Dow-17.24down-0.17%
10,433.71
Nasdaq-6.83down-0.31%
2,169.18
S&P-0.59down-0.05%
1,105.65

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video player requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player
More video on MSN Money
Traders © Digital Vision/SuperStock

Extra7/8/2009 5:15 PM ET

Oil speculators under fire

In a departure from the prevailing hands-off approach, regulators on both sides of the Atlantic are weighing new restrictions on traders in the commodity markets.

By The Wall Street Journal

Policymakers on both sides of the Atlantic launched an effort to crack down on what they called speculation in oil markets, underscoring concerns that a sharp rise in oil prices could worsen the global economic downturn.

In Washington, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the main U.S. futures-market regulator, said it is considering tougher regulation of oil-futures markets. The proposed rules, which drew immediate criticism from traders, would seek to curb the influence of speculative investors such as hedge funds and investment banks by limiting how much money any single trader can bet on any one commodity at a time.

In an opinion piece submitted to The Wall Street Journal, meanwhile, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and French President Nicolas Sarkozy wrote that governments need to act to curb a "dangerously volatile" oil price that defies "the accepted rules of economics" and "could undermine confidence just as we are pushing for recovery."

The moves come at a time when the hotly debated idea that speculative investors are driving up prices is gaining credence, and political momentum is building to stop them.

In recent months, oil producers and Asia's biggest oil-consuming nations have called for regulators to address the issue of price volatility, and the U.S. Senate has blamed speculators for high commodity prices.

On Tuesday, Democratic Sen. Byron Dorgan, a backer of a bill introduced last year to limit speculation, called the CFTC's action "a positive first step" to curbing "oil speculators looking for a quick buck at the expense of American consumers."

The price of oil recently bounced back to some $73 a barrel from a 2009 low of nearly $34, despite a slump in demand, bulging supplies and a world economy in the doldrums. Crude, which closed at $62.93 Tuesday, reached $145 a barrel last summer. Higher prices could affect the prospects for economic recovery: A sustained 10% rise in the price of oil can knock as much as 0.4 percentage point off global economic growth over the subsequent 12 months, estimates Jim O'Neill, chief economist at Goldman Sachs.

Much trade in oil futures is carried out by commercial traders such as oil companies, utilities and airlines seeking to protect their profits against swings in energy prices. In recent years, big noncommercial traders such as hedge funds and investment banks have poured money into oil and other commodities. Such investors typically put their money in indexes that track the value of futures contracts, in which investors promise to pay a certain amount in the future for oil and other commodities.

Video on MSN Money

Recession © Stockbyte/SuperStock
Does oil volatility threaten the recovery?
Momentum is building to limit the involvement of traders in commodity markets, as government leaders worry that rising prices will impair the recovery potential of their economies. (July 8)
As of last July, financial investors had about $300 billion riding on such indexes, roughly four times the level in January 2006, according to the International Energy Agency, a watchdog headquartered in Paris. Money drained from oil and other commodity markets during the second half of 2008, but investments have since surged, partly as a hedge against inflation and a weaker dollar: JPMorgan Chase analysts estimate that a net $25 billion was poured into commodities in the first half of 2009.

Oil-market analysts question the idea that speculative investments have pushed up prices. They attribute the current volatility to uncertain prospects for economic recovery -- and the long-term rise to a surge in demand from China, India and other developing economies.

"No one has a clear expectation of what the future price is going to be," said David Kirsch, an oil-market analyst at PFC Energy. "Putting limits on financial investment is only going to have a limited effect on overall volatility."

Continued: The interventionist line

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 88
Thursday, July 09, 2009 5:04:09 AM
Far too many people that have no knowledge of the real value of commodities, or very little care about the impact, have access to trade.  It's this STUPID element that is having an impact on oil prices and the market in general. Profit above responsibility strikes again.  Fear above market fundamentals is driving a lot of the market right now.
Thursday, July 09, 2009 8:19:50 AM

The article implies that the UK and France desire to control the futures market (in the name of saving it, of course).

 

We could discuss the "real value" of commodities, but the bottom line is that when governments control the market, it's no longer free.  It is whatever the government wishes it to be and that's a dangerous path to travel.

Thursday, July 09, 2009 8:59:32 AM

Well we have seen the dangerous path the "free market" path has provided.  I don't believe that government control or nationalization is being discussed but governments should have an improved supervisory capacity.

