Dow+17.46up+0.17%
10,023.42
Nasdaq+7.12up+0.34%
2,112.44
S&P+2.67up+0.25%
1,069.30
Car © Frank Whitney/Brand X/Corbis

Extra5/22/2008 4:15 PM ET

About those Ford profits: Never mind

As gas prices hurt demand for its fuel-guzzling SUVs and trucks, the company announces it will cut North American production. That throws a monkey wrench into CEO Alan Mulally's promise of profitability.

By Elizabeth Strott

Rising gas prices have claimed another victim.

In a blow to Ford Motor's (F, news, msgs) turnaround plan, the U.S. automaker this morning said it will not be profitable in 2009, blaming lower demand for its high-profit -- but low fuel-economy -- SUVs and trucks.

"Unless there is a fairly rapid turnaround in U.S. business conditions, which we are not anticipating, it now looks like it will take longer than expected to achieve our North American Automotive profitability goal," said Chief Executive Alan Mulally in a prepared statement.

Shares of Ford fell 8.2% on the news to close at $7.16.

Mulally had set a goal for profitability by 2009.

Ford lowered its outlook for full-year car and truck sales to between 15 million and 15.4 million, down from a previous forecast of 15.3 million to 15.6 million.

The automaker also said it is cutting North American production, citing "lower industry volume . . . dramatic model mix shifts away from large trucks and SUVs, and higher commodity costs."

Instead, the company will increase production of smaller vehicles, including the Ford Focus, Fusion and Escape, as well as the Mercury Milan and Mariner. The company said it expects to produce 690,000 vehicles in North America in the second quarter, a 15% decline from the same quarter in 2007. In the third quarter, Ford plans to produce 510,000 to 540,000 vehicles, down 15% to 20% from last year's third quarter.

Profitable by 2010?

"The news is a disappointment, especially if you consider the optimism after their first-quarter results," which were surprisingly upbeat, Argus Research analyst Kevin Tynan said. "But it's not all that surprising."

Both Ford and General Motors (GM, news, msgs) have been through large restructurings, and they've done a "tremendous" job at getting costs out of the system, which resulted in the better-than-expected first-quarter numbers, Tynan said. But "that can't sustain the weak demand for their big-profit vehicles," he said.

Stock chart (year)

Ford Motor
Graphical chart for F
The problem is that "there's just no sales momentum at all, so anything you've done on the cost side is good" but not enough, Tynan said.

It won't get easier either, Tynan cautioned. "Because of oil prices and gasoline prices, the domestic companies need massive investment in research and development to become competitive in hybrids and smaller vehicles in general."

Tynan added that he didn't think it was possible for Ford to be profitable by 2010.

First-quarter earnings surprise

Ford's first-quarter results, announced in late April, gave hope to investors that Mulally's restructuring plan was working.

Ford earned $100 million, or a nickel per share, up from a net loss of $282 million, or 15 cents per share, in the same period a year ago. Analysts had expected a loss of 15 cents per share.

Profit from continuing operations came in at $525 million, or 20 cents per share.

The results showed "there are signs of progress that Ford just may, in fact, be fixable," Lehman Bros. analyst Brian Johnson told Bloomberg on April 24.

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High

Check another?

MSN Money Video

Article Index

Search for a Market Dispatches article by topic or stock symbol.


Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.