Anthony Mirhaydari

Extra12/29/2010 5:30 PM ET

The end of the cheap-money era

The global economy was fueled for years by low-cost borrowing, and money is still cheap now. But that's changing. Here's why it's happening -- and how to respond.

By Anthony Mirhaydari
MSN Money

For more than a generation, the price of money has been falling.

Since the inflation genie was put back in the bottle in the early 1980s, U.S. interest rates have been on a slide. The federal funds rate fell from a high of 22.4% in 1981 to nearly zero now. In fact, back in October, the government actually borrowed $10 billion via a bond issue at an interest rate of negative 0.55%. That's right: People actually paid for the privilege of lending Uncle Sam hard-earned cash.

Over the past 30 years, it's been an economic truth that credit has been and will always be cheaper. That encouraged people to borrow. Consumers offset stagnant wages and a higher cost of living by running up debt. The savings rate dropped from nearly 12% in 1975 to a low of 1.2% in 2005, while household debt swelled from 68% in 1977 to 128% of disposable income in 2007. (Both numbers have improved a bit since those lows.)

This helped finance the consumer-spending boom that drove the economy forward. It funded new industries and new jobs. On the downside, it encouraged two economic bubbles, in tech stocks and real estate. And it helped the government finance a steady stream of budget deficits, thanks to tax cuts, war expenditures, stimulus initiatives and economic bailouts.

Historical central bank lending rate © MSN Money
It's hard to blame people for taking advantage of historically cheap money around the world. Short-term interest rates have fallen to 500-year lows, based on an analysis of historical data from the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England and the Bank of St. George in Italy by the folks at Global Financial Data. Sidney Homer and Richard Sylla go back even further in their "A History of Interest Rates," which suggests that money hasn't been as cheap and plentiful as it is now for virtually the whole of human history -- going back to 3000 B.C., when the Babylonians charged rates of at least 20%.

But this era is ending as we roll into a global infrastructure and investment boom the likes of which we haven't seen since the post-World War II reconstruction of Japan and Europe.

Life without cheap money

This change will produce strains on the global financial system on a scale that hasn't been seen in 60 years.

Many governments will be forced to address out-of-control budget deficits and unsustainable debt levels with higher taxes and austerity. Consumers will be forced to deleverage and cut spending. Investors will need to rediscover equities after a recent fascination with bonds. And businesses will need to do more with less capital.

This will mean the end of 0% credit cards, 0% auto loans, interest-only mortgages and low-cost auto leases. If you need to borrow money for something, now's the time.

But there are also many positives, including lucrative new opportunities for investors, especially in those companies set to profit from the modernization of the developing world. Banks are also set to do well as higher interest rates increase loan profits.

First, let's review how we got here.

Savings glut or investment dearth?

Economists have pointed to various causes for ultralow interest rates, which are a function of the supply of money (from savings) and the demand for money (from investment in productive assets). Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke suggested in 2005 that a "global saving glut" led by the likes of China was funneling excessive savings into the United States -- which helped inflate the housing bubble by keeping long-term interest rates low.

New research by McKinsey Global Institute puts the blame on a lack of investment -- equivalent to $20 trillion over the last 30 years, the size of the U.S. and Japanese economies combined. Investment in infrastructure, housing, machinery and equipment fell from a peak of 26% of gross domestic product in the 1970s to a low of 20.8% in 2002 and just 21.8% now.

We can see evidence of this inadequate investment all around the developed world.

I've written about how the capital base of the United States is shrinking as businesses let their factories fall into disrepair. The American Society for Civil Engineers gave our infrastructure a "D" grade in its latest report card and estimates that we need to spend $2.2 trillion over the next five years to rebuild bridges, fix water supplies and upgrade our schools, roads and energy systems. The government estimates that while U.S. road use nearly doubled from 1980 to 2008, system capacity increased by just 8%. It's no wonder rush-hour traffic is so terrible.

It's not just here. In London, 40% of the city's water mains are more than 100 years old and 12% are more than 150 years old.

The other story is the emerging demand for new homes, factories, office towers, hospitals, shopping centers, schools and utilities across the developing world. McKinsey believes that if consensus forecasts of global growth are realized, worldwide investment will exceed 25% of GDP in 2030, or $24 trillion -- up from $11 trillion today.

Continue: The coming investment boom

More from MSN Money

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowHigh

Recent Articles by Anthony Mirhaydari

24Comments
1/03/2011 7:44 PM
avatar

Strange that this analysis posits a lot of "this much must happen by 2030", but there is no "or else...". Many times in history there has been incorrect analysis, but even when accurate it was never tested because the world just didn't go there, and the "or else..." took hold. At that point there is no one connecting it to the original requirement, it just happened another way. So this is mostly incomplete prognostication that does no good.

