Dow-17.24down-0.17%
10,433.71
Nasdaq-6.83down-0.31%
2,169.18
S&P-0.59down-0.05%
1,105.65

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player. Click here to download.
More video on MSN Money . . .
Bill Fleckenstein

Contrarian Chronicles7/13/2009 12:01 AM ET

Why creating jobs is so hard

An economy built on bubbles looks healthy until all that froth disappears, exposing the rotten framework. A structural repair is needed, and it won't be quick or easy.

By Bill Fleckenstein
MSN Money

Vice President Joe Biden recently acknowledged the administration's misreading of the weak economy.

In view of his comments, I would like to update readers on my three-baseball-game analogy (introduced Nov. 3, 2008, in "Economy sinks as we save bankers") and note where we are now:

Although we've managed to put the financial crisis behind us, the reality of the economic crisis is slowly becoming clearer to more and more people.

A bubble gave jobs, then took 'em away

As an example of the fact that more people are starting to understand the root problem: The Financial Times recently carried an article by Pimco CEO Mohamed El-Erian titled "American jobs data are worse than we think" (subscription required).

He notes that "there are rare occasions, such as today (July 2, when the June employment report was released), when we should think of the unemployment rate as much more than a lagging indicator; it has the potential to influence future economic behaviors and outlooks."

Of course, the reason we have such a problem creating jobs is because the country spent 10 to 12 years engulfed in financial bubbles. They created a vast misallocation of capital and gave the economy the appearance of health -- when all we were doing was creating more risk.

Now we've got a broken economy and will experience serious difficulty creating real jobs. One of the shocking developments, El-Erian points out, is the speed with which jobs have been lost and how fast unemployment has screamed higher. He notes (in terms not far from what I've written): "The unemployment rate will increasingly disrupt an economy that, hitherto, has been influenced mainly by large-scale dislocations in the financial system."

That's El-Erian's way of saying: The big issue now is not the financial mess but the economic crisis.

A mania couldn't sustain an economy

Slowly but surely, I think that as "green shoots" come and go without really yielding a lot (read "Will economy's 'green shoots' wither?"), more folks will start to grasp that we have an enormous hole to dig ourselves out of.

What landed us there was Federal Reserve money printing, which created the bubbles -- aided and abetted by greed on Wall Street and Main Street, and by authorities' abdication of responsibility. All of that allowed us to experience a decade-plus of bubblenomics. Until folks fully process those facts, I believe that they will find it virtually impossible to navigate this post-bubble period.

Video on MSN Money

A shocker from Joe Biden © CNBC
A shocker from Joe Biden
The vice president says the administration misread the economy and hints at a possible second stimulus. Is it time to consider it?

At some point, the economic crisis may feed back into the financial system, creating another financial crisis as we discover that the stress tests done on banks were way too lenient and that some financial institutions are back on the disabled list.

Ultimately, we will endure the real nightmare of the funding crisis, the third part of my three-baseball-game analogy. (Read "The next crisis has already begun.") Thus far, the risk of a dollar meltdown from all the Fed's money printing doesn't seem to have attracted much attention outside the occasional maneuver by China (to express its concerns about the dollar, to ever-so-slightly rejigger the rules for settling trades in renminbi or to set up currency swaps).

A bright spot for savers

Though it may be quite a ways off, higher interest rates caused by both our own massive borrowing needs and a weak currency will not be "fixed" via stimulation. Once we get to that point, only austerity and intelligent policies will extricate the country from that quagmire.

The one bright spot? In that environment, the financially prudent may actually get a fair return for saving money.

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High

Recent Contrarian Chronicles Articles

Search for a Bill Fleckenstein article by topic or stock symbol.

