Dow+150.25up+1.52%
10,058.64
Nasdaqunch0.00%
2,150.87
S&Punch0.00%
1,070.52

MSN Money Video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires an updated version of the free Adobe Flash Player
More video on MSN Money . . .
TheNewsMarket.com / inhorgenta

Extra5/29/2009 12:01 AM ET

Have diamonds lost their shine?

The global economic slide has combined with increased retail competition to pressure the glamorous industry, forcing many stores to consider closing.

By Catherine Holahan
MSN Money

New York's diamond district was just as dazzling as ever on a recent Tuesday afternoon. Shop windows sparkled with stones capable of stealing a tourist's attention away from midtown Manhattan's skyscrapers. Sellers, attempting to catch buyers' eyes, made sweeping gestures over their wares, hands adorned with thumbnail-sized jewels.

Despite the impressive displays, though, the diamond business has lost much of its brilliance in recent months.

"It was horrible from January to March," says Wendy Gandola, a saleswoman at Millman Diamond in the heart of a 47th Street stretch renowned for the precious stones.

Jewelry sales are down about 14% in the first three months of the year compared with the same period in 2008, according to the International Diamond Exchange, an online stone exchange for jewelers that also provides industry research.

Now, thanks to "wedding season," business has picked up slightly, Gandola says, though it's still down from previous years. "People are not buying 'just because' anymore."

Diamond sellers, in particular, are caught between a rock and a hard place. The recession has put a severe damper on demand, but retailers can't offer significant discounts without drastically cutting into their margins, because of recent actions to keep diamond prices artificially high.

"If you get a deal, it is not coming from De Beers -- it's coming from the vendor," says Norman, a seller at Blauweiss/Berkowitz jewelers, declining to give his last name.

Privately held De Beers, led by its largest shareholder, Anglo American (AAUK, news, msgs), and Alrosa, Russia's state-controlled diamond company, together wield monopoly power over diamond production. The pair accounted for more than 65% of all rough diamonds last year. That enables the two companies to set the price for the gems, in much the same way the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries can set the price of oil, by ramping up or cutting back production.

De Beers has been rapidly shuttering mines, cutting production by more than 90%. Alrosa, meanwhile, has begun stockpiling diamonds, declining to sell a single stone since December, according to a New York Times article this month.

"The recent recovery in rough diamond prices may be presenting an illusion that there has been a significant recovery in demand for diamond jewelry," says Des Kilalea, an industry analyst at RBC Capital Markets. "In fact, most retailers report quite the opposite."

Many diamond retailers have already sliced their profit margins. Traditionally, jewelers sell diamonds for 49% more than the wholesale cost, according to Harry Winston Diamond and the International Diamond Exchange. But competition from online retailers such as Blue Nile (NILE, news, msgs) and Amazon.com (AMZN, news, msgs), which sell diamonds at a markup below 25%, has made it more difficult to continue charging such high prices.

"Buyers now do a lot of investigation," says Norman, of Blauweiss/Berkowitz. "They know the price from Blue Nile."

Unable to reduce prices further, many jewelers are watching shoppers pass them by and struggling to stay in business.

Blauweiss/Berkowitz has been around for nearly 100 years and isn't going anywhere, Norman says. But more than 30 jewelers nationwide declared bankruptcy in the first half of this year, according to the Jewelers Board of Trade, an industry research and marketing group.

Despite making business more difficult now, some jewelers are positive about recent actions by De Beers and Alrosa. After all, diamonds are appealing, in part, because their worth is supposed to be relatively stable. A fire sale in the short run -- though it could help jewelers increase sales -- could seriously dampen the jewels' future appeal.

"It's a good thing if buyers see a stable market," says Josef Millman of Millman Diamond. "They will want to buy more."

Excluding recent events, the price of diamonds has remained relatively stable for the past five years, according to IDEX, a diamond exchange for jewelers that tracks prices.

To further this view, De Beers has started promoting diamonds as investments. The Financial Times reported this month that the company had launched a global advertising campaign to attract investors who are concerned that inflation could erode the value of their money and are seeking a stable alternative to holding cash.