 

Anyway, cheap money isn't gone, it's just that reasonable credit requirements are being re-established, along with higher rates for higher risk. Personally I wouldn't lend my money to China or Russia at any rate, because there's an underlying philosophy there that says I don't really deserve to be paid back--so I'd just skip that myself. This goes for the rest of the Socialists out there as well. Why do you think anyone should lend you money? Because you "need" something (whatever that means)? Or else what?

avatar

For the last 10 years or so, the global engine was fueled by the U.S./China trade relationship.  As I understand it, China buys our Treasuries (I.O.U.'s).  These treasuries were paid for with taxes from profits made of the Chinese Export machine.  The more China exported to the U.S. (and the rest of the world), the more money was available for the purchase of  U.S. treasuries.  This demand for U.S. treasuries would theoretically keep the value of the dollar strong.  So, the government won and the U.S. consumer won.  Both parties could spend without regard for fiscal responsibility.

 

U.S. manufacturing lost, because a strong dollar made them globally uncompetitive.

 

Now that the party is coming to an end, the U.S. government and the U.S. consumer will have to look at their budgets in earnest.

 

Investments in infrastructure will follow the next inevitible U.S. domestic manufacturing boom.

 

The U.S. manufacturers poised to benefit should be obvious.  They will be the ones still in business.

12/31/2010 10:14 AM
avatar
No sh**, Sherlock.  No rise in interest rates, no recovery.  Kapish?
12/31/2010 1:28 AM
avatar
so everone is all a titter at the prospect of speculating on the next great investment that wields you a wonderful one year return on investment while building nothing for the future that lasts for our kids. america. where did you go? let s make sure that rich people succeed shall we because they will alwys act in the interst of the common good of all of us,
12/31/2010 1:23 AM
avatar

bizzare ramblings from a kid still trying to live in old world terms. everyone is trying to make a new direction while attracting attention with fear. while much higher interest rates might be part of a new world order someday, i see no logic in this happening anytime soon. this kid is another gop member trying to make himself relevant for his own narcicist success. where are we all going? no where fast.

12/30/2010 9:34 PM
avatar
If any of you need money I'll lend you some. I charge 20% interest. Take it or leave it!
12/30/2010 5:10 PM
avatar

The federal funds rate fell from a high of 22.4% in 1981 to nearly zero now.  Yes the US government is trying to kill of all of the American savers.  Holding cash is safe if FDIC insured but your value is bound to go backwards.

12/30/2010 12:55 PM
avatar
I want to borrow as much money as I can can, live it up for a while and then walk away from the debt and default.
12/30/2010 12:16 PM
avatar

I agree that interest rates are going up. But for different reasons, one, investors are beginning to question Americas willingness to pay the debt. Two, the fear of inflation. Anthony may have a third reason. America biggest problem is no economic leadership!! Politian’s don’t get elected by presenting trough decisions.

12/30/2010 11:11 AM
avatar

This guy's articles are a lot (but not always) smoke and mirrors.  He loves numbers more than common sense.

 

Cheap money is gone because we realized that if you lend money out cheaply and easily, you get bad recessions, like the tech-bust and the Great Recession.   A lot of people and companies lost a lot of money on account of this.  So, basically, we all realized that we have to recoup our lost money, so we have to increase the price of leant money and lend it to the people or corporations that pay their bills.  I'm not saying that encouraging savings has nothing to do with it.  It does.  But, it's a secondary, tertiary, or quarnery reason behind the move, not the primary reason.  You couldn't save enough money to fund the expansions he's talking about.  We're seeing corrective behavior here, not a change in fundamental philosophy.

 

This dude really should not be posting on msn Money.  This is the same guy who years ago said the price of a barrel of oil would be between $40 and $140, basically saying that there's a good chance your friends will be between 4'11" and 7'0".

12/30/2010 10:25 AM
avatar
Power and control is what it's all about and the banksters and corporporatists soon overwhelm a majority of them, in both party parties, with the one thing that will keep them in power and control - money. We have a political cesspool of a swamp that will be hard to drain - if in fact it can even be done at this point.
As to the article - I find it one of his better attempts. In fact I find it a little disconcerting because I mostly agree with the premise, and this kid gets a whole lot mostly wrong. Perhaps this is his proverbial year end discovery of a "nut". I sure hope so - I'm betting on it in fact.
12/30/2010 10:04 AM
avatar

i used to work as a supplier to the CAT-ingersol-deere companies and it was known then (10 years ago) that those companies had already aligned themselves with overseas growth.  in an industrial  trade magazine at the time those companies were identified as also being a safe USA investment for international investment returns.  each have a counterpart around the world in key spots to either produce their products outright in other countries or exploit their significant subassemblies into unique products in other countries. 

