Dow-17.24down-0.17%
10,433.71
Nasdaq-6.83down-0.31%
2,169.18
S&P-0.59down-0.05%
1,105.65

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video player requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player
More video on MSN Money . . .
Bill Fleckenstein

Contrarian Chronicles6/29/2009 12:01 AM ET

Realty fervor takes aim at reality

The real-estate balloon has deflated, but there's still plenty of hot air surrounding home prices. Let us now appraise industry lobbying efforts to lift valuations.

By Bill Fleckenstein
MSN Money

As the aftermath of the real-estate/credit bubble enters its second year, let's begin by devoting our attention to two key cogs in that wheel: the National Association of Realtors and the National Association of Mortgage Brokers.

For both organizations, the operative words are: long on bombast, short on shame.

Mark-to-fantasy still rules

Reacting last Tuesday to macro data near and dear to his heart, NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun made his own plea for what -- in Wall Street terms -- would be called mark-to-model:

"Pending home sales indicated much stronger activity, but some contracts are falling through from faulty (my emphasis) valuations that keep buyers from getting a loan."

By "faulty," he meant: "Lenders are using appraisers who may not be familiar with a neighborhood, or who compare traditional homes with distressed and discounted sales." (A slight variation is contained within a letter to members from the NAMB: "Appraisal Management Companies are assigning appraisers from a different municipality, county, or even state to appraise the target house. Therefore, unfamiliar with the neighborhood and unable to produce an accurate appraisal.")

In other words, we don't want these house prices marked to the last sale. We want them marked to where we think they ought to be marked.

Yun continued: "In the past month, stories of appraisal problems have been snowballing from across the country, with many contracts falling through at the last moment. There's the danger of a delayed housing market recovery and a further rise in foreclosures if the appraisal problems are not quickly corrected."

Honest appraisals: Not in my backyard

That pathetic little threat didn't cut it for Barry Ritholtz (the author of "Bailout Nation," among his other talents), who, in an e-mail to me, summed up the situation:

"I did some more digging, and I quickly discovered what this contemptible suggestion was all about: It is part of a broader lobbying effort by the National Association of Mortgage Brokers (NAMB) and the NAR against honest appraisals. For more proof of this lobbying effort, see the letters to mortgage brokers and real estate agents from their trade associations to mobilize against mandating honest appraisals."

(Ritholtz has posted both the mortgage brokers letter and the Realtors letter on his Web site.)

Video on MSN Money

Is the housing recovery stalling? ©  CNBC
Is the housing recovery stalling?
Kenneth Rosen, chairman of the Fisher Center at the University of California, Berkeley, and Lawrence Yun, of the National Association of Realtors, discuss the housing recovery.

So, in the wake of the greatest credit/real-estate bubble the world has ever seen, we get this: On the one hand, the powers that be decide they really don't want to utilize mark-to-market accounting in the financial system. On the other, those at the epicenter of the real-estate bubble itself are advocating the use of appraisers who will come up with the "right" number rather than a realistic evaluation.

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High

Recent Contrarian Chronicles Articles

Search for a Bill Fleckenstein article by topic or stock symbol.

MSN Money Video

Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 76
Friday, June 26, 2009 3:07:17 PM
Right on !!!!
Friday, June 26, 2009 5:24:48 PM
So, if an appraiser comes from out of state and appraises in my community he is the glorified honest expert - even though he has no clue as to market conditions specific to my neighborhood or any real knowledge of the market area - and should be trusted and hailed as the honest chap that he pretends, er portends - no wait - might be.  Well actually he has no business appraising in my neck of the woods at all - he has no competency.  And I as an appraiser, just because I happen to live in this community, cannot give an honest appraisal well - because I know too much about it;  after all, I'm just a shill for the local banks and mortgage companies.  Is that the gist of it?  Well I take magnificent umbrage to that notion.   I guess I'll have to appraise in some other state and be hailed as the savior of honesty and integrity in some place I know nothing about.  This is nuts you'all. 
Friday, June 26, 2009 10:19:33 PM
I have been reading Mr. Fleckenstein for more than 6 years now and he is right on.  We can argue about everything concerning the housing crisis (interest rates, appraisals, taxes, etc...) in this country until we are blue in the face.  The crux of the problem is very simple.  The median income in this country is in the 40K region, while the median home price is around 220K.  Until home prices come WAY down to a level where people can afford them (paying the mortgage along with the family car, babysitter, food, vacation, cell phone, etc...) as you could 20 years ago, nothing is going to change, and the situation is going to continue to deteriorate.  And all the while, the idiots on the hill can't seem to understand this first-grade concept.  People are finally getting a grip with the simplest and oldest economic principle:  Appraise all you want, nothing is worth a penney unless someone is willing to pay you for it.  At this point in time, I honestly believe you could lower the short-term interest rate into negative territory (where the bank pays you interest on the loan) and you still would not have many takers.
Saturday, June 27, 2009 8:28:40 AM

Correct. 

