Dow+150.25up+1.52%
10,058.64
Nasdaq+24.82up+1.17%
2,150.87
S&P+13.78up+1.30%
1,070.52

MSN Money video

Video on MSN Money
This video requires the installation of the free Adobe Flash Player. Click here to download.
More video on MSN Money . . .
Michael Brush

Company Focus7/22/2009 12:01 AM ET

Emerging markets will lead us back

While the US chases 'green shoots,' India and China are booming. But Americans' years-long consumer-spending spree could be the catalyst for a global recovery.

By Michael Brush
MSN Money

Pessimists like to gloat that what we're seeing in this recession is U.S. consumers getting their comeuppance.

Decades of reckless borrowing peaked two years ago and has since started tumbling down, wrecking the economy along with it.

All we have to show for it now are piles of unwanted stuff, bigger piles of debt and over-mortgaged homes, and we could be left with ho-hum economic growth for years.

But this bleak view overlooks a big piece of today's global economy: U.S. consumers were, in one sense, making a huge investment in the economies of emerging-world countries as we purchased their stuff.

Now that investment should pay off. Emerging economies are starting to truly emerge as economic powerhouses, with some already casting off the global recession and posting strong growth. Take stocks, for example: Even after a strong rally, the U.S. market is merely about even this year. China's market is up 27%. India's is up 48%.

The good news: This will help the U.S. bounce back, perhaps more strongly than most anticipate, as a world of new consumers starts buying our stuff. The risk, at least if you're nationalistically minded: Though the U.S. may not lose its leadership role in the global economy, its superiority will dwindle.

Decoupled prosperity

Recent news of robust growth in places such as China and India confirms that emerging markets are on an economic path of their own, relying less on support from U.S. customers. This is the theoretical decoupling that many economists had buzzed about, then dismissed as the world followed the U.S. into recession.

It turns out that decoupling is real.

Next, expect consumers in these emerging economies to start buying more stuff made in the U.S., nudging the U.S. back to "normal" growth of 3% to 3.5% per year sooner than many people expect, says James Paulsen, an economist and market strategist with Wells Fargo.

And that is how the "investments" made by U.S. consumers will pay off. Our spending helped them build up industries, creating jobs and consumers -- who now can turn around and buy from us.

To be sure, emerging-market economies deserve credit, too. Most of their financial institutions steered clear of the credit-market mess that has crippled the more advanced economies of the U.S. and Europe, says Cristina Panait, who follows emerging markets as a portfolio manager of the Payden Emerging Markets Bond Fund (PYEMX).

But here's a closer look at how the U.S. consumer helped create this boom.

A second Marshall Plan

After World War II, the U.S. channeled $13 billion to Europe for rebuilding, recognizing that we needed the region as a trading partner. That's about $115 billion in today's dollars.

The payoff came in the 1950s and 1960s, when European demands for our stuff contributed to robust U.S. economic growth. This ingenious strategy was called the Marshall Plan, named after then-Secretary of State George Marshall, who played a key role in developing it.

Now the U.S. is starting to benefit from an unofficial Marshall Plan set in motion by U.S. consumers over the past 15 years, Paulsen believes. As U.S. consumers binged, a lot of what they bought came from factories in China, India, Indonesia, Vietnam and other emerging-world countries. During this time, the U.S. ran trade deficits of about $650 billion a year, Paulsen estimates. That means we spent that much more abroad than foreigners bought from us.

That money helped emerging-market nations build out their infrastructure. It paid the salaries that fueled the growth of now-thriving middle classes. "We ran trade deficits for the better part of a decade and a half, and that amounts to a constant investment in these economies," Paulsen says. The result was a "new world consumer, with wants, desires and savings."

Trade deficits were criticized along the way as a sign the U.S. was living beyond its means. But the payoff may be coming soon.

Some big changes

Here are some numbers that give a sense of the changes that U.S. consumers helped bring about in the emerging world:

  • In China, about 400 million people have risen above poverty since the late 1970s. And 150 million of them now have manufacturing jobs -- a group nearly the size of the entire U.S. work force, says Fred Fraenkel, the chairman of investment policy for Beacon Trust. An additional 200 million Chinese should rise above poverty in the next five to 10 years, he estimates. The size of the middle class has likewise been rising dramatically throughout the developing world. "This is moving so fast . . . that it's hard to comprehend," Fraenkel says.

  • One way to grasp the big picture is to consider how sharply the emerging-market share of world gross domestic product has risen. Developing economies accounted for 45% of world GDP last year, up from 37% in 2000, says Panait, of investment firm Payden & Rygel. The value of emerging-market contribution to world GDP rose to $30.9 trillion in 2008 from $15.5 trillion in 2000.

  • Emerging-market customers are now buying much more of our stuff. Developing countries bought 35% of the $1.3 trillion worth of U.S. exports in 2008, according to Franklin Vargo of the National Association of Manufacturers. That's up from 25% in 1990. China was the largest, with $70 billion in purchases, followed by Brazil, Singapore and Taiwan. They buy agricultural products but also significant amounts of manufactured goods. (See "The myth of U.S. industry's demise" for more.)