MSN Money Video

Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 95
Friday, July 10, 2009 11:37:03 PM
I completely agree !  Smile You, Mr. Fleckenstein, are one of the few msn commentators left worth reading.
Sunday, July 12, 2009 5:16:48 AM
Unemployment could reach 15 %.  It will become the most watched number on wall street.  It will drag out over a few years and move up a little month after month as companies try to restore productivity. The old "pushing on a string." This will keep prices down, the market flat to down and interest rates low.  Marginally and poorly managed companies will suffer and well managed companies will be O.K. Example, Airlines down, Southwest O.K. 
Sunday, July 12, 2009 7:59:56 AM
Creating jobs is easy.  Get the government out of the picture, and job growth explodes.    Obama and the liberal nazi Democrats want to destroy jobs, not create them.  Obama wants to control who gets a paycheck and who doesn't.  That's why Obama destroyed GM and gave it to the UAW. The cure for socialism,  and the key to restoring prosperity, is to keep as many Democrats out of work for as long as possible.   If you have any Democrats working for you, get rid of them, and don't hire any of them.  Smile
Sunday, July 12, 2009 8:05:56 AM
I agree.  I have a few simple questions that reveal who the Democrats are, then I fire them.  When it comes to destroying a company, they are the worst.
Monday, July 13, 2009 4:08:27 AM
I disagree with doctorfixit it.  Our country has been destroyed in a bipartisan effort involving both parties over the last generation.  It is high time that we look at how we have been creating, conserving and using capital over the last thirty years or so and ask why we prefer to give our money to China, India and Mexico instead of using it here.

The foreigners will not fund our follies forever.

Monday, July 13, 2009 4:26:32 AM

Good Intentions and Unintended Consequences: Was the path to the country’s financial crisis paved with good intentions? When laws, governmental regulations, and political activism were used to try to achieve more home ownership the unintended consequences was the collapse of our financial sector.

 

As is the case in many government-inspired programs, the unintended consequences far outweigh any benefit. We can regain our economic power as a nation and gain greater prosperity for all if we remember this lesson.

 

Greater home ownership could have been achieved through education. Renters can become homeowners when they learn how to establish better credit ratings. The unintended consequence of easy mortgages, lower lending standards, and government intervention was the collapse in the mortgage industry. This led to the overall national financial crisis.

 

 Political activism such as in community organizing of ACORN and community organizer Barack Obama can mobilize political support, but it is very often ineffective in solving community problems. When citizens see political activism as their way out of poverty, the unintended consequences are a devaluation of education, loss of community leadership, and ignoring local resources as solutions to poverty in a community.

 

Government welfare programs have good intentions, a means of temporary support for citizens, but often traps families in poverty for their entire life. Minimum wage laws are intended to give workers higher wages, but often causes the loss of jobs for the very ones they intend to help. If you want to help a person succeed in life teach him or her employable skills, financial management skills, and good work ethics.

 

The Obama plans for “new and wonderful” government programs which have many unintended consequences. The plans “to tax the rich” have unintended consequences of drying up investment capitol, punishing the achievers, and taking money out of the economy. It does not work. If the federal government could operate with less money, more money would be circulating in the economy, and we would all be more prosperous.

 

The good intentions of government policy and political activism caused our current financial crisis, and it was not a failure of the free market system. We can choose between the use of the free enterprise system to regain our financial strength or more government intervention and their unintended consequences.

Monday, July 13, 2009 6:12:01 AM

Once again, reading Mr. Bill is like a breath of fresh air.  Bill, you are a guiding light.  Please keep up the work.

 

Below is a reprint of a letter I sent to my clients in January 2009.  Nothing has changed.

 

The Economy as of January 2009

The Currency is now Too Damaged to be Strong

 

Where are we?  What should we expect in 2009?  Have we hit bottom yet?  What are good investments at this point in time?

 

Due to the current financial crisis, and the response from government, we are now living in a country that has thrown out the rule book that made this country great.  Government is now in charge of making the major financial decisions as to what is too small to save and what is too big to fail, but policy makers seem to be ignoring the silent elephant in the room  - too damaged to be strong. 

