Dow+165.66up+1.61%
10,483.82
Nasdaq+41.68up+1.94%
2,187.72
S&P+20.17up+1.85%
1,111.55

MSN Money Video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires an updated version of the free Adobe Flash Player.
More video on MSN Money
Bill Fleckenstein

Contrarian Chronicles11/2/2009 12:01 AM ET

3 stocks for a stock picker's market

The recent rally is impressive but historically not surprising. The Fed's money printing continues, and investor risk-taking has resumed. This all calls for caution.

By Bill Fleckenstein
MSN Money

Given the recent market gyrations and the sloppy and weak trading, I thought I'd home in on the action and examine what clues, if any, that action might afford.

Heading into earnings season, I expressed my belief that most companies were set up to win at "beat the number," which they did. What I was curious to see was how the market would respond, and, in essence, the good news was sold.

Thus I think there's a decent probability that we'll go into some sort of trading range for a while. Whether that turns out to be for a long while or becomes the start of a top, I don't know.

If we do slip into a trading range, I would be somewhat shocked if that resolved itself with a big move to the upside, though given the money printing that continues, I wouldn't rule out that possibility. Consequently, although I am open to the idea of looking for stocks to short, I intend to be extra-cautious.

Right now, I have no reasons to take short positions other than the macroconomic ones, including debt and unemployment, that I've written about before. That backdrop aside, the monetary backdrop is not conducive to shorting stocks because of all the money printing going on.

Even if the market turns out to be rangy or exhibits somewhat of a downward bias, it's possible, in light of the money printing, that some stocks will do OK to well while others will do OK to poorly.

Buying in single packages, not bulk

Thus my long positions in a few non-money-printing-beneficiary companies -- e.g., Microsoft (MSFT, news, msgs), Novatel Wireless (NVTL, news, msgs) and Eli Lilly (LLY, news, msgs) -- as I think we could experience, for the time being, a market of stocks rather than a stock market. (Read "The trouble with techs right now" for more on Lilly and tech stocks in general. I also discussed this outlook in a recent appearance on CNBC; watch the video here.)

In other words, we might witness the evolution of a true stock picker's market for the first time in years, rather than the market's being essentially "all one trade," which has been my view.

We'll see how this plays out, but I thought it was worth introducing some of those ideas as food for thought.

An outlook dressed in shades of gray

Another view of the stock market comes by way of Jeremy Grantham's October newsletter (.pdf file).

Referring to the market rally of 1930, he points out that if that market could bounce as much as it did, with as little help as it got from the Federal Reserve and the government in terms of large stimulus, then it's no surprise we've seen the rally that we've seen.

His outlook for the market: It's just a guess, but he thinks it might face some tougher going early next year.

"It is hard for me to see what will stop the charge to risk-taking this year," Grantham wrote. "With the near universality of the feeling of being left behind in reinvesting, it is nerve-wracking for us prudent investors to contemplate the odds of the market rushing past my earlier prediction of 1,100. It can certainly happen.

Become a fan of MSN Money on Facebook

"Conversely, I have some modest hopes for a collective sensible resistance to the current Fed plot to have us all borrow and speculate again. . . . My guess, though, is that the U.S. market will drop below fair value, which is a 22% decline (from the S&P 500 ($INX) level of 1,098 on Oct. 19)."

In summary, Grantham believes there is unfinished business on the downside, though he does not think we need to make a new low. His road map seems to be not terribly different from what my current thoughts are. Perhaps that means some variation of that theme will play out -- unless it doesn't.

Windows' 7th heaven

In Microsoft's earnings report last week, the company did far better than most people expected. Even though I was thinking Microsoft might possibly do a bit better than expected, I was surprised at how much better it did. What it will accomplish over the next year or so is pretty much ordained, though.

When you think about the fact that 40% of revenue is derived from a product that for close to a decade has basically been a dry hole (that being the operating system) and that now the company has a really fine product release (Windows 7), you can see how the future looks bright. (Microsoft is the publisher of MSN Money.)

