Senate Democratic leaders on Thursday rejected Republicans' objections to a financial reform bill and said they would bring the legislation to a floor vote next week.
The political media will track, in excruciating detail, the trapeze act of Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) as he reaches for the elusive 60th vote needed to push his bill past a GOP filibuster. The clowns on both sides will emit their reliably windy rhetoric: Republicans claiming that the legislation will invite more outrageous bailouts, Democrats that this bureaucratic reshuffle will fend off the next financial cataclysm.
Instead of building this buffer, the Senate will argue about issues that amount to little more than elaborate distractions. First, the Dodd bill would create a consumer protection agency to prevent home loan and credit card abuses. Republicans, echoing Jamie Dimon and his cohorts, attack the plan as hostile to capitalism. Dodd has compromised by sequestering the watchdog within the bank-friendly Federal Reserve. Look for him to offer more cosmetic changes to tempt GOP crossover votes.CEO
With or without a reform bill, if the White House put real cops on the banking beat, we would see real enforcement. If we get the sort of do-nothing crews we've had since Ronald Reagan, rearranging the seating charts won't make much of a difference.
Capital and liquidity requirementsThe other fake debate will focus on proposals to enhance Washington's authority to put to rest troubled financial giants -- a less traumatic "do not resuscitate" procedure for the next Lehman Brothers.
The Democrats want to give regulators more tools to liquidate endangered Wall Street Goliaths without the panic sparked by Lehman's abrupt Chapter 11. Republicans, warning that their mollycoddling foes are encouraging taxpayer giveaways, argue that ordinary bankruptcy court is sufficient. Again, the argument seems tangential.
Which brings us to the issue that deserves attention but will be largely absent from the Capitol Hill theatrics: capital and liquidity requirements.
Capital is the investment in a financial institution that doesn't have to be paid back to anyone. When a bank's assets -- say, exotic real-estate-backed securities -- fall suddenly in value, its capital provides a bulwark against disaster. In the last debacle, too many Wall Street institutions lacked sufficient capital. They were too highly leveraged. Since 2007, U.S. banks have boosted cash reserves and raised $519 billion of capital at the urging of regulators, Bloomberg News reported last month. As memories of the crisis fade, however, those stockpiles will diminish -- unless someone sets tough rules.
As a chastened Alan Greenspan told the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission on April 7: "The primary imperatives going forward have to be increased risk-based capital and liquidity requirements on banks and significant increases in collateral requirements for globally traded financial products."
More from MSN Money and BusinessWeek
- Banking rules breed risks no one sees coming
- Wall Street dead? No, just moving
- Goldman Sachs: Don't blame us