 

The problem we now face is simply the 2006-2007 Sub-Prime mortgage problem has morphed into the Prime mortgage problem of 2008 and is currently morphing into the commercial real estate problem of 2009 which will once again threaten the previously "saved" banks that were deemed "too big to fail".  These banks will need to be "saved" yet again in early 2009.  Watch as Citibank, Bank of America, and others begin to fail as the "fix" was simply stupid in the first place. 

 

Too big to fail is simply government arrogance as government tries to sweep under the rug the pain that is to come for what it (government) has done to the economy.  Either we pay for what government has done and feel the pain now, or we shift the pain to future generations.  Those are the only two choices.  Deflation will continue to run until the bubbles are totally gone and the bad investments made as a result of the bubbles are devalued, and the capital that still remains in these bubble investments is either written down or is re-deployed.  This will take all of 2009 and probably most of 2010.

 

The deflation monster unleashed by the mortgage failures and the resulting weakness in the financial sector have already wiped out over 12 trillion dollars of individual wealth in the US alone.  Along the way unemployment is rising and demand is contracting as evidenced by the drastically slowing retail sector that recently reported the lowest Christmas season sales in almost 40 years.  The reason for this carnage is simple.  This recession is totally different from anything in recent history because it is not a recession born of Federal Reserve interest rate policies. 

 

This recession was born in a Federal Reserve created monetary bubble that morphed into a consumption bubble based on easily obtained money due to Congressional stupidity and lack of oversight.  As a result, unimaginable amounts of capital have either been lost altogether or poorly invested into the wrong asset classes as this bad investment of trillions of dollars of capital caused the creation of false demand.  In reaction to this very large but false demand, the global economy has leveraged more capital and built infrastructure and manufactured inventory to meet the false bubble driven demand, and this demand is now gone.  Large amounts of capital are still invested in the wrong assets,  and businesses, and it is this capital still invested in these bubble blunders that has to be re-deployed at some point in time in order to get the economy back on track.  This process of capital being re-deployed is going to cause massive job losses.   

 

Worse still, due to the existence of excessive inventories as a result of the bubble driven demand, there is no empty channel to stuff to get the recovery going.  In the past, all the Federal Reserve had to do to get the economy going again was lower interest rates.  When rates were lowered in the past, the cheaper money gave the incentive to businesses  to start building inventory and the economy got going.  This time around, even with interest rates at or near zero (a historical event unto itself) there is no "go" because there is nothing to build.  There are still too many houses, malls, cars, clothes, televisions, computers, office

Monday, July 13, 2009 6:15:56 AM

I would like to ad this as well.

 

La France, you are right on target.  Fell good government policies have nearly wiped out discretionary income and it is discretionary income that allows an economy to prosper.  With each new program, with each expansion of existing programs, discretionary incomes are reduced bit by bit.  When you reach the point that government will not save and the people can't due to no discretionary incomes, you are in trouble, real trouble.  Welcome to 2009.

Monday, July 13, 2009 6:36:35 AM
This is just one more of the apoligist for the Democrat party running interference for Obama and crew. Rushing ahead at any sign of trouble making more excuses instead of holding them accountable for their actions. This is exactly what is wrong with this whole insestious relationship between the Media and the Democrat Party. And when the information this guy puts out there proves to be bad, then what. Will he be held accountable by MSN for bad information. NO he will be given an award for protecting another failed Democrat.
Monday, July 13, 2009 7:02:54 AM
When are we going to realize that the major cause of the high levels of unemployment is our position on this global free-trade market. The problem is many of the Fortune 500 companies who have recently laid off thousand of Americans realize that they can go overseas (China, Vietnam, India) to drastically reduce their labor costs. Jim Cramer recent show summed it up beautifully about how Alcoa showed better than expected numbers by shifting their U.S based operations to China and Brazil. Could someone please tell me where the people who worked for these major corporations who got let go will find a job paying the same as what they had?
1 - 10 of 95
To add a comment, pleasesign in