Video: Bull market or bust? Fleckenstein's view

But when you add in that all of Microsoft's major products will see new versions released in the next year and that the company has some interesting new products as well, coupled with the fact that it has cut expenses, I believe Microsoft can do well regardless of the world economy.

Obviously, if the economy is strong, that will benefit the company, but if it's not particularly strong, the company will still do just fine. So, barring some stupid upside move in Microsoft, my ownership of that stock will probably be on autopilot for the next year, though I might have to change my mind down the road.

It has been amazing to me to watch the "dead fish" trip over themselves to avoid MSFT over the past year. I just wish I'd been even bolder when I first started talking about Microsoft a year ago, when it was half the price it is today. Of course, that's the way investing usually is. You never own enough of the winners, even if they look like reasonably safe layups.

At the time of publication, Bill Fleckenstein owned long positions in Microsoft, Eli Lilly and Novatel Wireless.

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High

Recent Contrarian Chronicles Articles

Search for a Bill Fleckenstein article by topic or stock symbol.

MSN Money Video

Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 11
Saturday, October 31, 2009 12:37:32 AM
Prediction is tricky business. What's Miscrosoft's moat? Thanks to Linux nipping Windows OS from below in Netbooks and Apple from above; and Google Apps threatening Microsoft applications, I don't see businesses jumping to upgrade to Windows 7. Look at Vista. I'd rather stick to stocks that WOULD benefit from money-printing - by that I don't mean financials, whose balance sheets are strange and mysterious; but consumer staples - KFT, HNZ, UN, PG, JNJ etc, utilities - PGN or ETFs like VPU; and cheapish commodity and energy stocks, if any still exist. Mind the price you pay and make very sure you get a decent dividend with a reasonable payout ratio. But hey what do I know, I've been following WEB and Graham's boring principles. totally ignoring the masterful advice from Fleck.
Saturday, October 31, 2009 11:22:38 AM
Mr. Fleckenstein has every reason to remind all readers of his market commentary that indeed the FED IS PRINTING MONEY LIKE NEVER BEFORE. The Fed has increased the monetary base on the order of a trillion dollars ... which has gone into all assests ... not just stocks ... but also all commodities ... and real estate ... but not new jobs or new industry. The debt which is being DESTROYED through individual default of credit cards and mortgages and banking DEFAULT of commercial real estate is GREATER THAN THE AMOUNT THE FED HAS PRINTED !!!!! Which is why we are still in a deflationary situation for all assests EXCEPT THOSE WHICH ARE VALUED IN DOLLARS but mostly produced outside of the U.S. domain .... NAMELY OIL AND GASOLINE. Please see http://www.federalreserve.gov/RELEASES/z1/ and http://www.eia.doe.gov/oil_gas/petroleum/data_publications/weekly_petroleum_status_report/wpsr_historical.html U.S. Petroleum Balance Sheet, Week Ending 01/02/2009 Gross Product Imports line right below Net Product Imports line is what you want to pay attention to.
Sunday, November 01, 2009 5:28:30 AM
I agree with b-cap.  I do not see dollars piling up in the economy. I just see the printing replacing the dollars that have disappeared.  The Consumer debt that was defaulted on and destroyed is being replace by U.S. Government debt.  Is that a problem? Maybe or maybe not.  It might just be a pimple on a elephants A.  It depends on how it is managed.
Sunday, November 01, 2009 8:50:40 PM
The market has gotten too far ahead of itself, a correction to 9000 for the Dow would probably be a good thing for the rest of the year.
Monday, November 02, 2009 8:26:58 AM

Google's great for email, and trying with collaboration apps, but have you tried the Google Apps replacement-Powerpoint or replacement-Excel?  They're not quite ready for prime time, and if MS is maintaining leadership, MS will do well.  Also, SQL Server is hands down cheaper for the power than Oracle.  MySQL may work for you, but since it's now owned by Oracle anyway, it's not like you'd get it free and open-source warm-n-fuzzy, you'd still have to give some money to a billionaire jackass.  Bill Gates or Larry Ellison?  Myself, I'm happier to pay Gates. 

