Dow+150.25up+1.52%
10,058.64
Nasdaq+24.82up+1.17%
2,150.87
S&P+13.78up+1.30%
1,070.52

MSN Money Video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires an updated version of the free Adobe Flash Player.
More video on MSN Money
Starbucks logo © Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Extra11/19/2009 8:45 PM ET

What's to hate about Starbucks

An empire built on airs, the company has begun shunning its own image for hipper garb. But its big new style is decidedly down-market.

[Related content: Starbucks, spending, retail, McDonald's, food]
By Scott Reeves, Minyanville

There's a lot to dislike about Starbucks (SBUX, news, msgs). But even if you hate the company right down to the canned art on the walls and the sticky-sweet goo passed off as coffee, you've got to admit those businessmen in Seattle sure know how to build an empire on faux exclusivity and inflated prices.

When profits plunged 97% in the fourth quarter of 2008, optimists interpreted it as a sudden outbreak of good taste. No such luck. In the third quarter of 2009, the company earned 20 cents a share, compared with a penny for the same period a year earlier.

What happened? Analysts will prattle endlessly about Starbucks closing 600 weak stores to get costs in line, improving customer experience and -- get this -- continuing innovation intended to differentiate its 7,087 company-operated and 4,081 licensed stores in the U.S. from the competition.

Don't believe it.

There's evidence that far from innovating, Starbucks's latest innovation -- the independent-coffeehouse-themed 15th Avenue Coffee and Tea -- was ripped off from small nonchain coffee shops in the Pacific Northwest.

Sebastian Simsch, a co-owner of Seattle Coffee Works near the city's landmark Pike Place Market, said Starbucks employees elbowed their way into his 300-square-foot store last year to nose around.

"I thought it was funny," he told The Seattle Times. "We're this little store, and I thought Starbucks didn't need to learn from me."

Starbucks' drones reportedly got so thick that Simsch called corporate headquarters to complain. After that, the spies didn't return, even when he moved into a bigger space next door.

It seems Starbucks finally figured out that one size doesn't fit all, especially if you're catering to customers who pride themselves on their up-to-the-minute, cutting-edge looks and attitudes. The chic new stores will be rebranded with individual names to create the illusion that they're locally owned. Who says you can't buy authenticity?

Of course, Starbucks has to do something to maintain its place in the coffee game. Many coffee lovers swear by Peet's Coffee & Tea (PEET, news, msgs), a company with about 190 shops in California and half a dozen other states that traces its roots to Berkeley's gourmet ghetto. Aficionados say Peet's stuff is fresher and far superior to anything coming out of Seattle.

Starbucks also faces increased competition from unlikely blue-collar sources: McDonald's (MCD, news, msgs) and Dunkin' Donuts.

Thanks to that competition, coffee drinkers may have even more reason to hate Starbucks.

Consumer Reports magazine says a cup of joe from McDonald's beats the expensive stuff at Starbucks. (See "Starbucks to rip off more than just its customers.") The magazine hired trained tasters to sample a medium cup of black coffee from McDonald's, Burger King (BKC, news, msgs), Dunkin' Donuts and Starbucks.

McDonald's beat the rest, Consumer Reports said. Coffee from the Golden Arches was "decent and moderately strong."

Become a fan of MSN Money on Facebook

Somewhere, there's a poet at Starbucks working on a sonnet who took a punch to the solar plexus. But here's the knockout blow:

"Although (McDonald's coffee) lacked the subtle top notes needed to rise and shine, it had no flaws," the magazine said. Starbucks, it said, "was strong, but burnt and bitter enough to make your eyes water instead of open."

In order to better compete, Starbucks is heading down-market to meet McDonald's on its own turf. It recently rolled out an instant coffee artfully -- no, dramatically -- named Via Ready Brew.

So much for the ritual of preparation, the sense of indulgence and maybe even the ambient glow from being among kindred souls at Starbucks.

The new instant stuff must pack a wallop because the copywriters at Starbucks went into overdrive. Under the heading "How Starbucks Via Ready Brew can change your life," (.pdf file) the unsuspecting pilgrim learns:

Video: Starbucks' profits perk up

"It's pretty revolutionary, when you think about it. With Starbucks Via, great coffee can be yours anytime, anywhere. A life-altering concept, with tasty consequences, to be sure. But with endless possibilities for enjoyment, where does one begin?" (See also "Why Starbucks' caffeine high may not last" and "Will Starbucks Via be an instant success?")

Some testers say Starbucks' new instant coffee is as good as slightly stale regular coffee, and that almost certainly beats cleaning solvent or battery acid. For the record, the instant coffee comes in two flavors, Colombia and Italian roast, and a three-serving pouch costs $2.95. (Note to Starbucks' corner office: Colombia is a noun; Colombian is an adjective. Make it "Colombian instant coffee" lest you offend the delicate sensibilities of English majors everywhere. You got Italian roast right, apparently by chance.)

Peddling instant coffee looks like a Hail Mary pass from a company that built an empire by convincing people coffee was a luxury product and complimenting them on their taste, wit and sophistication to get them to pay inflated prices for it. But now Starbucks is going for broke with breakfast offerings that include a ham-and-egg sandwich and coffee for $3.95.

