Dow+17.46up+0.17%
10,023.42
Nasdaq+7.12up+0.34%
2,112.44
S&P+2.67up+0.25%
1,069.30
Martha Stewart © Charles Rex Arbogast/AP Photo

Extra6/18/2008 2:29 PM ET

Martha Stewart's company is doomed

The hard truth is that demand for Martha Stewart in all forms -- magazines, books, TV shows, Web sites and merchandise -- has passed its peak.

By Slate.com

In one of the least surprising executive moves of the year, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia on June 11 announced the resignation of its CEO, Susan Lyne. Lyne, a respected media veteran who launched Premiere magazine and had a successful career at ABC television, took over the company in 2005 after Martha had legal problems.

The company has hardly impressed Wall Street since. The stock, which traded at more than $30 a share in 2005, today is at about $8.

Last year, the magazine portion of the company laid off dozens of employees and shut down Blueprint after a year and a half of publishing. Someone had to go.

But while Lyne's fall was as predictable as a soufflé's in an earthquake, the fundamental problems at the company were almost certainly beyond her control -- or any CEO's.

Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia (MSO, news, msgs) (we'll call it MSLO, even though the stock ticker is MSO) is a textbook intersection of two media business lessons that should have been learned in the 1990s.

Indeed, Martha's personal aura is so powerful that it's easy for the casual observer to misunderstand exactly where the company makes its money. While Martha Stewart is probably best known as a magazine publisher, broadcaster and ex-con, the true profit center for the company is in merchandising.

In the first quarter of 2008, for example, MSLO made $6.6 million in profits from merchandising, far more than the $1.6 million in profits that came from publishing, according to the most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Video on MSN Money

Patio © Corbis
'2 lifestyle brands are better than 1'
Martha Stewart and James McCann, CEO of 1-800-Flowers.com, appeared together on CNBC this spring to tout the flower and gift retailer's move to sell a Martha Stewart-branded collection of flower arrangements and plants.
Of course, there's nothing intrinsically wrong with running a merchandising company. The problem in MSLO's case is that too many of its free-range, organic eggs are in the same down-market merchandising basket.

In 2007, 76% of MSLO merchandising revenues came through Kmart, which sells everything from bed sheets to artificial Christmas trees under the brand Martha Stewart Everyday.

Continued: Today's go-to domestic goddess

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High

Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.