Dow+17.46up+0.17%
10,023.42
Nasdaq+7.12up+0.34%
2,112.44
S&P+2.67up+0.25%
1,069.30

MSN Money Viceo

Video on MSN Money
This video player requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player
More video on MSN Money
Obama © Michal Czerwonka/epa/Corbis

Extra4/29/2009 9:00 AM ET

Obama's 100 days of economic change

The president hopes to use the economic crisis to forge far-reaching changes in American society. Here's a scorecard on how he's fared so far.

By U.S. News & World Report

It's a bit like getting your first report card after just a week of school, but President Barack Obama's first 100 days in office obviously haven't been the usual honeymoon period.

When Obama became president in January, the economy had been in recession for 13 months, with no end in sight. Huge banks like Citigroup (C, news, msgs) were still foundering despite the emergency resuscitation rendered during President George W. Bush's final months. Big companies were announcing four- and five-digit layoffs. The "D" word -- depression -- was being whispered.

It's impossible to turn around the world's biggest economy in 100 days, but Obama has clearly tried. Since January, his administration has put in place a vast economic-recovery program. The question now is whether it will work.

Here's an early assessment of how Obama has tackled the biggest problems facing the economy:

The housing bust. With so many problems these days, it's easy to forget that the recession began with a massive plunge in housing values -- which continues. And most economists say the economy won't rebound until housing prices bottom out and stabilize. So far, prices nationwide have fallen nearly 30% from their 2006 peaks, with further declines likely through most of 2009.

Obama's action plan: The $75 billion "Making Home Affordable" program to help qualified homeowners avoid foreclosure.

Foreclosure © Matthew Cavanaugh/epa/Corbis
Effectiveness: Questionable. The Obama administration says the program could help 3 million to 5 million homeowners avoid foreclosure, which in turn would help stop the plunge in real-estate prices. But banks have to go along with the voluntary program, and so far it's not clear that enough will. Meanwhile, foreclosure rates continue to rise.

How to tell when it's getting better: When foreclosure rates stop rising and real-estate values stop falling.

Other indicators, such as occasional monthly increases in home sales, can be misleading, because those can reflect foreclosure fire sales rather than normal buying activity. Many potential buyers are waiting for prices to stop falling before committing to a purchase, and they're the ones who will help the housing market become healthy again.

The bank rescue. The much-derided Troubled Asset Relief Program introduced by Bush and then-Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson has accomplished one important thing: It prevented an even worse financial panic than the one after Lehman Bros. (LEHMQ, news, msgs) and AIG (AIG, news, msgs) collapsed last September. Obama's challenge has been to continue propping up some of the most troubled banks, like Citigroup and Bank of America (BAC, news, msgs), wind down AIG and start nursing the financial sector bank to health.

Obama's plan: While continuing TARP, Obama's Treasury secretary, Timothy Geithner, has also introduced the Public-Private Investment Program to start buying up to $1 trillion in "toxic" assets from the banks. Unwinding those money-losing securities is essential for the banks to write off their losses, return to profitability and start lending normally again.

Citigroup © JupiterImages
Effectiveness: It's too early to tell. TARP has helped stabilize some banks, and a few may even start paying back the money they've gotten from the government. As for PPIP -- designed to help the most troubled banks -- it won't get fully under way until early summer, and there's no guarantee it will work, despite generous government subsidies.

How to tell when it's getting better: When banks start paying back their bailout money, and the Treasury Department says no more banks will need a bailout. But it could get worse before that happens. And it's still possible the government may have to completely take over a few big banks, which would be a clear sign that the PPIP didn't work.

The credit crunch. When Wall Street cratered last fall, banks essentially stopped lending to businesses and consumers alike. They've eased up a bit since then, as the financial sector has slowly started to stabilize. But lending is still down sharply, partly because consumers are reluctant to spend and they've stopped asking for loans.