Video on MSN Money

Rich © moodboard/Corbis
Are the rich immune to the recession?
Milton Pedraza, the CEO of the Luxury Institute, explains how the downturn has affected the wealthy.
Diamond sellers, however, say that plan is unlikely to prove attractive. Most diamond buyers, says Blauweiss/Berkowitz's Norman, buy jewels as adornments. Unlike gold, diamonds are not openly traded on an exchange, making investors less likely to view diamonds as an investment, some sellers say.

The experience of many diamond owners who look to sell their jewels also is unlikely to win over investors. Typically, sellers get much less than the amount on the jewels' appraisal certificates, say jewelers.

Recently, however, it has become slightly easier to sell diamonds. A year-old Web site, I Do Now I Don't, is dedicated to giving diamond owners a way to sell their unwanted jewelry from failed relationships. Jewelers also buy diamonds, though they may want just the stone and not the setting. Sellers and buyers are also finding eBay to be a good secondary market.

"It's good that buyers know diamonds don't spoil," Millman says. "They retain their value."

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 162
Friday, May 29, 2009 6:10:12 AM
Privately held De Beers, led by its largest shareholder, Anglo American (AAUK, news, msgs), and Alrosa, Russia's state-controlled diamond company, together wield monopoly power over diamond production. The pair accounted for more than 65% of all rough diamonds last year. That enables the two companies to set the price for the gems

How ridiculous... Two companies basically control the number of new/raw diamonds that are available to the entire world and therefore, the price.

 

Like everything else in life, these stones are worth no more than what people are willing to pay for it. Until people are able to get back to work and have greater expendable income; food, shelter, etc. are much more valuable than a rock. Let's face it, you can't eat it or live in it.

Friday, May 29, 2009 6:41:45 AM
anyone who wears diamonds is wearing other peoples BLOOD!
Friday, May 29, 2009 6:43:02 AM
If retail is truly 49% more than wholesale prices, wouldn't buyers be able to sell their "investments" for 51% of what they paid, rather than "much less?"  The "much less" is the truth, because diamonds have a rather stunning markup as they move from the mines to the jewelry store.
Friday, May 29, 2009 7:18:18 AM
Well it's about time that people started recognizing diamonds for what they really are.  I shiny lump of stone with limited industrial value.  What a scam DeBeers has played on people.  Other than making sawblades or grinding wheels, diamonds have absolutely no practical value.
Friday, May 29, 2009 7:35:58 AM
always amazing to see how much people value a piece of rock dug out of the earth,instead of lifes other treasures.
Friday, May 29, 2009 8:02:19 AM

The sad part of the diamond trade today is that consumers are being TOTALLY MISLED BY MOST OF THE CERTIFIED DIAMONDS ON THE MARKET. Instead of buying the diamond the gullible consumer is buying what is stated on the certificates. The certs from IGI, EGL(both USA and Israel) are not worth the paper they are printed on. The only "reliable diamond certs" are those from the GIA and the AGS. However, the GIA certs are much leass accurate than they used to be. Since all larger stones are sold with certs the demand for knowledgeable graders has outpaced the actual workload.

 

To anyone buying a diamond today, regardless of the reason, do your homework on line and see what the prices are..Blue Nile is a good starting point, before you go to your local jeweler. Then you had better develop a personal relationship with that local jeweler so that you are both dealing with each other with respect and honesty. Only then will you be able to get fair value for the money you are spending. Jewelers are allowed to make profit on their merchandise except that now with the advent of all the great info online they have been forced to cut their profit margins on diamonds.

 

I would stay away from the mall stores, the ones that are located in seemingly every mall, as the salespeople receive little training and are more interested in selling the extended warranties, 100% profit, to the store, then they are in learning about diamonds.

 

Diamonds are an awful investment as those who have tried to sell their stones have sadly found out. As soon as a salesperson mentions the word investment...walk out of the store.

