Dow+17.46up+0.17%
10,023.42
Nasdaq+7.12up+0.34%
2,112.44
S&P+2.67up+0.25%
1,069.30

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video player requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player
More video on MSN Money
retail health clinics © Jim Arborgast/Photodisc Red/Getty Images

Extra6/19/2009 12:01 AM ET

Wal-Mart stumbles over in-store clinics

Its slow start has given drugstore chains a head start in offering basic-care clinics that are popular with consumers. But the retail giant still intends to become a major player.

[Related content: Wal-Mart, health care, retail, savings, drugs]
By BusinessWeek

Two years ago, Wal-Mart Stores (WMT, news, msgs) announced plans to have retail medical clinics in 400 of its stores by 2010 and said it saw the potential for as many as 2,000. By February 2008, the retailer had 78 clinics. But now, after failed venture-capital collaborations, a few faulty partnerships and a reassessment of the business model, it has only 31.

For a company known for its retail acumen and dominance, that retrenchment illustrates the complicated nature of incorporating basic-care facilities into a big-box business model.

Americans have shown increased interest in retail medical clinics, which are typically open seven days a week and operate until as late as 8 p.m. According to the Convenient Care Association, a trade organization based in Philadelphia, the number of people visiting such clinics doubled nationally between 2007 and April 2009, to 14%.

The retailing behemoth, however, is still formulating an appropriate model.

"Wal-Mart is not a drugstore. I'm not surprised that there would be false starts," says Candace Corlett, the president of consultancy WSL Strategic Retail. Pharmacy chains, meanwhile, have seized a large swath of the retail clinic market.

Still, Wal-Mart sees plenty of opportunity and says it remains on track to have 400 clinics within the next few years to take advantage of growth in the field.

Wal-Mart collects a brand fee and income from renting space to the clinic operators -- and uses its massive buying clout to buy equipment for them -- but it holds no ownership stake in the clinics.

These offices, also known as "convenient care" clinics, are typically staffed by nurse practitioners or physician assistants and offer basic treatments for common ailments such as strep throat, sinus infections and rashes.

Clinics mesh basic care with a retail philosophy that stresses convenience and savings. Prices are usually displayed on menu boards. Visits typically cost $45 to $75, not including prescriptions.

The clinics perform physicals, drug tests, blood work and other noninvasive screenings without the lengthy waits, high prices and hefty paperwork often associated with hospitals. For more serious cases, the clinics refer patients to a doctor or emergency room.

The goal is to "simplify, like a Starbucks (SBUX, news, msgs) or a McDonald's (MCD, news, msgs)," says Karen Bowling, the CEO of Solantic, a Jacksonville, Fla., company that operates 26 clinics, three of them in Wal-Mart stores.

Wal-Mart isn't alone in searching for a profitable business model in an industry that is striving for greater awareness and traffic. Retail clinics need customer traffic to cover their $500,000 to $600,000 yearly operating costs. With each visit bringing an average of $59 to $80, a clinic requires roughly 20 patients per day to break even and 30 to turn a healthy profit.

Walgreen (WAG, news, msgs) subsidiary Take Care Health Systems, for example, operates more than 200 offices and sees patients as young as 18 months. By expanding its hours and services, Take Care Health had estimated sales of $450,000 per location in 2008, according to Kalorama Information, which publishes health-care market research.

"I think the challenge in (making the clinics) profitable is as simple as getting to the point where you have an adequate amount of consumer awareness," says Chip Phillips, the president of MinuteClinic, which has 500 retail clinics in 25 states and operates as a unit of drugstore chain CVS Caremark (CVS, news, msgs).

Wal-Mart has more than 1 million potential clients among its employees alone, and it is betting that the combination of rising health-care costs and consistent traffic from budget-minded shoppers will prove successful. However, the enterprise has been marked by early stumbles and is taking longer than expected to develop. Industry experts and clinic operators cite brand confusion, advertising problems, broken partnerships and the recession as factors in Wal-Mart's halting foray in the field.

Video on MSN Money

Wimpy © The Everett Collection
A 'Wimpy' health care system
One obstacle to reform is that Americans, like a certain hamburger-chomping moocher, prefer to pay later for what they consume today.
Location is key, too. Freestanding retail clinics operating out of strip malls draw attention from auto traffic or public transportation stops. Solantic, for example, sees more business at such locations, and especially at its Orlando International Airport site.

