Dow+150.25up+1.52%
10,058.64
Nasdaq+24.82up+1.17%
2,150.87
S&P+13.78up+1.30%
1,070.52

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player. Click here to download.
More video on MSN Money . . .
Warren Buffett © The Associated Press

Extra7/23/2009 5:00 PM ET

Buffett’s $93,000 shares are a steal

The Oracle of Omaha has taken advantage of financial turmoil to lift his company's real value, and its shares could trade for $110,000 or even $125,000 in the next year.

By Barron's

Warren Buffett has taken advantage of the past year's financial turmoil to make more than $20 billion of promising investments for Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A, news, msgs), including preferred stock and warrants issued by Goldman Sachs (GS, news, msgs) and General Electric (GE, news, msgs), and a convertible issue from Swiss Re, the European reinsurer.

Buffett's investment coups haven't registered significantly on Wall Street. On Thursday, Berkshire's class A shares closed above $93,000. Down 5% this year and way below their late-2007 peak of $149,000, the shares haven't kept pace with the stock market's rally since the end of March.

Yet Berkshire itself looks appealing, at just 1.3 times our estimate of its current book value of $72,000 a share. In the past decade, the stock has traded for an average of 1.6 to 1.7 times book value, a measure of shareholder equity per share. The current price-to-book ratio is near the low reached in early 2000, when Berkshire's stock bottomed around $40,000.

One fan tells Barron's that the stock could top $110,000 in the next year. If so, it would trade for roughly 1.4 times our estimate of book value in 12 months: $80,000 a share. That price target doesn't seem outlandish in view of the projected price-to-book-value ratio. In a better economic and financial environment, Berkshire might even trade up to $125,000 a share, implying a multiple of book value closer to the 10-year average.

Cheaper shares even cheaper?

Berkshire's class B shares, worth about 1/30th of the A shares, fetch about $3,000 each. The B shares look like an even better buy than the A shares because they sell at a 2.5% discount to their theoretical value. But the discount has persisted for some time and could continue, as the B shares can't be converted into A shares.

Berkshire's book value, which stood at $66,250 a share as of March 31, likely has risen since then because of the market's powerful rally. That has lifted the value of the company's famed equity portfolio, which now totals more than $50 billion. The market value of Berkshire's equity and bond derivatives also has increased, and we assume the company earned more than $1,000 a share from operations in the second quarter, in line with reported first-quarter figures. That's how we arrived at an estimated book value of $72,000 a share.

Following Buffett's advice, most Berkshire watchers focus on book value as a measure of the company's valuation, as reported earnings can be distorted by realized investment gains and losses. Historically, Berkshire's shares have tracked changes in book value.

Why Berkshire is behind

The sluggish performance of Berkshire's shares may owe to several factors: Investors recently have favored economically sensitive and other "offensive" stocks; Berkshire is perceived to be "defensive" because of its financial strength, including a cash position of $23 billion on March 31.

Also, investors remain concerned about Buffett's miscalculated sale of long-term put options on $35 billion of equity indexes, including the Standard & Poor's 500 Index ($INX), when stock prices were much higher. The puts showed a loss of about $5 billion on March 31, and it is difficult to value them based on Berkshire's limited disclosure. Berkshire has taken a big hit, as well, on some of its own equity holdings, including large stakes in ConocoPhillips (COP, news, msgs) and American Express (AXP, news, msgs). Both stocks have fallen more than 50% from their highs.

Video on MSN Money

More economic stimulus needed, Buffett says © CNBC
Buffett: More economic stimulus needed
The Oracle of Omaha says a stimulus won't work instantly, and it's unrealistic to expect quick results. Still, he says, it's time to consider a second one.

It also doesn't help that shares of property and casualty insurers are out of favor amid concerns about weak insurance pricing. Berkshire owns Geico, the No. 3 domestic auto insurer, as well as reinsurer General Re and a specialized reinsurance business focused on hurricanes, earthquakes and other high-risk events shunned by many insurers. Some investors worry, too, that Berkshire's large size -- the company now has a market value of $132 billion -- makes it tough for Buffett to generate high returns. Then there is his age: The Great One turns 79 next month.

None of these issues, save Buffett's age, is significant. Buffett sounded upbeat at Berkshire's annual meeting in May, saying he thought Berkshire stock could best the S&P 500 in the coming years. He noted that the stock hadn't kept pace with the growth in retained earnings in recent years. Asked whether Berkshire's competitive advantage would die with him, Buffett replied that Berkshire's strengths -- including a unique business mix and culture, long-term orientation and patient shareholder base -- will outlive him.

This article was reported by Andrew Bary for Barron's.

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 20
Wednesday, July 22, 2009 2:59:42 PM
...and what happens if the man dies soon?  Unfortunately, he brings both the value and is old...if he dies (it's been known to happen), then do the shares act like Apple did when Jobs was reported to have an almost incurable cancer, or worse?
Wednesday, July 22, 2009 3:02:27 PM

“.. investors remain concerned about Buffett's miscalculated sale of long-term put options …including the Standard & Poor's 500 Index ($INX).”