 

the claim as well was in time china will have their hands full fulfilling their own country needs and will in time no longer be such an international power.  i'm not sure how true that prediction will turn out to be....

12/30/2010 10:04 AM
avatar
Here we go again with Anthony. First it was to be an epic bull market, then it might be a fools rally, now we're back to bet the ranch on equities.  I happen to agree there is a reasonable outlook for increased infrastructure investment, but not from Anthony's acumen.  I believe he gets his articles written right after he reads the "thought du jour"...............​.watch out for tomorrow.
12/30/2010 9:46 AM
avatar
Aftermarket engineer....good post but I am not so sure the rich get into politics to protect their fortunes as much as they just enjoy the power of it. The ultra rich cannot spend it all in a lifetime. I think if you have all the toys money can buy what is left but the power that money gives you and most politicians are all about the power and the limelight.
12/30/2010 9:29 AM
avatar
Aftermarket Engineer:   Excellent Post. The Best of the Year. Unfortunately, the general public has been brain washed for so many years by the these selfish Pols., Lobbyists and biased medias that they are unwilling to formulate an independent analysis. Just think, in another week  we will have the greatest friend that corporate lobbyists has ever had in congress as Speaker of the House. That's what the public voted for and got. Quite telling of the perspicacity of the American voters, isn't it ??
12/30/2010 8:40 AM
avatar
Needee1 is right.  Honest people aren't attracted to politics any more.  It is run by movie stars (Reagan, the Shwartz), the ultra rich (Bloomberg, Heinz' hubby), and family dynasties (formerly the Kennedy's and Bush's) of the ultra rich.  These people are only entering politics so they can influence legislation to protect their investment (oil, foreign stocks, sweat shops in China).  We need new politicians who actually worked for a living before entering politics.  Most importantly, we need people who view politics as serving the public, not an entitlement position.  The problem is, if this type of person enters politics they are overpowered by the current "professional politicians" and the corporate media that supports them (Fox News, Rush, Mathews).  What's worse is the general public actually believes what the media spins because it is easier than generating an independant thought.  I think both parties have let us down because they are only interested in protecting their own investments and those of their campaign contributors.  Boys and girls, we're down to smoke-and-mirrors with the current parties - the Tea Party was just a Republican Party strategy to get the votes of those that couldn't bring themselves to throw all their chips into either party's pot.  that means the Republicans knew the public was getting fed up with the 2 dominant parties AND that the Democrats were too dumb to see it!!!  I'm at a loss ...
12/30/2010 8:22 AM
avatar

Good article, with a forecasting insight.  However, and I have heard this a number of times recently people on the cusp of retirement age need to still be invested in stocks.  While my cash position currently is 95% I am reluctant to move into any equities.  The retirement plan my spouse has participated in for over 15 years lost 80% of its value 2 years ago, it has never recovered and instead floats at a fixed level. 

I most fear inflation, the author I take is too young to remember the ravages of the 70's and 80's.  Eroded purchasing power caused great pain and this time around will create even greater pain.  A worthless currency generally destroys even the strongest economies. 

avatar
hey rich people get richer and poor stay poor, our upper class likes it that way, quit giving the rich so many tax breaks and loop holes, let the fat rats fix the problem they have created. we the poorer are trying to stay afloat, live with in our means and enjoy life. stick it to em good, all those fat rats, till we fix things here at the bottom. good luck as the rats run things, we can only pray and hope, good luck.
12/30/2010 2:13 AM
avatar

strrig228:

Honest people aren't interested in getting into politics.  Republicans don't have the answers and neither do the Democrats.  I thought I had the solutions once but they seem more and  more farfetched.  Quite frankly we're doomed not matter what we do now.  Even though America won't be #1 anymore it was a great ride!!

12/29/2010 11:20 PM
avatar
the people of this country need to vote everyone in government out of office and put some new people that are honest , and not corupted but special intrest groups. people who work for the people!!!
Report
Please help us to maintain a healthy and vibrant community by reporting any illegal or inappropriate behavior. If you believe a message violates theCode of ConductPlease use this form to notify the moderators. They will investigate your report and take appropriate action. If necessary, they report all illegal activity to the proper authorities.
Categories
Additional comments(optional)
100 character limit
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
viewCounter