Dow-17.24down-0.17%
10,433.71
Nasdaq-6.83down-0.31%
2,169.18
S&P-0.59down-0.05%
1,105.65

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player.
More video on MSN Money . . .

MSN Money poll

  1. Is former President Bill Clinton to blame for the banking crisis?

Vote to see results

Click here to see results without voting

  1. Is former President Bill Clinton to blame for the banking crisis?
    1. Yes.
      50%
    2. No.
      11%
    3. He shares some of the blame.
      39%
42501 responses, not scientifically valid, results updated every minute.
Bill Clinton © Pascal Le Segretain/amfAR/Getty Images

Extra6/26/2009 12:01 AM ET

Did Clinton cause the banking crisis?

A trio of regulatory changes and missteps on the former president's watch let the banks run wild and encouraged the housing bubble. But he had help, of course.

By David Weidner, MarketWatch

On Wall Street and Main Street they call William Jefferson Clinton the "Comeback Kid," but it's not because of some Election Day surprise.

It's because almost everything he did regarding financial-services regulation has come back to haunt us.

If it wasn't apparent before, the former president's handiwork became clear when President Barack Obama announced his plans for sweeping financial-services reforms. Obama's efforts to bring fair dealing to the mortgage markets, rules to the derivatives marketplace and restraint to big financial companies underscore the missteps of Clinton's second term.

We had weakly regulated markets when Clinton took office, but by the time he left, they were an invitation to lawless dealing. For the ease of it, Willie Sutton would have traded his gun and mask for a briefcase and necktie.

Clinton created a fertile environment for home-lending charlatans and hiding places for Wall Street swindlers, and upset a regulatory structure that had served the financial marketplace so well for more than six decades.

3 big mistakes

Clinton bashing -- like Bush bashing -- is often a cop-out, but Clinton made critical mistakes when it came to dealing with the financial industry. Three poor decisions stand out.

The first, in 1997, was a change to the amount of taxes a homeowner had to pay on the sale of his or her home, up to $500,000. That change effectively made buying and selling a home for profit the most compelling investment in America by tax standards. It shifted our housing market from one of supply and demand to one of rampant speculation.

The second mistake was one of inaction. In 1998, Long-Term Capital Management's use of derivatives and leverage required a massive $3.6 billion hedge fund bailout organized by the New York Federal Reserve Bank. After the fiasco rocked the markets, the administration was on the spot. Would it push for tighter regulation of this new form of investment vehicle? Would it rein in the derivatives markets?

Alan Greenspan and Arthur Levitt, then the chairmen of the Federal Reserve and the Securities and Exchange Commission, respectively, and Clinton's Treasury secretary, Robert Rubin, all counseled against it to varying degrees. No action was taken.

Video on MSN Money

Explaining Obama's regulatory reforms © CNBC
Explaining Obama's regulatory reforms
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner testifies before the Senate Banking Committee about White House plans to overhaul financial rules (June 18).

Repeal of Glass-Steagall

But perhaps the biggest mistake of the Clinton years regarding Wall Street and the one that rings loudest today was the 1999 repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, which effectively had split investment banking and brokerages from commercial banks.

In the years leading up to the repeal, Wall Street had been grumbling that the law had become an anachronism. Financial technology was sophisticated. We were so much smarter than they were back in 1929 that there was no way a financial-services conglomerate could pose a threat to the system, Wall Street experts said. Besides, they argued, it was a good idea for banks to handle customers' investments and savings as a hedge in the bad times.

Continued: Aides who abetted

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 1096
Thursday, June 25, 2009 8:20:13 PM
Yea...but "I didnt have sex with that woman." But we still pay him thousands to listen to his speeches don't we? Sad
Thursday, June 25, 2009 8:34:53 PM
We'll fix the system, flourish, grow lazier and greedier, and do all this again in about 20 years. 
Thursday, June 25, 2009 9:06:39 PM
Did I miss the part in which Mr. Weidner explains how Clinton strengthened the Community Re-Investment Act to require banks to issue more sub-prime mortgages?  And what about requiring Fannie and Freddy to hold sub-prime mortgages (which happened on Bush's watch, I believe)?  By artificially raising demand for housing, these two measures helped to create a housing bubble.  Weidner seems to know nothing about them, however.

Instead, Weidner identifies Gramm-Leach-Bliley as the main culprit, even though neither he nor anyone else has come up with a plausible explanation how the bill could possibly have caused the financial meltdown.

#4
Thursday, June 25, 2009 9:43:18 PM
If we blame Bill Clinton for the banking crisis, then we should also blame him for the airliner crash off the coast of Brazil. . .Smile
Thursday, June 25, 2009 10:19:56 PM
If it all started while Clinton was in power how can they keep blaming Bush for the last 8 years. Maybe the Republicans should now say it all was created 12 to 16 years ago and win back the next election.
Friday, June 26, 2009 12:26:36 AM
SmileCan't blame him for the crash. If Bill was anywhere around he would have found the black box.
Friday, June 26, 2009 12:28:34 AM
Hindsight is 20-20. However, the irony is that glass-steagle was created because of the same abuse that occurred in the 1930s. Why didn't anyone see the folly of allowing investment banks to merge with commercial banks? Maybe too many people were making money. Sometimes history does repeat itself!
Friday, June 26, 2009 3:23:36 AM
I cannot blame clinton of almost anything,he was to busy to stay at the oval table for peronal amusement.
#9
Friday, June 26, 2009 5:48:27 AM
Astounding...this author blames Bill Clinton and primarily calls out the repeal of the Glass Steagall act on his watch as the culprit.

The legislation that repealed the 1933 law was crafted by three Republicans at the behest of their benefactors, the banking industry (who had been clamoring for this for decades).
 
Respective versions of the legislation were introduced in the U.S. Senate by Phil Gramm (Republican of Texas) and in the U.S. House of Representatives by Jim Leach (R-Iowa). The third lawmaker associated with the bill was Rep. Thomas J. Bliley, Jr. (R-Virginia), Chairman of the House Commerce Committee from 1995 to 2001.

A Republican controlled House and Senate passed this legislation by VETO-PROOF margins.  Yes, Clinton signed it into law because constitutionally, he had no CHOICE.

Yet this author lays the blame on CLINTON?  Laughable....and journalistically dishonest.  For shame. David Weidner


Friday, June 26, 2009 5:54:27 AM
?
1 - 10 of 1096
To add a comment, pleasesign in