Wal-Mart's clinics, however, are typically situated inside, near the store's main doors -- along the same row as its photo studios and Subway sandwich shops -- rather than near its pharmacies, and may catch a consumer's eye only on the way out. Plus, the company doesn't allow signage directly outside the store to promote the clinics and restricts indoor signs to areas near the clinic offices, says Natassia Orr, the administrator of Broward Health Weston in Weston, Fla. At Wal-Mart, "the challenge is from an awareness perspective," Solantic's Bowling says.

The retailing giant does run in-store TV advertising and promotions on walmart.com, and is "working with our existing clinic operators to determine how we can better communicate to our customers about the benefits of clinics," company spokeswoman Christi Gallagher says.

Continued: Increased collaboration with established providers

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 72
Friday, June 19, 2009 7:21:21 AM
Who makes the titles of these articles?  A measured informed startup is not a "Stumble."
Friday, June 19, 2009 7:40:10 AM

It's great to see these health care alternatives rising up across America.  I haven't had the need to use one yet, but will do so.

 

Capitalism is alive and well and that is GREAT news!

Friday, June 19, 2009 7:59:24 AM
It has never died. The problem is the politicians and cable talking heads using the word socialism to protect their pocket books and scare us into supporting them. It's called fear mongering. Very sad.
We will always have some socialism in the good ole USA. I don't see anyone giving up on social security or police, etc.  I think Omaba knows better - watch him run away from GM by early 2010. lol
Friday, June 19, 2009 8:11:57 AM

they tried this at a grocery store near

it didn't work

they closed it

the $$ isn't that greatSad

Friday, June 19, 2009 8:35:48 AM

A member of the elite media. Anti Walmart, pro union, an obama lover. I too was misled by the headline.

Friday, June 19, 2009 8:37:28 AM
old wally world wants to control the medical world too.
Friday, June 19, 2009 8:39:14 AM
While I never shop at Wal*Mart (and there are two in town), it's business model of incorporating walk-in clinics will gain traction as time goes on.  Greater brand-identification through coupling with existing care organizations will be a big step in that direction, but for Wal*Mart to become the, well, Wal*Mart of walk-in clinics, it will need to do something other similar clinics do not do - namely, adopt a sliding scale of charged ranging from $1.00 to $99.00.  As we are forced (through national health care reform) to purchase insurance, and for those whose employer-covered plans continue to require greater co-payments, the amount of the deductible portion of the premium will become the most critical issue on a month-to-month basis.  To Wal*Mart, the difference between charging $45 per visit, or virtually nothing for some, and up to $99 for others, will guarantee that people of all financial abilities will be able to obtain the kind of primary care which is becoming increasingly available at these walk-in clinics. 
#8
Friday, June 19, 2009 8:52:29 AM
How is it fear mongering to call something what it is. what is needed is for people to understand the difference between Socialism and Fascism. So far in Obama's brief stint as president has managed to do both. When the government takes over the business and runs it, that's Socialism. Think GM. When a company is publicly or privately held, but the government dictates their actions or polices, then that's Fascism.Think the new Fed powers. Why are people so afraid to call something for what it is. This administration has done more in six months to kill Free Market than any other administration since the last Progressive movement of the 30 and 40's
Friday, June 19, 2009 9:22:07 AM

frankly,i don't see the entire model as viable. if convenience is going to be the chief selling point, there are going to have to be x-ray and laboratory equipment, which is expensive, and the cost of which has to be amortized. moreover, there will have to be paraprofessional personnel to run them. these people aren't cheap. but the biggest issue is this: once again, if you're going to sell convenience, you're going to have to staff these places with multiples (!!!) of professional level practitioners. if you got 1 doc, the wait is going to be not much better than the er, and that defeats the purpose.

add to these factors the costs of materials and insurance (potentially astronomical), regulatory compliance, etc., and as i said originally, i don't see a viable enterprise here.

i won't even deal with the issue of wal-mart (in particular) attracting nothing but second-rate talent to work there. all right for a megastore, not so good in healthcare.

Friday, June 19, 2009 9:29:50 AM
If Wal-Mart brings a clinic into the store that I use, I will no longer do business with them.  Plain and simple.  Over the years, Wal-Mart has been turning me off.  When I buy meat from them it is always bad so I go to Kroger to get my groceries now.  I have bought glasses (to see with) from them but had to return to get them fixed.  When they saw them they said, "Oh, we don't carry these anymore."  Wow, they were only a few months old.  I used to buy my craft and sewing things from them but they cleared out that department this year.  JoAnn Fabrics, here I come.  I am so sick of Wal-Mart.  This is one customer that won't be coming back.
1 - 10 of 72
To add a comment, pleasesign in