Obama's mission is to make the banks more comfortable taking reasonable risks, to help boost consumer spending and keep capital flowing to businesses.

Obama's plan: The $200 billion Capital Purchase Program -- an offshoot of TARP -- injects money directly into banks, so they'll have more reserves against which they can lend. The Federal Reserve's Term Asset-Backed Securities Lending Facility -- lovingly referred to as TALF -- is a $200 billion effort to restart the secondary market for many kinds of loans, ultimately making more funding available to consumers.

Credit crunch © Henryk T. Kaiser/agefotostock
Effectiveness: Moderate. These programs are less visible than the AIG or auto-company bailouts, but they seem to be helping. Borrowers with good credit, for example, now have an easier time getting loans.

How to tell when it's getting better: A key sign of success will be the availability of loans, at reasonable rates, to people with fair or even subprime credit ratings. Many such borrowers still can't get mortgages or car loans at any interest rate, which impedes normal economic activity. Many small businesses are shut out, too, and desperate for capital in order to survive.

Video on MSN Money

Presidential seal © Brooks Kraft/Corbis
Grading Obama on the economy
Americans are confident that the president is competently handling the financial mess he inherited. But is the perception based more on personality than program details? (April 28)
The stimulus plan. To counteract the cutback in consumer spending and jump-start the economy, Congress in February passed the $787 billion American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

Obama's plan: The biggest chunk of the money, about $288 billion, goes to tax cuts. Another $280 billion will go to states and municipalities to spend on infrastructure projects, Medicaid programs and expanded unemployment benefits. Lesser amounts will go toward health care reform, green energy initiatives and other projects.

Uncle Sam © Lee White/Corbis
Effectiveness: Too early to tell. The tax cuts might sound big, but they amount to only an extra $67 per month for the biggest beneficiaries. That's a lot less than the average household income has fallen during the recession, and probably not enough to boost spending by much.

The rest of the spending will take months or even years to filter into the economy. A recent Government Accounting Office report found that most states are off to a slow start in terms of applying for funds, with only about $50 billion due to be delegated by Sept. 30. The bulk of the funds won't get spent until 2010, at the earliest.

How to tell if it's working: When the economy stops shrinking and starts growing.

The U.S. gross domestic product has fallen for three consecutive quarters, and the International Monetary Fund predicts that the U.S. economy will shrink by 2.8% in 2009 and stagnate in 2010. Anything better than that probably represents success for Obama's stimulus plan.

Continued: Most decisive act of governance

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 50
Wednesday, April 29, 2009 7:56:08 AM
It does appear to me that the "president" is obviously sandbagging any money for infrastructure until such time as it will be politically convenient to create the jobs most needed now.
Wednesday, April 29, 2009 8:01:30 AM

Personally, Mr. Obama has taken on too many issues at one time...when one has so much on their plate invariably there will be items that will suffer., i.e. the banking and financial situations., (first things first) Not even Christ sought to accomplish it all in a day...then why should Mr. Obama think he can?...We know he has a high regard for himself...but please!!!  Too, all this jetting around the country and abroad...doesn't the White House have enough rooms to carry out the country's business? Speaking of arrogance..."I won the election I will trump you."  To members of his own party..."We are keeping score, Bro."  Bro?  I am not looking for a President that is already running for his next term or one that thinks of himself as a celebrity using photo opts at every opportunity, swaggering as though he is on a run way....Really lets start acting Presidential!!!

 

I also have issues with members of his cabinet that have had tax issues.  The head of the Treasury $148,000 in back taxes?   If that were me the IRS would own my home.  Also, too much government hands in private enterprise....Surely it will come back to haunt us...and for the first time in my life I am afraid for my Country.

 

Oh, and just for the record "NO" I am not a Republican!!!!

