Dow+30.69up+0.29%
10,464.40
Nasdaq+6.87up+0.32%
2,176.05
S&P+4.98up+0.45%
1,110.63

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player
More video on MSN Money . . .
12 blue chips ready to rally © Sandra Baker/Getty Images

Extra8/25/2009 12:01 AM ET

12 blue chips ready to rally

Many blue-chip stocks that were left behind in the market's recent upswing are worth buying. This handpicked dozen could rise 20% in the next year.

By Barron's

This time, the cream isn't rising to the top.

The historic rally that has lifted the Standard & Poor's 500 Index ($INX) by 50% from its March lows has been led by economically sensitive and lower-quality stocks, including such sectors as financials, basic materials, retailers and industrials. By contrast, high-quality stocks like Abbott Laboratories (ABT, news, msgs), Exxon Mobil (XOM, news, msgs) and Procter & Gamble (PG, news, msgs) generally have lagged, with many showing outright losses this year.

The rush by investors for cyclical, economically sensitive stocks has only increased as the outlook for the global economy has brightened. But now a shift may be at hand. Quality stocks soon could start to shine.

Several factors are working in their favor, including relatively low price-to-earnings multiples, decent growth outlooks and strong financial positions. The run in economically sensitive stocks has left many of them trading at very high P/E ratios for 2009 and even 2010 -- to the extent they have any profits at all this year. Investors now can grab best-in-class companies such as Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A, news, msgs), Microsoft (MSFT, news, msgs) and Wal-Mart Stores (WMT, news, msgs) at attractive prices and for little or no premium relative to their lesser brethren. (Microsoft publishes MSN Money.)

Jeremy Grantham of GMO, a Boston investment-management company that evaluates a range of domestic and overseas asset classes, argues that U.S. blue-chip stocks now represent some of the best investments in the world.

Barron's has picked a dozen quality stocks that look ready to rally. The stocks trade for an average of 12 times projected 2010 earnings, excluding Berkshire Hathaway, which tends to get valued based on its book value rather than reported profits.

Each of our dozen could rise 20% in the next year, and most have secure dividends of 2% or more. The major market indexes may rise more grudgingly in the months ahead, following the biggest rally since the late 1930s. The S&P 500 Index now is valued at about 15 times projected 2010 operating profits, a premium to most of the blue chips on our list. And if the economy unexpectedly weakens, quality stocks are apt to offer greater downside protection than most of the market averages.

The bull case for the cyclicals, including many financials, rests on hoped-for 2011 or 2012 profits, but those might not materialize if the economy sputters. The investment outlook for Caterpillar (CAT, news, msgs), Ford Motor (F, news, msgs), Dow Chemical (DOW, news, msgs), Paccar (PCAR, news, msgs) and a range of other economically sensitive stocks hinges on distant earnings. New investor favorite Ford, whose shares have more than tripled this year to $8, isn't expected to earn much money until 2011. And who knows what the economy and global auto market will look like then?

"The easy winner of the cheapest-equity subcategory is still high-quality U.S. blue chips," Grantham wrote in a recent market commentary. "They were really trashed on a relative basis by the second-quarter rally in junk. I understand a rally in junk after the record decline, but this was excessive and based apparently on unrealistic hopes for a strong, sustained economic recovery."

In fact, it's one of the biggest issues confronting professional investors: Should one stick with the stocks that have been doing best -- the cyclicals -- in the hope that the rally continues or start buying quality issues?

Video on MSN Money

Your market shopping list © CNBC
Your market shopping list
Here's another look at blue-chip stocks to buy for the long term.

Numerous measures illustrate the outperformance of economically sensitive and lower-quality stocks. The Morgan Stanley index of cyclical stocks is up 48.6% this year, led by Ford, Goodyear Tire (GT, news, msgs), Freeport-McMoRan Copper and Gold (FCX, news, msgs), Sears (SHLD, news, msgs) and Ingersoll-Rand (IR, news, msgs). The Morgan Stanley Consumer Index, by contrast, is up 7.5%, held back by double-digit percentage declines in Safeway (SWY, news, msgs), Abbott Labs and Procter & Gamble.

Given its high-quality composition, the Dow Jones Industrial Average ($INDU) is one of the worst-performing U.S. market indexes this year: It has gained just 6% while the S&P 500 has risen 11%, the technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite Index ($COMPX) 27% and the S&P 400 Midcap Index ($MID.X) 21%. The energy sector has badly lagged the big gain in oil prices, as Dow components Chevron (CVX, news, msgs) and Exxon actually are in the red.

Continued: A dozen stocks to consider

 1 | 2 | 3 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High

MSN Money Video

Find Hot Stocks

Find hot stocks © Digital Vision / Getty ImagesSurefire ways to discover the best-performing equities.
Barrons on MSN Money
Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 13
Tuesday, August 25, 2009 12:53:41 AM
Eye-rolling?????
#2
Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:01:50 AM
Tuesday, August 25, 2009 8:37:07 AM
I am trying to learn how to use puts to save  my big gains
Tuesday, August 25, 2009 8:56:39 AM
I, like many others, gave up on picking individual stocks, based on expert recommendations such as those in the above article!
No load mutual funds takes some of the worry out of the daily ups and downs of individual stocks. In fact, in uncertain times such as these, a diversified portfolio that includes bonds is the way to go. One of my loomis sayles bond funds is up 19.81% in 2009 and my overall portfolio is up 17.89%. Not bad for an 80 year old guy.


Tuesday, August 25, 2009 11:26:25 AM
 I am 71 and would like to share my thoughts with you easy picks...
Tuesday, August 25, 2009 1:20:29 PM
I love that you put Berkshire Hathaway's $100k per share stock in here.  For the extremely small % of people that can actually afford one share, 99% of those would have ZERO diversity in their portfolio.  Ask the investors of Bernie Madoff's company how not having any diversity can completely ruin your financial position.  I know it's not 100% the same but imagine the devastation these people would realize if the SEC were to discover that Warren Buffett were also entangled in fraud.  In my personal opinion, the only people that should ever consider buying a share of stock for $100k should be multi-millionaires (at a MINIMUM net worth of $5-10 million) in case something did happen and the stock became worthless overnight. 
Tuesday, August 25, 2009 3:13:38 PM
BUY INDEX FUNDS.Slow and Steady wins the race.
Wednesday, August 26, 2009 11:10:01 AM

Athleticnerd,

 

You should consider BRK.B.  It moves with BRK.A but comes at a fraction of the price.  These days around 3300 per share.  Yes, that's still about a hundred times the share price of a lot of stocks.  So, only buy one instead of a hundred.

Friday, August 28, 2009 11:00:17 AM
I use a ten per cent down side. The cost should not be bad on an up day two weeks or so before the expiration. You don't have to buy contracts for all your stock. I would for 60 to 65% that way you should be able to protect any good gains September is shaping up to be a very volatile month. Beware.
Saturday, August 29, 2009 10:06:55 PM
how do you figure walmart could pay off, at this high. the stock stayed in the 40 dollar range forever. how? they always come up with some way to drive the stock to that range.
1 - 10 of 13
To add a comment, pleasesign in