In fact, Starbucks is becoming a bohemian McDonald's, minus the lip-smacking grease and inexpensive, hearty coffee lacking "top notes." You've got to love the comic opera tone of the latest scam -- and hate the company that hatched it.

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 313
Friday, November 20, 2009 1:38:20 AM
So many reasons to hate Sbux, but the number one reason...they have turned into the Wal-Mart of coffee. What used to be a company that treated their "partners" well, is now a company that crapped all over them. Eagerly awating the McDonalds opening very soon across the street from my local Sbux!!!!

Oh yeah, the Via??? What a ripoff!

Friday, November 20, 2009 2:16:39 AM
Miaosizang.  "Stand up against the spread of global capitalism"?  You poor deluded fool. 
Friday, November 20, 2009 3:19:45 AM
which Mcdonalds did they go to cause the one I went to served me burnt sugar suspended in a coffee looking liqiud.  If you find yourself in durango go to durango joes to get your cafe latte or what have you
Friday, November 20, 2009 6:36:46 AM
The author must have a serious hatred for Starbucks.  Taste buds and sense of smell but not be too good either.  Come on man, have you really tried McDonald's coffee.  Worst I have ever tasted.  I have a son who works part time a Starbucks while going to college.  Good company and one of the few who have some perks for part time employees>>health and dental insurance, can buy company stock at reduced price, 401k option, flexible hours.  Very successful company with a great product and always trying new ideas, give em a break. 
Friday, November 20, 2009 6:38:11 AM
Go to a good supermarket.  Buy White House Kona Blend, or Barrie House coffees.  Have them custom-ground extra-fine, just one notch coarser than espresso or buy a package of Illy Espresso. 

Make them at home with clean, filtered water in a good coffeemaker.  Thank me later.

Come to think of it, check out this link too:

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2006378/travels_in_the_world_of_coffee.html

Friday, November 20, 2009 6:45:30 AM
Starbucks built their empire on the fact that we are a nation of 300 million sheep.  In what other country would people willingly pay $5 for a 50 cent cup of coffee, with a quarters worth of frothy milk in it? 

And for the record, I'm not a coffee drinker. 

Friday, November 20, 2009 7:51:23 AM
Sounds like our dear writer has been on the short-end of class warfare and Starbucks is an easy drive-by target.  It's just coffee, not aristocracy.  I'm from Philly so my preference is Wawa for the quality, flavors, and price.  But when I do something social like meet with friends or a date, over coffee, we most certainly do NOT go to McDonalds.  Can you imagine a date at McDonalds?????  The Starbucks "experience" that you don't seem to get is a comfortable atmosphere with no ketchup on the floor.  As for taste, until Consumer Reports walks a mile in my taste buds I don't see the point of their opinion.
Friday, November 20, 2009 8:10:52 AM
Starbucks success was based on a chance confluence of a generation of over indulged lemmings in an economy inflated by hype.  It had no more to do with genuine business sense than a guy who hits the lotto at the local 7-11.  Howard may have deluded himself into thinking it was all due to his cleverness, but his recent moves have shown that he really has no clue about the business.  At the beginning of the economic crash he was touting some new Italian coffee for 15.00 per cup. Then he decides to go head to head with McDonalds, who not only served up a better coffee, but offerred something for the kids as well.  Most of Howard's die hard customers are the type that built themselves mini mansions with huge master suites, walk in closets, wine cellars, exercise rooms, offices etc. and then as an after thought threw in some 8 X 10 boxes designated as the children's rooms.  Now that his Ferrari coffee is sitting dead alongside the road like its namesake, and McD has whipped his bu** in the breakfast market he has taken on Nestle in the instant market.  Nestle is a giant with a long established and superior product, so his game plan is to insult them.  His next big idea seems to be to copy the little local guys and then move in next door with a computer generated name designed to sound like its a local mom and pop.  Failing to realize that his core supporters are too afraid to patronize a place that doesn't carry the ' cache" that was Starbucks.  If you're ever in LA, visit the La Brea tarpits.  There you will find the bones of other extinct animals that simply thrashed about in panic until they sank into oblivion.
Friday, November 20, 2009 8:11:37 AM
And you would make an impact HOW?????
Friday, November 20, 2009 8:11:41 AM

First off, let me say, I find Starbucks coffee superior to most others.  Caribou & even dunkin donuts coffee isn't bad, not to be confused with the dreck served up by McDonald's (whose Angus burgers I love).  I hate the Pike's blend.  I always drink a large black coffee, no cream, no sugar (and I don't order it Venti, that's too HoiPeloi) and it is usually 1.95.  The price for coffee is not too high, for a large GREAT coffee.  I think their bakery treats are too expensive.

 

My biggest gripe about them is that they want to be a high end coffee house, and yet they have usually 2 choices for coffee.  One almost always is Pike's.  Why can they not have at least 3 + decaf (better yet why not just drop the decaf).  The boast lots of different varieties, but the marketing guy must be a moron that prevents a customer from being able to ordering all but 2 on any given visit.

1 - 10 of 313
To add a comment, pleasesign in