they make today -- Exxon Mobil's (XOM, news, msgs) decision to bid for oil and gas exploration rights off Ghana, for example -- isn't likely to pay off for years and years and years. That time frame for decisions makes them inherently cautious: They certainly don't want to make a decision with a payoff 10 years down the road on the basis of today's fleeting enthusiasm or pessimism about oil prices. But they also know that if a company doesn't take risks today, it won't be around tomorrow.

Video: Why early cyclicals will do best

And what are these cautious long-term risk takers investing in right now? Natural gas. They're taking advantage of the currently depressed prices for natural gas to buy into future sources of supply. In the long term, they believe, the price of natural gas will move up as a recovering global economy demands more energy. Natural gas, they also know, is a key transitional fuel for a world trying to reduce its output of carbon dioxide. It burns with less CO2 emissions than coal or oil, and it doesn't require an expensive retooling of the energy infrastructure, as wind and solar do, before it can become a major source of power.

Individual investors can make a similar long-term investment by buying shares of a low-cost U.S. natural-gas producer, such as Ultra Petroleum (UPL, news, msgs), whenever the energy sector goes into one of its periodic panicked sell-offs. The stock certainly has the volatility that makes this strategy work for a long-term investor. At a current price near $53 a share, Ultra sells for well below its June 2008 high of $98 but well above its 52-week low of just below $29. It traded near $45 as recently as August, and I'd certainly be interested in adding to positions when it next hits that price range.

Continued: The view across the pond

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High

Stock Picks

Search for a Jubak's Journal article by topic or stock symbol.

MSN Money Video

MoneyShow.com
Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 16
Monday, November 02, 2009 11:14:40 PM
Hibxae----not a very good job at your veiled attempt to advertise this corny so called wealthy dating site.  There probably isn't one rich person on that site-----just posers, scammers and criminals.  lol.
Tuesday, November 03, 2009 6:41:56 AM

During this economic crisis, one thing is clear:  investment in public companies is a fools game and will stay so unless and until management begins to work for shareholders.  That means a big current return on your investment - dividends!  Jubak does not mention the current return OR the priority these companies give investors.

 

Consider COP, 6 bbls of oil reserves for every share - $77 x 6 while the stock is $50 - why?  Because mgt gives a much larger piece of the revenue stream to taxes, labor and their pay than to shareholders.  Investors do not believe this will change so the demand for COP stock is low which keeps the price low.

 

Look at Ford - does anyone truly expect people to invest for a return of or on their money when the unions strangle the business?  Not worth the risk, especially without a substantial current dividend.

 

Jubak, if you do not discuss mgt's concern for shareholders with an emphasis on dividends, then you have left out the most important analysis for investors.

#3
Tuesday, November 03, 2009 10:42:07 AM

Don't look for much help in the near future. The direction of the current administration is to reward the non-productive and demonize and penalize the productive.  The mark of a true populist Marxist. This is the change we voted for. Enjoy. 

Tuesday, November 03, 2009 10:57:57 AM

Don't Blame the unions they are there to protect workers and get a livable wage and benefits for the workers!!! When a report is published what union people get for a wage it always includes all benefits which make it look a lot higher! My son is in the electrical Union and his hourly wage as a journeyman is 28.00 per hour. It takes 5 years of on the job training and Schooling to become a journeyman. He don't have unusual benefits his deductibles are average to high on insurance. With rent, car payment household and family expenses he barely makes it!! These days 28.00 is not an unreasonable wage.

The problem is the ones at the top want more more more and give the ones at the top more more more with higher wages unlimited travel benefits better insurance and eye popping bonuses!!! Many of these people are not even needed to run the company. Many get bonuses for just being there and some have screwed up many time and should not get these eye popping bonuses and wages. The Share holders and regular workers should!!!!! This Nation it going more and more to Rich and Poor and no in between is this what we want for our kids???  Bring more businesses back to America and stop illegal aliens from getting jobs here and make English required to get citizenship. We all need to speak the same language or we will have civil wars..... just because of not being able to communicate well. SUPPORT AMERICA!!!!SUPPORT AMERICANS!!!!!

Tuesday, November 03, 2009 1:53:04 PM
Anybody that has to talk about how much they have. Does not have very much!
Tuesday, November 03, 2009 2:41:02 PM

nanapaula

 

To amp0709

 

You are so right.  I thank God my children learned this lesson before they got any older.  Like so many Americans, they wanted everything right now.  But this recent downturn in the economy has taught them to save money for what they want.  I was always a good example; but children learn better from their own mistakes.  It is better to have savings than things that wear out or get lost.

Tuesday, November 03, 2009 3:41:42 PM

My parents came from Europe, taught me to save money.  I fail to understand how people live in this country.  My Slovak friends come to this country with nothing but the shirt on their back.  Why is it there homes are paid off and better off financially than most Americans ?  People don't live within their budget.  I never buy new car.  Are you aware the cost of first drive from car lot ?  In 1999, I bought 2 year old Mercury Sable 97 for $11500. New Sable was $ 19000.  I am not crazy to spend $ 19000 on car losing value each year.  When I bought my house in 2001, I had savings $ 200K in the bank.  House cost $ 142K.  I took out 15 year mortgage thinking tax savings.  The tax deductions weren’t worth it so paid off house in 5 years.  I am age 48, never married, good salary as electrical engineer, graduated 1994 from CSU, no college debt. The problem is people want everything in life today, not 10 years later.  I do not post net worth ½ million to show off as some people may think.  I was not born with silver spoon in mouth.  It began with zero savings.  Woman said, “It is not how much you earn, it is how much you save.”  I save $ 3000 / month.  Last year earned $ 8000 bank interest.  I always pay off credit card to avoid interest.  I support my mother on fixed income.  I know first hand what it means to struggle in life.

 

 

Tuesday, November 03, 2009 4:00:35 PM

I heard plenty of cries from unions.  Engineer at work made comment about it.  He said, "The unions are driving manufacturing out of this country.  The unions are putting themselves out of a job."

 

When in Japan on business trips, I saw Japanese workers in the plant. They work like robots and barely noticed me.  I do not feel sorry for the unions, with all the strikes and demands.  They got what they deserve.

case dismissed...

Tuesday, November 03, 2009 4:12:57 PM
You tell 'em keilers!!  Jubak is a dufus!!
Tuesday, November 03, 2009 4:59:53 PM

     Why do some people call the Atlantic Ocean a pond? A pond is a man made body of water which is very small. You could make one in your yard. Now the ocean is something else. So lets not be ignorant and call it a pond.

1 - 10 of 16
To add a comment, pleasesign in