Wednesday, April 29, 2009 8:12:46 AM
It´s fundamental to recall how America became so wealthy (the activities of each citizen back in those days!)
Now this saturation in the Markets, crying out for attention! Its a fact that bailouts are important, the issue seems to request a new image  of the whole, focus on how it all derailed! Need to stop the bleeding immediately, so far, why is all that money (Bailouts) like an engine, do not pull this wreck out of the hole that we are in?Sad
Wednesday, April 29, 2009 8:20:43 AM

I completly agree with Lilshel.

President won the crowd bescause of his speaches and winning over your people. Young people don't know anything. Talking nice and promising the big "change" will not do anything for the country. Lets see some results!!!!! SO far I have not seen anything that would improve our economy. Instead playing celebrity (buying a dog, having photoshoots to rank up his stending in the media) he should start worring how to fix the issues.

Being a celebrity and flashing with hes eyes (nice speaches) will not help our county in any means.

Wednesday, April 29, 2009 8:28:29 AM

Report Card: Housing-F, Banks-D, Credit-D, Stimulus-F,Auto Bailout-D, AIG-F, Unemployment-F, Federal Deficit-F.  I'll touch on a few of the lowlights, IMO.  There have been little signs of improvement in the housing industry with it being so hard to qualify for a loan.  Most people can't afford to pay cash up front to subsidize their refinancing.  Banks are in a catch 22, they need to hold onto their money and assets while having enough capitol to stay in business. The banks are also being told to increase lending? The auto bailout should have never happened.  If GM and Chrysler were already on the verge of bankruptcy, the govt. should of stepped in after they filed.  Unemployment is at an all time high and the govt. isn't going to step in and create jobs?  The federal deficit has tripled since last year.  We are on a pace to completely devalue the dollar to where China products will be expensive.  Start exporting more.

 

It's not the fault of one man but it is the fault of many.  The nation's advisers seemed to be concentrating on propping up their lobbyists to try and recover their own stock market losses before they retire.  It's too late to stop the current flow but it isn't too late to change your votes again in a couple of years. 

Wednesday, April 29, 2009 8:42:41 AM
One of the best US News articles I've read in years, but this means little since I cancelled my subscription years ago. I found Obama to be an interesting diversion during the primaries. Once nominated I found his outstanding charisma and political savvy outweighed only by his complete lack of meaningful experience and substance. During his first 100  (more like 190) days he's been buried by a way-too-full plate from the administrative and congressional gaffes of the past 16 years. What I now sense, feel, and hope is that since early April he's got his puppy, the wide eyed glee of a kid with a new toy is gone, and he is realizing that it's time to loosen his tie, tighten his belt, get to work, and quit smoozing with the David Letterman's.  
#7
Wednesday, April 29, 2009 8:43:50 AM

Lilshel:

I agree with you that Obama has taken on too many things at once, but the criticisms about how he walks, talks, and acts are getting old...This has NOTHING to do with how he governs!!!

 

As for too many hands in private industry.....It was the deregulation under Clinton and Bush that got us into this mess!!! We cannot have a completely theoreticaly free market system....because as we've found out here lately, people are greedy...that's why the top 1% of America controls over 40% of the money in the U.S.  There has to be a mixture of regulation and free market thinking to bring our economy out of the hole!!!

Wednesday, April 29, 2009 8:47:53 AM
Chrysler workers' union eyes majority ownership
Updated 13h 23m ago | Comment  | Recommend E-mail | Save | Print |
By David N. Goodman And Tom Krisher, Associated Press Writers
STERLING HEIGHTS, Mich. — The United Auto Workers union will own 55% of a restructured Chrysler LLC and its retiree health care trust will get a seat on the board if union members vote to approve contract concessions this week.

Chrysler stock could even be traded publicly again, as there are mechanisms for the UAW to sell shares to fund the health care trust.

 

Factory-level union leaders voted unanimously Monday night to recommend approval of concessions that union President Ron Gettelfinger said would help keep the automaker out of bankruptcy.

