Dow+30.69up+0.29%
10,464.40
Nasdaq+6.87up+0.32%
2,176.05
S&P+4.98up+0.45%
1,110.63

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video player requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player
More video on MSN Money
Barbie Fashionista doll (© Mark Lennihan/AP) // Barbie Fashionista doll (© Mark Lennihan/AP)

Extra10/23/2009 12:01 AM ET

Mattel pins hopes on Barbie's makeover

The world's best-selling doll is losing favor with older girls and market share to sassier rivals. Now, after a reinvention that took 18 months and cost millions of dollars, the rollout of a new version of the toy aims at reclaiming its status as a fashion icon.

By The Wall Street Journal

This was supposed to be the year that Barbie finally regained her tiara as the queen of the toy aisles.

After many false starts, Mattel (MAT, news, msgs) thought it had found a way to make the iconic fashion doll once more a must-have for girls of all ages -- and to boost the company's flagging revenues as well. It is spending millions of dollars to promote its new "Fashionista" Barbies, even hiring a choreographer-to-the-stars to create a dance called "The Barbie" for a video that had its premiere on the "Today Show" and was posted on YouTube.

But the latest Barbie was beaten to the stores by two new dolls that could threaten her resurgence, industry insiders say. One comes from perhaps the hottest toy makers in North America, Spin Master. The other was created by designers with a grudge against Mattel, which wrested away their company's rights to the hit Bratz dolls.

And so a firefight is breaking out in the doll business that would put G.I. Joe to shame.

BarbieMoney © Mark Lennihan/AP

Inside the high-security Mattel design center near its headquarters in El Segundo, Calif., guards check visitors' laptops and briefcases on entrance and exit. Humans who bear an uncanny resemblance to Barbie -- high heels, ponytails, sparkly jewelry -- gathered there late last month in the Pink Room. That's where they're devising battle plans for their new Barbie, who wears runway-inspired outfits and has 12 movable joints that are supposed to allow girls to pose her like a supermodel.

A few miles away, in the Los Angeles studio of Toronto company Spin Master, designers were struggling to figure out a way to lash their Liv dolls -- which trump Barbie by having 14 movable joints -- into retail display boxes more quickly. "If one of the dolls' heads is turned, or her hair is covering her face, the presentation is destroyed," explains a company spokesman.

Meanwhile, in the Van Nuys, Calif., headquarters of MGA Entertainment, former Bratz designers were devising accessories that girls can color for the company's new line of dolls, Moxie Girlz.

Already the sniping has begun. "The Fashionista Barbies don't even come with a hairbrush," says MGA's founder and chief executive, Issac Larian.

The battle for the hearts and minds of American girls comes at a crucial time for Mattel. The company's sales, one-fifth of which come from the $1.3 billion Barbie brand, have stagnated for several years, and in 2008 profits fell 37%, to $379.6 million. Last week, Mattel said third-quarter revenues slid 8% and net profit fell 3.5%. Sales of Barbies worldwide declined 8%.

Barbie still remains the best-selling doll in the world. Since March, Mattel's stock has risen steadily along with the overall market, due in part to investor anticipation of Barbie's revitalization, analysts say. The company is relying on the doll to carry it through the holiday season.

"Our core Barbie business was something we counted on heavily this year with the absence of entertainment-related properties," Robert Eckert, Mattel's chairman and chief executive, told analysts in a mid-July conference call.

But some analysts are dubious, contending in published reports that Mattel has had difficulty executing its strategies even without added competition.

Video: Mattel battles for doll domination

Mattel pulled out all the marketing stops earlier this year to celebrate Barbie's 50th anniversary, even turning a house in Malibu, Calif., into a life-size version of Barbie's Dream House. It also reoffered five Barbie dolls from past decades.

Such efforts helped rejuvenate sales in the first quarter, but Barbie lost momentum again, with sales sliding 15% worldwide in the second quarter.

"Barbie had the doll aisle to herself in the first half while riding a 50th-anniversary wave, yet could not produce overall sales growth," says Gerrick Johnson, a retail analyst at BMO Markets.

Continued: 'How do you know when a doll is pretty?'

 1 | 2 | 3 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 276
Friday, October 23, 2009 10:34:47 AM

The makeover's ridiculous. She looks like Botched Eyelift Barbie.

Friday, October 23, 2009 10:38:31 AM

Made in china and probably full of lead

Friday, October 23, 2009 10:43:06 AM

Great in times of economic turmoil Barbie is a fashionista.  I would love if the chage in Barbie more accurately reflected the real world and real people.  I have curly brown hair and eyes and woud love a Barbie to look more like me. 