Monday, November 02, 2009 9:29:47 AM

Mother of all Carry Trades Faces an Inevitable Bust

 

Nouriel Roubini | Nov 1, 2009
 
From the FT:
 
Since March there has been a massive rally in all sorts of risky assets – equities, oil, energy and commodity prices – a narrowing of high-yield and high-grade credit spreads, and an even bigger rally in emerging market asset classes (their stocks, bonds and currencies). At the same time, the dollar has weakened sharply, while government bond yields have gently increased but stayed low and stable.
 
This recovery in risky assets is in part driven by better economic fundamentals. We avoided a near depression and financial sector meltdown with a massive monetary, fiscal stimulus and bank bail-outs. Whether the recovery is V-shaped, as consensus believes, or U-shaped and anaemic as I have argued, asset prices should be moving gradually higher.
But while the US and global economy have begun a modest recovery, asset prices have gone through the roof since March in a major and synchronised rally. While asset prices were falling sharply in 2008, when the dollar was rallying, they have recovered sharply since March while the dollar is tanking. Risky asset prices have risen too much, too soon and too fast compared with macroeconomic fundamentals.

So what is behind this massive rally? Certainly it has been helped by a wave of liquidity from near-zero interest rates and quantitative easing. But a more important factor fuelling this asset bubble is the weakness of the US dollar, driven by the mother of all carry trades. The US dollar has become the major funding currency of carry trades as the Fed has kept interest rates on hold and is expected to do so for a long time. Investors who are shorting the US dollar to buy on a highly leveraged basis higher-yielding assets and other global assets are not just borrowing at zero interest rates in dollar terms; they are borrowing at very negative interest rates – as low as negative 10 or 20 per cent annualised – as the fall in the US dollar leads to massive capital gains on short dollar positions.

Let us sum up: traders are borrowing at negative 20 per cent rates to invest on a highly leveraged basis on a mass of risky global assets that are rising in price due to excess liquidity and a massive carry trade. Every investor who plays this risky game looks like a genius – even if they are just riding a huge bubble financed by a large negative cost of borrowing – as the total returns have been in the 50-70 per cent range since March.

People’s sense of the value at risk (VAR) of their aggregate portfolios ought, instead, to have been increasing due to a rising correlation of the risks between different asset classes, all of which are driven by this common monetary policy and the carry trade. In effect, it has become one big common trade – you short the dollar to buy any global risky assets.

Yet, at the same time, the perceived riskiness of individual asset classes is declining as volatility is diminished due to the Fed’s policy of buying everything in sight – witness its proposed $1,800bn (£1,000bn, €1,200bn) purchase of Treasuries, mortgage- backed securities (bonds guaranteed by a government-sponsored enterprise such as Fannie Mae) and agency debt. By effectively reducing the volatility of individual asset classes, making them behave the same way, there is now little diversification across markets – the VAR again looks low.

So the combined effect of the Fed policy of a zero Fed funds rate, quantitative easing and massive purchase of long-term debt instruments is seemingly making the world safe – for now – for the mother of all carry trades and mother of all highly leveraged global asset bubbles.

While this policy feeds the global asset bubble it is also feeding a new US asset bubble. Easy money, quantitative easing, credit easing and massive inflows of capital into the US via an accumulation of forex reserves by foreign central banks makes US fiscal deficits easier to fund and feeds the US equity and credit bubble. Finally, a weak dollar is good for US equities as it may l

Monday, November 02, 2009 3:31:08 PM

With a highly volatile market such as this one, I prefer buying stocks that pay me while I wait.  Take a look at some of these:

 

Altria (MO) 7.51% dividend, 11.81 P/E, 80% ROE

EV Energy Partners (EVEP) 12% dividend, 1.44 P/E, 81% ROE

Universal Corp (UVV) 4.4% dividend, 8.15 P/E, 16% ROE

Banco Santander ADR (STD) 4.35% dividend, 10.37 P/E, 14% ROE

Lorillard (LO) 5.15% dividend, 13.47 P/E, 174% ROE

Linn Enegy (LINE) 10.29% dividend, 1.64 P/E, 94% ROE

British Petroleum ADR (BP) 5.93% dividend, 20 P/E, 9% ROE

 

The biggest risk is whether high dividend paying companies can sustain them.  Just like with anything else, you need to do your homework before buying.  