 

Wow, I finally beat Buffet in the market. I sold Jul 09 S&P puts with an average strike of 650 last November. They expired out of the money, so, now I’m following through on the rest of my plan and using the profits to take a vacation. Might as well, I didn’t make nearly enough to even buy one share of Buffet’s class A stock.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009 3:06:33 PM

"  Buffett is not as great an investment manager as the media likes to portray him.  His company lost over 30% last year.  A manager who knows what he or she is really doing does not lose money  "

-   GrowthStockTips.com



Wednesday, July 22, 2009 3:11:01 PM

America's Top 10 Alcohol-Drinking Cities—and 10 Most Sober Cities

 

The list below ranks the 10 U.S. metropolitan areas—defined as counties or groups of counties with a population of 10,000 or more—with the highest rates of heavy drinking. A second list identifies the 10 metro areas with the lowest rates. Is heavy drinking a problem in your community?

 

Heaviest Drinking Metro Areas % Who Drink Heavily

 

1. Reno, Nev. 9.4
2. Palm Bay-Melbourne, Fla. 9.1
3. Boulder, Colo. 9.0
4. Austin 8.8
5. Charleston, S.C. 8.7
6. McAllen, Texas 8.6
7. Naples-Marco Island, Fla. 8.5
8. Riverside, Calif. 8.4
9. Cape Coral, Fla. 8.1
10. Barnstable Town, Mass. 8.0

 

Find Here:Most Sober Metro Areas % Who Don't Drink Heavily
Wednesday, July 22, 2009 3:20:56 PM

I personally prefer lower income taxes to a stimulus package. 

 

Think about it.  The Government doesn't earn a single dime, they TAKE it from the working class, the taxpayer.  So they TAKE $1.00 out of our monthly paycheck, pay $0.90 worth of beureaucratic overhead, and then they're going to give back $0.10? 

 

It's like toasting my bread and then paying/waiting for a distinguished government agent to come over and butter it. 

 

Why not just leave the stimulus in my bank account where it belongs in the first place.  We'd cut out a whole lot of red tape and wastefull overhead.  Lower income taxes is the greatest stimulus of all!

Wednesday, July 22, 2009 3:36:14 PM
payneinboise    #7
Wednesday, July 22, 2009 3:06:33 PM

"  Buffett is not as great an investment manager as the media likes to portray him.  His company lost over 30% last year.  A manager who knows what he or she is really doing does not lose money  "

What's that saying again....oh yeah, ignorance is bliss!  I'm sure your bank statement is much larger than Mr. Buffet's and you've never lost any money in the market during a recession/depression.  People say some truly stupid things from behind their computer screens.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009 4:08:09 PM

I know one of the ways Buffett has gotten rich, and it certainly was not the most  ethical way. One of his companies did a  dirty number on me and nearly broke their own arms patting themselves on their backs for getting out of paying what should have been paid.

I have no respect for him at all, and why doesn't he keep his mouth shut?  We have enough goobers that have been elected that we need to listen to in D.C. We do not need old Buffett telling us anything!!

Wednesday, July 22, 2009 4:32:36 PM
Sounds like more MSN Money "Hype" to me, bout like that Jim Cramer and his out landish yelling, also note- one of the VIDEOS above is claiming that E Bay has hit on every note as far as expectations, of their earnings, thats wrong, mega wrong, just a few years ago E Bay was having difficulties and their stock price was down in 2007 and 2006,, more HYPE from a poor reporter,, and as far as this Omaha Mogual,, who owns Nebraska Furniture mart-- GET THIS - the Kansas City Unified Government is having to sue them, Nebraska Firniture Mart, because their 2 or 3 years behind on back Property Taxes and refuse to pay their share of Property Taxes, but I bet when they wanted to build and move into that city, those suit and ties made all kinds of promises to city officials,, now its a different story,, if Mr. Buffet has so much money then paying these property taxes shouldn't even cause his eyes to flicker,, or is this another Bernie Madoff scheme much like the ENRON debacle- yet to be discovered and unfold,before the publics eyes,,, time will tell,, many felt they were doing OK too and everything was kosher too till ENRON went bakrupt, and this MADOFF thing unraveled--- now we all know different don't we,, never assume anything is as it appears , no matter who it is !!!!Open-mouthed
Wednesday, July 22, 2009 5:12:09 PM

Scientists, Technologies Inventors-Brainstorming Start-ups in the box.

Lets choke the conglomerates and tycoons by not letting them use the latest invented technologies in the Power, Water and Food Sectors, among myriad of others.

Let them keep their $billions and their exuberant securities, but don’t let them use the tech to further enrich them selves.

Keep brainstorming to a point that they have to beg for a glass of drinking water and for food on their lavish tables. Curtailment methodology by substitution of old tech with the least costly new tech, thus old tech becomes obsolete and of no value.

Don’t be enticed by a chicken feed dollar from the Govs even if you starve to dead and be subjected to Technology Transfer, which tech will indubitably be transferred to the conglomerates and tycoons who are nourishing the Govs, thus they remain the winners.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009 5:40:40 PM
I was foolish enough to buy his stock five years ago when he said there would only be 15% returns rather than the 24% returns of previous years. After five years only out $5000. What a genius he is. Don't believe that adds up to 15% returns.  He is living on past glories.  What has he done for his shareholders lately?
1 - 10 of 20
To add a comment, pleasesign in