A summary of the revised Chrysler-UAW contract says that Italian automaker Fiat Group SpA eventually will own 35% of a restructured Chrysler, with the remaining 10% stake divided between the U.S. government and secured lenders, mostly banks and hedge funds.

The Obama administration required that equity fund at least 50% of Chrysler's $10.6 billion obligation to a union-run trust that will take over retiree health care costs starting next year, according to the summary.

It also said that under the agreement, workers will no longer get most of their pay if they are laid off. Instead, they will get supplemental pay from the company equal to 50% of their gross base pay.

Union leaders say ratification votes across the nation should be finished by Wednesday. That's one day before Chrysler's government-imposed deadline to restructure or the government will cut off aid and send the company into liquidation.

Chrysler is living on $4 billion in U.S. government loans and must win concessions from its unions, swap equity for debt and ink a partnership deal with Fiat. If Chrysler can pull the package together in time, the government has said it will loan a new Chrysler-Fiat partnership up to $6 billion more. Chrysler also could get $500 million to stay afloat through April.

Fiat has been in discussions with Chrysler to take a 20% stake in the Auburn Hills, Mich., automaker in exchange for Fiat's small-car technology.

Under the UAW deal reached with Chrysler, Fiat and the U.S. Treasury Department, cost-of-living pay raises will be suspended through the contract's expiration in 2011, and it adds a provision for binding arbitration on a new contract through 2015. If no agreement can be reached on a new contract, the arbitrator must base total hourly labor costs on a rate comparable to Chrysler's U.S. competitors, including foreign-owned manufacturers.

The union also agreed to consolidate nonskilled labor job classifications into a team concept at all factories. Performance and Christmas bonuses will be suspended this year and next to help pay health care costs.

As part of the deal, Fiat committed to manufacturing a small car in one of Chrysler's U.S. facilities, but the summary doesn't say where. In addition, Fiat will share key technology with Chrysler, including as all of its vehicle underpinnings and a 1.4 liter, four-cylinder engine.

The health care trust will select one member of Chrysler's board, with the UAW's consent.

"We fought to maintain our wages, our health care and our jobs," Gettelfinger and Vice President General Holiefield said in a letter to workers. "In the face of adversity, we secured new product guarantees, and we negotiated new opportunities for UAW involvement in future business decisions."

In addition to the stock, the company will pay its remaining $4.6 billio

#9
Wednesday, April 29, 2009 8:50:23 AM
Blueheaven: Scroll up to the top of the page where you see those three little green arrows pointing upward!!!....This will be the seventh week in a row!!!
Wednesday, April 29, 2009 9:00:39 AM
There have been little signs of improvement in the housing industry with it being so hard to qualify for a loan.

I'd have to disagree because anyone who pays attention to housing reports has seen several things. Mortgage applications are up higher than last year, new home sales and existing home sales have increased or basically stopped decreasing the last 2 months. And the supply of homes on market has dropped to under 10 months for the first time in over a year.

The auto bailout should have never happened.  If GM and Chrysler were already on the verge of bankruptcy, the govt. should of stepped in after they filed.

How would that have been good? A bankruptcy of 2 of the Auto makers would have resulted in millions more of unemployed over the next 6 months, that would tip us into depression almost certainly.

 

The government is basically managing the companies thru an outside bankruptcy reorganization (which is what should be done) because it's the least impactful to unemployment.

 

It's not as easy as starting and stopping. This is just like money flow. Once a bankruptcy occurred even if the gov stepped in after, what are they going to do? Re-employ everyone suddenly? Supply chains don't work like that.

Unemployment is at an all time high and the govt. isn't going to step in and create jobs?

Really...U6 isn't 25+% last time I checked. And U6 was also higher in 1982-1983 than it is now. Of course, U6 IMO is not an effective measruement of unemployment because A) it counts people who do have jobs, and B) it counts people who are chronically lazy job searchers, who really are not even looking

1 - 10 of 50
To add a comment, pleasesign in