Monday, November 02, 2009 7:00:32 PM
bCapp, how does money go "into" stocks or commodities?  You make it sound like all this money is just swallowed up and disappeared from circulation. When you buy stocks or commodities, the money you pay simply moves to the person selling the stocks/commodities to you, and then they invest or spend it somewhere else. The money doesn't disappear. It stays circulating in the economy.
Tuesday, November 03, 2009 10:53:31 AM
To reply to Filbert32. The GREAT DEBATE among "dismal scientist" types is the following: After all is said and done will history look back at the current economic situation in the U.S. and label it as "inflationary" or "deflationary?" I say no matter what the Fed does in winter 2009-early 2010 to prevent "deflation" in the U.S. stock market from happening ... it will fail ... and fail no later than the Fall of 2010. It's not just a hunch or gut feeling but based upon the Fed's own flow of funds report. Looking at the data from 1983 onward ... never has the U.S. government crowded out and taken over borrowing from the private INDIVIDUAL sector in such a dramatic fashion. My deflationary thesis rest upon the fact the U.S. government as ONE entity will fail to provide the POSITIVE ECONOMIC MULTIPLIER EFFECT OF BORROWING MONEY that MILLIONS of individuals have ... until recently ... been capable of doing. Let me repeat ... the private sector, that is, the "typical" U.S. consumer is being FORCED to "deleverage" and either repay debt or default ... or for the past year ... pay some of the credit card one month and let the mortgate slide ... and in the next month ... pay the regular mortgage payment and let the credit card slide. The reason the U.S. consumer is forced to do so is simple ... ALL assets in the U.S. are currently overpriced as the typical individual can no longer meet the required monthly payment obligations to "OWN" such assets ... that is ALL ASSETS valued in U.S. dollars are in a "bubble" produced by the Federal Reserve policy of keeping "employment levels" high and completely ignoring inflation for ten plus years .... but the Fed's blunt instrument of 1970-1979 style inflation will be useless BECAUSE the Fed can't control prices at the gasoline pump. If the Fed continues to inflate the next bubble is in energy, in particular, GASOLINE !!! Not only does the U.S. import 66% of its oil, UNLIKE THE 1970s the U.S also imports gasoline ... until recently ... as the weak dollar doesn't provide much incentive to foreign refiners to send gasoline to the U.S. ... and diesel prices are currently higher than gasoline because the weak dollar allows foreigners of diesel powered cars to get their deisel from the U.S. "cheaper." Ticker symbol UGA is one way to play $5 gallon gasoline next summer ... but I prefer to short the airlines ... or buy and hold railroads for 10 plus years like Buffet did today. Finally, Filbert32 you mention "the money you pay simply moves to the person selling the stocks/commodities to you, and then they invest or spend it somewhere else." On an individual case by case level what you claim is true, but on a MACRO level what you assert is false. The market is going UP ... there are currently less sellers than buyers ... as such your claim on a MACRO level is invalid.
Saturday, November 07, 2009 1:59:56 PM

I don't know

 

BL, suggest you put the Bud can down for a few hours and shake the cobwebs out.  The "biggest problem" that you face is not the sustainability of your beloved dividend payments, but a sharp and sustained drop or even evaporation of the underlying companies.

 

Do the math.  You "make" 10% average dividends "while you wait."  Your portfolio drops and average of 22% (read the article) but YOUR portfolio (which holds riskier stocks trying to attract capital by paying higher-then-market dividends) drops by 35%.  Just to get back to even you will then have to make 54% in total returns.

 

You are taking a very large amount of risk and being very Pollyannaish about the downside.  You would be much better off well-allocated with healthy doses of gold and corporate bonds.

 

See a fee-only active RIA today. 

1 - 10 of 11
To add a comment, pleasesign in