Continued: Guidance for investors now

 1 | 2 | next >

Rate this Article

Click on one of the stars below to rate this article from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). LowRate it 1Rate it 2Rate it 3Rate it 4Rate it 5High
Fund data provided by Morningstar, Inc. © 2009. All rights reserved.
StockScouter data provided by Gradient Analytics, Inc.
Quotes supplied by Interactive Data.
MSN Money's editorial goal is to provide a forum for personal finance and investment ideas. Our articles, columns, message board posts and other features should not be construed as investment advice, nor does their appearance imply an endorsement by Microsoft of any specific security or trading strategy. An investor's best course of action must be based on individual circumstances.
Join the discussion!
Sort by:
1 - 10 of 15
Tuesday, July 21, 2009 8:34:20 PM

I have to agree, I have recently moved to Singapore with my family and the economy here is booming, I think the economy in China is even better and high paying jobs are easily available.  The supermarket and shopping centres are full of shoppers here in Singapore unlike in US.Smile

 

With China's $ 2.3 Trillion surplus of foreign reserve I believe the boom in China has become from fake to real... in previous years the boom in China were dependent on foreign investment and foreign capital (fake boom dependent on foreign investment) to nowadays China is buying up resources and companies overseas based on their high savings rate ($ 2.3 Trillion in foreign reserves, not included is their high savings rates in the Trillions of Dollars), real boom using their own money for investment and growth !Open-mouthed

Tuesday, July 21, 2009 9:55:51 PM

what are you planning on exporting from the US? fast food and lawsuits don't export well.

 

best investment right now are ACG - ammo/C-rations/gold. the hard times are coming folks. don't be fooled.

 

Tuesday, July 21, 2009 10:13:05 PM
So we're supposed to be excited because all of our exported jobs and income streams should now be used to buy American-made goods and hence keep us from twisting in the wind in perpetuity?  Sounds like we're supposed to hope that a derivative of our former economy will come to the rescue.  One could have just looked at the situation with a little common sense and said "the world markets and economy will normalize based on who offers goods and services for the best price, while keeping in mind that the American standard of living will be lowered thanks to our free trade agreements lining the pockets of those in control of industry" or more succinctly "we gave away all of the jobs and can no longer live off of the credit bubble, so expect that sooner or later we'll be living at a low enough standard of living that we can compete when it comes to producing goods as cheaply as the locations our former manufacturing base has been exported to."

Why the populace has such a difficult time looking at direct facts instead of being spoon fed common sense information little by little has always been a point of fascination.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009 4:00:26 AM

I believe we should export more jobs to (other countries) i.e. partnership with the emerging markets. I suggest we sell our entire Congress, Administrative Branch, and all (TARP) Banking executives (still standing) as indenture servants.

Our products from job/manufacturing in the U.S. would not sell over there. They have no use for our new (currently debated), universal healthcare, cap and trade, imaginary green jobs,  credit bubble, or immigration amnesty that are our current administrations new emerging markets to restart our economy. However, a "US Indentured Agency" might work. After the debt to the American Taxpayers is repaid we can then let them return home to retire.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009 5:42:34 AM
Yes...stocks are going up through the roof and unemployment in the United States is rising.  I just cant wait to double my money in the market again...yeah right.  What a bunch of garbage.  This country is going to the dogs and its going fast.
Wednesday, July 22, 2009 8:03:22 AM

Investor Peter Schiff has been saying to invest in foreign stocks in China and Singapore as well as gold and silver. But, he also says that once the world stops trading in dollars America day will come!  The chickens will come home to roost as an influx of dollars flood our market and we will not even be able to afford any imports! 

I really think its silly to think that Asia is going to want to buy expensive American products in the near future!  America will be forced to get back to the old days and make stuff in America so WE can survive the next millennium!

Wednesday, July 22, 2009 10:48:12 AM

Well one thing is for sure, you can always count on MSN for a good chuckle. Even if we wanted to manufacture something of value again and sell it at a price India or Asia would be willing or able to pay - nobody is going to invest in it if there's a chance it will be a union shop or have the government interfere. There's certainly no money coming from the banking sector to finance anything that isn't already showing proven reserves (which is nothing).

 

Keep drinking the kool-aid.

Wednesday, July 22, 2009 12:47:09 PM

Thanks Michael, This is good news for us who saved money and did not get caught too badly in our current economic meltdown. We will make lots more money in the stock market and get taxed to death for our success. I guess it's only fair.

 

Wednesday, July 22, 2009 3:24:02 PM
I agree with most of the bloggers here. We have been screwed by big corporations, insurance companies and banks. What they don't realize is, they have screwed things up so badly by rearranging our way of life and our ability to make our own goods, that the country may not come back from this to a point for our benefit or theirs. I'm real happy they made a lot of money for themeselves and their kids. Now where are they going to live? A compound? The country may not be completely ruined, but the entire ideal that our parents generation had is completely and utterly gone. Maybe the only way is to crash completely and start over again - economically and politically. We need a new constitution - one that stands for us.
Wednesday, July 22, 2009 3:58:35 PM
We make little if anything here in the U.S. that emerging nations need from us, and if we did, then what you're saying is that Americans will be working to make things for the emerging countries, so America will become a servant to emerging nations.  America is so stupid - it's been sold out to big corporations for the almighty dollar.  Capitalism & greed are a double edged sword - it made America great and now it's killing us.
1 - 10 of 15
To add a comment, pleasesign in