 

Be wary of the certs that you are being shown and stay away from any but the GIA or AGS. There is nothing wrong with negoiating a better price on the stone you are considering and if you have done your homework you should know what a fair price is for that stone.

 

Men , who mostly let their ego get in the way when making a diamond engagement ring purchase, should realize that a VS diamond gets just as dirty as an SI diamond and once the ring is presented no one will ever know the difference between the 2 qualities with the naked eye. The most meaningful parts of a diamond when buying is the cut, for example a 1ct round diamond should measure approx 6.5mm in diameter, but it also could measure 6.1mm. The smaller diameter means the cutter saved as much weight as he could from the rough stone and because of that the stone should sell for less than the better cut stone. Then color, how white the diamond is matters. The difference between D, E, F, G, H, the top 5 colors, when the stone is mounted is negligible, however, the higher color commands the better price. Rarer in nature you know.

 

Clarity is the most misunderstood feature of a diamond. The fewer, and less noticeable the natural imperfections, the more rare the stone is and therefore more pricey. However, all diamonds get dirty and once they do...does it really matter if the stone is VVS or SI...as long as you cannot see the imperfections with the naked eye...who cares. And one good thing about a diamonds imperfection...if you know where it is and what it looks like in the stone...you will always be able to identify your diamond.

 

When it comes to buying a diamond, unless money is of no consequence, be smart and learn about what you are buying before you spend that $4,000 on a decent quality 1ct round. Remember, BUY THE DIAMOND AND NOT THE CERTIFICATE. And ask questions . If you are not happy with the knowledge of the salesperson...find one that is knowledgeable and more interested in making you a customer of the business than just selling you a diamond.

 

Diamond buying ahould be a fun experience and it will be providing that you do your homework first.

 

 

Friday, May 29, 2009 8:11:01 AM

I hate to tell you this but have no idea as to what you are talking about. If you bought a diamond in 1985..D Flawless you would have paid about $9,000...today that same diamond would be worth about $20,000...sure did lose its value??...

 

Before you spout nonsense learn the facts about the diamond business. Diamonds are an awful investment..that is true. However, if you buy a diamond at the right price to begin with it will most likely never lose its value unless of course the entire diamond market crashes which happened after the 1979-1980 price explosion which made D Flawless 1cts sell for $60,000 per carat...several years later the same stone was $9,000 and has gone up since.

 

It's misinfo like yours that makes for nonsense talk about diamonds.

Friday, May 29, 2009 8:16:25 AM

I think it is so sad how people believe an engagement ring needs to be a diamond.  The average life span of someone who works in a diamond mine is around 35-years-old.  A lot of the diamond miners were practically forced into these situations when De Beers occupied (bought) land from government officials.  Then they told the people living there that they could stay and work for wages (extremely meager) or move.  Your talking about people who live in under-developed countries.  Where would they move to and how could they move?  So of course they had to work which I'm sure De Beers knew would happen.  So what I'm trying to say is please don't think diamonds are your only choice.  There are plenty of other gems, stones, and pearls that don't have harsh mining conditions.  If you really have to have a diamond, synthetic diamonds are almost impossible to tell apart from a real one (unless you are a licensed jewler) that's why they are the same price as a real one.

Friday, May 29, 2009 8:17:58 AM
If you buy a diamond from a store, it is instantly worth half its value!!  No other product is like this. 

Ummmm.....before the car industry dump, new cars instantly lose 25-30% of their value the minute you drive it off the lot and will be completely worthless in roughly 15yrs or so. 

 

Personally, I think diamonds are worth a dime a dozen and don't see their appeal, but on paper, its a better purchase than a car over the long run.  Your great-great-great grandkids could most likely sell your diamond but, not your car.

 

 

Friday, May 29, 2009 8:30:35 AM
Because of briliant advertising campaign, diamond industry (monopoly) made huge profits over the decades.  It is time that people realize that diamonds are really of little use beyond cutting tools.  Sorry to all the suckers who bought stones.  The Diamond industry needs to find a real job instead of selling worhless products. 
1 - 10 of 162
To add a comment, pleasesign in