 

"Traders don't want rules that are going to change the game."  But of course they don't and they certainly are not policing themselves.  If you were so inclined and had license to rape, ravage and pillage the world would you want to have limiting rules ?

 

I think what is needed is limitation and licensing of who participates.  The thought is overly simplistic but Sam Sixpack, a WalMart loading dock specialist, does not merit 1000 Feb WTI crude contracts but Valero does. 

 

"Speculators play a crucial role in the futures market by providing liquidity" is a long abused concept and should be revised.   

Thursday, July 09, 2009 9:39:34 AM

In the old days oil was priced by supply and demand.  Now a days all it takes is the threat of a storm, hurricane, Middle East unrest of whatever else speculators can make up to run the price of oil up.  Oil goes up, gas goes up and the economy tanks.  When speculators get back to supply and demand instead of made up reasons to run prices up I say let the market run.  Until then, I say HANG THEM ALL AT THE HIGHEST TREE AND LET THE VULTURES EAT THEIR ROTTING CORPSES!!!!

Thursday, July 09, 2009 9:41:35 AM

Idiots...

 

Why don't you enter the oil market and sell the oil to the American people who you say are being cheated, for far less.  You would beocme the new XOM in a few months.  Everyone buys oil on the free market.  As long as there is an idiot to buy it at $70+ a barrel, they will charge $70.  STOP using oil/gasoline if you want to pay less.

 

Drill for more Oil here in the USA.  Use more coal!  Build windmills everywhere.  Develop cheap hydrogen fuel.  Develop batteries and solar panels (right now these harm the environment more than they help it).  Skip stupid stuff like ethanol from corn (Forces up food prices, is not viable with oil under $90/barrel, and without taxpayer money is even less so...)

 

Another option is to become a speculator!  Buy oil low and sell high!

Buy shares of the oil companies and reap the windfall!

 

Such morons...

Thursday, July 09, 2009 9:46:49 AM

Is Sam Sixpacks money any less green than Valero's or YOURS?

 

Who decides who should be able to buy the oil?  Sounds like rationing to me.  If SamSixpack wants to buy oil (and he is not using leverage) then I say let him buy what he wants.  If he makes (or loses) a fortune, I say good for him.  It is his money and his risk. 

 

Lets not take away Freedom to make or lose money! 

 

If you don't want the OIL @ $70, DON'T buy it!

Thursday, July 09, 2009 9:49:54 AM
Simple way to make the speculators stop, require anyone purchasing oil to actually take control of said oil, ie, store it themselves.  Watch the speculators stop immediately as they suddenly realize they have no where to put said oil they need to take ownership of.
Thursday, July 09, 2009 9:52:59 AM
I talked of this very issue 2 years ago on here it did not seem to matter but I wish the companies that did this (hedge funds financial institutions were disclosed , So Americans could be sure to do zero business with them in any capacity , They added to the whole mess take the wasted monies that people spent on over priced Gas for homes-cars ,air travel,freight movements add that up its billions , All these billions went to oil rich nations like a huge vacuum sucking  cash out of the Americans pockets such as buying at big box retailers who sell everything made in China if only we could curtail 25% of that and make something in the USA with the overpriced illegal pricing of Oil , this country would have 5% unemployment today not 10%.
Thursday, July 09, 2009 9:54:59 AM

O here is a good one, now the senate and others in house are worried all the sudden of the potential of someone, Jacking the price of oil up just because they got a hair up their butts and felt like doing it, just to do it and put more money in their pockets. 

 

Now what's wrong with this, Us, the people have had the screws put to us in other areas of life and no one seems to give a dang about that, Getting raped ever time we turn around and the rich continue to get rich and the rest of us try to figure out what the heck we are going to do to continue making ends meat and attempt to stay alive.  Why don't the same people that are seem so concerned now look at other areas of life as well, grant it oil going back to 4.00 or more a gallon isn't good by no means but their are so many other things that need attention as well it isn't funny.

#10
Thursday, July 09, 2009 9:59:10 AM

It is about time. The only folks crying are the speculators and folks that sell luxury goods to them. The downside is huge and upside benefits very few. It is gambling plain and simple and yes I do understand the commodities markets.

1 - 10 of 88
To add a comment, pleasesign in