 Americans have used debt to replace income for far too long.  The debt load is now so high that many are paying (or trying to) pay down existing debt rather than accumulate more.  We need to rebalance the cost of living and earning.  When the cost of living exceeds our ability to earn, consumption can only be based on ever increasing debt.  Debt used for everyday living can quickly accumulate and overcome our ability to service our debts. 


The **** and NAMB are less concerned about the market than filling their own pockets.  CNBC Diana Olick is hot on the story with a post thanking them for all of their emails outlining the appraisal problem.  When in fact there is no problem.  Fundamental market principles dictate that the market for any given product or service is what is paid for it.  End of story, not what one thinks that it is worth. 

Just how long can an economy function when the markets are routinely manipulated to a mark to model value, hoarding oil off shore, or hiding assets / debts in off the books balance sheets?  As long as the markets are manipulated, the average Joe does not have a chance and eventually the economy collapses from its own manipulation.  Why would anyone want to invest in a manipulated market? 

What is next monopoly money?


There is of course a simple solution if you want the consumer to buy more.  Stop the market manipulation, allow the consumer to discharge their debts and increase their income.  


Saturday, June 27, 2009 3:12:45 PM

How many potential buyers are waiting on the sidelines for the 'real' price? Guess we keep waiting. This would have already bottomed if true capitalism was left to function, without all the manipulation.

 

Saturday, June 27, 2009 5:18:35 PM

June 27, 2009 - The Need For Idiot Prove HUD FORMS

 

Back in the 60s the rule of thumb was that a mortgage could be no more than two and a half times annual salary not counting the wife's income if you were married.

You still had to put 20% down and be within certain debt limits as well as being a credit worthy prospect.

Mortgage brokers liked to confuse and bewilder the public with their blizzard of paperwork when all that was required was essentially printing a "TRUTH_IN" law at the top of the HUD form that required attesting signatures. Now days propective buyer/sellers should be provided with an interactive DVD to explain and be tested to prove they have adequate knowledge of the transaction they are about to enter into.

Let's not allow the mortgage brokers and bankers to require the signing of any other documention except for the HUD form and provide it a few days before closing like they are supposed to do but never adhere to.

With both ends of the deal signing with full knowlege after being somewhat educated, this will alleviate much of the skullduggery.

If you are to stupid to pass the simple test of comphrehension then it will be far less expensive to mandate that a moonlighting paralegal or whoever is to help you. 

Pragmatic-Ray

Saturday, June 27, 2009 11:45:22 PM
If you were an appraiser during the housing bubble, and went along with all those outrageous valuations, then yes, you were nothing but a shill for real estate agents, mortgage lenders and banks.  And you know it.  If the "right" appraisal didn't come through, you'd stop getting referrals.  And you knew that too.

"Shill" is perhaps too kind.
Sunday, June 28, 2009 2:30:22 AM
it's not that you can't give an honest appraisal well because you know your community too well, it's that you know your local realtwhores too well.
Sunday, June 28, 2009 6:27:43 AM
Open-mouthed
We all know the Government is trying to elevate home prices. What needs to be done is change the ,INCENTIVES or manipulate them a little.
Such as : 1. giving $15,000 tax break for ALL home buyers,maybe even $20,000 2. Government reduced interest rate of 4% or lower for all home buyers, which by the way they should be able to do what with all the stimulus funds,etc. in the economy., 3. Give reduced Cap. gains on sells of second homes....Open-mouthed

I probably could think of more ,but this is just a few for OUR Government to do.... If they really want to get this economy going...
What are they waiting for?

Sunday, June 28, 2009 8:33:44 AM

Inflating home prices is something the banks themselves are encouraging - I recently applied for a refi under the Stability for Homeowners Program but wasnt able to bacause according to the bank my home was worth alot less than the 504K I owed on the first mortgage.  (amount being refi cannot be more than 105% of home's value) they claimed my home was worth in the low 400K's.  I decided to apply for a short sale - they sent a real estate agent from a town 70 miles away to do my BPO - broker price opinion - the agent said that my house was worth 725K - thats 125K more than I paid for the house 2 years ago and about 300K more than Chase said it was worth about 6 weeks ago - i tried ever which way to get the bank to realize that it was impossible for my home to be worth so much especially when they had just valued it at close to 400K but couldnt get anyone to listen - no refi - no short sale - no help -

1 - 10 of 76
To add a comment, pleasesign in