 

I would never buy my girls Barbie.  I also will be staying out of the stores on Black Friday and prefer to bargain shop from home online.

 

I am not a fashionista, but a  "frugalista".   I just found out that the lingerie under the Gilligan and O'Malley name at Target is actually made by Victoria Secrets...and so much cheaper!
Target is also great for fashion and funky home stuff that looks like it cost a lot more, as well as for great everyday staples.

I shop at all my favorite stores through an online website fatcrumbs http://www.fatcrumbs.com that gives me the unpublished codes and or free shipping at about 500 stores (including Target, The Gap, Best Buy, Old Navy, Drugstore.com, etc) as well as giving me between 5 and 50% back in cash on my purchases.

Friday, October 23, 2009 10:45:27 AM
I think this all sounds a little dumb. Barbie is a famous brand and will always be known to everyone. The other dolls will come and go. I just think there is alot of other brands out there at the moment. Barbie could have stayed the way it was and girls would still like them. Barbie is Barbie. I don't really like how all the joints show and stuff. It actually looks fake and tacky. Girls want something that looks real. I liked the old joints, How they were under the plastic. They should have added more but left the real look.
Friday, October 23, 2009 10:45:43 AM
Sad
Friday, October 23, 2009 10:48:25 AM

i don't think they need a make over just a price change omg a mom knows the price of a doll. you can buy the same out dated Mattel doll at big lots for 5 dollars the regular toy stores indulging Wal-Mart they are over priced for the price i will pay for a doll i can go to a discount store and get it cheaper even aldi's has dolls people Barbie dolls yes a outlet store has Barbie dolls they are sold guess what at 5.00 a doll not 20.00 to 50 dollars for a doll. what that is down right outrageous for something that the child will play with what once, twice or a couple of times until they break it. the looks are not the problem with the babies they look fine the clothes are to be desired but hey it is a doll . But if Mattel reads msn they will understand our concerns the price is the issue. lower the price and get more consumers.

 

no need for a make over to do what to make babies lips bigger or her waist or her boobs no need for that it is the price that is the concern. I say lower the price so we all can afford to get our kids toys like Barbie dolls for our little girls to play with.

 

all the changes in the world will not do a pinch of crap it is the fact that a average Barbie doll at a store like target, Wal-Mart , kohl's  are any where from 20.00 to 50.00 the most expensive dolls i seen can average to 100.00 for a doll that is made of plastic and dressed like a street walker you see on the corner of a busy high way. the clothes could be a factor but i say it is the price lower the price gain more consumers. the economy is in the sinker so as it is with people on unemployment and getting benefits to people getting minim wage jobs to survive.

 

three things i like to see is this

1. Lower the price

2. make her stay the same ( Barbie )

3.Clothes can make a difference but who really cares about the clothes leave her the same as she is but lower the price.

 

those things would change not the only the repartition of the name Barbie but the name of Mattel.

 

 

Friday, October 23, 2009 10:54:05 AM
I remember Mattel in the 50's, and all they pushed were toys for boys. The Mattel Fanner 50 gun was a big seller. When they added the shootin' shell feature, a spring loaded plastic cartridge to which a greenie-stick'em cap could be added, we were in heaven. Their closest competition at that time came from the Stallion line if guns out of Jacksonville, Texas. They ceased to be a toy manufacturer for boys with the advent of the Barbie Doll in 1959.
Friday, October 23, 2009 10:57:27 AM
That barbie is 1/2 the size of the barbie's I had when I was little. Look at how skinny her arms are! She's got a lollipop head! Just another stick figure icon to help little girls develop eating disorders.
Friday, October 23, 2009 10:58:51 AM
I would never buy my girls Barbie.
There's nothing wrong with buying your girls Barbie. I grew up playing with barbies and I'd say I'm pretty well adjusted... but I don't know... that could be because I had GOOD PARENTING!! I'll be buying my little girl Barbies as well. Open-mouthed

Friday, October 23, 2009 11:01:22 AM
Personally, I don't like Barbie, no matter what she costs or even if she were free.  It sends the wrong idea to little girls that this is the perfect body.  This is what leads to anorexia, the idea that Barbie is perfect and they need to look like this to be considered "perfect".  I would honestly love to see normal proportioned dolls, even chubby dolls for little girls to play with.  I will never purchase Barbies for any little girl.  I played with them as a child but I was brought up to be secure in how I looked and didn't need to strive to be the "perfect Barbie body".
1 - 10 of 276
To add a comment, pleasesign in